"A very difficult conversation": Challenges and opportunities for improvement in pediatric oncology clinician communication about late effects.

OBJECTIVES: Current approaches to communicating the potential late effects of pediatric oncology treatments leave many patients and families feeling unaware of risks and unprepared for the future. We aimed to identify provider perspectives on early communication about late effects. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with pediatric oncology providers at Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center from December 2021 to March 2022. Purposeful sampling ensured a diversity of clinical roles. Thematic analysis was conducted using deductive and inductive codes. RESULTS: We interviewed nine pediatric oncology providers; all expressed discomfort discussing potential late effects in early treatment conversations. Barriers to late effects communication included (i) social-emotional factors, including lack of perceived importance to families, worry about emotional burden on families, and provider feelings of helplessness/wanting to provide hope; and (ii) suboptimal set-up/resources, including limitations of consent forms, time constraints, and lack of available data. All providers supported the creation of a communication tool to assist early discussions of late effects. CONCLUSIONS: Communicating about late effect risks poses unique challenges to providers because of the perceived impact on families and the limitations of current practices and available resources. These findings support the need for a late effects communication tool to assist in early communication about late effects risks.

A nursing perspective on inpatient sleep and circadian disruptions for pediatric stem cell transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Children treated with stem cell transplant (SCT) are routinely hospitalized for long periods where they are exposed to significant sleep and circadian disruptions. As nurses play a primary role in symptom management during SCT, we sought to understand their perspective on patient sleep and circadian disruptions, perceived barriers to a good sleep and circadian environment, and suggestions for improvement. PROCEDURE: Four focus groups were conducted with pediatric SCT nurses (N = 25 participants). A semistructured focus group guide was administered, with the discussions recorded and transcribed. A multistage thematic analysis combining prefigured and emergent dimensions was conducted. Our analysis focused on drawing comparisons within and across focus groups to understand the unique work experiences that participants had related to the patient's sleep and circadian environment. RESULTS: Three key themes emerged. First, nurses expressed a high awareness of how disruptive the hospital environment is for patients. Second, nurses described their extensive efforts to try to minimize the impact of these disruptions. Finally, they provided clear recommendations for how to improve upon these concerns, along with barriers that they perceive could impede implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Front-line caregivers on a pediatric SCT unit describe key contributors to sleep/circadian disturbances for patients. Within the constraints of the considerable medical needs of this patient population and the physical room/hospital environment, nurses strive to minimize these disruptions to the best of their ability. It is crucial that hospitals assess and remediate these disturbances for these children that have important implications for overall health.

Experience and Needs of Patients With Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer and Their Caregivers: A Qualitative Study.

PURPOSE: The incidence of young-onset colorectal cancer (YOCRC; defined as patients who are diagnosed with CRC before age 50 years) is rising rapidly, and CRC is predicted to be the leading cause of cancer death in this age group by 2030. Yet, there has been limited research into the experiences and needs of patients with YOCRC and their caregivers. The goal of this study was to better understand the experiences and needs of patients with YOCRC and their caregivers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Semistructured focus groups were conducted with patients with YOCRC, caregivers of patients with YOCRC, and bereaved caregivers of patients with YOCRC. Focus group discussion guides addressed the experience and impact of diagnosis and treatment of YOCRC. Results were analyzed using a thematic analysis informed by framework analysis. RESULTS: Twenty patients and caregivers participated in three focus groups (eight patients, seven caregivers, and five bereaved caregivers). Four primary themes were identified: (1) feeling overwhelmed by the health care system and desiring patient navigation; (2) feeling isolated and wanting opportunities for peer support; (3) life disruption because of difficulty juggling multiple roles and desiring psychosocial support; and (4) enthusiasm about participation in research and genetic testing. CONCLUSION: This study identified and described the unique experiences and care needs of patients with YOCRC and their caregivers. The findings provide evidence that specialized models of care are needed. The results of this study informed the development of a center dedicated to the care of patients with YOCRC.