RLIM Is a Candidate Dosage-Sensitive Gene for Individuals with Varying Duplications of Xq13, Intellectual Disability, and Distinct Facial Features.

Interpretation of the significance of maternally inherited X chromosome variants in males with neurocognitive phenotypes continues to present a challenge to clinical geneticists and diagnostic laboratories. Here we report 14 males from 9 families with duplications at the Xq13.2-q13.3 locus with a common facial phenotype, intellectual disability (ID), distinctive behavioral features, and a seizure disorder in two cases. All tested carrier mothers had normal intelligence. The duplication arose de novo in three mothers where grandparental testing was possible. In one family the duplication segregated with ID across three generations. RLIM is the only gene common to our duplications. However, flanking genes duplicated in some but not all the affected individuals included the brain-expressed genes NEXMIF, SLC16A2, and the long non-coding RNA gene FTX. The contribution of the RLIM-flanking genes to the phenotypes of individuals with different size duplications has not been fully resolved. Missense variants in RLIM have recently been identified to cause X-linked ID in males, with heterozygous females typically having normal intelligence and highly skewed X chromosome inactivation. We detected consistent and significant increase of RLIM mRNA and protein levels in cells derived from seven affected males from five families with the duplication. Subsequent analysis of MDM2, one of the targets of the RLIM E3 ligase activity, showed consistent downregulation in cells from the affected males. All the carrier mothers displayed normal RLIM mRNA levels and had highly skewed X chromosome inactivation. We propose that duplications at Xq13.2-13.3 including RLIM cause a recognizable but mild neurocognitive phenotype in hemizygous males.

Genotyping in patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia by sequencing of newborn bloodspot samples.

OBJECTIVES: Genotype-phenotype correlation in congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) caused by 21-hydroxylase deficiency ranges from 45 to 97 %. We performed massively parallel sequencing of CYP21A2 on stored newborn bloodspot samples to catalogue the genotypes present in our patients with CAH and enable genotype-phenotype comparison. METHODS: Participants ≤15 years old with clinically diagnosed CAH were recruited from The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network. Phenotype was classified from clinical and biochemical details in the medical record as salt wasting (SW), simple virilising (SV), non-classic (NC) or an intermediate phenotype (SW/SV; SV/NC). Amplicon-based sequencing for CYP21A2 was performed on stored newborn bloodspot samples by the New South Wales Newborn Bloodspot Screening Laboratory on MiSeq™Dx (Illumina, California). Available genetic test results were also obtained from the medical records. RESULTS: Samples from 67 participants (43 % female, age 0.3-15 years) were sequenced, including 9 sibships. SW phenotype was present in 33/67 participants (49 %), SV in 9 (13 %) and NC in 16 (24 %). Intermediate phenotypes included SW/SV in seven participants (10 %) and SV/NC in two (3 %). Variants were identified in 90/116 alleles (78 %). A complete genotype was available in 47/67 participants (70 %). The most common genotype was homozygous c.293-13A/C>G (I2G) in 7/47 participants (15 %). Genotype correlated with the most commonly reported phenotype in 36/44 cases (82 %). Correlation was higher in SW and NC phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: This study uses genetic testing of newborn bloodspots to identify and characterise the genotypes present in an ethnically diverse Australian population with CAH. It further strengthens our knowledge of genotype-phenotype correlations in CAH.

Newborn Screening for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

A pilot newborn screening (NBS) program for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) study proposes to assess the feasibility of the screening procedure, temporal course of the various steps of screening, and the public acceptability of the program. This is particularly vital to ascertain as DMD is considered a 'non-treatable' disease and thus does not fit the traditional criteria for newborn screening. However, modern perspectives of NBS for DMD are changing and point to possible net benefits for children and their families undertaking NBS for DMD. The aim of this workshop was to establish pathways for the successful implementation and evaluation of a pilot NBS for DMD program in Australia. Consensus was reached as to the rationale for, potential benefits, risks, barriers and facilitators of screening, alongside the establishment of screening protocols and clinical referral pathways.

Gene selection for the Australian Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening Project ("Mackenzie's Mission").

Reproductive genetic carrier screening aims to offer couples information about their chance of having children with certain autosomal recessive and X-linked genetic conditions. We developed a gene list for use in "Mackenzie's Mission", a research project in which 10,000 couples will undergo screening. Criteria for selecting genes were: the condition should be life-limiting or disabling, with childhood onset, such that couples would be likely to take steps to avoid having an affected child; and/or be one for which early diagnosis and intervention would substantially change outcome. Strong evidence for gene-phenotype relationship was required. Candidate genes were identified from OMIM and via review of 23 commercial and published gene lists. Genes were reviewed by 16 clinical geneticists using a standard operating procedure, in a process overseen by a multidisciplinary committee which included clinical geneticists, genetic counselors, an ethicist, a parent of a child with a genetic condition and scientists from diagnostic and research backgrounds. 1300 genes met criteria. Genes associated with non-syndromic deafness and non-syndromic differences of sex development were not included. Our experience has highlighted that gene selection for a carrier screening panel needs to be a dynamic process with ongoing review and refinement.