Does CD10 Expression Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer?

BACKGROUND: Accurate preoperative prediction of lymph node status would be a revolutionary adjunct in treating colorectal cancer. The immunohistochemical marker CD10 has been suggested recently to have a predictive capacity for lymph node involvement in colorectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationship between the presence of the CD10 molecular marker and lymph node metastasis in a US patient population using previously banked colorectal cancer specimens. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a single academic institution. PATIENTS: Included were specimens from 191 patients, with cancer stages ranging from T1N0 to T3N2. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The relationship between CD10 and different clinicopathologic parameters was assessed, as well as the ability to predict lymph node metastasis by itself and in conjunction with lymphovascular invasion. RESULTS: CD10 was significantly correlated with left-sided colon cancers (p = 0.01) and the presence of mucinous histology and had a relatively high specificity (75.7%) for lymph node metastasis. CD10 did not correlate with lymph node status (p = 0.33) or enhance the ability of lymphovascular invasion to predict lymphatic metastasis in our patient population. Sensitivity and specificity of lymphovascular invasion alone for lymph node metastasis were 62.8% and 93.6%, whereas adding CD10 status resulted in a sensitivity of 70.6% and specificity of 69.3%. Multivariate analysis revealed only lymphovascular invasion as a predictor of lymph node metastasis in our patient population. LIMITATIONS: This study was primarily limited by its small sample size and retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: In our patient population, CD10 status was not significantly associated with lymph node metastasis, and it was no better than lymphovascular invasion alone when predicting lymph node status.

Surgeon Perspectives Regarding Death and Dying.

BACKGROUND: Surgical patients most commonly receive palliative care services within 24-48 hours of death, and reasons for this delay are poorly understood. Research with nonsurgeons suggests that physician characteristics and beliefs about death and dying may contribute to late referral. OBJECTIVE: To describe surgeon perspectives related to death and dying, and their relationship with delayed referrals to palliative care. DESIGN: Using a previously validated survey instrument supplemented by open-ended questions, deductive content analysis was used to describe surgeon preferences for end-of-life care. SETTINGS: Participants were all current nonretired members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgeon descriptions of a "good death" and how personal experiences influence care provided. RESULTS: Among 131 survey respondents (response rate 16.5%), 117 (89.3%) completed all or part of the qualitative portion of the survey. Respondents consistently reported their personal preferences for end-of-life care, and four central themes emerged: (1) pain and symptom management, (2) clear decision making, (3) avoidance of medical care, and (4) completion. Surgeons also reflected on both good and bad experiences with patients and family members dying, and how these experiences impact practice. LIMITATIONS: The small sample size inherent to Internet surveys may limit generalizability and contribute to selection bias. CONCLUSION: This study reveals surgeon preferences for end-of-life care, which may inform initiatives aimed at surgeons who may underuse or delay palliative care services. Future studies are needed to better understand how surgeon preferences may directly impact treatment recommendations for their patients.

Surgeons' Perceived Barriers to Palliative and End-of-Life Care: A Mixed Methods Study of a Surgical Society.

BACKGROUND: Nearly 20% of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients present with potentially incurable (Stage IV) disease, yet their physicians do not integrate cancer treatment with palliative care. Compared with patients treated by primary providers, surgical patients with terminal diseases are significantly less likely to receive palliative or end-of-life care. OBJECTIVE: To describe surgeon perspectives on palliative and end-of-life care for patients with Stage IV CRCs. DESIGN: This is a convergent mixed methods study using a validated survey instrument from the Critical Care Peer Workgroup of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Promoting Excellence in End-of-Life Care Project with additional qualitative questions. SETTINGS: Participants were all current, nonretired members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgeon-perceived barriers to palliative and end-of-life care for patients with Stage IV CRCs were identified. RESULTS: Among 131 Internet survey respondents (response rate 16.5%), 76.1% reported no formal education in palliative care, and specifically noted inadequate training in techniques to forgo life-sustaining measures (37.9%) and communication (42.7%). Over half (61.8%) of surgeons cited unrealistic expectations among patients and families as a barrier to care, which also limited discussion of palliation. At the system level, absence of documentation, appropriate processes, and culture hindered the initiation of palliative care. Thematic analysis of open-ended questions confirmed and extended these findings through the following major barriers to palliative and end-of-life care: (1) surgeon knowledge and training; (2) communication challenges; (3) difficulty with prognostication; (4) patient and family factors encompassing unrealistic expectations and discordant preferences; and (5) systemic issues including culture and lack of documentation and appropriate resources. LIMITATIONS: Generalizability is limited by the small sample size inherent to Internet surveys, which may contribute to selection bias. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons valued palliative and end-of-life care but reported multilevel barriers to its provision. These data will inform strategies to reduce these perceived barriers.

Characterizing the Role of U.S. Surgeons in the Provision of Palliative Care: A Systematic Review and Mixed-Methods Meta-Synthesis.

CONTEXT: The provision of palliative care varies appropriately by clinical factors such as patient age and severity of disease and also varies by provider practice and specialty. Surgical patients are persistently less likely to receive palliative care than their medical counterparts for reasons that are not clear. OBJECTIVES: We sought to characterize surgeon-specific determinants of palliative care in seriously ill and dying patients. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature focused on surgery and palliative care within PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, and Ovid Medline databases from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2016 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Quantitative and qualitative studies with primary data evaluating surgeons' attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors or experiences in care for seriously ill and dying patients were selected for full review by at least two study team members based on predefined inclusion criteria. Data were extracted based on a predetermined instrument and compared across studies using thematic analysis in a meta-synthesis of qualitative and quantitative findings. RESULTS: A total of 2589 abstracts were identified and screened, and 35 articles (26 quantitative and nine qualitative) fulfilled criteria for full review. Among these, 17 articles explored practice and attitudes of surgeons regarding palliative and end-of-life care, 11 articles assessed training in palliative care, five characterized surgical decision making, one described behaviors of surgeons caring for seriously ill and dying patients, and one explicitly identified barriers to use of palliative care. Four major themes across studies affected receipt of palliative care for surgical patients: 1) surgeons' experience and knowledge, 2) surgeons' attitudes, 3) surgeons' preferences and decision making for treatment, and 4) perceived barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Among the articles reviewed, surgeons overall demonstrated insight into the benefits of palliative care but reported limited knowledge and comfort as well as a multitude of challenges to introducing palliative care to their patients. These findings indicate a need for wider implementation of strategies that allow optimal integration of palliative care with surgical decision making.