Decoupling FcRn and tumor contributions to elevated immune checkpoint inhibitor clearance in cancer cachexia.

High baseline clearance of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), independent of dose or systemic exposure, is associated with cachexia and poor outcomes in cancer patients. Mechanisms linking ICI clearance, cachexia and ICI therapy failure are unknown. Here, we evaluate in four murine models and across multiple antibodies whether altered baseline catabolic clearance of administered antibody requires a tumor and/or cachexia and whether medical reversal of cachexia phenotype can alleviate altered clearance. Key findings include mild cachexia phenotype and lack of elevated pembrolizumab clearance in the MC38 tumor-bearing model. We also observed severe cachexia and decreased, instead of increased, baseline pembrolizumab clearance in the tumor-free cisplatin-induced cachexia model. Liver Fcgrt expression correlated with altered baseline catabolic clearance, though elevated clearance was still observed with antibodies having no (human IgA) or reduced (human H310Q IgG1) FcRn binding. We conclude cachexia phenotype coincides with altered antibody clearance, though tumor presence is neither sufficient nor necessary for altered clearance in immunocompetent mice. Magnitude and direction of clearance alteration correlated with hepatic Fcgrt, suggesting changes in FcRn expression and/or recycling function may be partially responsible, though factors beyond FcRn also contribute to altered clearance in cachexia.

Antibody Drug Clearance: An Underexplored Marker of Outcomes with Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has dramatically changed the clinical landscape for several cancers, and ICI use continues to expand across many cancer types. Low baseline clearance (CL) and/or a large reduction of CL during treatment correlates with better clinical response and longer survival. Similar phenomena have also been reported with other monoclonal antibodies (mAb) in cancer and other diseases, highlighting a characteristic of mAb clinical pharmacology that is potentially shared among various mAbs and diseases. Though tempting to attribute poor outcomes to low drug exposure and arguably low target engagement due to high CL, such speculation is not supported by the relatively flat exposure-response relationship of most ICIs, where a higher dose or exposure is not likely to provide additional benefit. Instead, an elevated and/or increasing CL could be a surrogate marker of the inherent resistant phenotype that cannot be reversed by maximizing drug exposure. The mechanisms connecting ICI clearance, therapeutic efficacy, and resistance are unclear and likely to be multifactorial. Therefore, to explore the potential of ICI CL as an early marker for efficacy, this review highlights the similarities and differences of CL characteristics and CL-response relationships for all FDA-approved ICIs, and we compare and contrast these to selected non-ICI mAbs. We also discuss underlying mechanisms that potentially link mAb CL with efficacy and highlight existing knowledge gaps and future directions where more clinical and preclinical investigations are warranted to clearly understand the value of baseline and/or time-varying CL in predicting response to ICI-based therapeutics.

Overcoming resistance to anabolic SARM therapy in experimental cancer cachexia with an HDAC inhibitor.

No approved therapy exists for cancer-associated cachexia. The colon-26 mouse model of cancer cachexia mimics recent late-stage clinical failures of anabolic anti-cachexia therapy and was unresponsive to anabolic doses of diverse androgens, including the selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) GTx-024. The histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) AR-42 exhibited anti-cachectic activity in this model. We explored combined SARM/AR-42 therapy as an improved anti-cachectic treatment paradigm. A reduced dose of AR-42 provided limited anti-cachectic benefits, but, in combination with GTx-024, significantly improved body weight, hindlimb muscle mass, and grip strength versus controls. AR-42 suppressed the IL-6/GP130/STAT3 signaling axis in muscle without impacting circulating cytokines. GTx-024-mediated ß-catenin target gene regulation was apparent in cachectic mice only when combined with AR-42. Our data suggest cachectic signaling in this model involves catabolic signaling insensitive to anabolic GTx-024 therapy and a blockade of GTx-024-mediated anabolic signaling. AR-42 mitigates catabolic gene activation and restores anabolic responsiveness to GTx-024. Combining GTx-024, a clinically established anabolic therapy, with AR-42, a clinically evaluated HDACi, represents a promising approach to improve anabolic response in cachectic patients.