Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Ther ; 46(6): 509-514, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38762398

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The pillar for therapeutic decisions in the evolution of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is the patients' prognostic stratification. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a Spanish real-world setting to assess the clinical improvement of PAH patients treated with selexipag measured as changes in the risk profile. Secondary objectives were to describe their baseline characteristics, initial risk status, and variables used to assess patient survival and adverse events. FINDINGS: Total 42 patients (mean age 52.36 [SD: 15.09] years) were included. All had received initial endothelin receptor antagonist treatment and 95.2% dual therapy with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor or riociguat. At 6 to 12 months from baseline, patients risk stratification tripled the percentage of patients with low risk, and a trend towards improved risk stratification (P = 0.122). World Health Organization functional class changed, with more patients in milder classes (P = 0.003), and symptom progression slowed down (P < 0.0001). At 3-years, survival was 85.7% and the estimated median survival time was 2.73 years (SD: 1.351; 95% CI: 2.51-2.95). IMPLICATIONS: Selexipag did not achieve a significant improvement in risk profile, although it did show an excellent survival rate, effectively improved functional class, and delayed symptom progression in real life. Selexipag was well tolerated and showed a favorable safety profile, supporting a clinical benefit for PAH patients.


Assuntos
Acetamidas , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acetamidas/uso terapêutico , Acetamidas/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Espanha , Idoso , Hipertensão Arterial Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão Arterial Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Pirazinas/uso terapêutico , Pirazinas/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Receptores de Epoprostenol/agonistas , Pirazóis/uso terapêutico , Pirazóis/efeitos adversos , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Hipertensivos/efeitos adversos , Antagonistas dos Receptores de Endotelina/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas dos Receptores de Endotelina/efeitos adversos , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinas/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/efeitos adversos , Hipertensão Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão Pulmonar/fisiopatologia
2.
Cardiorenal Med ; 14(1): 235-250, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38432220

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The coexistence of heart and kidney diseases, also called cardiorenal syndrome, is very common, leads to increased morbidity and mortality, and poses diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties. There is a risk-treatment paradox, such that patients with the highest risk are treated with lesser disease-modifying medical therapies. SUMMARY: In this document, different scientific societies propose a practical approach to address and optimize cardiorenal therapies and related comorbidities systematically in chronic cardiorenal disease beyond congestion. Cardiorenal programs have emerged as novel models that may assist in delivering coordinated and holistic management for these patients. KEY MESSAGES: (1) Cardiorenal disease is a ubiquitous entity in clinical practice and is associated with numerous barriers that limit medical treatment. (2) The present article focuses on the practical approaches to managing chronic cardiorenal disease beyond congestion to overcome some of these barriers and improve the treatment of this high-risk population.


Assuntos
Síndrome Cardiorrenal , Humanos , Síndrome Cardiorrenal/terapia , Síndrome Cardiorrenal/fisiopatologia , Gerenciamento Clínico
3.
Clin Kidney J ; 17(6): sfae140, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38835512

RESUMO

Background: Albuminuria could potentially emerge as a novel marker of congestion in acute heart failure. However, the current evidence linking albuminuria and congestion in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) remains somewhat scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of albuminuria in a cohort of patients with CHF, identify the independent factors associated with albuminuria and analyse the correlation with different congestion parameters. Methods: This is a subanalysis of the Spanish Cardiorenal Registry, in which we enrolled 864 outpatients with heart failure and a value of urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (UACR) at the first visit. Results: The median age was 74 years, 549 (63.5%) were male and 438 (50.7%) had a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. A total of 350 patients (40.5%) had albuminuria. Among these patients, 386 (33.1%) had a UACR of 30-300 mg/g and 64 (7.4%) had a UACR >300 mg/g. In order of importance, the independent variables associated with higher UACR were estimated glomerular filtration rate determined by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (R2 = 57.6%), systolic blood pressure (R2 = 21.1%), previous furosemide equivalent dose (FED; R2 = 7.5%), antigen carbohydrate 125 (CA125; R2 = 6.1%), diabetes mellitus (R2 = 5.6%) and oedema (R2 = 1.9%). The combined influence of oedema, elevated CA125 levels and the FED accounted for 15.5% of the model's variability. Conclusions: In patients with chronic stable heart failure, the prevalence of albuminuria is high. The risk factors of albuminuria in this population are chronic kidney disease and hypertension. Congestion parameters are also associated with increased albuminuria.

4.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38871231

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The development of specific heart failure (HF) units has improved the management of patients with this disease due to improved organization and resource management. The Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC) has defined 3 types of HF units (community, specialized, and advanced) based on their complexity and service portfolio. Our aim was to compare the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of patients with HF according to the type of unit. METHODS: We analyzed data from the SEC-Excelente-IC quality accreditation program registry, with 1716 patients consecutively included in two 1-month cutoffs (March and October) from 2019 to 2021 by 45 SEC-accredited HF units. We compared the characteristics, treatment and 1-year outcomes between the 3 types of units. RESULTS: Of the 1716 patients, 13.2% were treated in community units, 65.9% in specialized units, and 20.9% in advanced units. The rates of mortality (27.5 vs 15.5/100 patients-year; P<.001), admissions for HF (39.7 vs 29.2/100 patients-year; P=.019), total decompensations (56.1 vs 40.5/100 patients-year; P=.003), and combined death/admission for HF (45.2 vs 31.4/100 patients-year; P=.005) were higher in community units than in specialized/advanced units. Follow-up in a community unit was an independent predictor of higher mortality and admissions at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with follow-up by more specialized units, follow-up in a community unit was associated with a higher decompensation rate and increased 1-year mortality.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA