Obesity and immune-checkpoint inhibitors in advanced melanoma: A meta-analysis of survival outcomes from clinical studies.

Obesity is a chronic inflammatory condition that has been associated with different types of cancer. However, its role in melanoma incidence, progression, and response to immune-checkpoint-inhibitors (ICI) is still controversial. On the one hand, increased levels of lipids and adipokines can promote tumor proliferation and several genes associated with fatty acid metabolism have been found to be upregulated in melanomas. On the other hand, immunotherapy seems to be more effective in obese animal models, presumably due to an increase in CD8 + and subsequent decrease in PD-1 + T-cells in the tumor microenvironment. In humans, several studies have investigated the role of BMI (body mass index) and other adiposity-related parameters as potential prognostic markers of survival in advanced melanoma patients treated with ICI. The aim of this research has been to systematically review the scientific literature on studies evaluating the relationship between overweight/obesity and survival outcomes in patients with advanced melanoma treated with ICI and to perform a meta-analysis on those sharing common characteristics. After screening 1070 records identified through a literature search, 18 articles assessing the role of BMI-related exposure in relation to survival outcomes in ICI-treated patients with advanced melanoma were included in our review. In the meta-analysis of the association between overweight (defined as BMI>25 or BMI 25-30), overall survival (OS), and progression free survival (PFS), 7 studies were included, yielding a summary HR of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.74-1.03) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.86-1.08), respectively. Our results show that, despite few suggestive findings, the use of BMI as a valuable predictor of melanoma patients' survival in terms of PFS and OS should not be currently recommended, due to the limited evidence available.

Synchronous occurrence of primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma and cutaneous Rosai-Dorfman disease in distinct lesions: A unique association.

Rosai-Dorfman disease, also known as sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy (SHML), is a rare subtype of reactive histiocytosis which is seldom associated with Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. To date, the coexistence in the same patient of extra nodal SHML and primary cutaneous B-cell lymphoma (PCBCL) has been reported in the literature, as metachronous diagnosis in the anatomical area of the original PCBCL or synchronous occurrence in the same lesions. However, no data have been published as for synchronous occurrence of the two pathological entities in distinct anatomical sites. Herein, we report the first ever described synchronous occurrence of PCBCL and SHML, detected in distinct lesions, affecting the same patient. The complete resolution of the patient's PCBCL after rituximab treatment and the concomitant regression of SHML suggest that this clinically benign reactive histiocytic proliferation, potentially triggered by the lymphoma microenvironment itself, may take place not only in the site of the PCBCL lesion, but also in other distant areas not directly affected by the primary cutaneous lymphoma.

Predictors of Recurrence and Progression in Poorly Differentiated Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinomas: Insights from a Real-Life Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Surgery represents the primary treatment option for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) aiming for complete tumor resection (R0). Recurrence and metastasis significantly affect survival and outcomes, and poorly differentiated (G3) cSCC is associated with a higher risk of recurrence. However, the specific clinical and histopathological features that predict recurrence and progression in G3-cSCC remain unclear. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a series of patients with primary G3-cSCC diagnosed at the Turin University Hospital between January 2016 and January 2021. After independent histological revision, logistic regression models were used to identify clinico-pathological predictors of cutaneous recurrence, lymphnode/metastatic progression, and both types of progression. RESULTS: Among the 161 G3-cSCC patients, 80.1% (129/161) showed no signs of local recurrence or metastatic progression, while 19.9% (32 patients) had progressed. In the univariate logistic regression, tumor clinical diameter, depth of infiltration (DOI), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were identified as significant predictors across the various types of progression (p < 0.05). In the context of multivariate logistic regression, distinct models proved to be significant. For skin recurrence, a 3-variable model incorporating DOI (OR 1.16, 95% CI, 1.01-1.35, p = 0.050), LVI (OR 3.61, 95% CI, 1.11-11.8, p = 0.034), and desmoplasia (OR 3.45, 95% CI, 1.25-9.5, p = 0.017) was selected. Regarding lymphnode/metastatic progression, a 3-variable model combining pT2 (OR 6.10, 95% CI, 1.15-32.35, p = 0.034), pT3 (OR 14.33, 95% CI, 2.79-73.63, p = 0.001), and LVI (OR 3.86, 95% CI, 1.10-13.62, p = 0.036) was identified. Lastly, a 2-variable model for both types of progression consisted of vertical tumor thickness (OR 5.45, 95% CI, 1.11-27.32, p = 0.039) and LVI (OR 1.15, 95% CI, 1.04-1.26, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Tumor size, DOI, and LVI were significant predictors of recurrence and metastatic progression. Notably, the size of histologically defined tumor-free margins did not affect the risk of recurrence, whilst LVI emerged as a key predictor of all forms of progression. These findings provide insights into risk stratification and suggest that close monitoring and potential adjuvant therapies, such as radiation therapy, may be necessary especially for patients with lymphovascular involvement.

Association between maternal dupilumab exposure and pregnancy outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A nationwide retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There is limited epidemiological evidence on outcomes associated with dupilumab exposure during pregnancy; monitoring pregnancy outcomes in large populations is required. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential association between exposure to dupilumab in pregnant women with atopic dermatitis and any adverse pregnancy, neonatal, congenital and post-partum outcomes. METHODS: We performed a multicentre retrospective cohort study across 19 Italian tertiary referral hospital. Childbearing women were eligible if aged 18-49 years and carried out the pregnancy between 1 October 2018 and 1 September 2022. RESULTS: We retrospectively screened records of 5062 patients receiving dupilumab regardless of age and gender, identifying 951 female atopic dermatitis patients of childbearing age, 29 of whom had been exposed to the drug during pregnancy (3%). The median duration of dupilumab treatment prior to conception was 22.5 weeks (range: 3-118). The median time of exposure to the drug during pregnancy was 6 weeks (range: 2-24). All the documented pregnancies were unplanned, and the drug was discontinued in all cases once pregnancy status was reported. The comparison of the study cohort and the control group found no significant drug-associated risk for adverse pregnancy, congenital, neonatal or post-partum outcomes. The absence of a statistically significant effect of exposure on the event was confirmed by bivariate analysis and multivariate analysis adjusted for other confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: This cohort of pregnant patients exposed to dupilumab adds to the existing evidence concerning the safety of biologic agents in pregnancy. No safety issues were identified regarding the primary outcome assessed. In clinical practice, these data provide reassurance in case of dupilumab exposure during the first trimester. However, the continuous use of dupilumab throughout pregnancy warrants further research.

