Photoablative atherectomy followed by a paclitaxel-coated balloon to inhibit restenosis in instent femoro-popliteal obstructions (PHOTOPAC).

Background: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of preparing instent femoropopliteal lesion with photoablative laser atherectomy or plain balloon angioplasty (POBA) prior to drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. Patients and methods: The prospective, multicenter, randomized study enrolled patients with Rutherford-Becker-class (RBC) 1 to 5 and instent lesions located in superficial femoral artery and/or popliteal artery above the knee joint. Primary endpoint was target lesion percent stenosis at 1 year as determined by the angiographic core-laboratory. Secondary endpoints included procedural success, major adverse event rate, clinical improvement and improvement in ankle-brachial index (ABI), clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), and primary patency rate at until 2-year follow-up. Results: The study was terminated prior to the enrollment goal due to slow enrollment. Thirty patients were included in the laser plus DCB cohort and 31 patients in the control cohort. Primary endpoint was not significantly different (p=0.331). Procedural success was 83.3% and 87.1% for the laser plus DCB and the control cohort, respectively. Serious adverse events at 30 days and 1-year were not statistically different between the two cohorts. For the ABI, significant improvements were present at discharge as well as at the follow-up visits. This was also evident for the RBC at the follow-up visits. One- and two-year freedom from CD-TLR was 86.7% vs. 87.1%, and 63.6% vs. 72%, respectively. Duplex derived primary patency was 90% at 6-months, 65.5% at one year and 56.5% at two year for the laser cohort and 90.3%, 75.9% and 53.8% for the control cohort. Conclusions: Safety of instent photoablative laser atherectomy followed by DCB angioplasty is confirmed by this study. Due to the small sample size, no benefit over POBA as vessel preparation could be shown.

Improved Carotid Stenosis Quantification on Novel 4D/3D-Doppler Ultrasonography Indexing to the Common Carotid Artery.

PURPOSE: The accuracy of internal carotid artery stenosis (ICAS) quantification depends on the method of stenosis measurement, impacting therapeutic decisions and outcomes. The NASCET method references the stenotic to the distal ICAS lumen, the ECST method to the local outer and the common carotid artery (CC) method to the CC diameter. Direct morphometric stenosis measurement with four-dimensionally guided three-dimensional ultrasonography (4D/3DC-US) demonstrated good validity for the commonly used NASCET method. The NASCET definition has clinically relevant drawbacks. Our purpose was to investigate the validity of the ECST and CC methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 4D/3DC-US percent-stenosis measures of 103 stenoses (80 patients) were compared to quantitative catheter angiography and duplex ultrasonography (DUS) in a blinded fashion. RESULTS: The 4D/3DC-US versus angiography intermethod standard deviation of differences (SDD, n = 103) was lower for the CC method (5.7 %) compared to the NASCET (8.1 %, p < 0.001) and ECST methods (9.1 %, p < 0.001). Additionally, it was lower than the NASCET angiography interrater SDD of 52 stenoses (SDD 7.2 %, p = 0.047) and non-inferior for the ECST method (p = 0.065). Interobserver analysis of equivalent grading methods showed no differences for the SDDs between angiography and 4D/3DC-US observers (p > 0.076). Binary comparison to angiography showed equal Kappa values > 0.7 and an accuracy ≥ 85 % for the NASCET and CC methods, higher than for the ECST method. The binary accuracy of ICAS grading did not differ from DUS for all methods. CONCLUSION: The new 4D/3DC-US CC method is an accurate and well reproducible alternative to the NASCET and ECST methods and offers potential for clinical application.

Symptomatic type I endoleak following popliteal artery aneurysm repair.

A case of a symptomatic type Ib endoleak following popliteal artery aneurysm repair with successful interventional therapy introduces a short review of the limited literature to this relevant potential complication. Illustration of important factors supporting endoleak formation after endovascular popliteal artery repair and recommendation of a consequent surveillance are discussed.

