Targeted therapy moves to earlier stages of non-small-cell lung cancer: emerging evidence, controversies and future challenges.

Lung cancer continues to be the leading cause of cancer mortality and a serious health problem despite the numerous advances made in the last decade and the rapid advance of research in this field. In recent years, there has been a decrease in mortality from lung cancer coinciding with the approval times of targeted therapy. To date, targeted therapy has been used in the context of advanced disease in clinical practice, with great benefits in survival and quality of life. The next step will be to incorporate targeted therapy into the treatment of earlier stages of non-small-cell lung cancer, and there is already a randomized trial showing a disease-free survival benefit. However, there are many questions that need to be resolved first. In the present review, the authors discuss the findings of published reports and ongoing clinical trials assessing the role of targeted therapies in nonmetastatic disease.

Lay abstract Despite major therapeutic advances over the last decade, lung cancer continues to present the highest mortality rate of all cancers. Precision and personalized therapy directed at specific alterations in the genetic material of the tumor as well as immunotherapy has significantly improved survival in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. The next step will be to incorporate precision medicine into the treatment of earlier stages of non-small-cell lung cancer. The recent publication of the results of the ADAURA phase III trial showing a significant improvement in disease-free survival in patients with resected EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer who received an adjuvant EGFR-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitor called osimertinib has opened the doors to the incorporation of this novel agent into routine clinical practice. However, there are many questions that need to be resolved first. In the present review, the authors discuss the findings of published reports and ongoing clinical trials assessing the role of precision medicine in nonmetastatic disease.

Association of metastatic pattern and molecular status in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to investigate the association between driver oncogene alterations and metastatic patterns on imaging assessment, in a large cohort of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients. METHODS: From January 2010 to May 2017, 550 patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma with molecular analysis were studied retrospectively including 135 EGFR-mutated, 81 ALK-rearrangement, 47 BRAF-mutated, 141 KRAS-mutated, and 146 negative tumors for these 4 mutations (4N). After review of the complete imaging report by two radiologists (junior and senior) to identify metastatic sites, univariate correlation analyzes were performed. RESULTS: We found differences in metastatic tropism depending on the molecular alteration type when compared with the non-mutated 4N group: in the EGFR group, pleural metastases were more frequent (32% versus 20%; p = 0.021), and adrenal and node metastases less common (6% versus 23%; p < 0.001 and 11% versus 23%; p = 0.011). In the ALK group, there were more brain and lung metastases (respectively 42% versus 29%; p = 0.043 and 37% versus 24%; p = 0.037). In the BRAF group, pleural and pericardial metastases were more common (respectively 47% versus 20%; p < 0.001 and 11% versus 3%; p = 0.04) and bone metastases were rarer (21% versus 42%; p = 0.011). Lymphangitis was more frequent in EGFR, ALK, and BRAF groups (respectively 6%, 7%, and 15% versus 1%); p = 0.016; p = 0.009; and p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: The application of these correlations between molecular status and metastatic tropism in clinical practice may lead to earlier and more accurate identification of patients for targeted therapy. KEY POINTS: • Bone and brain metastasis are the most common organs involved in lung adenocarcinoma but the relative incidence of each metastatic site depends on the molecular alteration. • EGFR-mutated tumors preferentially spread to the pleura and less commonly to adrenals, ALK-rearrangement tumors usually spread to the brain and the lungs, whereas BRAF-mutated tumors are unlikely to spread to bones and have a serous (pericardial ad pleural) tropism. • These correlations could help in the clinical management of patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma.

Combination treatments with immunotherapy in brain metastases patients.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of many advanced cancers. However, in most pivotal trials, patients with brain metastases (BM) were either excluded, or only selected patients were allowed. Therefore, there are still some concerns about the safety/efficacy ratio of ICI in patients with BM. In this special report we will provide an overview on the biological rationale for using ICI in the treatment of BM, the reported BM-related outcomes of clinical trials with a focus on ICI plus chemotherapy and ICI plus ICI combinations. Last, we will provide future challenges with this strategy, as well as directions for future research.

Successes and failures: what did we learn from recent first-line treatment immunotherapy trials in non-small cell lung cancer?

