MRI and intraoperative pathology to predict nipple-areola complex (NAC) involvement in patients undergoing NAC-sparing mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: Nipple-areola sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate implant reconstruction is an option for patients with non-locally advanced breast cancer. The prediction of occult tumour involvement of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) may help select candidates to NSM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively recorded clinical and pathological data, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results and intraoperative pathological assessments of the subareolar (SD) and proximal nipple ducts (ND) of 112 consecutive breast cancer patients scheduled for NSM. All parameters were correlated with final pathological NAC assessment by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (27.7%) had tumour involvement of the NAC. At univariate analysis, age (p=0.001), post-menopausal status (0.003), tumour central location (p=0.03), tumour-NAC distance measured by MRI (p=0.000) and intraoperative pathologic assessment (SD+ND) (p=0.000) were significantly correlated with NAC involvement. At multivariate analysis, only MRI tumour-NAC distance (p=0.008) and menopausal status (p=0.039) among all preoperative variables retained statistical significance. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI tumour-NAC distance were 32.2% and 88.6% and those of intraoperative pathologic assessment were 46.7% and 100%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the double assessment (MRI plus intraoperative pathology) were 50.0%, 96.2% and 84.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative pathologic assessment and tumour-NAC distance measured by MRI are the most important predictors of occult NAC involvement in breast cancer patients. A negative pathological assessment and a tumour-NAC distance ⩾ 5 mm allow optimal discrimination between NAC positive and NAC negative cases and may serve as a guide for the optimal planning of oncological and reconstructive surgery.

Nipple-areola complex sparing mastectomy with periareolar pexy for breast cancer patients with moderately ptotic breasts.

BACKGROUND: Nipple-areola complex sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate implant reconstruction has been recently introduced for breast cancer patients who are not candidates for breast preserving surgery. As the cosmetic results in moderately ptotic breasts may not be optimal, a modified NSM with a periareolar pexy (PP-NSM) was introduced at our Institution. Patients selection criteria and complication rates of PP-NSM were prospectively recorded and compared with those of the classical NSM. RESULTS: Over a period of 11 months, 22 PP-NSMs and 35 NSMs were performed. The mean jugular-nipple distance was significantly longer in the PP-NSM as compared with the NSM (22.6 vs. 19.6 cm; p=0.000), whereas the mean inframammary fold-areola distance was superimposable (5.4 cm). The periareolar mastopexy led to a mean cranial transposition of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) of 2.2 cm (range 1.5-4 cm). Mean breast weight was significantly higher in the PP-NSM as compared with the NSM cohort (336 vs. 236 g; p=0.003). The only case of total NAC necrosis occurred in the PP-NSM group. Partial NAC necrosis was slightly more frequent in the PP-NSM than in the NSM group (13.6% vs. 2.9%%; p=n.s.), possibly due to the higher percentage of smokers (41.0% vs. 14.0%; p=0.05). Early cosmetic results were good to excellent from the surgeon's and the patient's point of view in over 80% of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: PP-NSM allows good cosmetic results and low complication rates in patients with moderately ptotic breasts requiring a mastectomy. In particular, PP-NSM seems to be a good option for women at high risk for developing breast cancer and for selected patients affected by non-locally advanced breast cancer.

Aesthetic role of the surgically rebuilt inframammary fold for implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

The inframammary fold (IMF) represents one of the most important anatomic landmarks in defining a woman's breast ptosis and inferior quadrant shape. Therefore it is important to preserve it, if this is oncologically safe, at the time of excisional surgery. If it is sacrificed, dislocated cranially or caudally, or there is a thick panniculus adiposus with a poor definition of the fold, it is necessary to recreate it. We present our experience in the reconstruction of the IMF in patients suffering from post-oncologic mastectomy, reconstructed with silicone implants. From January 2000 to May 2004 at the Plastic Surgery Department of the University of Turin, 74 reconstructions of the IMF were performed through Nava's technique, partially modified by us. We believe that IMF reconstruction, through fixation of cutis, subcutis and fascia superficialis to VI rib, along with capsulectomy of periprotesic pocket inferior quadrants, is a milestone for achieving, in selected cases, a good aesthetic result in terms of shape, ptosis and projection of inferior pole. The comparison between patients' opinions (obtained through questionnaires) and surgeon's, at 1 year after the reconstruction, shows that both are satisfied with the achieved outcome in terms of shape, projection, symmetry, ptosis and IMF definition. Another comparison was made between cases of fold preservation and cases of fold reconstruction, with a remarkable similarity of aesthetic satisfaction. The technique proposed here appears to be the current method of choice for IMF reconstruction in all cases where it is necessary to recreate or redefine it.