Evaluation of laparoscopic vs robotic partial nephrectomy using the margin, ischemia and complications score system: a retrospective single center analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate differences between Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy (LPN) and Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) using the Margin, Ischemia and Complications (MIC) score system and to evaluate factors related with MIC success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single centre retrospective study on 258 LPN and 58 RAPN performed between January 2012 and January 2014. Success was defined when surgical margins was negative, Warm Ischemia Time (WIT) was ≤ 20 minutes and no major complications occurred. Mann-Whitney-U and Pearson χ2 correlation were used to compare LPN and RAPN. A matched pair comparison was also performed. Spearman correlation (Rho) was used to evaluate the relationship between clinical, intra and post-operative and pathological patients characteristics with MIC score. A binary regression analysis was also performed to evaluate independent factors associated with MIC success. RESULTS: The MIC rate in LPN and RAPN was 55% and 65.5% respectively. No differences in clinical, intra and post-operative outcomes between groups were found. Clinical tumor size (p-value: < 0.001; OR: 0.829; 95% CI: 0.697-0.987), PADUA score (p-value: < 0.001; OR: 0.843; 95% CI: 0.740-0.960), PADUA risk groups (intermediate; p-value: < 0.001; OR: 0.416; 95% CI: 0.238- 0.792; high: p-value: < 0.001; OR: 0.356; 95% CI: 0.199- 0.636), WIT (p-value: < 0.001; OR: 0.598; 95% CI: 0.530- 0.675) were independently associated with MIC. eGFR (< 60 vs ≥ 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2: p-value: < 0.001; OR: 3.356; 95% CI: 1.701-6.621) and Fuhrman nuclear grade (p-value: 0.014; OR: 1.798; 95% CI:1.129-2.865) were also independently associated with MIC. CONCLUSIONS: MIC score system is a simple and useful tool to report and to compare different surgical approach.

Recurrence and progression in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables.

OBJECTIVES: It was the aim of this study to evaluate the recurrence and progression at 1, 3 and 5 years in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who underwent a transurethral resection of bladder cancer following intravesical adjuvant chemotherapy or immunotherapy if indicated and to compare them with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) risk tables. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2002 and 2011, a total of 259 patients with NMIBC were treated with transurethral resection of bladder cancer. According to the clinical and pathological factors used by the EORTC scoring system, the patients were divided into four groups, and for each group, the probabilities of recurrence and progression were calculated. RESULTS: The recurrence and progression rates of NMIBC of our patients were similar to those in the EORTC risk score system. Moreover, in our sample group, we found a minimally significant reduction in the recurrence rate in the intermediate- and high-risk groups. CONCLUSION: From the results obtained, we considered it essential to introduce the use of EORTC risk tables into our clinical practice to determine the recurrence and progression of NMIBC.

Operative profile, safety and functional outcomes after GreenLight laser prostate surgery: results from a 12 months follow-up multicenter Italian cohort analyses.

BACKGROUND: Over the two past decades, GreenLight laser therapy has been considered a valid alternative for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia/benign prostatic obstruction (BPH/BPO). However, the debate on the effectiveness of laser therapy compared to conventional techniques is still open. The aim of our study is to analyze and describe the use of GreenLight laser prostate surgery in Italy, with regard to the surgical techniques performed and the surgical and functional outcomes at mid-term follow-up. METHODS: From March 2012 to July 2018, patients who underwent GreenLight laser prostate surgery for LUTS due to BPH/BPO from 19 Italian centers were included. The following parameters were evaluated in the population: age, prostate volume, prostate adenoma volume, PSA tot, Qmax at uroflowmetry (UFM), International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS), previous therapy for LUTS, use of anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs. We recorded also the kind of anesthesia, mean laser time (min), mean irradiation time (min), TURP conversion/completion rate, postoperative day of catheter removal, postoperative acute urinary retention (AUR), hospital stay, variation of hematocrit (Ht) and hemoglobin levels (Hb). Early complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, the re-operation rate within 30 days and after 30 days, the late complications and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement were also collected. Changes over time in terms of blood loss and functional outcomes (IPSS and Qmax at the UFM at 6 and 12 months) were tested with Student's test for paired samples. We assumed P≤0.05 as level of statistical significance. RESULTS: Overall, 1077 were enrolled in the study, 554 (56.4%) were treated with standard vaporization and 523 (48.6%) with anatomical vaporization. Student's t-test for paired samples showed no statistically significant differences in terms of reduction of Ht preoperative vs. Ht postoperative (42.80±3.91 vs. 39.93±5.35 95% CI P=0.3) and preintervention and postintervention Hb levels (14.28±1.46 vs. 13.72 P=0.35). Compared with the preoperative Qmax (8.60±2.64), the 6- and 12-month UFM showed a significant improvement [19.56±6.29, P<0.01 and 19.99±5.92 P<0.01]. In terms of IPSS variation, compared to the baseline level (22±5.51) the 6- and 12-month follow-up confirmed a significant reduction (8.01±4.41 P<0.01 and 5.81±4.12 P<0.01 respectively). Postoperative complications were CD0, CD1, CD2, CD3, CD4 in 33.0%,35.3%, 2.9%, 0.3%, and 0.6%. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the most numerous surgical series of GreenLight laser vaporization and with the longest follow-up. This technique should be considered as a safe and effective alternative in the treatment of secondary LUTS to BPH.