One-Year Outcomes Following Directional Atherectomy of Popliteal Artery Lesions: Subgroup Analysis of the Prospective, Multicenter DEFINITIVE LE Trial.

PURPOSE: To report the effectiveness of directional atherectomy for the treatment of popliteal artery occlusive disease. METHODS: This subset of the prospective, multicenter, single-arm DEFINITIVE LE trial included 158 patients (mean age 72.0±10.9 years; 82 men) who underwent directional atherectomy in 162 popliteal artery lesions between 2009 and 2011. Forty-eight (30.4%) patients were suffering from critical limb ischemia (CLI). The mean lesion length was 5.8±3.9 cm; 38 (23.5%) arteries were occluded. The primary outcome measure for patients with intermittent claudication (IC) was duplex ultrasound-defined primary patency at 1 year; the outcome for subjects with CLI was freedom from major amputation of the target limb at 1 year. Outcomes and adverse events were independently assessed. RESULTS: Procedure success (≤30% residual stenosis) was achieved in 84.4% of treated lesions; adjunctive stenting was required in 6 (3.7%) of the 162 lesions. The 1-year primary patency rate was 75.0% (IC patients 78.2% and CLI patients 67.5%, p=0.118). The freedom from major amputation in both cohorts was 100%. In both IC and CLI patients, significant improvements were demonstrated at 1 year in the Rutherford category, walking distance, and quality of life in comparison to baseline. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that directional atherectomy in popliteal arteries leads to favorable technical and clinical results at 1 year for claudicant as well as CLI patients.

Laser-assisted transprosthesial coil embolization combined with thrombin injection for treatment of an endoleak type II after endovascular aneurysm repair.

The treatment of endoleaks type II had to be adapted to the anatomy of each individual patient. The laser-assisted perforation of the prosthesis can be an easier method to reach the aneurysm sac directly than using transarterial or translumbar approaches.

Duplex derived intrarenal resistance index correlates with invasive pressure gradient measurements in detecting relevant unilateral renal artery stenosis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the correlation between the transstenotic pressure gradient as determined by a pressure wire and the decrease in the intrarenal resistance index (RI) > 0.05 measured by duplex ultrasound in significant unilateral renal artery stenosis (RAS). Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was correlated to the angiographic degree of RAS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 17 patients, transstenotic pressure gradient measurements, IVUS and RI measurements were obtained before and after stenting. After stenting, graded stenosis was created by progressive balloon catheter inflation. Stenosis severity was expressed as the ratio of the distal pressure (Pd) corrected for aortic pressure (Pa). The balloon inflation pressure was adjusted to create a stenosis with Pd/Pa ratio 1.0 to 0.7. In parallel, RI measurements were performed in the affected kidney and compared to the contralateral kidney for the calculation of the side-difference in RI. IVUS was performed to correlate the cross-sectional degree of stenosis with quantitative angiography (QA). RESULTS: In 60 out 68 measurements, the RI difference (decline > 0.05) correlated with a Pd/Pa ratio < 0.9; this correlation was significant by linear regression analysis (p < 0.001). The preinterventional mean degree of stenosis was 63.4 % + 16.1 (24.6 - 84.6 %) as assessed by QA and 76.7 % + 13.2 % (47 - 92 %) as assessed by IVUS, showing a significant correlation (p < 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: In unilateral RAS, a drop in RI > 0.05 as compared to the unaffected kidney correlates to an invasively measured Pd/Pa ratio < 0.9, which is regarded as a significant pressure gradient associated with increased renin production, which promotes renovascular hypertension. QA underestimates RAS severity as compared to IVUS.

One-Year Outcomes Following Directional Atherectomy of Infrapopliteal Artery Lesions: Subgroup Results of the Prospective, Multicenter DEFINITIVE LE Trial.