The immune checkpoint inhibitors have significantly modified the therapeutic landscape of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in second-line and, more recently, first-line settings. Because of the superior outcome with pembrolizumab as an upfront strategy, PD-L1 status should now be considered a new reflex biomarker for guiding first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Improved responses have also been reported with the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy as the first-line treatment; however, this strategy has not yet been validated by phase III trial data and its interplay with PD-L1 status still requires clarification.In this manuscript we review the contradictory results of recent phase III trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the first-line setting, the potential reasons for discrepancies, and some of the remaining open questions related to the positioning of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the first-line setting of non-small cell lung cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in first-line therapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Evading immune destruction is a hallmark of cancer. The first therapeutic wave in immunotherapies comprised a series of monoclonal antibodies directed against the immune checkpoint molecules cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4, programmed death 1 (PD-1), and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) revolutionizing the therapeutic landscape of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. They were validated initially as second-line treatment, becoming the new standard of care. RECENT FINDINGS: Based on immunotherapies efficacy, different strategies are being successfully investigated in first-line treatment, including frontline immune checkpoint inhibitors, and combination with chemotherapy or with other immune checkpoint inhibitors. In accordance with recent results, US Food and Drug Administration approved a checkpoint inhibitor for first-line treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer whose tumors have high PD-L1 expression, and European Medicines Agency approval is expected in early 2017. SUMMARY: In this review, we summarize the main results of the various strategic clinical development approaches used to date, as well as in ongoing clinical trials.

Identification of ALK, ROS1, and RET Fusions by a Multiplexed mRNA-Based Assay in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Samples from Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase (ALK), ROS proto-oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1), and ret proto-oncogene (RET) fusions are present in 5%-7% of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); their accurate identification is critical to guide targeted therapies. FISH and immunohistochemistry (IHC) are considered the gold standards to determine gene fusions, but they have limitations. The nCounter platform is a potentially useful genomic tool for multiplexed detection of gene fusions, but has not been validated in the clinical setting. METHODS: Formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) samples from 108 patients with advanced NSCLC were analyzed with an nCounter-based assay and the results compared with FISH, IHC, and reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). Data on response to fusion kinase inhibitors was retrospectively collected in a subset of 29 patients. RESULTS: Of 108 FFPE samples, 98 were successfully analyzed by nCounter (91%), which identified 55 fusion-positive cases (32 ALK, 21 ROS1, and 2 RET). nCounter results were highly concordant with IHC for ALK (98.5%, CI = 91.8-99.7), while 11 discrepancies were found compared with FISH (87.5% concordance, CI = 79.0-92.9). For ROS1, nCounter showed similar agreement with IHC and FISH (87.2% and 85.9%), but a substantial number of samples were positive only by 1 or 2 techniques. Of the 25 patients deriving clinical benefit from fusion kinase inhibitors, 24 were positive by nCounter and 22 by FISH. CONCLUSIONS: nCounter compares favorably with IHC and FISH and can be used for identifying patients with advanced NSCLC positive for ALK/ROS1/RET fusion genes.

Predictive biomarkers for programmed death-1/programmed death ligand immune checkpoint inhibitors in nonsmall cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Immune checkpoint inhibitors, antiprogrammed death receptor 1 (anti-PD-1)/antiprogrammed death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1), are new therapeutic regimens for managing advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer patients, giving an overall response rate of approximately 20% as monotherapy in second-line treatment. The use of predictive biomarkers for identifying patients suitable for these therapies is an important issue not only for making treatment decisions, but also from a medical economic point of view. RECENT FINDINGS: Among potential predictive biomarker candidates for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatments in nonsmall cell lung cancer, the expression of PD-L1 (as determined by immunohistochemistry) is currently the most studied. PD-L1 positivity has been associated with higher response rate to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies. However, several observations suggest that the predictive value of PD-L1 expression is not clear-cut. We review other potential predictive biomarkers, including programmed death-ligand 2, IFN-γ, and genetic signatures. SUMMARY: Standardized techniques and conditions for evaluating PD-L1 expression (tissue quality and age, percentage positivity threshold, managing heterogeneous and dynamic expression) are critical for establishing the use of this protein as a predictive marker. Care should be also taken when using anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies in combination with other therapies, which may impact the predictive value of PD-L1 expression.

