The psychological impact of surrogacy on the families of gestational surrogates: implications for clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the psychological impact of gestational surrogacy on surrogates' families. BACKGROUND: ASRM practice committee guidelines recommend that psychological counseling prior to surrogacy include consideration of a surrogate's own family, but there has been little research to help guide mental health professionals (MHPs) providing implications counseling. METHODS: Fifty-nine family members from 16 surrogate families were recruited and data were collected on family relationships, child psychological well-being, and family experiences of surrogacy. Family members filled out a series of questionnaires based on their age and role in the family system. RESULTS: Participants included 16 surrogates (28 surrogate pregnancies) with an average time since first surrogate pregnancy = 2.93 years (range = 0-8 years). Overall, families of surrogates are functioning well across a number of psychological domains. There were some differences between surrogates and spouses regarding their perceptions of their children's experience. A small number of children reported negative emotions about surrogacy and more research is needed to identify which children may be at risk. Children reported surrogacy having a positive impact on their lives and endorsed both pride and excitement about their mother being a surrogate. CONCLUSIONS: There has been limited data to inform MHPs tasked with implications counseling prior to surrogacy in offering guidance to surrogates' family members to help prepare them for the experience. This data can be used by MHPs providing implications counseling to help facilitate discussions about the potential impact of surrogacy tohelp ensure positive psychological outcomes for surrogates and their family members.

Clinical considerations in the psychological evaluation of gestational surrogates: uses of narrative assessment.

Potential risks and ethical considerations inherent in surrogacy arrangements place tremendous responsibility on mental health professionals performing the necessary assessments, yet there is little discussion and no consensus on the best testing protocol. In the U.S., the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) and the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) are the most common psychological measures used to screen gestational surrogates (GSs), although these self-report symptom inventories reveal tendencies to underreport, deny problems and present positive impressions that may conceal important clinical information. This study examines the utility of a multi-method approach in the psychological evaluation of GS candidates. A total of 43 women cleared to be GSs completed the PAI and an abbreviated protocol of a narrative construction assessment measure (The Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)) as part of the psychological screening process. Findings of the study show that utilising a multi-method approach in the psychological consideration of a GS can address the limitations inherent in a single-measure assessment approach. Including a narrative measure such as the TAT that is less affected by defensiveness found on self-report scales may allow for more subtleties in interpretation, helping assessors to identify women who may have particular psychological vulnerabilities. These might then be addressed through implications counselling.

Psychological assessment of gestational carrier candidates: current approaches, challenges, and future considerations.

The role of a mental health professional (MHP) in the psychological assessment of gestational carrier (GC) candidates has evolved over time, with clinical practices well established in the United States. Current ASRM guidelines recommend that all GC candidates undergo a psychosocial consultation and psychological testing (where deemed appropriate). Practice standards are relatively consistent among mental health disciplines, with assessments typically involving a clinical interview and the administration of a single, objective, self-report personality inventory. Although recent studies have established normative data for GCs, there has been little research into which assessment protocols are best suited to answer the referral questions of interest. Current challenges for MHPs placed in a gate-keeping role include providing a thorough screening using measures that typically yield defensive profiles that make them difficult to interpret. Research is emerging that suggests that using a multimethod approach in the psychological assessment of GCs may yield a more comprehensive psychological profile of GC candidates. This could allow MHPs to determine psychological appropriateness with more confidence and contribute additional data to be used in pre-surrogacy counseling. Assessing the psychological appropriateness of a woman to serve as a GC is a complex process, and there are a multitude of factors that must be considered, not the least of which are the psychological well-being of a potential GC, her partner, and her children throughout the process and beyond.

Impact on survivors of retinoblastoma when informed of study results on risk of second cancers.

BACKGROUND: To assess the impact of providing research feedback to retinoblastoma survivors or their parents regarding the risk of second cancers. PROCEDURE: A four-page survey was sent to 801 retinoblastoma survivors and 55 parents to ascertain their reactions to a "results-letter." The "results-letter" provided feedback from a study indicating that retinoblastoma survivors may be at increased risk of second cancers. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty-nine (339) retinoblastoma survivors and 43 parents responded to the survey. Eighty-four percent (84%) of respondents found the "results-letter" "very" to "extremely" understandable and 72% found it "very" to "extremely" useful. Participants scored "very" to "extremely" to the following emotions: frightened = 28%, anxious = 27%, sad = 25%, overwhelmed = 15%, angry = 11%, and guilty = 6%. Five (1.4%) respondents stated that they would have preferred not to receive the results. Responses did not vary significantly between survivors with different risks of second cancers. No significant differences were observed between males and females. However, parents were significantly more likely to report feelings of anxiety, guilt, anger, being overwhelmed, and frightened compared to adult retinoblastoma survivors (P < 0.05). Individuals with less than a college education were significantly more sad, angry, overwhelmed, and frightened by the information than individuals with a college degree or higher (P < 0.05). Eighteen percent (18%) of all respondents shared the feedback with their physician. The method of choice for receiving results was by letter with contact names and phone numbers. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that research participants want feedback even when the information is upsetting. Additional studies are needed to identify individuals who experience greater levels of distress following feedback in an attempt to provide improved methods of feedback and support.