PURPOSE: To report a subgroup analysis of the prospective, multicenter, single-arm DEFINITIVE LE trial to assess the effectiveness of directional atherectomy for the treatment of infrapopliteal artery lesions at 1 year. METHODS: In the DEFINITIVE LE trial, follow-up assessments occurred up to 1 year postprocedure. Of the 800 patients enrolled, 145 subjects with 189 infrapopliteal lesions met the criteria for this analysis. Seventy (48.3%) and 75 (51.7%) patients were suffering critical limb ischemia (CLI) and intermittent claudication, respectively; 68.3% (99/145) had diabetes. The mean lesion length was 58±44 mm (all lesions); 20.2% were occluded. The primary endpoint for patients with claudication was duplex ultrasound-derived primary patency, while for subjects with CLI it was freedom from major amputation of the target limb at 1 year. Endpoints and adverse events were independently assessed. RESULTS: Procedure success (≤30% residual stenosis) was achieved in 84% of treated lesions. The 1-year primary patency rate was 84% (claudicants 89.6% and CLI patients 78%, p=0.11), and the freedom from major amputation rate was 97.1% (claudicants 100% and CLI 93.8%, p=0.03). In both claudication and CLI patients, significant improvements in Rutherford category and objective measures of walking distance and quality of life were seen at 1 year in comparison to baseline. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that directional atherectomy in infrapopliteal arteries results in promising technical and clinical results at 1 year for claudicant as well as CLI patients.

Duplex ultrasound assessment of native stenoses in the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries: a comparative study examining the influence of multisegment lesions.

PURPOSE: To evaluate duplex ultrasonography (DUS) in the assessment of femoropopliteal stenoses comparing a single native stenosis (SNS) to multisegmental native stenoses (MNS). METHODS: Among the 1284 patients treated for atherosclerotic occlusive disease involving the femoropopliteal segment between November 2002 and November 2012, 139 patients (97 men; mean age 68±8 years) with 142 SNS or 143 MNS in 79 and 60 patients, respectively, were eligible for this retrospective analysis. The peak systolic velocity ratios with proximal (PSVRprox) and distal (PSVRdist) reference for the 285 lesions were compared with their respective angiographic stenosis grade as measured by 2 independent readers using quantitative vascular analysis to ensure objectivity. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate sensitivity, specificity, and the optimal thresholds of PSV and PSVR for detection of stenoses by grade (>50%, >70%, or >80% diameter stenosis). The area under the curve (AUC) values of dependent and independent receiver operating characteristic curves were compared. RESULTS: For SNS, correlation of PSVRprox to diameter stenosis (R=0.88) was higher (p<0.001) than the correlation for MNS (R=0.78). In the SNS group, the AUC for detecting a >50% (0.99±0.01), >70% (0.98±0.01), and >80% (0.96±0.01) stenosis with PSVRprox was significantly higher than in the MNS group [AUC50% 0.93±0.02 (p=0.01), AUC70% 0.92±0.02 (p=0.02), and AUC80% 0.87±0.03 (p=0.003)]. The optimal thresholds for detecting >50%, >70%, and >80% stenoses for SNS using PSVRprox were 2.6, 3.3, and 3.9, respectively. For MNS, the optimal thresholds of PSVRprox were 2.6, 3.4, and 3.9, respectively, with respective sensitivities of 87%, 81%, and 75%; respective specificities of 93%, 90%, and 82%; negative predictive values of 45%, 64%, and 74%; and positive predictive values of 99%, 95%, and 83%. CONCLUSION: DUS is an optimal tool for quantification of SNS. However, a multisegment setting has a significant negative impact on the quantification of femoropopliteal artery stenosis.

