Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neuromodulation ; 18(4): 297-303; discussion 304, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25688595

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Hemiplegic migraine is a particularly severe form of the disease that often evolves to a debilitating chronic illness that is resistant to commonly available therapies. Peripheral neurostimulation has been found to be a beneficial therapy for some patients among several diagnostic classes of migraine, but its potential has not been specifically evaluated for hemiplegic migraine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four patients with hemiplegic migraine were treated with concordant, combined occipital and supraorbital neurostimulation over periods ranging 6-92 months. The clinical indicators followed included assessments of headache frequency and severity, frequency of hemiplegic episodes, functional impairment, medication usage, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: All reported a positive therapeutic response, as their average headache frequency decreased by 92% (30 to 2.5 headache days/month); Visual Analog Score by 44% (9.5 to 5.3); frequency of hemiplegic episodes by 96% (7.5 to 0.25 hemiplegic episodes/month); headache medication usage by 96% (6 to 0.25 daily medications); and Migraine Disability Assessment score by 98% (249 to 6). All were satisfied and would recommend the therapy, and all preferred combined occipital-supraorbital neurostimulation to occipital neurostimulation alone. CONCLUSIONS: Concordant combined occipital and supraorbital neurostimulation may provide effective therapy for both the pain and motor aura in some patients with hemiplegic migraine.


Assuntos
Nervos Cranianos/fisiologia , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Enxaqueca com Aura/terapia , Nervos Espinhais/fisiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Órbita/inervação , Medição da Dor , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 17(1): 305, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23274677

RESUMO

Implantable peripheral neurostimulation was introduced in 1969 as a potential treatment for certain neuropathic pain syndromes, primarily involving the limbs. While a few early studies included implants for occipital neuralgia, serious interest in its potential as a treatment for head pain came only after our 1999 report of positive findings in a series of patients with occipital neuralgia. Subsequent investigators confirmed these initial findings, and then extended the application to patients with various primary headache disorders, including migraine. While most found a therapeutic response, the degree of that response varied significantly, and analysis suggests that the issue of paresthesia concordancy may be central, both in explaining the data, as well as providing direction for future endeavors. Therefore, while at present peripheral neurostimulation is gaining increasing acceptance as a treatment for chronic headaches, the precise clinical indications and procedures, as well as the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms, are still being worked out.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/tendências , Cefaleia/fisiopatologia , Cefaleia/terapia , Neuroestimuladores Implantáveis , Neurotransmissores/fisiologia , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/instrumentação , Humanos , Neuroestimuladores Implantáveis/tendências , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/tendências , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA