Creation of an Application to Increase Surgical Resident Operative Case Coverage.

PURPOSE: Studies have shown that the confidence of surgical residents to perform procedures after completing residency can be affected by their volume of operative experiences. Many surgical residencies span multiple hospitals with a multitude of attendings providing additional educational opportunities available via cross-coverage. This study aims to evaluate the use of a mobile application (app) for operative cross-coverage to improve surgical opportunities in a large surgical residency program and decrease the number of uncovered cases. METHODS: An app allowing for uncovered cases to be sent to all surgical residents was used starting March 2022. A survey was completed by residents pre- and postapp implementation. A retrospective chart review was conducted of all general surgery procedures at the 2 major hospital systems 4 months before and after implementation to evaluate resident case coverage. RESULTS: In the preapp survey, 71% (27/38) of residents noted cross-covering 1 or more cases a month with 90% (34/38) reporting, they were unaware of all cases available. In the postapp survey, 100% of residents reported better awareness of available cases, 97% (35/36) reported uncovered cases were more easily accessible, 100% felt the app simplified finding coverage, and 100% wanted to continue the app long-term. On retrospective review, 7210 cases were identified in the preapp and postapp period with an increased volume of cases in the postapp period. After implementation of the case coverage app, there was a significant increase in total case coverage (p = <0.001) as well as a significant increase in coverage of endoscopic (p = 0.007), laparoscopic (p = 0.025), open (p = 0.015) and robotic cases (p = <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the impact that technological innovation can play in the education and operative experiences of surgical residents. This can be used to improve operative experiences of residents in various surgical fields in any training program throughout the country.

Equivalent Operative Outcomes for Emergency Colon Cancer Resections Among Acute Care Surgeons and Specialists in Colorectal Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Improved screening has decreased but not eliminated the need for emergent surgery for colon cancer (CC), many of which are performed by acute care surgery (ACS) surgeons. This retrospective review compares outcomes for CC resections on the ACS service to the surgical oncology and colorectal services (SO/CRS). METHODS: Retrospective review was performed for CC operations between 2014 and 2019. Data for margin status, cancer stage, number of lymph nodes dissected, time to medical oncology follow-up, and time to initiation of chemotherapy were collected. Patients with curative resection, who chose comfort care, presented on alternative services or with non-CC indications as well as those were lost to follow-up were excluded. RESULTS: 36 ACS patients and 269 SO/CRS patients underwent CC resections. Most ACS patients presented emergently compared to the SO/CC group (83.3% vs 1%, P < .05) as well as with more advanced tumor stage. There were no statistically significant differences for presence of metastatic disease, number of lymph nodes obtained, or time to post-surgical care (in days) and chemotherapy initiation (in days). 3 (8%) EGS patients had positive margins compared to 6 (2%) CRS/SO patients due to the presence of perforated tumors in the ACS group (p < .05). There were no statistically significant differences in 30- day or 1-year mortality despite the emergent presentation of the ACS patients. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that despite emergent presentation and advanced disease burden, ACS surgeons provide quality care to CC patients, both in the operating room and in coordination of care.