Stent placement vs. balloon angioplasty for popliteal artery treatment: two-year results of a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate the 2-year technical and clinical results of primary nitinol stent placement in comparison with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in the treatment of de novo lesions of the popliteal artery. METHODS: The ETAP study (Endovascular Treatment of Atherosclerotic Popliteal Artery Lesions: balloon angioplasty vs. primary stenting; www.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00712309) is a prospective, randomized trial that enrolled 246 patients (158 men; mean age 72 years) who were randomly assigned to receive a nitinol stent (n=119) or PTA (n=127) for lesions averaging 42.3 mm in length. The results of the primary study endpoint were published. Secondary outcome measures and endpoints included primary patency (freedom from duplex-detected target lesion restenosis), target lesion revascularization (TLR), secondary patency, changes in ankle-brachial index and Rutherford class, and event-free survival (freedom from target limb amputation, TLR, myocardial infarction, and death). RESULTS: In total, 183 patients (89 stent and 94 PTA) were available for the 2-year analysis. The primary patency rate was significantly higher in the stent group (64.2%) than in the PTA group (31.3%, p=0.0001). TLR rates were 22.4% and 59.5%, respectively (p=0.0001). When provisional stent placement in the PTA arm was not considered as TLR and loss in patency, the differences prevailed between the study groups but were not significant (64.2% vs. 56.1% for primary patency, respectively; p=0.44). A significant improvement in ABI and Rutherford category was observed at 2 years in both groups. CONCLUSION: In treatment of obstructive popliteal artery lesions, provisional stenting reveals equivalent patency in comparison to primary stenting. However, the 2-year results of this trial suggest the possibility of a shift toward higher patency rates in favor of primary stenting.

Novel Approaches to the Management of Advanced Peripheral Artery Disease: Perspectives on Drug-Coated Balloons, Drug-Eluting Stents, and Bioresorbable Scaffolds.

Introducing anti-restenotic drug-based treatment modalities in femoropopliteal interventions is the potential revolutionizing reperfusion treatment of peripheral artery disease. Durability of recanalization procedures using drug-coated balloons (DCB) and drug-eluting stents (DES) yields in excellent mid-term and long-term technical and clinical outcomes and may be cost saving on the long term as compared to traditional treatment modalities such as plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) and bare metal nitinol stent implantation. Drug-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds are another drug-based promising treatment option but are still investigational. In particular, DCB provide a novel method to locally deliver paclitaxel into the arterial wall without the need of a chronically implanted delivery system or even if those devices will be indicated, they can be delivered focally. Following the first positive pilot studies, two large pivotal trials have confirmed superiority of DCB over plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in the treatment of TASC II A and B femoropopliteal lesions. Even for more complex femoropopliteal lesions such as long lesions and instent restenosis, single center studies and small randomized studies have shown promising mid-term technical and clinical results. For DES, follow-up data for the only commercially available device are now presented up to 5 years with excellent clinical outcome regarding freedom from target lesion revascularization and improvement of walking capacity. This review article summarizes the current knowledge and perspectives of drug-based endovascular treatment modalities in femoropopliteal interventions and discusses still unresolved needs.

Stent placement versus balloon angioplasty for the treatment of obstructive lesions of the popliteal artery: a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Stenting has been shown to improve patency after femoral artery revascularization compared with balloon angioplasty. Limited data are available evaluating endovascular treatment for obstructive lesions of the popliteal artery. METHODS AND RESULTS: This prospective, randomized, multicenter trial compared primary nitinol stent placement to percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty in patients with peripheral artery disease Rutherford-Becker class 2 to 5 who had a de novo lesion in the popliteal artery. The primary study end point was 1-year primary patency, defined as freedom from target-lesion restenosis (luminal narrowing of ≥50%) as detected by duplex ultrasound. Secondary end points included target-lesion revascularization rate and changes in Rutherford-Becker class. Provisional stent placement was considered target-lesion revascularization and loss of primary patency. Two hundred forty-six patients were included in this trial. The mean target-lesion length was 42.3 mm. One hundred ninety-seven patients were available for the1-year follow-up. The 1-year primary patency rate was significantly higher in the group with primary nitinol stent placement (67.4%) than in the percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty group (44.9%, P=0.002). Target-lesion revascularization rates were 14.7% and 44.1%, respectively (P=0.0001); however, when provisional nitinol stent placement was not considered target-lesion revascularization and loss in patency, no significant differences prevailed between the study groups (67.4% versus 65.7%, P=0.92 for primary patency). Approximately 73% of patients in the percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty group and 77% in the nitinol stent group showed an improvement of ≥1 Rutherford-Becker class (P=0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Primary nitinol stent placement for obstructive lesions of the popliteal artery achieves superior acute technical success and higher 1-year primary patency only if provisional stenting is considered target-lesion revascularization. Provisional stenting as part of a percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty strategy has equivalent 1-year patency and should be preferred over primary stenting. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00712309.

