The death of laparoscopy.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of laparoscopy in 1989 revolutionized surgical practices, reducing post-operative complications, and enhancing outcomes. Despite its benefits, limitations in laparoscopic tools have led to continued use of open surgery. Robotic-assisted surgery emerged to address these limitations, but its adoption trends and potential impact on open and laparoscopic surgery require analysis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) databases from 2012 to 2021. The study encompassed various abdominal procedures, employing Vector Autoregressive (VAR) models to analyze the dynamic relationships between surgical techniques. The models predicted future trends in open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery until Q2 of 2025. RESULTS: The analysis included 360,171 patients across diverse procedures. In urology, robotic surgery dominated prostatectomies (83.1% in 2021) and nephrectomies (55.1% in 2021), while the open approach remained the predominant surgical technique for cystectomies (72.5% in 2021). In general surgery, robotic colectomies were forecasted to surpass laparoscopy, becoming the primary approach by 2024 (45.7% in 2025). Proctectomies also showed a shift towards robotic surgery, predicted to surpass laparoscopy and open surgery by 2025 (32.3%). Pancreatectomies witnessed a steady growth in robotic surgery, surpassing laparoscopy in 2021, with forecasts indicating further increase. While hepatectomies remained predominantly open (70.0% in 2025), esophagectomies saw a rise in robotic surgery, predicted to become the primary approach by 2025 (52.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests a transformative shift towards robotic-assisted surgery, poised to dominate various minimally invasive procedures. The forecasts indicate that robotic surgery may surpass laparoscopy and open surgery in colectomies, proctectomies, pancreatectomies, and esophagectomies by 2025. This anticipated change emphasizes the need for proactive adjustments in surgical training programs to align with evolving surgical practices. The findings have substantial implications for future healthcare practices, necessitating a balance between traditional laparoscopy and the burgeoning role of robotic-assisted surgery.

Shape-Sensing Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy in the Multiple Pulmonary Nodule Diagnosis during a Single Anesthetic Event.

INTRODUCTION: The widespread use of computed tomography as a screening tool for early lung cancer has increased detection of pulmonary lesions. It is common to encounter patients with more than one peripheral pulmonary nodule (PPN) of uncertain etiology. Shape-sensing robotic-assisted bronchoscopy (ssRAB) emerges as a potential alternative to biopsy multiple PPN, in addition to mediastinal staging in single anesthetic procedure. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective review of 22 patients who underwent ssRAB for evaluation of two or more PPN, between November 2021 and April 2023 at Mayo Clinic, FL, USA. RESULTS: A total of 46 PPNs were biopsied in 22 patients. All lesions were ≤2 cm with a median minimum and maximum cross-sectional lesion size of 1.40 cm and 1.05 cm, respectively. Diagnostic yield was 86.9% (n = 40), and target reach was 91.3% (n = 42). Most lesions were in the upper lobes, a solid pattern was found in 78.3% (n = 36), bronchus sign was present in 82.6% of cases (n = 38), 54.4% (n = 25) were malignant nodules, and 32.6% (n = 15) were benign. Fourteen patients had at least one malignant lesion out of two or more nodules sampled, and 10 patients had a malignant diagnosis for all sampled lesions. The complication rate was 9% (n = 2) with one case of bleeding and one of pneumothorax. CONCLUSION: This study is, to our knowledge, the first to assess the use and safety of ssRAB for diagnosis of multiple PPN in a single anesthetic event. This procedure will mainly impact management decisions and subsequently shorten the time from diagnosis to treatment.

Management of a decade-old recurrent chylothorax with breast fistulization: a case report.

