Single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-sequencing from paired normal-adenocarcinoma lung samples provide both common and discordant biological insights.

Whether single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) captures the same biological information as single-nucleus RNA-sequencing (snRNA-seq) remains uncertain and likely to be context-dependent. Herein, a head-to-head comparison was performed in matched normal-adenocarcinoma human lung samples to assess biological insights derived from scRNA-seq versus snRNA-seq and better understand the cellular transition that occurs from normal to tumoral tissue. Here, the transcriptome of 160,621 cells/nuclei was obtained. In non-tumor lung, cell type proportions varied widely between scRNA-seq and snRNA-seq with a predominance of immune cells in the former (81.5%) and epithelial cells (69.9%) in the later. Similar results were observed in adenocarcinomas, in addition to an overall increase in cell type heterogeneity and a greater prevalence of copy number variants in cells of epithelial origin, which suggests malignant assignment. The cell type transition that occurs from normal lung tissue to adenocarcinoma was not always concordant whether cells or nuclei were examined. As expected, large differential expression of the whole-cell and nuclear transcriptome was observed, but cell-type specific changes of paired normal and tumor lung samples revealed a set of common genes in the cells and nuclei involved in cancer-related pathways. In addition, we showed that the ligand-receptor interactome landscape of lung adenocarcinoma was largely different whether cells or nuclei were evaluated. Immune cell depletion in fresh specimens partly mitigated the difference in cell type composition observed between cells and nuclei. However, the extra manipulations affected cell viability and amplified the transcriptional signatures associated with stress responses. In conclusion, research applications focussing on mapping the immune landscape of lung adenocarcinoma benefit from scRNA-seq in fresh samples, whereas snRNA-seq of frozen samples provide a low-cost alternative to profile more epithelial and cancer cells, and yield cell type proportions that more closely match tissue content.

A Test to Comprehensively Capture the Known Genetic Component of Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis.

The recent European Respiratory Society statement on familial pulmonary fibrosis supports the need for genetic testing in the care of patients and their relatives. However, no solution (i.e., a concrete test) was provided to implement genetic testing in daily practice. Herein, we tabulated and standardized the nomenclature of 128 genetic variants in 20 genes implicated in adult-onset pulmonary fibrosis. The objective was to develop a laboratory-developed test (LDT) on the basis of standard Sanger sequencing to capture all known familial pulmonary fibrosis-associated variants. Targeted DNA fragments were amplified using harmonized PCR conditions to perform the LDT in a single 96-well plate. The new genetic test was evaluated in 62 sporadic cases of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. As expected in this population, we observed a low yield of disease-causing mutations. More important, 100% of targeted variants by the LDT were successfully evaluated. Furthermore, four variants of uncertain significance with in silico-predicted deleterious scores were identified in three patients, suggesting novel pathogenic variants in genes known to cause idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Finally, the MUC5B promoter variant rs35705950 was strongly enriched in these patients with a minor allele frequency of 41.1% compared with 10.6% in a matched population-based cohort (n = 29,060), leading to an estimation that this variant may explain up to 35% of the population-attributable risk. This LDT provides a solution for rapid clinical translation. Technical laboratory details are provided so that specialized pulmonary centers can implement the LDT in house to expedite the clinical recommendations of expert panels.

Polygenic inheritance and its interplay with smoking history in predicting lung cancer diagnosis: a French-Canadian case-control cohort.

BACKGROUND: The most near-term clinical application of genome-wide association studies in lung cancer is a polygenic risk score (PRS). METHODS: A case-control dataset was generated consisting of 4002 lung cancer cases from the LORD project and 20,010 ethnically matched controls from CARTaGENE. A genome-wide PRS including >1.1 million genetic variants was derived and validated in UK Biobank (n = 5419 lung cancer cases). The predictive ability and diagnostic discrimination performance of the PRS was tested in LORD/CARTaGENE and benchmarked against previous PRSs from the literature. Stratified analyses were performed by smoking status and genetic risk groups defined as low (<20th percentile), intermediate (20-80th percentile) and high (>80th percentile) PRS. FINDINGS: The phenotypic variance explained and the effect size of the genome-wide PRS numerically outperformed previous PRSs. Individuals with high genetic risk had a 2-fold odds of lung cancer compared to low genetic risk. The PRS was an independent predictor of lung cancer beyond conventional clinical risk factors, but its diagnostic discrimination performance was incremental in an integrated risk model. Smoking increased the odds of lung cancer by 7.7-fold in low genetic risk and by 11.3-fold in high genetic risk. Smoking with high genetic risk was associated with a 17-fold increase in the odds of lung cancer compared to individuals who never smoked and with low genetic risk. INTERPRETATION: Individuals at low genetic risk are not protected against the smoking-related risk of lung cancer. The joint multiplicative effect of PRS and smoking increases the odds of lung cancer by nearly 20-fold. FUNDING: This work was supported by the CQDM and the IUCPQ Foundation owing to a generous donation from Mr. Normand Lord.