Higher vs Standard Adalimumab Induction Dosing Regimens and Two Maintenance Strategies: Randomized SERENE CD Trial Results.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Dose-optimization strategies for biologic therapies in Crohn's disease (CD) are not well established. The SERENE CD (Study of a Novel Approach to Induction and Maintenance Dosing With Adalimumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease) trial evaluated higher vs standard adalimumab induction dosing and clinically adjusted (CA) vs therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) maintenance strategies in patients with moderately to severely active CD. METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial, eligible adults (Crohn's Disease Activity Index score of 220-450, endoscopic evidence of mucosal inflammation, and previous failure of standard therapies) were randomized to higher induction regimen (adalimumab 160 mg at weeks 0, 1, 2, and 3; n = 308) or standard induction regimen (adalimumab 160 mg at week 0 and 80 mg at week 2; n = 206) followed by 40 mg every other week from week 4 onward. Co-primary end points included clinical remission at week 4 and endoscopic response at week 12. At week 12, patients were re-randomized to maintenance therapy optimized by Crohn's Disease Activity Index and C-reactive protein (CA; n = 92) or serum adalimumab concentrations and/or clinical criteria (TDM; n = 92); exploratory end points were evaluated at week 56. RESULTS: Similar proportions of patients receiving higher induction regimen and standard induction regimen achieved clinical remission at week 4 (44% in both; P = .939) and endoscopic response at week 12 (43% vs 39%, respectively, P = .462). Week 56 efficacy was similar between CA and TDM. Safety profiles were comparable between dosing regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Higher induction regimen was not superior to standard induction regimen, and CA and TDM maintenance strategies were similarly efficacious. Adalimumab therapy was well tolerated, and no new safety concerns were identified. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT02065570).

Higher vs Standard Adalimumab Induction and Maintenance Dosing Regimens for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: SERENE UC Trial Results.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: SERENE UC (Study of a Novel Approach to Induction and Maintenance Dosing With Adalimumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis) evaluated the efficacy of higher adalimumab induction and maintenance dose regimens in patients with ulcerative colitis. METHODS: This phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial included induction and maintenance studies, with a main study (ex-Japan) and Japan substudy. Eligible patients (18-75 years, full Mayo score 6-12, centrally read endoscopy subscore 2-3) were randomized 3:2 to higher induction regimen (adalimumab 160 mg at weeks 0, 1, 2, and 3) or standard induction regimen (160 mg at week 0 and 80 mg at week 2); all received 40 mg at weeks 4 and 6. At week 8, all patients were rerandomized 2:2:1 (main study) to 40 mg every week (ew), 40 mg every other week (eow), or exploratory therapeutic drug monitoring; or 1:1 (Japan substudy) to 40 mg ew or 40 mg eow maintenance regimens. RESULTS: In the main study, 13.3% vs 10.9% of patients receiving the higher induction regimen vs standard induction regimen achieved clinical remission (full Mayo score ≤2 with no subscore >1) at week 8 (induction primary end point; P = .265); among week-8 responders, 39.5% vs 29.0% receiving 40 mg ew vs 40 mg eow achieved clinical remission at week 52 (maintenance primary end point; P = .069). In the integrated (main + Japan) population, 41.1% vs 30.1% of week-8 responders receiving 40 mg ew vs 40 mg eow achieved clinical remission at week 52 (nominal P = .045). Safety profiles were comparable between dosing regimens. CONCLUSION: Although primary end points were not met, a >10% absolute difference in clinical remission was demonstrated with higher adalimumab maintenance dosing. Higher dosing regimens were generally well tolerated and consistent with the known safety profile of adalimumab in ulcerative colitis. CLINICALTRIALS: gov, Number: NCT002209456.

Effect of tight control management on Crohn's disease (CALM): a multicentre, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers of intestinal inflammation, such as faecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein, have been recommended for monitoring patients with Crohn's disease, but whether their use in treatment decisions improves outcomes is unknown. We aimed to compare endoscopic and clinical outcomes in patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease who were managed with a tight control algorithm, using clinical symptoms and biomarkers, versus patients managed with a clinical management algorithm. METHODS: CALM was an open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 study, done in 22 countries at 74 hospitals and outpatient centres, which evaluated adult patients (aged 18-75 years) with active endoscopic Crohn's disease (Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity [CDEIS] >6; sum of CDEIS subscores of >6 in one or more segments with ulcers), a Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) of 150-450 depending on dose of prednisone at baseline, and no previous use of immunomodulators or biologics. Patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to tight control or clinical management groups, stratified by smoking status (yes or no), weight (<70 kg or ≥70 kg), and disease duration (≤2 years or >2 years) after 8 weeks of prednisone induction therapy, or earlier if they had active disease. In both groups, treatment was escalated in a stepwise manner, from no treatment, to adalimumab induction followed by adalimumab every other week, adalimumab every week, and lastly to both weekly adalimumab and daily azathioprine. This escalation was based on meeting treatment failure criteria, which differed between groups (tight control group before and after random assignment: faecal calprotectin ≥250 µg/g, C-reactive protein ≥5mg/L, CDAI ≥150, or prednisone use in the previous week; clinical management group before random assignment: CDAI decrease of <70 points compared with baseline or CDAI >200; clinical management group after random assignment: CDAI decrease of <100 points compared with baseline or CDAI ≥200, or prednisone use in the previous week). De-escalation was possible for patients receiving weekly adalimumab and azathioprine or weekly adalimumab alone if failure criteria were not met. The primary endpoint was mucosal healing (CDEIS <4) with absence of deep ulcers 48 weeks after randomisation. Primary and safety analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This trial has been completed, and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01235689. FINDINGS: Between Feb 11, 2011, and Nov 3, 2016, 244 patients (mean disease duration: clinical management group, 0·9 years [SD 1·7]; tight control group, 1·0 year [2·3]) were randomly assigned to monitoring groups (n=122 per group). 29 (24%) patients in the clinical management group and 32 (26%) patients in the tight control group discontinued the study, mostly because of adverse events. A significantly higher proportion of patients in the tight control group achieved the primary endpoint at week 48 (56 [46%] of 122 patients) than in the clinical management group (37 [30%] of 122 patients), with a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test-adjusted risk difference of 16·1% (95% CI 3·9-28·3; p=0·010). 105 (86%) of 122 patients in the tight control group and 100 (82%) of 122 patients in the clinical management group reported treatment-emergent adverse events; no treatment-related deaths occurred. The most common adverse events were nausea (21 [17%] of 122 patients), nasopharyngitis (18 [15%]), and headache (18 [15%]) in the tight control group, and worsening Crohn's disease (35 [29%] of 122 patients), arthralgia (19 [16%]), and nasopharyngitis (18 [15%]) in the clinical management group. INTERPRETATION: CALM is the first study to show that timely escalation with an anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy on the basis of clinical symptoms combined with biomarkers in patients with early Crohn's disease results in better clinical and endoscopic outcomes than symptom-driven decisions alone. Future studies should assess the effects of such a strategy on long-term outcomes such as bowel damage, surgeries, hospital admissions, and disability. FUNDING: AbbVie.

Lymphoma Risk and Overall Safety Profile of Adalimumab in Patients With Crohn's Disease With up to 6 Years of Follow-Up in the Pyramid Registry.

OBJECTIVES: Real-world, prospective, long-term studies in Crohn's disease (CD) characterizing adalimumab safety data and lymphoma risk were lacking. We present the final results from the PYRAMID registry, which was designed to rule out a doubling of lymphoma risk in adalimumab-treated patients with CD. METHODS: Patients with moderately to severely active CD newly prescribed or currently receiving adalimumab according to local product labels were followed for up to 6 years and analyzed for adverse events (AEs). The registry exposure-adjusted observed rate of lymphoma was compared with the estimated background lymphoma rate from a sex-matched general population in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 17 Registry database adjusted for anticipated prior or concurrent thiopurine use in a CD population. RESULTS: A total of 5025 patients were evaluated (16680.4 PY of adalimumab registry exposure, ≈3 years/patient mean follow-up). Registry treatment-emergent AEs included 4129 serious AEs (n = 1853 [36.9%]; 24.8 E/100 PY), 792 serious infections (n = 556 [11.1%]; 4.7 E/100 PY), and 134 malignancies (n = 116 [2.3%]; 0.8 E/100 PY), including ten lymphomas. The observed lymphoma rate (0.060 E/100 PY) was lower than the estimated background rate (0.084 E/100 PY), and the upper bound of the one-sided 95% CI of the observed rate (0.102 E/100 PY) was lower than double the estimated rate (0.168 E/100 PY). CONCLUSIONS: PYRAMID is the longest prospective adalimumab study in routine clinical practice, with up to 6 years of follow-up. No new safety signals were reported. The pre-specified registry objective of ruling out a doubling of lymphoma risk with adalimumab was met.

