Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of an intravaginal ring releasing anastrozole and levonorgestrel in healthy premenopausal women: a Phase 1 randomized controlled trial.

STUDY QUESTION: What are suitable doses of the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole (ATZ) and the progestin levonorgestrel (LNG), when delivered to the systemic circulation by an intravaginal ring (IVR), for further clinical development as a potential new therapy for the treatment of endometriosis? SUMMARY ANSWER: Anticipated targets for pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety/tolerability were achieved for both drug components of the IVR at the doses investigated, supporting selection of the doses to be investigated in Phase 2 studies. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Aromatase is a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of estrogens and is known to increase local levels of estradiol (E2) at extragonadal sites. Up-regulation of aromatase expression has been demonstrated in endometriotic lesions and the use of oral aromatase inhibitors has been shown to reduce endometriosis-associated pelvic pain in small-scale clinical trials. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This Phase 1, randomized, multicentre, parallel-group, three-arm, open-label study assessed the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of various IVRs intended for systemic drug delivery. After screening, healthy, ovulating women aged 18-35 years were randomized to use IVRs releasing one of the three ATZ/LNG dose combinations (in vitro nominal daily drug release rates on Day 29: ATZ/LNG 500 µg/20 µg [low dose], ATZ/LNG 1000 µg/30 µg [mid dose] or ATZ/LNG 1500 µg/40 µg [high dose]) for two consecutive 28-day wearing periods without a treatment break. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Sixty women were included in the per protocol set. The primary variables were plasma concentrations of ATZ and LNG at the end of each treatment period and the mean size of largest follicle-like structures (FLSs) over 56 days. Serum concentrations of several hormones were also evaluated, with emphasis on E2 levels. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: At the end of the first treatment period, geometric mean plasma concentrations of LNG and ATZ, respectively, were 0.228 and 12.5 µg/l for the low dose, 0.269 and 19.8 µg/l for the mid dose and 0.384 and 37.3 µg/l for the high dose; results were similar at the end of the second treatment period. Over the entire treatment period, mean FLS sizes were higher in all three treatment groups than during the pretreatment cycle; more women in the mid- and high-dose groups had FLSs of at least 30 mm (32-45%) than those in the low-dose group (14-24%). Changes in the mean size of FLSs were similar to those reported for low-dose progestin-only oral contraceptives and generally resolved during the 2-month treatment period. Serum E2 levels were decreased, but only one woman in each of the mid- and high-dose groups, and no woman in the low-dose group, had a serum E2 level below 20 pg/ml in both cycles. All ATZ and LNG combinations showed good tolerability. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This was an exploratory study; no formal power calculation was performed. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The results of this first-in-human study of the ATZ/LNG IVR facilitated the selection of ATZ and LNG doses to be investigated in the Phase 2 studies of patients with endometriosis. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST: The study was funded by Bayer Pharma AG. T.R. is an employee of DINOX GmbH, which received funding from Bayer Pharma AG to perform this study. M.-H.S.-M., K.W., R.N., S.K., J.K., H.S. and B.R. are or have been employees of Bayer Pharma AG. H.S. is a named inventor on EP 2 552 404 B1, a patent application relating to this work. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT number: 2011-005620-18. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 16 November 2011. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 14 March 2012.

A two-centre, open-label, randomised study of ovulation inhibition with three transdermal contraceptive patches, each containing different amounts of ethinyl estradiol and gestodene in healthy, young women.

Here we report the findings of a two-centre, open-label, randomised, Phase IIa study designed to investigate whether an ethinyl estradiol (EE)/gestodene (GSD) patch that has been developed (referred to herein as the 'EE/GSD patch') reliably inhibits ovulation in comparison with patches delivering lower doses of these hormones. The study rationale was to provide justification of the doses of EE and GSD selected for the EE/GSD patch. Healthy women, aged 18-35 years, were randomised to receive treatment with either the EE/GSD patch, a 'reduced-GSD patch' (delivering similar amounts of EE and approximately half the amount of GSD) or a 'reduced-EE/GSD patch' (delivering half the amount of EE and GSD). Treatment was administered for three 28-day cycles (three × 7 patch-wearing days, plus a 7-day patch-free interval). The primary pharmacodynamic variable was the percentage of women with ovulation in at least one of Cycles 2 and/or 3, as indicated by Hoogland score. Pharmacokinetic parameters for EE and GSD were also measured. Results indicated that the EE/GSD patch effectively suppressed ovulation, while patches delivering lower doses of EE and GSD were less effective for this purpose. All three patches showed comparable tolerability.