AZD9291 in EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients whose tumors have an EGFR-activating mutation develop acquired resistance after a median of 9-11 months from the beginning of treatment with erlotinib, gefitinib and afatinib. T790M mutation is the cause of this resistance in approximately 60% of cases. AZD9291 is an oral, irreversible, mutant-selective EGF receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) developed to have potency against EGFR mutations, including T790M mutation, while sparing wild-type EGFR. A Phase I trial of AZD9291 in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients, demonstrated high activity, essentially among T790M-mutant tumors, with a manageable tolerability profile. Ongoing Phase III trials are evaluating AZD9291 in EGFR-mutant patients as first-line treatment compared with erlotinib and gefitinib; and as second-line treatment compared with chemotherapy after progression on EGFR TKI in T790M-mutant tumors. Better identification of T790M-mutant tumors post EGFR TKI relapse and mechanisms of resistance to AZD9291 are the future challenges. This article reviews the emerging data regarding AZD9291 in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Common EGFR-mutated subgroups (Del19/L858R) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: chasing better outcomes with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Ten years ago, somatic mutations in EGFR were identified in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Demonstration of the antitumor efficacy of EGF receptor-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors resulted in their approval for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Insights into the role of EGFR-sensitizing mutations and acquired and de novo T790M resistance mutations followed, and differences in progression-free survival for patients with EGFR Del19- and L858R-mutated tumors treated with reversible first-generation EGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors were reported. Recently, overall survival benefit in patients with Del19- but not L858R-mutated tumors has been demonstrated after treatment with afatinib, an irreversible ErbB family blocker. Although the biology underlying this difference in survival is currently unclear, this review examines several hypotheses.

First-Line Dual Immunotherapy, a Treatment Option in First-Line Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Are We Ready to Use It?

This article provides valuable insights into the use of dual immunotherapy for patients with metastatic NSCLC.

New Treatment Options for Patients With Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Focusing on EGFR-Mutant Tumors.

Druggable oncogene-driven non-small cell lung cancer has led to innovative systemic treatment options, improving patients' outcome. This benefit is not only achieved in the metastatic setting but also in the postsurgical setting, such as in lung cancers harboring a common sensitizing EGFR mutation or ALK-rearrangement. To enhance the outcome of these patients, we need to understand the mechanisms of acquired resistance and evaluate the role of new drugs with novel mechanisms of action in the treatment landscape. In this chapter, we review treatment strategies of EGFR-mutant tumors in all stages, the mechanisms of acquired strategies, and novel therapies in this subset.

Perioperative Treatment Strategies in EGFR-Mutant Early-Stage NSCLC: Current Evidence and Future Challenges.

Treatment with 3 years of adjuvant osimertinib is considered a new standard in patients with completely resected stage I to IIIA NSCLC harboring a common sensitizing EGFR mutation. This therapeutic approach significantly prolonged the disease-free survival and the overall survival versus placebo and revealed a significant role in preventing the occurrence of brain metastases. However, many unanswered questions remain, including the optimal duration of this therapy, whether all patients benefit from adjuvant osimertinib, and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in this population. Indeed, there is a renewed interest in neoadjuvant strategies with targeted therapies in resectable NSCLC harboring oncogenic drivers. In light of these considerations, we discuss the past and current treatment options, and the clinical challenges that should be addressed to optimize the treatment outcomes in this patient population.

Circulating tumor DNA to guide diagnosis and treatment of localized and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Liquid biopsy is a minimally invasive method for biomarkers detection in body fluids, particularly in blood, which offers an elevated and growing number of clinical applications in oncology. As a result of the improvement in the techniques for DNA analysis, above all next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has become the most informing tumor-derived material for most types of cancer, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although ctDNA concentration is higher in patients with advanced tumors, it can be detected even in patients with early-stage disease. Therefore, numerous clinical applications of ctDNA in the management of early-stage lung cancer are emerging, such as lung cancer screening, the identification of minimal residual disease (MRD), and the prediction of relapse before radiologic progression. Moreover, a high number of clinical trials are ongoing to better define the impact of ctDNA evaluation in this setting. Aim of this review is to offer a comprehensive overview of the most relevant implementations in using ctDNA for the management of early-stage lung cancer, addressing available data, technical aspects, limitations, and future perspectives.

The role of sex and gender in the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer: the 6th ICAPEM Annual Symposium.

The incidence and mortality of lung cancer in women are rising, with both increasing by 124% between 2003 and 2019. The main risk factor for lung cancer is tobacco use, but indoor radon gas exposure is one of the leading causes in nonsmokers. The most recent evidence demonstrates that multiple factors can make women more susceptible to harm from these risk factors or carcinogens. For this consensus statement, the Association for Lung Cancer Research in Women (ICAPEM) invited a group of lung cancer experts to perform a detailed gender-based analysis of lung cancer. Clinically, female patients have different lung cancer profiles, and most actionable driver alterations are more prevalent in women, particularly in never-smokers. Additionally, the impact of certain therapies seems to be different. In the future, it will be necessary to carry out specific studies to improve the understanding of the role of certain biomarkers and gender in the prognosis and evolution of lung cancer.