Responsiveness of Endoscopic Indices of Disease Activity for Crohn's Disease.

OBJECTIVES: The Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) and the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) are commonly used to assess Crohn's disease (CD) activity; however neither instrument is fully validated. We evaluated the responsiveness to change of the SES-CD and CDEIS using data from a trial of adalimumab, a drug therapy of known efficacy. METHODS: Paired video recordings (N=112) of colonoscopies (baseline and week 8-12) obtained from patients with CD who participated in a trial of adalimumab therapy were reviewed in random order, in duplicate, by four central readers (56 pairs of videos by 2 groups of readers). Responsiveness of the SES-CD and the CDEIS was evaluated by comparing correlations between the observed and pre-specified predictions of change scores for these endoscopic indices with a global endoscopic evaluation of severity (GELS), a patient reported outcome (PRO2), and the Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI), and by calculation of the standardized effect size, and Guyatt's Responsiveness statistic (GRS) using 2 definitions of change; (1) treatment assignment and (2) an absolute change in total PRO2 of 50. The potential application of effect size estimates was demonstrated by calculating hypothetical sample sizes for comparing two independent groups. The impact of removing stenosis as an index item and adjusting for the number of segments observed was also assessed. RESULTS: Changes in both endoscopic instruments and the GELS were highly correlated. The SES-CD displayed numerically higher effect sizes for both definitions of change. The standardized effect size and GRS estimates (95% confidence interval) for the SES-CD based on treatment assignment were 0.84 (0.53, 1.15) and 0.79 (0.48, 1.09). Corresponding values for the CDEIS were 0.72 (0.42, 1.02) and 0.75 (0.45, 1.06). The standardized effect size and GRS estimates for the SES-CD based on an absolute change in total PRO2 of 50 points or greater were 0.76 (0.49, 1.02) and 0.93 (0.64, 1.21). Corresponding values for CDEIS were 0.70 (0.44, 0.97), 0.83 (0.55, 1.10). Removal of stenosis as an index item and adjusting for observed segments did not improve responsiveness estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Although both the SES-CD and CDEIS are valid measures of endoscopic disease activity that are moderately responsive to changes in endoscopic disease activity, the SES-CD displayed numerically greater responsiveness in this data set.

Crohn's Disease Activity and Concomitant Immunosuppressants Affect the Risk of Serious and Opportunistic Infections in Patients Treated With Adalimumab.

OBJECTIVES: Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) drugs are commonly used to treat moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD). Both the activity of CD and the concomitant immunosuppressants (corticosteroids and immunomodulators) used with anti-TNF drugs could increase the risk of infection. We determined the relative risk of serious and opportunistic infections associated with increasing disease activity and concomitant immunomodulators and corticosteroids in patients with CD treated with adalimumab. METHODS: This pooled analysis identified incident treatment-emergent serious and opportunistic infections among patients with CD in clinical trials of adalimumab. Disease activity was assessed with the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI). RESULTS: The analysis included 2,266 patients treated with adalimumab with median age 35 years. Higher disease activity was associated with significantly increased risks of both serious and opportunistic infections at 1 year, with each 100-point increase in CDAI associated with a >30% increased risk of each type of infection. Concomitant use of immunomodulators was associated with a significant >3-fold decreased risk of serious infection (hazard ratio (HR) 0.29 (0.08-0.98), P=0.045) by 1 year. Concomitant use of corticosteroids was associated with a significantly increased risk of serious infection by day 120 (HR 2.40 (1.33-4.35), P=0.004). Concomitant use of either category of immmunosuppressant was associated with numerically higher rates of opportunistic infection, 40% of which were due to herpes zoster, compared with adalimumab monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Higher disease activity in CD is associated with significantly increased risks of both serious and opportunistic infections. In addition to corticosteroid-sparing strategies, consideration should be given to expanding herpes zoster vaccination guidelines to include younger patients.