Drug-coated balloons vs. drug-eluting stents for treatment of long femoropopliteal lesions.

PURPOSE: To compare the performance of drug-coated balloons (DCB) and drug-eluting stents (DES) in long femoropopliteal lesions. METHODS: A retrospective dual center study included 228 patients (139 men; median age 69 years) with femoropopliteal lesions ≥10 cm suffering from peripheral artery disease (Rutherford categories 1-5) treated either with DCB or DES. Propensity score stratification was used to minimize bias. The 131 DCB patients (77 men; mean age 68.9±10.5 years) had a mean lesion length of 194.4±86.3 mm (range 100-450), while the 97 DES patients (62 men; mean age 68.2±8.0 years) had lesions averaging 195.0±64.5 mm (range 100-350) in length. Restenotic lesions were treated in 68 (51.9%) DCB patients and 43 (44.3%) DES patients; over half the lesions in both groups were total occlusions [DCB: 69 (52.7%), DES: 61 (62.9%)]. Outcome measures were patency (peak systolic velocity ratio <2.4), clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), event-free survival, and freedom from worsening of Rutherford classification by ≥2 categories. RESULTS: In the DCB cohort, provisional stent placement was performed in 24 (18.3%) lesions for refractory stenosis (5, 3.8%), flow-limiting dissection (13, 9.9%), and other reasons (6, 4.6%). There was no procedure-related mortality in either cohort. The binary restenosis rates were 23.9% (26/109) and 30.4% (24/79, p=0.319) in the DCB and DES cohorts, respectively, and clinically driven TLR rates were 15.6% (17/109) vs. 19.0% (15/79, p=0.543), respectively. Estimates for freedom from clinically driven TLR and event-free survival were not different between the study cohorts nor were outcomes regarding the ankle-brachial index and Rutherford category. CONCLUSION: DCB and DES perform equally well in the endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal lesions ≥10 cm and better than traditional endovascular treatment. In a real world setting of TASC C and D lesions, the provisional stent rate in the DCB cohort is low.

Heparin-bonded stent-graft for the treatment of TASC II C and D femoropopliteal lesions: the Viabahn-25 cm trial.

Purpose: To confirm the performance and safety of the 25-cm Viabahn endoprosthesis with Propaten bioactive surface when used in the treatment of de novo and/or restenotic TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II C and D lesions of the superficial femoral artery and proximal popliteal artery. Methods: The 25-cm Gore Viabahn Endoprosthesis study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01263665) is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study that enrolled 71 patients (50 men; mean age 66.7 ± 8.34 years) with lifestyle-limiting claudication (Rutherford class 2 to 4) and lesions longer than 20 cm (mean length 26.5 ± 5.31 cm, range 20-40). The majority of lesions (92.9%) were total occlusions. The primary performance outcome was post-deployment stent length within ± 10% of the pre-deployment stent length determined angiographically by quantitative vascular analysis. The primary safety outcome was device- and procedure-related serious adverse events occurring within 30 days of the procedure. The patients underwent follow-up examinations at 1 month and 1 year. Results : The median follow-up was 12.3 months (mean 12.3 ± 0.6). Nine (12.7%) patients discontinued the study due to different reasons including 2 bypass surgeries. Angiography was available in 60 patients to determine the primary performance outcome, which was met in all cases. Two (2.8%) patients experienced a procedure-/device-related adverse event (dissection) during the 30-day follow-up. Kaplan-Meier estimates for 1-year primary and secondary patency were 67.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 53.5% to 77.3%] and 96.9% (95% CI 88.0% to 99.2%), respectively. Changes in ankle-brachial index and Rutherford category at 1 and 12 months each showed sustained improvement. Conclusion : This study confirms that the 25-cm Viabahn endoprosthesis acutely performs as intended and is safe when used as indicated in complex femoropopliteal lesions. One-year primary and secondary patency rates are satisfying and comparable to historical prosthetic bypass graft outcomes.