GreenLight Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate: One Laser for Different Prostate Sizes.

Introduction: GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate (photoselective vaporization of the prostate [PVP]) is a safe and effective procedure for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Long-term results and advantages of PVP in patients with large and symptomatic prostate are still under evaluation. Materials and Methods: In a multicenter experience, patients who underwent standard or anatomical PVP were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with follow-up >12 months were divided into two groups based on prostate volume (<100 cc vs ≥100 cc). Pre- and perioperative data, as well as postoperative results and complications, were recorded after 3, 6, and 12 months and then annually. Results: One thousand and thirty-one patients were eligible, 916 of these had a prostate volume of <100 cc and 115 ≥ 100 cc. Median follow-up period was 25.0 months (interquartile range [IQR] 16.5-35.0) and 16.0 months (IQR 12.0-24.0) in ≥100 and <100 groups, respectively. No difference was found in terms of catheterization time, postoperative stay, and postoperative acute urine retention. Patients with prostate ≥100 required longer operative time (75 vs 55 minutes), lasing time (41.7 vs 24.9 minutes), and higher energy used but lower energy density. Patients with prostate ≥100 had a higher incidence of early (50.4% vs 35.7%) and late complications (21.7% vs 12.8%) and early urge/incontinence symptoms (40.9% vs 29.3%). No statistically significant differences were found for the maximum urinary flow (Qmax) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) results between the two groups. The reintervention rate in ≥100 group was 3.5% vs 2.3% in <100. Conclusions: In the midterm follow-up, GreenLight PVP guarantees the same results in different prostate volume groups. Early and late complications are more frequent in large prostates.

Evaluation of PADUA score as predictor of Warm Ischemia Time (WIT) during Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy (LPN).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of Preoperative Aspects and Dimension Used for an Anatomical (PADUA) classification in the prediction of Warm Ischemia Time (WIT) during Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy (LPN). METHODS: Single centre retrospective study on 402 patients who underwent LPN between January 2011 and October 2013. WIT was correlated with each characteristics of the PADUA classification. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to evaluated the independent predictive risk factors of WIT >20 minutes. RESULTS: The median WIT was 19.8 minutes (IQR 15-25). The PADUA risk groups (High vs Low: OR: 2.804; 95% CI 1.155-6.806; p-value <0.001; Intermediate vs Low: OR 0.971; 95% CI 0.185-5.092 p-value <0.001) and PADUA score as continuous variable (OR: 1.512; 95% CI 1.043-2.194; p-value <0.001) were the best independent risk factors of WIT >20 minutes. Another important factor related with WIT >20 minutes was a CKD stage 3 (p-value: 0.047; OR: 0.528; 95% CI:0.282-0.990). CONCLUSIONS: This study reveal that tumor' anatomical aspects may influence the WIT. The use of the nephrometry scoring systems should to be use by the surgeon in the planning of nephron sparing surgery (NSS) and should be considered for its inclusion in international guidelines.

Neoadjuvant sunitinib effectiveness in T4 renal clear cell carcinoma: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Sunitinib therapy showed an improvement in survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 51-year-old man, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Score (ECOG) of 0, presented at our Institute in March 2012 for macrohematuria and urinary retention. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen showed a right renal lesion. The lesion had a diameter of 15 cm and was developing towards the liver, in the absence of cleavage planes between the liver and kidney. A 12 mm finding, suspected as secondary lesion, was detected at the level of the VII hepatic segment. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with Sunitinib was proposed. RESULTS: The patient underwent a ultrasound-guided biopsy, which confirmed the presence of Clear Cell Carcinoma. The patient began chemotherapy treatment in May 2012 according to the scheme SUNITINIB 50 mg daily for 4 weeks every 6 weeks. After four courses of treatment, according to RECIST criteria for solid tumors, 40% (9 cm vs 15 cm) regression of the primary tumor and 33% (8 mm vs 12 mm) regression of the secondary lesion were observed at a CT scan of the abdomen. In February 2013, Laparoscopic Adrenal-Sparing Radical Nephrectomy was performed. At a follow-up of 3 months, performed with a thorax and abdomen CT scans, there was a complete remission of hepatic secondary lesion and no areas of secondary localization of disease. CONCLUSION: This case report showed the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with Sunitinib. The use of this chemotherapy agent can change the approach to the management of cRCC.