Increased risk of malignancy with adalimumab combination therapy, compared with monotherapy, for Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Few studies have assessed the risk of malignancy from anti-tumor necrosis factor monotherapy or combination therapy for Crohn's disease (CD). We determined the relative risk of malignancy in patients with CD who received adalimumab monotherapy, compared with the general population. We also compared the risk of malignancy associated with combination adalimumab and immunomodulator therapy with that of adalimumab monotherapy. METHODS: We performed a pooled analysis of data from 1594 patients with CD who participated in clinical trials of adalimumab (CLASSIC I and II, CHARM, GAIN, EXTEND, and ADHERE studies; 3050 patient-years of exposure). We calculated rates of malignancy among patients; the expected rates of malignancy, based on the general population, were derived from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry and National Cancer Institute survey. RESULTS: Compared with the general population, patients receiving adalimumab monotherapy did not have a greater than expected incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) or other cancers, whereas those receiving combination therapy had a greater than expected incidence of malignancies other than NMSC (standardized incidence ratio, 3.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.66-5.10) and of NMSC (standardized incidence ratio, 4.59; 95% CI, 2.51-7.70). Compared with patients receiving adalimumab monotherapy, those patients receiving combination therapy had an increased risk of malignancy other than NMSC (relative risk, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.07-7.44) and of NMSC (relative risk, 3.46; 95% CI, 1.08-11.06). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CD, the incidence of malignancy with adalimumab monotherapy was not greater than that of the general population. Co-administration of immunomodulator therapy and adalimumab was associated with an increased risk of NMSC and other cancers.

Adalimumab for the treatment of Japanese patients with intestinal Behçet's disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Behçet's disease is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory disease that can involve the mouth, skin, eyes, genitals, and intestines. Active intestinal Behçet's disease can be complicated by gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and perforation. We performed a multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against tumor necrosis factor α, in patients with intestinal Behçet's disease who were refractory to corticosteroid and/or immunomodulator therapies. METHODS: The study was conducted at 12 sites in Japan, from November 2010 through October 2012. Twenty patients were given 160 mg adalimumab at the start of the study and 80 mg 2 weeks later, followed by 40 mg every other week for 52 weeks; for some patients, the dose was increased to 80 mg every other week. A composite efficacy index, combining GI symptom and endoscopic assessments, was used to evaluate efficacy. The primary efficacy end point was the percentage of patients with scores of 1 or lower for GI symptom and endoscopic assessments at week 24. Secondary end points included complete remission and resolution of non-GI Behçet's-related symptoms. RESULTS: Nine patients (45%) had GI symptom and endoscopic assessment scores of 1 or lower at week 24 of treatment, and 12 patients (60%) had these scores by week 52. Four patients (20%) achieved complete remission at weeks 24 and 52. Individual global GI symptom and endoscopic scores improved for most patients at weeks 24 and 52. Two thirds of patients with oral aphthous ulcers, skin symptoms, and genital ulcers, and 88% of patients with erythema nodosum had complete resolution of these conditions at week 52. A total of 9 of 13 patients (69%) taking steroids at baseline were able to taper (n = 1) or completely discontinue steroids (n = 8) during the study. No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab is a potentially effective treatment for intestinal Behçet's disease in Japanese patients who are refractory to conventional treatments. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01243671.