Renal artery stenosis: Up-date on diagnosis and treatment.

Significant renal artery stenosis (RAS) can cause or result in deterioration of arterial hypertension and may promote the development of renal insufficiency. The activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system results in structural heart disease and may impact patient survival. Technical improvements of diagnostic and interventional endovascular tools have led to a more widespread use of endoluminal renal artery revascularization and extension of the indications for this type of therapy during the past two decades. Whereas balloon angioplasty is still the method of choice for the treatment of fibromuscular dysplasia, stent implantation is indicated in ostial atherosclerotic RAS. However, none of the so far published or presented randomized controlled trials could prove a beneficial outcome of RAS revascularization compared to medical management. As a result of these negative trials including the largest published trial to date, the ASTRAL trial, referrals to endovascular renal artery revascularization have declined and, moreover, reimbursement of these procedures has become a matter of debate. Crucial for a clinical benefit following revascularization of RAS is proper patient selection, revascularization being only indicated after proof of hemodynamic relevance of RAS. This article summarizes the appropriate diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected RAS, discusses the limitations of the results published so far and their impact on the indication for RAS revascularization.

Percutaneous intervention versus surgery in the treatment of common femoral artery lesions: study protocol for the prospective, multi-center, randomized PESTO-CFA trial.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy has become established as a first-line therapy in most arterial regions. However, open vascular surgery (endarterectomy) remains the treatment of choice for common femoral artery (CFA) lesions. The aim of this study is to investigate the acute and mid-term results of directional atherectomy plus drug-coated balloon (DCB) in comparison to endarterectomy in treatment of de novo arteriosclerotic CFA lesions. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, multicenter non-inferiority study will enroll 306 participants with symptomatic (Rutherford category 1 to 5) de novo stenosis of the CFA including the bifurcation. Patients eligible for both treatment groups could be included in this 1:1 randomized trial. Primary efficacy endpoint is patency of the target lesion at 12 months defined as restenosis < 50% without the need of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (cdTLR). Primary safety endpoint is a combined endpoint including death, myocardial infarction, major or minor amputation of the target limb, and peri-procedural complications at 30 days. Secondary endpoints include primary patency of the target lesion at 6 and 24 months, secondary patency, cdTLR 6, 12, and 24 months, change in ankle-brachial index, and Rutherford-Becker class at 6, 12, and 24 months. Limb salvage, change in quality of life measured by Walking Impairment Questionnaire, and major adverse events including death, myocardial infarction, and minor or major amputation of the target limb will be determined at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. DISCUSSION: Endovascular treatment of CFA lesions is still a matter of debate. Few studies compared modern endovascular therapy methods against the so-called gold standard surgical endarterectomy so far. Based on recent positive results, this study aims to confirm non-inferiority of a "leaving nothing behind" endovascular approach combining directional atherectomy and DCB compared to surgical therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02517827.