Impact of Concurrent Genomic Alterations on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With ALK-Rearranged NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors have exhibited promising activity against advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC. However, co-occurring genetic alterations, such as CDKN2A/B or TP53, may negatively affect the efficacy of targeted therapies. METHODS: From December 2017 to December 2022, this study cohort analyzed next-generation sequencing data of 116 patients with metastatic ALK-rearranged NSCLC from five Latin American cancer centers. Clinicopathologic and molecular features were associated with clinical outcomes and risk of brain metastasis (BrM) in patients with and without concurrent somatic alterations. RESULTS: All patients (N = 116) received a second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and alectinib was selected in 87.2% of cases. Coalterations occurred in 62% of the cases; the most frequent were TP53 mutations (27%) and CDKN2A/B loss (18%). The loss of CDKN2A/B was associated with an increased risk of BrM, with a cumulative incidence of 33.3% versus 7.4% in the non-coaltered subgroup. Compared with patients without coalterations, patients with concurrent CDKN2A/B loss (n = 21) had a shorter median progression-free survival (10.2 versus 34.2 mo, p < 0.001) and overall survival (26.2 versus 80.7 mo, p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, co-occurring CDKN2A/B loss was associated with poorer progression-free survival and OS despite the presence of other somatic coalterations, TP53 mutations, BrM, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the worse prognostic value, which depicted co-occurring alterations in patients with ALK rearrangement. CDKN2A/B loss was substantially associated with worse outcomes and a higher risk of brain metastases. The evidence presented in our study may help select patients with ALK-positive tumors suitable for treatment escalation and closer brain follow-up.

Meta-Analysis on the Combination of Chemotherapy With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 and Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 Blockade as First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Pleural Mesothelioma.

INTRODUCTION: Dual immune checkpoint blockers regimen represents a standard first-line therapy in unresectable pleural mesothelioma (PM). Novel combination strategies, including immune checkpoint blockers and antiangiogenic drugs, are currently under investigation in this setting. We aimed to assess the efficacy of the chemoimmunotherapy combination by reference to literature evidence. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy associated with programmed death-ligand 1 and programmed cell death protein 1 agent in unresectable PM. We estimated the weighted summary proportion of disease response, along with the landmark probability of survival outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 349 patients with unresectable PM from four trials (DREAM, PrE0505, JME-001, and IND.227) were included, 79% (n = 274) with epithelioid and 21% (n = 75) with nonepithelioid histologic type. In aggregate, the objective response rate was 59.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 50.3%-67.9%) and disease control rate was 92.2% (95% CI: 89.2%-94.8%). Comparing epithelioid versus nonepithelioid tumors, the objective response rate was 64.5% versus 46.4%, (p < 0.001) and the disease control rate was 92.3% versus 80.0%, (p = 0.043), with an OR of 2.56 (95% CI: 1.51-4.32) for disease response and of 3.37 (95% CI: 0.99-11.47) for disease control. The aggregated estimated probability of progression-free survival was 63% (95% CI: 53%-71%) at 6 months and 25% (95% CI: 21%-31%) at 12 months, whereas the 6-, 12- and 24-month overall survival rates were 88% (95% CI: 81%-93%), 71% (95% CI: 61%-79%) and 39% (95% CI: 34%-45%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: According to our analysis, first-line chemoimmunotherapy holds promise as a new treatment approach for PM, exhibiting encouraging survival outcomes and an enhanced response rate, including for the epithelioid subtype. Ongoing studies are necessary to establish its precise placement within the treatment algorithm.

Prevalence of pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants in cancer predisposition genes among selected patients with lung adenocarcinoma: The GERMLUNG study.

INTRODUCTION: Pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in cancer predisposition genes may play a role in lung cancer (LC) susceptibility. However, determining an eligible population for genetic testing remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of PGVs in a selected cohort of individuals with lung adenocarcinoma. METHODS: A cross-sectional cohort study was conducted to assess the PGVs rate in lung adenocarcinoma patients with a family history of LC, young-onset presentation, history of never/light smoking, or actionable genomic alterations (AGAs). Sequencing was performed using Sophia Hereditary Cancer Solution panel F, including 144 cancer predisposition genes. Variants classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic were included for further analysis. RESULTS: Of 201 patients, 43 (21.4 %) exhibited PGVs, among which 64.5 % were DNA damage repair genes, and 86.1 % were clinically actionable. The main PGVs were in ATM (9.3 %), TP53 (6.9 %), BRCA2 (6.9 %), and CHEK2 (6.9 %) genes. PGVs were associated with male sex (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.46, 95 % CI 1.15-5.32, p = 0.021), along with a trend toward association with AGAs (aOR 6.04, 95 % CI 0.77-49.74, p = 0.094). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a high PGVs prevalence was identified based on our selection criteria, which represents an effective strategy to identify candidates for germline genomic testing, potential screening strategies in close relatives, and personalized therapeutic modalities. Our results warrant further exploration in other populations to confirm them.