Identifying unmet needs and challenges in the definition of a plaque in mycosis fungoides: An EORTC-CLTG/ISCL survey.

BACKGROUND: Consensus about the definition and classification of 'plaque' in mycosis fungoides is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To delineate a comprehensive view on how the 'plaque' entity is defined and managed in clinical practice; to evaluate whether the current positioning of plaques in the TNMB classification is adequate. METHODS: A 12-item survey was circulated within a selected panel of 22 experts (pathologists, dermatologists, haematologists and oncologists), members of the EORTC and International Society for Cutaneous Lymphoma. The questionnaire discussed clinical and histopathological definitions of plaques and its relationship with staging and treatment. RESULTS: Total consensus and very high agreement rates were reached in 33.3% of questions, as all panellists regularly check for the presence of plaques, agree to evaluate the presence of plaques as a potential separate T class, and concur on the important distinction between plaque and patch for the management of early-stage MF. High agreement was reached in 41.7% of questions, since more than 50% of the responders use Olsen's definition of plaque, recommend the distinction between thin/thick plaques, and agree on performing a biopsy on the most infiltrated/indurated lesion. High divergence rates (25%) were reported regarding the possibility of a clinically based distinction between thin and thick plaques and the role of histopathology to plaque definition. CONCLUSIONS: The definition of 'plaque' is commonly perceived as a clinical entity and its integration with histopathological features is generally reserved to specific cases. To date, no consensus is achieved as for the exact definition of thin and thick plaques and current positioning of plaques within the TNMB system is considered clinically inadequate. Prospective studies evaluating the role of histopathological parameters and other biomarkers, as well as promising diagnostic tools, such as US/RM imaging and high-throughput blood sequencing, are much needed to fully integrate current clinical definitions with more objective parameters.

Switching from adalimumab originator to biosimilars in hidradenitis suppurativa: What's beyond cost-effectiveness?

In the last years, adalimumab biosimilars have represented a commonly used alternative to the originator agent in the treatment of moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa. As of today, studies investigating the switch from adalimumab originator to biosimilar, following pharmacoeconomic policies, are lacking. Herein we present a real-life setting retrospective study aimed at assessing the safety and efficacy of this switch in 37 patients, evaluated for 12 months in terms of IHS4 (International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System) and HiSCR (Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response). Overall, no significant differences emerge between adalimumab originator and biosimilar in terms of clinical response following non-medical switch. High discontinuation rates (43.2%) raise questions on patients' compliance to the new drug regimen, as severe pain at the injection site represents a substantial cause of biosimilar discontinuation (i.e., 31.5% of the cases). In selected cases, rechallenge with adalimumab originator may represent a valid option, as 66.6% (n = 8) of the patients who switched back to the former agent have benefited in terms of tolerability and efficacy. Carefully integrating pharmacoeconomic policies with a thorough assessment regarding the benefit-risk ratio of a nonmedical switch from originator to biosimilars remains essential to provide each HS patient with the best therapeutic option.

Retinoid-associated myopia in dermatologic patients: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Systemic retinoids are among the most prescribed drugs in dermatology, thanks to their activity as proliferation modulators and keratinisation normalisers. Common side effects such as blood lipid disorders, xerosis and photosensitivity are well established and usually dose dependent. Conversely, retinoid-associated ocular disturbances have been reported, yet with differences in terms of frequency and manifestations As data regarding a potential correlation with refractive errors are heterogenous and have not been previously thoroughly addressed, we performed a systematic review of the literature with the aim of comprehensively evaluating the current evidence regarding retinoid-associated myopia in dermatologic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was carried out according to the PRISMA guidelines. A search on MEDLINE, Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane Library was conducted using the MeSH terms: retinoid, isotretinoin, acitretin, bexarotene, etretinate, alitretinoin, myopia, refractive errors, via the Boolean term AND. Only manuscripts in English were considered, there was no restriction on type of article. Animal research and in vitro studies were excluded. RESULTS: Six articles were finally included in this systematic review. One well designed prospective study was able to show a slight myopic shift in the first six months, but id did not evaluate further development of the refractive error nor the effects of drug discontinuation. Another prospective study, with a smaller sample size showed no myopic progression at 12 months. Two case reports showed a myopic shift after two weeks from therapy start. Another case report showed a myopic shift associated with narrowing of the anterior chamber after one week from therapy start. Finally a large retrospective study based on spontaneous reporting systems and world's literature classified myopia as a certain side effect. CONCLUSION: Considering the current literature, it is not possible to define a clear correlation between the use of retinoids and the development or worsening of myopia. Some studies suggest that retinoids may cause a myopic shift and the pathophysiologyical mechanism is supported by some animal and in vitro studies, but there is a lack of large prospective and well-controlled studies. In case of ocular disturbances after retinoid use a prompt ophthalmological referral is advisable and in case of the detection of a myopic refractive error a relationship to retinoids should be ruled out, considering also other possible causes such as age and previous refractive status.