Adalimumab induces deep remission in patients with Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with moderate to severe ileocolonic Crohn's disease (CD) who received adalimumab induction and maintenance therapy had greater rates of mucosal healing than patients who received placebo after adalimumab induction therapy in a 52-week trial (EXTend the Safety and Efficacy of Adalimumab Through ENDoscopic Healing). We investigated whether this treatment also induced deep remission-a composite clinical and endoscopic end point. METHODS: Rates of deep remission, defined as the absence of mucosal ulceration and CD Activity Index scores less than 150, were compared between patients given continuous adalimumab and those given only induction therapy followed by placebo. We assessed the relationships between deep remission and other outcomes among patients who received adalimumab. The outcomes of patients with deep remission were compared with those of patients with only the absence of mucosal ulceration or only clinical remission. RESULTS: Rates of deep remission were 16% in patients given adalimumab vs 10% in those given placebo (P = .34) at week 12, and 19% vs 0% (P < .001) at week 52. Rates of deep remission were greatest among patients who received adalimumab and had CD for 2 years or less (33% at weeks 12 and 52). At week 52, patients who achieved deep remission at week 12 required significantly fewer adalimumab treatment adjustments, hospitalizations, and CD-related surgeries; had significantly less activity impairment; and had better quality of life and physical function compared with patients not achieving deep remission. Deep remission generally was associated with better outcomes than only an absence of mucosal ulceration; outcomes of patients with deep remission vs only clinical remission were similar. Deep remission was associated with estimated total cost savings of $10,360 (from weeks 12 through 52) compared with lack of deep remission. CONCLUSIONS: In an exploratory study of patients with moderate to severe ileocolonic CD who received adalimumab induction and maintenance therapy, patients achieving deep remission appeared to have better 1-year outcomes than those not achieving deep remission. These findings should be validated in large, prospective trials. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00348283.

Four-year maintenance treatment with adalimumab in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: Data from ULTRA 1, 2, and 3.

OBJECTIVES: The safety and efficacy of adalimumab for patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) has been reported up to week 52 from the placebo-controlled trials ULTRA (Ulcerative Colitis Long-Term Remission and Maintenance with Adalimumab) 1 and 2. Up to 4 years of data for adalimumab-treated patients from ULTRA 1, 2, and the open-label extension ULTRA 3 are presented. METHODS: Remission per partial Mayo score, remission per Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) score, and mucosal healing rates were assessed in adalimumab-randomized patients from ULTRA 1 and 2 up to week 208. Corticosteroid-free remission was assessed in adalimumab-randomized patients who used corticosteroids at lead-in study baseline. Maintenance of remission per partial Mayo score and mucosal healing was assessed in patients who entered ULTRA 3 in remission per full Mayo score and with mucosal healing, respectively. As observed, last observation carried forward (LOCF) and nonresponder imputation (NRI) were used to report efficacy. Adverse events were reported for any adalimumab-treated patient. RESULTS: A total of 600/1,094 patients enrolled in ULTRA 1 or 2 were randomized to receive adalimumab and included in the intent-to-treat analyses of the studies. Of these, 199 patients remained on adalimumab after 4 years of follow-up. Rates of remission per partial Mayo score, remission per IBDQ score, mucosal healing, and corticosteroid discontinuation at week 208 were 24.7%, 26.3%, 27.7% (NRI), and 59.2% (observed), respectively. Of the patients who were followed up in ULTRA 3 (588/1,094), a total of 360 patients remained on adalimumab 3 years later. Remission per partial Mayo score and mucosal healing after ULTRA 1 or 2 to year 3 of ULTRA 3 were maintained by 63.6% and 59.9% of patients, respectively (NRI). Adverse event rates were stable over time. CONCLUSIONS: Remission, mucosal healing, and improved quality of life were maintained in patients with moderately to severely active UC with long-term adalimumab therapy, for up to 4 years. No new safety signals were reported.

Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in Chinese patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease: results from a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Efficacy of adalimumab in Crohn's disease (CD) has not been shown in China. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab in Chinese patients with CD. METHODS: This 26-week, multicenter, phase III study evaluated patients with moderately to severely active CD and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (⩾3 mg/l) who were naïve to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy. Patients were randomized to double-blind adalimumab 160/80 mg at weeks 0/2 and 40 mg at weeks 4/6 or placebo at weeks 0/2 followed by blinded adalimumab 160/80 mg at weeks 4/6. At week 8, all patients received open-label 40 mg adalimumab every other week through week 26. The primary endpoint was clinical remission [CD activity index (CDAI) <150] at week 4. Clinical remission at week 26 was assessed in week-8 responders (decrease in CDAI ⩾70 points at week 8 from baseline) and compared with a clinically meaningful threshold of 30%. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study. RESULTS: At baseline, 205 patients were enrolled, with mean [standard deviation (SD)] age of 32.9 (9.9) years and CD duration of 2.7 (3.0) years. At week 4, 38/102 patients (37%) receiving adalimumab and 7/103 (7%) receiving placebo (p < 0.001) achieved clinical remission. Among week-8 responders, 93/144 (65%) achieved clinical remission at week 26 (p < 0.001). No unexpected AEs and no malignancies, active tuberculosis, or deaths were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab induced and maintained remission in Chinese patients with CD. Safety results were consistent with the known safety profile of adalimumab. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02499783.

The effects of concomitant immunomodulators on the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of adalimumab in paediatric patients with Crohn's disease: a post hoc analysis.

BACKGROUND: In the IMAgINE 1 study, adalimumab induced and maintained remission of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease in children. AIM: To assess the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and safety of immunomodulator and adalimumab combination therapy vs adalimumab monotherapy in paediatric patients with Crohn's disease. METHODS: Patients 6-17 years old with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (n = 192) received weight-based adalimumab induction at baseline and week 2. At week 4, 188 patients were randomised to high-dose or low-dose adalimumab. Patients receiving immunomodulators (investigator's decision) at baseline maintained a stable dose until week 26; patients could then discontinue immunomodulators. Adalimumab serum concentrations were measured at weeks 4, 26 and 52. Safety was evaluated at each study visit. Data were analysed using non-responder imputation (NRI; week 4) or modified NRI (weeks 26; 52). RESULTS: At week 4, patients with (n = 117) and without (n = 71) baseline immunomodulator use had similar response (79%; 87%; P = 0.235) and remission (26%; 30%; P = 0.737) rates. At week 26, patients with and without baseline immunomodulators had no significant difference in response (68%; 55%; P = 0.086) or remission (41%; 30%; P = 0.122). At week 52, patients with (n = 82) and without (n = 106) immunomodulator use had no significant difference in response (56%; 46%; P = 0.189) or remission (38%; 33%; P = 0.539). Adalimumab serum trough concentrations and serious infection rates (7%; 6%) were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Analyses found no statistically significant difference in response or remission between patients receiving adalimumab monotherapy vs immunomodulator and adalimumab combination therapy. Serious and infectious adverse event rates were similar between groups.

Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab by Disease Duration: Analysis of Pooled Data From Crohn's Disease Studies.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Analyses of Crohn's Disease [CD] studies of anti-TNF agents, including adalimumab, have reported higher remission rates among patients with shorter disease duration. To further explore the relationship between disease duration and clinical efficacy, we analysed a larger patient cohort. METHODS: Data were pooled from 10 clinical trials in patients with moderately to severely active CD who received treatment with either adalimumab or placebo. Analyses of efficacy using Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] endpoints [remission, clinical response [CR]-70, CR-100, patient-reported outcome [PRO] remission] or Harvey-Bradshaw Index [HBI] endpoints [remission/response] were conducted for induction and maintenance treatment periods. Logistic regression was used for comparisons between adalimumab and placebo treatment. Cochran-Armitage trend tests were used for comparisons between disease-duration subgroups [<1 year, ≥1-<2 years, 2-≤5 years, and >5 years]. RESULTS: During induction, the proportion of patients achieving CDAI remission was higher in adalimumab- versus placebo-treated patients [p <0.001] and was highest [adalimumab: 45.8%] in the <1 year subgroup compared with longer disease-duration subgroups [≥1-<2 years: 31.0%; 2-≤5 years: 23.1%; >5 years: 23.6%, Cochran-Armitage p = 0.026]. In the majority of maintenance treatment analyses, patients with <1 year disease duration had the highest efficacy responses, with statistically significant differences in remission rates across disease-duration subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrates that earlier initiation of adalimumab treatment shortly after diagnosis in patients with moderately to severely active CD leads to improved long-term clinical outcomes.

