Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 14(7): D102-D109, 2017 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28166462

RESUMO

This study aimed to compare personal exposures to diesel fuel and a biodiesel blend exhaust in an underground mine. Personal exposure monitoring was performed in a non-operational, hard rock underground mine during use of a load-haul-dump vehicle. Eight-hour time-weighted average (TWA8) exposure concentrations of ultra-low sulfur diesel and 75% biodiesel/25% diesel blend (B75) fuels were compared. Compared to diesel, use of B75 was associated with relative percent reductions of 22 and 28% in median respirable (r) diesel particulate matter (DPM) and nitrogen dioxide and 25 and 23% increases in median total DPM and nitric oxide TWA8 exposure concentrations, respectively. Diesel was associated with a slightly greater total geometric mean mass concentration and lower mean surface area concentration. Although further testing is needed, B75 has the potential to reduce rDPM exposures.


Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/análise , Biocombustíveis , Gasolina , Mineração , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Emissões de Veículos/análise , Monóxido de Carbono/análise , Monitoramento Ambiental , Humanos , Dióxido de Nitrogênio/análise , Material Particulado/análise , Projetos Piloto
2.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 12(3): D18-25, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25412337

RESUMO

Diesel fuel is commonly used for underground mining equipment, yet diesel engine exhaust is a known human carcinogen. Alternative fuels, including biodiesel, and a natural gas/diesel blend, offer the potential to reduce engine emissions and associated health effects. For this pilot study, exposure monitoring was performed in an underground mine during operation of a load-haul-dump vehicle. Use of low-sulfur diesel, 75% biodiesel/25% diesel blend (B75), and natural gas/diesel blend (GD) fuels were compared. Personal samples were collected for total and respirable diesel particulate matter (tDPM and rDPM, respectively) and total and respirable elemental and organic carbon (tEC, rEC, tOC, rOC, respectively), as well as carbon monoxide (CO), formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, naphthalene, nitric oxide (NO), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Compared to diesel, B75 use was associated with a 33% reduction in rDPM, reductions in rEC, tEC, and naphthalene, increased tDPM, tOC, and NO, and no change in rOC, CO, and NO2. Compared to diesel, GD was associated with a 66% reduction in rDPM and a reduction in all other exposures except CO. The alternative fuels tested both resulted in reduced rDPM, which is the basis for the current Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) occupational exposure standard. Although additional study is needed with a wider variety of equipment, use of alternative fuels have the promise of reducing exposures from vehicular exhaust in underground mining settings.


Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/análise , Mineração , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Emissões de Veículos/análise , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/análise , Biocombustíveis , Carbono/análise , Monóxido de Carbono/análise , Monitoramento Ambiental , Gasolina , Humanos , Gás Natural , Óxidos de Nitrogênio/análise , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Compostos Orgânicos/análise , Material Particulado/análise , Projetos Piloto
3.
J Occup Environ Hyg ; 12(5): 287-93, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25830445

RESUMO

Noise exposures and hearing loss in the mining industry continue to be a major problem, despite advances in noise control technologies. This study evaluated the effectiveness of engineering, administrative, and personal noise controls using both traditional and in-ear dosimetry by job task, work shift, and five types of earplug. The noise exposures of 22 miners performing deep shaft-sinking tasks were evaluated during 56 rotating shifts in an underground mine. Miners were earplug-insertion trained, earplug fit-tested, and monitored utilizing traditional and in-ear dosimetry. The mean TWA8 noise exposure via traditional dosimetry was 90.1 ± 8.2 dBA, while the mean in-ear TWA8 was 79.6 ± 13.8 dBA. The latter was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) personal exposure limit (PEL) of 90 dBA. Dosimetry mean TWA8 noise exposures for bench blowing (103.5 ± 0.9 dBA), jumbo drill operation (103.0 ± 0.8 dBA), and mucking tasks (99.6 ± 4.7 dBA) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than other tasks. For bench blowing, cable pulling, grinding, and jumbo drill operation tasks, the mean in-ear TWA8 was greater than 85 dBA. Those working swing shift had a significantly higher (p < 0.001) mean TWA8 noise exposure (95.4 ± 7.3 dBA) than those working day shift. For percent difference between traditional vs. in-ear dosimetry, there was no significant difference among types of earplug used. Reflective of occupational hearing loss rate trends across the mining industry, this study found that, despite existing engineering and administrative controls, noise exposure levels exceeded regulatory limits, while the addition of personal hearing protection limited excessive exposures.


Assuntos
Mineração , Ruído Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Dispositivos de Proteção das Orelhas , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/etiologia , Perda Auditiva Provocada por Ruído/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Ruído Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Doenças Profissionais/prevenção & controle , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle
4.
J Occup Environ Med ; 57(7): 705-12, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26147538

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the comparative acute health effects associated with exposures to diesel and 75% biodiesel/25% diesel (B75) blend fuel emissions. METHODS: We analyzed multiple health endpoints in 48 healthy adults before and after exposures to diesel and B75 emissions in an underground mine setting-lung function, lung and systemic inflammation, novel biomarkers of exposure, and oxidative stress were assessed. RESULTS: B75 reduced respirable diesel particulate matter by 20%. Lung function declined significantly more after exposure to diesel emissions. Lung inflammatory cells along with sputum and plasma inflammatory mediators increased significantly to similar levels with both exposures. Urinary 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine, a marker of oxidative stress, was not significantly changed after either exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Use of B75 lowered respirable diesel particulate matter exposure and some associated acute health effects, although lung and systemic inflammation were not reduced compared with diesel use.


Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/análise , Biocombustíveis , Gasolina , Exposição por Inalação/análise , Mineração , Exposição Ocupacional/análise , Material Particulado/análise , Emissões de Veículos/análise , Adulto , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/análise , Biomarcadores/análise , Determinação de Ponto Final , Monitoramento Ambiental , Feminino , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Masculino , Estresse Oxidativo , Testes de Função Respiratória
5.
J Occup Environ Med ; 56(4): 388-96, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24495958

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In a hot underground metal mine, this study evaluated the relationship between job task, physical body type, work shift, and heat strain. METHODS: Thirty-one miners were evaluated during 98 shifts while performing deep shaft-sinking tasks. Continuous core body temperature, heart rate, pre- and postshift urine specific gravity (USG), and body mass index were measured. RESULTS: Cutting and welding tasks were associated with significantly (P < 0.05) increased core body temperature, maximum heart rate, and increased postshift urine specific gravity. Miners in the obese level II and III body mass index categories, as well as those working night shift, had lower core body temperatures (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that job task, body type, and shift are risk factors for heat strain.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Estresse por Calor/etiologia , Temperatura Alta , Mineração , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Temperatura Corporal , Frequência Cardíaca , Humanos , Masculino , Metais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Gravidade Específica , Análise e Desempenho de Tarefas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA