Differences in integrated assessment and management of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) for people with HIV across the WHO European region.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the extent of integration of non-communicable disease (NCD) assessment and management in HIV clinics across Europe. METHODS: A structured electronic questionnaire with 41 multiple-choice and rating-scale questions assessing NCD assessment and management was sent to 88 HIV clinics across the WHO European Region during March-May 2023. One response per clinic was collected. RESULTS: In all, 51 clinics from 34 countries with >100 000 people with HIV under regular follow-up responded. Thirty-seven clinics (72.6%) reported shared NCD care responsibility with the general practitioner. Systematic assessment for NCDs and integration of NCD management were common overall [median agreement 80%, interquartile range (IQR): 55-95%; and 70%, IQR: 50-88%, respectively] but were lowest in central eastern and eastern Europe. Chronic kidney disease (median agreement 96%, IQR: 85-100%) and metabolic disorders (90%, IQR: 75-100%) were regularly assessed, while mental health (72%, IQR: 63-85%) and pulmonary diseases (52%, IQR: 40-75%) were less systematically assessed. Some essential diagnostic tests such as glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) for diabetes (n = 38/51, 74.5%), proteinuria for kidney disease (n = 30/51, 58.8%) and spirometry for lung disease (n = 11/51, 21.6%) were only employed by a proportion of clinics. The most frequent barriers for integrating NCD care were the lack of healthcare workers (n = 17/51, 33.3%) and lack of time during outpatient visits (n = 12/51, 23.5%). CONCLUSION: Most HIV clinics in Europe systematically assess and manage NCDs. People with HIV appear to be screened more frequently than the general population at the same age. There are, however, larger gaps among eastern European clinics in general and for clinics in all regions related to mental health, pulmonary diseases and the employment of some essential diagnostic tests.

Clinical trial: An open-label, randomised trial of different re-start strategies after treatment withdrawal in HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND: Stopping nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) may trigger a beneficial immune response leading to HBsAg loss, but clinical trials on re-start strategies are lacking. AIM: To assess whether it is beneficial to undergo a prolonged flare after NA cessation. METHODS: One-hundred-and-twenty-seven patients with HBeAg negative, non-cirrhotic CHB with at least 24 months of viral suppression on NA therapy were included. All study participants stopped antiviral therapy and were randomised to either low-threshold (ALT > 80 U/L and HBV DNA > 2000 IU/mL) or high-threshold (ALT > 100 U/L for >4 months, or ALT > 400 U/L for >2 months) for the re-start of therapy. The primary endpoint was HBsAg loss within 36 months of stopping antiviral treatment. The primary analysis was based on intention-to-treat allocation with last observation carried forward. RESULTS: There was a numerical but not statistically significant difference in HBsAg loss between the low-threshold (3 of 64; 4.7%) and the high-threshold (8 of 63; 12.7%) group (risk difference: 8.0%, 95% CI: -2.3 to 19.6, p = 0.123). None of the patients with end-of-treatment HBsAg > 1000 IU/mL achieved HBsAg loss; among those with end-of-treatment HBsAg < 1000 IU/mL, 8 of 15 (53.3%) achieved HBsAg loss in the high-threshold group compared to 3 of 26 (11.5%) in the low-threshold group. CONCLUSIONS: We could not confirm our hypothesis that a higher threshold for restart of therapy after NA withdrawal improves the likelihood of HBsAg loss within 36 months in patients with HBeAg negative CHB. Further studies including only patients with HBsAg level <1000 IU/mL and/or larger sample size and longer follow-up duration are recommended.

Treatment cessation in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: clinical response is associated with increase in specific proinflammatory cytokines.

Patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B may experience an immune response after stopping nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA)therapy, which may potentially trigger HBsAg loss or off-therapy sustained viral control. The immunological mechanisms determining clinical response remain poorly understood. To identify inflammatory signatures associated with defined outcomes, we analysed plasma cytokines and chemokines from 57 HBeAg-negative patients enrolled in the Nuc-Stop Study at baseline and 12 weeks after NA cessation. Clinical response at 12 weeks was classified into four groups: immune control, viral relapse, evolving clinical relapse, and resolving clinical relapse. Twelve weeks after treatment cessation 17 patients (30%) experienced immune control, 19 (33%) viral relapse, 6 (11%) evolving clinical relapse, and 15 (26%) resolving clinical relapse. There was a significant increase in interferon-γ-induced protein 10 (IP-10; p = 0.012) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF; p = 0.032) in patients with evolving clinical relapse. Sparse partial least-squares multivariate analyses (sPLS-DA) showed higher first component values for the clinical relapse group compared to the other groups, separation was driven mainly by IP-10, TNF, IL-9, IFN-γ, MIP-1ß, and IL-12. Our results demonstrate that evolving clinical relapse after NA cessation is associated with a systemic increase in the proinflammatory cytokines IP-10 and TNF.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT03681132.