Adalimumab Effectiveness Up to Six Years in Adalimumab-naïve Patients with Crohn's Disease: Results of the PYRAMID Registry.

BACKGROUND: PYRAMID was an international multicenter, noninterventional, postmarketing registry assessing long-term safety and effectiveness of adalimumab (Humira), as used in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Adult patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease with or without prior adalimumab experience were enrolled in the registry and followed for up to 6 years. Effectiveness measurements included the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA, a composite of Harvey Bradshaw Index [HBI] and rectal bleeding score), clinical remission (HBI < 5), Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire. Data were reported for adalimumab-naïve patients and analyzed by baseline immunomodulator use and disease duration. RESULTS: This study evaluated 2057 adalimumab-naïve patients. Mean PGA improved from 7.5 (baseline) to 3.9 (year 1) and 3.3 (year 6). The proportion of patients in HBI remission increased from 29% (573 of 1969; baseline) to 68% (900 of 1331; year 1) and 75% (625 of 831; year 6). Patients stratified by baseline immunomodulator use had similar HBI remission rates; patients with disease duration <2 years achieved numerically higher HBI remission rates than patients with longer disease duration. Patient-reported SIBDQ and WPAI scores improved at year 1; all WPAI subscore improvements were clinically meaningful (≥7% point change) at year 1 and maintained through year 6. Serious infections were reported in 11.1% of patients; incidence rates of malignancies, lymphoma, and demyelinating disorders were low. CONCLUSION: Adalimumab therapy, as used in routine clinical practice, improved physician-reported and patient-reported disease outcomes and remission rates for up to 6 years. No new safety signals were observed.

Challenges in IBD Research: Pragmatic Clinical Research.

Pragmatic clinical research is part of five focus areas of the Challenges in IBD research document, which also includes preclinical human IBD mechanisms, environmental triggers, novel technologies, and precision medicine. The Challenges in IBD research document provides a comprehensive overview of current gaps in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) research and delivers actionable approaches to address them. It is the result of multidisciplinary input from scientists, clinicians, patients, and funders, and represents a valuable resource for patient centric research prioritization. In particular, the pragmatic clinical research section is focused on highlighting gaps that need to be addressed in order to optimize and standardize IBD care. Identified gaps include: 1) understanding the incidence and prevalence of IBD; 2) evaluating medication positioning to increase therapeutic effectiveness; 3) understanding the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM); 4) studying pain management; and 5) understanding healthcare economics and resources utilization. To address these gaps, there is a need to emphasize the use of emerging data sources and real-world evidence to better understand epidemiologic and therapeutic trends in IBD, expanding on existing data to better understand how and where we should improve care. Proposed approaches include epidemiological studies in ethnically and geographically diverse cohorts to estimate incidence and prevalence of IBD and impact of diversity on treatment patterns and outcomes. The implementation of new clinical trial design and methodologies will be essential to evaluate optimal medication positioning, appropriate use of TDM in adults and children, and multidisciplinary approaches to IBD pain management and its impact on healthcare resources.

Adalimumab Reduces Extraintestinal Manifestations in Patients with Crohn's Disease: A Pooled Analysis of 11 Clinical Studies.

INTRODUCTION: Extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) are common and associated with additional morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of adalimumab therapy on EIM resolution and identify potential predictors of EIM resolution in adult and pediatric patients with moderate to severe CD. METHODS: EIM data were pooled from 11 induction, maintenance, and open-label extension studies of adalimumab. Resolution of EIMs was evaluated at approximately 6 months and 1 year. Median time to initial EIM resolution and first EIM recurrence (reflecting durable resolution) of any EIM and specific categories of EIMs (arthritis/arthralgia, ocular, cutaneous) were calculated. A Cox model was used to determine predictors of initial and durable EIM resolution. RESULTS: At baseline, 54% (1137/2094) of patients receiving adalimumab and 51% (297/586) receiving placebo had EIMs. EIM resolution occurred in a significantly greater proportion of adalimumab versus placebo patients at 6 months (54% vs 31%; P < .001) and 1 year (60% vs 42%; P = .008). Median time to initial resolution of any EIM, arthritis/arthralgia, and cutaneous EIMs was significantly shorter in patients receiving adalimumab versus placebo. Durable resolution of any EIM and arthritis/arthralgia was significantly longer for patients receiving adalimumab versus placebo. Clinically meaningful predictors of EIM resolution included adalimumab treatment, male sex, and moderate (versus severe) disease activity at baseline. CONCLUSION: Adalimumab is effective for achieving initial and durable resolution of any EIM and, in particular, arthritis/arthralgia in patients with moderate to severe CD. Predictors of EIM resolution included adalimumab treatment and moderate disease severity. FUNDING: AbbVie.