Background: Chylothoraces result from traumatic or non-traumatic insult to the thoracic duct, allowing for lymph to accumulate in the chest. Patients present with increasing dyspnea and fatigue, and the diagnosis is made via chest X-ray, computed tomography (CT), and comparative analysis of the pleural fluid and serum. Management largely entails diet modification and drainage with or without adjunct medications, reserving pleurodesis, percutaneous duct embolization, or thoracic duct ligation for recalcitrant cases. Case Description: A 72-year-old female presented with a 10-year history of recurrent chylothorax. This was precipitated by a rib biopsy in 2013 for concerns of fibrous dysplasia, which was complicated by pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement and recurrent chylous effusion. The patient remained minimally symptomatic despite its chronicity. The lymphatic leak fistulized into her right breast in 2019 to cause significant swelling and exacerbate discomfort. Upon presentation, she noted incessant dyspnea, right arm and breast lymphedema, and exercise intolerance. Initial treatment involved placement of an indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) and interventional radiology (IR)-guided thoracic duct embolization. When persistent, she proceeded with video-assisted thorascopic surgery (VATS) decortication, talc pleurodesis, and ligation of the chylous leak. She was discharged with a drain that remained for one month until sinograms displayed resolution of the effusion. Conclusions: Optimal chylothorax management remains debatable as it is understudied with few high-quality trials guiding treatment. When conservative management is unsuccessful, procedural intervention is often required to minimize morbidity and mortality. A literature review yielded sparse similarities between our case and others, highlighting the irregularity of presentation, challenges faced, and importance of a multidisciplinary approach in management.

A Retrospective External Validation of the Cleveland Clinic Malignancy Probability Prediction Model for Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules.

Objective: To perform a retrospective, multicenter, external validation of the Cleveland Clinic malignancy probability prediction model for incidental pulmonary nodules. Patients and Methods: From July 1, 2022, to May 31, 2023, we identified 296 patients who underwent tissue acquisition at Mayo Clinic (MC) (n=198) and Loyola University Medical Center (n=98) with histopathology indicating malignant (n=195) or benign (n=101). Data was collected at initial radiographic identification (point 1) and at the time of intervention (point 2). Point 3 represented the most recent data. The areas under the receiver operating characteristics were calculated for each model per time point. Calibration was evaluated by comparing the predicted and observed rates of malignancy. Results: The areas under the receiver operating characteristics at time points 1, 2, and 3 for the MC model were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.61-0.74), 0.67 (95% CI, 0.58-0.77), and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.63-0.76), respectively. The Cleveland Clinic model (CCM) was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.61-0.74), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.65-0.84), and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66-0.78), respectively. The mean ± SD estimated probability for malignant pulmonary nodules (PNs) at time points 1, 2, and 3 for the CCM was 64.2±25.9, 65.8±24.0, and 64.7±24.4, which resembled the overall proportion of malignant PNs (66%). The mean estimated probability of malignancy for the MC model at each time point was 38.3±27.4, 36.2±24.4, and 42.1±27.3, substantially lower than the observed proportion of malignancies. Conclusion: The CCM found discrimination similar to its internal validation and good calibration. The CCM can be used to augment clinical and shared decision-making when evaluating high-risk PNs.

Sublobar Resection, Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy, and Percutaneous Ablation Provide Comparable Outcomes for Lung Metastasis-Directed Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Prolonged survival of patients with metastatic disease has furthered interest in metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). RESEARCH QUESTION: There is a paucity of data comparing lung MDT modalities. Do outcomes among sublobar resection (SLR), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and percutaneous ablation (PA) for lung metastases vary in terms of local control and survival? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Medical records of patients undergoing lung MDT at a single cancer center between January 2015 and December 2020 were reviewed. Overall survival, local progression, and toxicity outcomes were collected. Patient and lesion characteristics were used to generate multivariable models with propensity weighted analysis. RESULTS: Lung MDT courses (644 total: 243 SLR, 274 SBRT, 127 PA) delivered to 511 patients were included with a median follow-up of 22 months. There were 47 local progression events in 45 patients, and 159 patients died. Two-year overall survival and local progression were 80.3% and 63.3%, 83.8% and 9.6%, and 4.1% and 11.7% for SLR, SBRT, and PA, respectively. Lesion size per 1 cm was associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.24; P = .003) and LP (hazard ratio, 1.50; P < .001). There was no difference in overall survival by modality. Relative to SLR, there was no difference in risk of local progression with PA; however, SBRT was associated with a decreased risk (hazard ratio, 0.26; P = .023). Rates of severe toxicity were low (2.1%-2.6%) and not different among groups. INTERPRETATION: This study performs a propensity weighted analysis of SLR, SBRT, and PA and shows no impact of lung MDT modality on overall survival. Given excellent local control across MDT options, a multidisciplinary approach is beneficial for patient triage and longitudinal management.