Overall Survival From the EORTC LCG-1613 APPLE Trial of Osimertinib Versus Gefitinib Followed by Osimertinib in Advanced EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Osimertinib has been established as a standard of care for patients with common sensitizing EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) although the sequential approach (first-generation inhibitor gefitinib followed by osimertinib) has not been formally compared. The phase II APPLE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02856893) enrolled 156 treatment-naïve patients, and two treatment strategies were evaluated: osimertinib up front or the sequential treatment approach with gefitinib up front followed by osimertinib at the time of progression, either molecular progression (detection of plasma T790M resistance mutation) regardless of the radiologic status or just at the time of radiologic progression. Patients' characteristics were well balanced, except for the higher proportion of baseline brain metastases in the sequential approach (29% v 19%). Per protocol, 73% of patients switched to osimertinib in the sequential arm. Up-front treatment with osimertinib was associated with a lower risk of brain progression versus the sequential approach (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54 [90% CI, 0.34 to 0.86]), but a comparable overall survival was observed between both strategies (HR, 1.01 [90% CI, 0.61 to 1.68]), with the 18-month survival probability of 84% and 82.3%, respectively. The APPLE trial suggests that a sequential treatment approach is associated with more frequent progression in the brain but a similar survival in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Cancer and Infection by Hepatitis B or C Virus: A Perspective Through the Results of a European Survey.

Introduction: Patients with cancer and hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are underrepresented in several clinical trials testing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Consequently, safety and efficacy of ICI therapy in this population have not been completely defined. We aimed to evaluate the attitudes of oncologists on this topic. Methods: We conducted a 14-item European anonymous online survey. Results: Physicians from 56 oncology departments (26 from Italy, 15 from France, and 15 from Spain) took part in the survey. They mainly used to prescribe ICIs for treating patients with lung cancer, melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma. Of them, 95% recognized the need for specific guidelines addressing the management of patients with cancer and HBV or HCV treated with ICIs. Just 63% of the respondents screened patients for HBV and HCV status before ICIs initiation, although the risk of immune-related hepatotoxicity or viral reactivation was a major concern for most of them. Only 9% of the surveyed oncologists considered HBV and HCV infection a major exclusion criterion for receiving ICIs. Furthermore, 29% of the respondents would start a prophylactic treatment of active infection at ICIs initiation. Conclusions: ICIs administration in patients with cancer and HBV or HCV infection is of concern for most of the surveyed European oncologists. Nonetheless, active screening and treatment of viral hepatitis should be improved. Data in this specific setting are needed for an evidence-based management and should be generated by broadening inclusion criteria of clinical trials to allow the enrollment of patients with HBV and HCV.

Immune checkpoint blockers in patients with unresectable or metastatic thymic epithelial tumours: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: For patients with advanced thymic epithelial tumours (TET), there is no standard second-line treatment after platinum-based chemotherapy. Although immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) are a potential treatment strategy, their efficacy seems limited with an increased risk of immune-related adverse events (ir-AEs), thus hampering their application in daily clinical practice. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis to better evaluate the existing evidence about the activity and safety of ICB in the setting of unresectable or metastatic advanced TET previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. RESULTS: Six phase I/II trials met the eligibility criteria including a total of 166 evaluable patients (77% thymic carcinoma, 23% thymoma) evaluable for activity after being treated with pembrolizumab, nivolumab, avelumab or atezolizumab. The overall response rate to ICB was 18.4% (95% CI: 12.3-26.5), and the one-year progression-free survival rate and one-year overall survival rate were 26.0% (95% CI: 19.6-34.6) and 66.9% (95% CI: 59.6-75.2%), respectively. The incidence of grade 3-5 ir-AEs was 26.4%, with 17.1% in thymic carcinoma and 58.3% in thymoma. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the absence of a robust demonstration of efficacy in the context of randomised trials, our results suggest ICB as a potential strategy in patients with pretreated TET, mainly among patients with thymic carcinoma. Close monitoring is strongly advised to detect severe immune-toxicity.