Performance of Crohn's disease Clinical Trial Endpoints based upon Different Cutoffs for Patient Reported Outcomes or Endoscopic Activity: Analysis of EXTEND Data.

Background: Clinical trial endpoints for Crohn's disease (CD) activity correlate poorly with mucosal inflammation; to assess treatment efficacy, patient-reported outcomes and endoscopic assessments are preferred. This study assessed the impact on treatment efficacy estimations of using different definitions of clinical and endoscopic remission and endoscopic response, and of using site- or central-based endoscopy evaluation. Methods: This post hoc analysis of data fromEXTEND (extend the safety and efficacy of adalimumab through endoscopic healing), a placebo (PBO)-controlled, randomized trial of adalimumab (ADA) for mucosal healing, included adults with moderate-to-severe CD. Subsets of patients meeting specified Simplified Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) inclusion criteria, according to site or central reading, and baseline stool frequency (SF) and/or abdominal pain score (AP) thresholds were evaluated. Various endpoint definitions based on the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI), its SF and AP components, SES-CD, and composite endpoints were compared between treatment groups. Results: Increased stringency of Week 12 clinical endpoints compared to CDAI<150 to SF≤3.0/1.5&AP≤1.0 reduced PBO response rates by ≥12% and increased treatment effects by ≤10%. Amending the SES-CD endpoint from ≤4 to ≤2 reduced the treatment effect from 24% to 8%. Composite endpoints further diminished response rates and effect sizes. Site-based evaluation was associated with lower remission rates versus central reading in the PBO group and, thus, greater ADA-related treatment effects. Conclusions: This analysis is the first to demonstrate that increasing the stringency of clinical and endoscopic endpoint definitions in CD trials, especially lowering SF or SES-CD definitions, reduces the ability to detect treatment-related change in CD activity; focus on endpoints that reflect clinical change is warranted.

Clinical Benefit of Long-Term Adalimumab Treatment in Patients With Crohn's Disease Following Loss of Response or Intolerance to Infliximab: 96-Week Efficacy Data From GAIN/ADHERE Trials.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In the 4-week GAIN clinical trial, adalimumab was efficacious in inducing remission in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease [CD] who had prior loss of response/intolerance to infliximab. The efficacy and safety of adalimumab in these patients are reported here for up to 96 weeks or for 3 years, respectively, in the ADHERE open-label extension study. METHODS: Patients who completed GAIN could enrol in ADHERE and receive open-label adalimumab 40 mg every other week. Efficacy variables included clinical response (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] decrease from baseline ≥70/≥100 points [CR-70/CR-100]) and remission [CDAI<150], steroid discontinuation and fistula remission [absence of drainage]. Data were reported using hybrid non-responder imputation [hNRI], last observation carried forward and as-observed analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed by randomized group in GAIN and by Week 4 efficacy in GAIN. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 310 patients from GAIN enrolled in ADHERE. CR-70, CR-100 and remission rates at Week 96 were 39.0%, 35.5%, and 26.5% [hNRI], respectively. Of the patients with CR-70 response or remission at Week 4 of GAIN, 45.5% and 44.4% [hNRI], respectively, maintained the effect at Week 96. Steroid discontinuation and steroid-free remission rates increased from Week 12 to 96 in patients using corticosteroids at GAIN baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term adalimumab maintenance therapy led to sustained clinical remission and response, and steroid discontinuation in a considerable proportion of patients with CD previously treated with infliximab. No new safety signals were observed in this patient population.