Two-year retention rate of golimumab in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: data from the LORHEN registry.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to provide data on golimumab real-life use in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) from a multicentre observational registry of Northern Italy. METHODS: We extracted data of patients who started treatment with golimumab from October 2010, and who had at least one follow-up visit. Data were analysed until a maximum follow-up of 24 months. The two-year retention rate in the three diseases was assessed with Kaplan-Meier estimators. To compare crude survival between diagnoses and lines of treatment we used the log-rank test, while Cox proportional hazard models were used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: Overall, 410 subjects were included: 180 patients with RA, 110 with PsA and 120 with AS. The two-year retention rate of patients with RA was 47.3%, 48% for PsA, and 62.8% for AS. Crude survival on treatment of patients with AS was significantly higher than that of RA patients (p=0.032), while no significant difference was found between AS and PsA and between RA and PsA. In patients with RA, subjects treated with concomitant sDMARDs showed a lower discontinuation rate than those receiving golimumab alone. The comparison between first and second line of treatment groups did not show any significant difference in mean survival time in patients with RA, PsA and AS. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of real-life data on two-year survival on treatment with golimumab in RA, PsA and AS. Golimumab showed a similar retention rate when given as first or second line of treatment.

Factors influencing the choice of first- and second-line biologic therapy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: real-life data from the Italian LORHEN Registry.

According to international recommendations, the selection of the biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is mainly left to the clinician's preference. We analyzed the real-life factors influencing the first-line choice or the switching strategy, focusing on the prescription of abatacept (ABA) or tocilizumab (TCZ) compared to TNFα inhibitors (TNFi). Patients enrolled in the Lombardy Rheumatology Network (LORHEN) Registry after January 1, 2010, when all considered bDMARD agents were available, were included. The population was divided into "first-" and "second-line" bDMARD. We included 1910 patients (first line n = 1264, second line n = 646). Age was higher in ABA or TCZ vs TNFi treated patients (p < 0.0001). Positive latent tuberculosis screening was associated with first-line ABA (p = 0.002). Methotrexate (MTX) combination therapy was lower in the TCZ group (p = 0.02). The type (dyslipidemia, hypertension, pulmonary disease) and the number of comorbidities influenced the choice towards ABA (p = 0.01). Multinomial logistic regression demonstrated that a second-line treatment, higher age, dyslipidemia, pulmonary disease, other comorbidities, and extra-articular RA manifestations were associated with ABA compared to TNFi. TCZ was associated with a second-line treatment, higher age, and more severe disease activity. Stopping the first bDMARD due to adverse events (AE) influenced the choice towards ABA. In real life, higher age and comorbidities influence the choice towards ABA and TCZ compared to TNFi. ABA was preferred in case of suspension of previous treatments due to AE. After failing a first-line TNFi, swapping to a different mechanism of action is more common.

Use of ultrasound in treatment decisions for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an observational study in Italy.

In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), treatment response is generally assessed using standard clinical disease activity measures. However, ultrasound has become increasingly popular among rheumatologists to monitor disease activity and response. The purpose of this analysis of ECOgraphic evaluation for STaging ARthritis (ECOSTAR) study data was to determine how ultrasound affects clinicians' decisions about changing treatment in RA. ECOSTAR was an observational, cohort study conducted between March 2010 and December 2012 at nine clinical centers in Italy in RA patients being considered for treatment change. After clinical evaluation of each patient, patients underwent diagnostic ultrasound (US) investigations and each patient was given a total echography score using a combination of scores for joint effusion, synovial hypertrophy, and power Doppler. The US results were provided to the clinicians and the influence of US on the clinicians' treatment choices were recorded. Ninety-five patients screened for study inclusion had confirmed RA (mean age 53.9 years; mean disease duration 8.9 years). Therapy changes were made by clinicians according to the hand and wrist joint US scores: score 0 appeared to have no influence on clinicians' decision to modify treatment, scores >0-3 were associated with a numerically higher estimated probability of not changing therapy than changing therapy, and scores >3 had a greater influence on the clinician to modify therapy and an increased probability of the clinician changing therapy versus not changing therapy. Ultrasonography scores appear to influence treatment decisions in patients with RA, with clinicians appearing less likely to alter treatment regimens in patients with low ultrasound scores and more likely to change treatment regimens when higher scores are obtained. Further research is warranted.