Matched comparison of uncoated and paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for isolated popliteal lesions excluding bail-out stenting.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCB) in isolated popliteal lesions. BACKGROUND: The benefit of using DCB in femoropopliteal arteries including the proximal popliteal artery has been demonstrated, but has not yet been evaluated for isolated popliteal lesions. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study includes patients requiring treatment with DCB of isolated popliteal lesions. Two cohorts matched (Plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) versus DCB) by their baseline and lesion characteristics were compared. Lesions receiving bail-out stents were excluded. Primary endpoint was the 1-year target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate. Secondary endpoints included the procedural success and complication rate, primary patency, changes in Rutherford-Becker class (RBC) and ankle-brachial index (ABI). RESULTS: One hundred and seven patients were included in this study. More than one third of the patients had critical limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) (35 % (POBA) versus 40.4 % (DCB), p = 0.354. The technical success rate of the procedure was 85.1 % (n = 40/47) in the DCB group and 83.3 % (n = 60) in the POBA group (p = 0.510). There were three complications in the POBA group (5.0 %) but none in the DCB group (p = 0.172). After 12 months, in the entire cohort 14 patients (13.1 %) had to undergo a TLR. The TLR-free survival was 81.7 % in the POBA and 93.6 % in the DCB group (p = 0.060). Primary patency rates after POBA and DCB were 65.1 % and 87.5 % at 6 months (p = 0.024), respectively. At 12 months, the patency rates were 71.7 % and 85.1 % (p = 0.076), respectively. For both treatment arms, there was a significant improvement in ABI and RBC compared to baseline. Four patients from the DCB group and two from the POBA group received a minor amputation (p = 0.232). One patient in the DCB group died within 12 months. CONCLUSION: After one year the use of DCB is by trend more effective for the treatment of isolated popliteal stenosis compared to POBA. A larger scale prospective study is mandatory.

Drug-coated balloon angioplasty after directional atherectomy improves outcome in restenotic femoropopliteal arteries.

BACKGROUND: Restenosis remains an unresolved problem despite different treatment modalities and new stent technology in femoropopliteal arteries. No standard therapy has proven to provide acceptable outcome data for this entity. Directional atherectomy alone did not result in satisfactory long-term patency rates. The outcome might be improved in conjunction with drug-coated balloon angioplasty. METHODS: In this retrospective study, restenotic lesions of the femoropopliteal arteries were treated with directed atherectomy in 89 lesions of consecutive patients (58% male; mean age, 69 ± 11 years). All patients received adjunctive treatment with conventional balloon percutaneous angioplasty (PTA; n = 60) or drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCB; n = 29). RESULTS: Lesion location was in the stent (DCB [n = 27] vs PTA [n = 36]) and in native restenotic vessels (DCB [n = 2] vs PTA [n = 25]). The 1-year Kaplan-Meier freedom from restenosis estimates (95% confidence intervals) in the DCB and PTA groups were 84.7% (70.9%-98.5%) and 43.8% (30.5%-57.1%), respectively. In a multivariable Cox model for restenosis, DCB treatment had a hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 0.28 (0.12-0.66; P = .0036) compared with the PTA group. In the multivariable model for procedural success, the effect of treatment did not differ between PTA and DCB (P = .134). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of directed atherectomy with adjunctive DCB is associated with a better event-free survival at 12 months of follow-up compared with PTA after directed atherectomy.

New approach to protected percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the lower limbs.

PURPOSE: To provide evidence for the safety and efficacy of the Proteus embolic capture balloon in lower limb interventions and to evaluate its indications for use. METHODS: The study was designed as a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single arm study enrolling 123 patients (78 men; mean age 68 years). The primary endpoint was rate of freedom from death, amputation, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 30 days post procedure. Follow-up was performed at 30 days and at 12 months. RESULTS: The freedom from death, amputation, and TVR rate was 95.9% (118/123). Procedure and device success rates were 98.7% (218/223) and 97.8% (156/158), respectively. TVR and death rates at 12 months were 18.8% and 4.1%, respectively. Histological analysis identified particles in 100% of the balloons. The median number of particles per subject was 339 (range 63-4361). Medians of particle size and total particle area were 0.8 (range 0.3-8.3) and 1.0 mm(2) (range 0.1-237) per balloon, respectively. Particles >1 mm were found in 37% (53/143) of the balloons analyzed. Higher mean number, length, and surface area of particles were found in long lesions (909±1057, 2.6±2.3 mm, and 18.2±44.2 mm(2), respectively; all p<0.0001 vs. short lesions). Additionally, longer particles were found in total occlusions (2.5±2.5 mm, p<0.0001), and a higher mean particle count was found in thrombotic lesions (1785±1821, p<0.05). De novo lesions had more thrombotic material than any other type of lesion. CONCLUSION: Proteus demonstrated good particle capture ability, making it a useful tool in situations where embolism is anticipated, such as complex lesions with calcified or thrombotic material and/or lesions with high plaque burden (i.e., long and totally occluded).