Comparative analyses of published cost effectiveness models highlight critical considerations which are useful to inform development of new models.

Background: Comparative analyses of published cost effectiveness models provide useful insights into critical issues to inform the development of new cost effectiveness models in the same disease area.Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe a comparative analysis of cost-effectiveness models and highlight the importance of such work in informing development of new models. This research uses genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing after first line treatment failure for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) as an example.Method: A literature search was performed, and published cost effectiveness models were selected according to predetermined eligibility criteria. A comprehensive comparative analysis was undertaken for all aspects of the models.Results: Five published models were compared, and several critical issues were identified for consideration when developing a new model. These include the comparator, time horizon and scope of the model. In addition, the composite effect of drug resistance prevalence, antiretroviral therapy efficacy, test performance and the proportion of patients switching to second-line ART potentially have a measurable effect on model results. When considering CD4 count and viral load, dichotomizing patients according to higher cost and lower quality of life (AIDS) versus lower cost and higher quality of life (non-AIDS) status will potentially capture differences between resistance testing and other strategies, which could be confirmed by cross-validation/convergent validation. A quality adjusted life year is an essential outcome which should be explicitly explored in probabilistic sensitivity analysis, where possible.Conclusions: Using an example of GART for HIV, this study demonstrates comparative analysis of previously published cost effectiveness models yields critical information which can be used to inform the structure and specifications of new models.

Relaxin-like factor (RLF) mRNA expression in the fallow deer.

Employing RT- and RACE-PCR on RNA isolated from testicular tissue, we have cloned the coding cDNA sequence for the RLF, also known as Insl3, of the fallow deer. The RLF coding sequence consisted of 396 bp encoding a peptide of 131 amino acids and shared highest homology with bovine, sheep and goat RLF. Northern analysis revealed a single 0.9 kb transcript in the deer testis. There is only one RLF gene in the deer genome. Nonradioactive in situ hybridization revealed the Leydig cells to be the sole source for RLF mRNA in the deer testis. In the non-pregnant uterus, RLF transcripts were located in the luminal and glandular epithelium of the endometrium. Within the ovary of the pregnant doe, follicular theca interna cells and the corpus luteum expressed RLF transcripts. In uteroplacental tissues, luminal and glandular epithelium, fetal uninucleate and binucleate trophoblast cells (BNC) of the basic villous trophoblast layer expressed RLF mRNA. BNC located at the apical trophoblast layer or the tip of the fetal villus were devoid of RLF transcripts. Pseudostratified trophoblast cells at the base of fetal villi coexpressed RLF mRNA and immunoreactive MHC class Ib molecules.

Economic outcomes of sequences which include monoclonal antibodies against vascular endothelial growth factor and/or epidermal growth factor receptor for the treatment of unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with unresectable, metastatic colorectal cancer with wild type Kirsten ras mutational status are eligible for sequential treatments which include monoclonal antibodies as first line (1L), second line (2L), or third line (3L) regimens. OBJECTIVE: To compare the economic outcomes of different sequences which include monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: Individual drug regimens for 1L, 2L, and 3L treatments were compiled according to the clinical studies in the Summary of Product Characteristics for monoclonal antibodies. They were combined into plausible treatment sequences. Health outcomes were approximated using additive median PFS benefit, and economic outcomes were calculated with a treatment sequencing costing tool. Limitations of the analysis include the clinical trial data sources, cost assumptions, and the additive PFS approach. RESULTS: Seventeen sequences were evaluated. Results of the analysis show that sequences including 1L anti-EGFRs generally have relatively low-to-medium health outcomes at the highest comparative sequence costs compared to sequences including 2L anti-EGFRs, which have lower health outcomes at the lowest cost. Sequences including 3L anti-EGFRs (sequential bevazicumab-based 1L and 2L) have the highest health outcomes, with potential cost savings of €5972-€11,676 if replacing 2L anti-EGFRs or an additional cost of €5909-€12,708 if replacing 1L anti-EGFR regimens. CONCLUSION: Clinical sequences consisting of 1L and 2L line bevacizumab followed by 3L anti-EGFR potentially yield the greatest health outcomes associated with a reasonable trade-off in additional cost when replacing 1L anti-EGFRs and are potentially cost-saving if replacing 2L anti-EGFRs, per patient per lifetime. To maximize health outcomes, optimal sequences include anti-EGFRs as 3L regimen, with an approximately equivalent trade-off in costs between the most costly (anti-EGFR 2L) and least costly (anti-EGFR 1L) sequences.