Assessing psychological and supportive care needs in glioma patients - feasibility study on the use of the Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form (SCNS-SF34-G) and the Supportive Care Needs Survey Screening Tool (SCNS-ST9) in clinical practice.

Neuro-oncological patients experience high symptom and psychosocial burden. The aim was to test feasibility and practicability of the Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form (SCNS-SF34-G) and the SCNS-Screening Tool (SCNS-ST9) to assess supportive care needs of neuro-oncological patients in clinical routine. A total of 173 patients, most with a primary diagnosis of high-grade glioma (81%), were assessed first using SCNS-SF34-G in comparison to two well-established patient-reported outcome measures, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQC30 + QLQ-BN20) and Distress Thermometer (DT). In a follow-up assessment, SCNS-ST9 was used in a subgroup (n = 90). Questionnaires were completed either with personal guidance offered (group A) or by patients alone (group B). Feasibility was compared between instruments and groups for possible associations with patient and treatment-related factors. Missing values occurred in similar frequencies in all instruments. Errors in completion occurred in SCNS-SF34-G in 20% and in SCNS-ST9 in 16%; difficulties in completion were observed more often in SCNS-SF34-G and SCNS-ST9 (39%) compared to DT and EORTC (13%, p < .001). Distress was found to be associated with difficulties in completion of SCNS (OR 1.4, [95% CI 1.1-1.9], p = .013). SCNS-SF34 and SCNS-ST9 are suitable tools for glioma patients as long as personal guidance is offered.

Does size matter? Minimally invasive approach in pediatric neurosurgery--a review of 125 minimally invasive surgeries in children: clinical history and operative results.

OBJECTIVE: Surgery is an integral component and typically the first line of therapy for children with central nervous system tumors. Conventional aims of neurosurgery including tumor removal, management of hydrocephalus, and diagnostic sampling have been radically modified with innovative technologies such as navigational guidance, functional mapping, endoscopic surgery, second-look surgery, and physiologic imaging. The aim of the study was to investigate our operative results using minimally invasive technique in children. METHODS: Clinical features, surgical technique and results, length of hospital stay, and complications were reviewed retrospectively. Pre- and early postoperative MRI was evaluated for degree of surgical resection. Correlation of tumor localization, lengths of hospital stay as well as surgical techniques and clinical outcome with follow-up was investigated. RESULTS: One hundred ten patients underwent 125 tumor resections using minimally invasive approaches (image- and functional guided tailored keyhole approaches for supratentorial, retrosigmoidal, and suboccipital keyhole approaches for infratentorial lesions). Most tumors were located supratentorial (62.4 %). In 29.6 % of the cases, the surgery was performed endoscope-assisted or endoscope-controlled; neuronavigation was used in 45.6 % and ultrasound in 24 % of the cases. Astrocytomas were diagnosed in 26.4 % of cases, ependymomas in 9.6 %, and medulloblastomas in 14.4 %. Gross total resection was achieved in 60.8 %. The most common complication was CSF fistula (n = 9), and the occurrence was significantly higher in younger children (p = 0.0001) and infratentorial located tumors (p = 0.02). Surgery for posterior fossa lesions was associated with a longer hospital stay (p = 0.02) compared to surgery of supratentorial lesions. Mean follow-up was 29.7 months (range 0.3-79.1 months), and most of the children recovered during the further course of the follow-up (symptoms better or idem in 74.4 %). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our study shows that it is possible to achieve surgical results in the pediatric population applying minimal invasive techniques comparable to those described in the literature.

[Patient-centered care. Improvement of communication between university medical centers and general practitioners for patients in neuro-oncology]. / Patientenzentrierte Versorgung. Verbesserung der Kommunikation zwischen Universitätsklinik und Hausärzten bei neuroonkologischen Patienten.

INTRODUCTION: Communication between university medical centers and general practitioners (GP) is becoming increasingly more important in supportive patient care. A survey among GPs was performed with the primary objective to assess their opinion on current workflow and communication between GPs and the university medical center. METHODS: The GPs were asked to score (grades 1-6) their opinion on the current interdisciplinary workflow in the care of patients with brain tumors, thereby rating communication between a university medical center in general and the neuro-oncology outpatient center in particular. RESULTS: Questionnaires were sent to1000 GPs and the response rate was 15 %. The mean scored evaluation of the university medical center in general was 2.62 and of the neuro-oncological outpatient clinic 2.28 (range 1-6). The most often mentioned issues to be improved were easier/early telephone information (44 %) and a constantly available contact person (49 %). Interestingly, > 60 % of the GPs indicated they would support web-based tumor boards for interdisciplinary and palliative neuro-oncological care. CONCLUSION: As interdisciplinary care for neuro-oncology patients is an essential part of therapy, improvement of communication between GPs and university medical centers is indispensable. Integrating currently available electronic platforms under data protection aspects into neuro-oncological palliative care could be an interesting tool in order to establish healthcare networks and could find acceptance with GPs.

Postsurgical screening for psychosocial disorders in neurooncological patients.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of a brain tumor can cause severe psychosocial distress, which can have a variety of negative consequences on patients' physical and mental well-being. The detection of psychosocial distress in daily clinical routine is difficult and subsequent referral to mental health professionals is rare. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of psychological disorders of patients early postoperatively and to investigate both the Hornheide Screening Instrument (HSI) and Distress Thermometer (DT) as screening tools in neurooncological practice. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-four patients with brain tumors of different histology were postoperatively evaluated by the Distress Thermometer and Hornheide Screening Instrument. Additionally, correlation to gender, age, localization of the tumor, Karnofsky performance score and tumor entity were analyzed. RESULTS: After initial surgery 36 patients (26.9 %) showed pathologic results in the HSI and 50 patients (36.7 %) were severely distressed (DT Score≥6). Women had the highest rate of psychological disorders, followed by patients suffering from gliomas and meningiomas. Further highlighting the results of both tests, over 80 % of those patients who scored pathologically in both tests were in need of professional psychiatric help due to depression. CONCLUSION: Both the DT and HSI are suitable instruments for identifying patients in psychological distress after brain tumor surgery in neurooncological routine. Our results confirm that nearly one third of patients are unable to overcome the difficulties facing the diagnosis of a brain tumor in this early situation and should be supported by mental health professionals.