SUMMIT registry: one-year outcomes after implantation of the EPIC self-expanding nitinol stent in the femoropopliteal segment.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the EPIC self-expanding nitinol stent in patients with femoropopliteal occlusive disease. METHODS: The prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized SUMMIT study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01336101) enrolled 100 patients (76 men; mean age 67.6 years) with symptomatic de novo femoropopliteal disease undergoing angioplasty and subsequent implantation of EPIC stents from April 2011 to October 2011. The mean lesion length was 69.5±40.5 mm; 29 of the lesions were total occlusions. Clinical examination and duplex sonography were prospectively performed after 6 and 12 months. The primary endpoint was in-stent restenosis as assessed by duplex ultrasound (peak systolic velocity ratio ≥2.5). Further outcome measures were patency rates, improvement in the Rutherford category and ankle-brachial index (ABI), as well as stent integrity based on plain radiography. RESULTS: A residual stenosis <30% was achieved in all procedures. The primary patency rates were 96.8% after 6 months and 85.1% at 1 year. The secondary patency rates were 97.9% and 91.2% at the same intervals. The 1-year binary >50% restenosis rate was 15.7%. Freedom from target lesion revascularization at 1 year was 92.3%. Between baseline and the 12-month follow-up, the mean ABI increased from 0.73 to 0.96, and the mean Rutherford category decreased from 2.9 to 1.0 (p<0.001 for both comparisons). Plain radiographs from 86 patients at the 12-month examination confirmed the absence of stent fractures. CONCLUSION: The outcome of the SUMMIT registry demonstrates that the EPIC self-expanding nitinol vascular stent is a safe and effective device for treating peripheral artery disease in the femoropopliteal segment.

Endovascular treatment for extensive aortoiliac artery reconstruction: a single-center experience based on 1712 interventions.

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical and technical outcomes following endovascular therapy for aortoiliac occlusive disease, including complex reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation. METHODS: A retrospective database search identified 1184 consecutive patients (864 men; mean age 64±10 years) who underwent 1712 procedures to treat target lesions in the distal aorta and iliac arteries from September 1996 to December 2006. The intended strategy was to open only one femoral access site primarily, so a second puncture was needed only for the kissing balloon technique at the aortic bifurcation. The primary endpoint was a 1-year duplex-based primary patency; secondary endpoints included acute technical success (residual stenosis <30%), secondary patency, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Results were stratified by lesion morphology, which was classified according to the TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC II) document. RESULTS: Most of the interventions were done in the iliac arteries (n=1337); 292 cases involved the aortic bifurcation, and 83 cases were in the distal aorta/aortic bifurcation. The mean follow-up was 3.24 years (range 0-12.7). In the entire study cohort, the 12- and 24-month restenosis, TLR, and primary/secondary patency rates did not differ among TASC II A-D subgroups. The symptom-driven TLR in the entire cohort was 8% and 9% at the 12- and 24-month follow-up, leading to secondary patency rates of 96% and 91% in the entire cohort. Outcomes for complex interventions in the distal aorta or aortic bifurcation did not differ significantly compared to the total cohort. The overall survival without restenosis, amputation, or surgery in TASC II subgroups A+B was higher (69.6%±1.5%) compared to TASC II C+D lesions (62.8%±1.9%, p=0.001). CONCLUSION: The indication for percutaneous intervention in aortoiliac occlusive disease can be extended to complex TASC C and D lesions in experienced endovascular centers, even if complex reconstruction of the distal aorta or the aortic bifurcation is indicated.