RESUMO
Risk assessments for human exposures to plant protection products (PPPs) have traditionally focussed on single routes of exposure and single compounds. Extensions to estimate aggregate (multi-source) and cumulative (multi-compound) exposure from PPPs present many new challenges and additional uncertainties that should be addressed as part of risk analysis and decision-making. A general approach is outlined for identifying and classifying the relevant uncertainties and variabilities. The implementation of uncertainty analysis within the MCRA software, developed as part of the EU-funded ACROPOLIS project to address some of these uncertainties, is demonstrated. An example is presented for dietary and non-dietary exposures to the triazole class of compounds. This demonstrates the chaining of models, linking variability and uncertainty generated from an external model for bystander exposure with variability and uncertainty in MCRA dietary exposure assessments. A new method is also presented for combining pesticide usage survey information with limited residue monitoring data, to address non-detect uncertainty. The results show that incorporating usage information reduces uncertainty in parameters of the residue distribution but that in this case quantifying uncertainty is not a priority, at least for UK grown crops. A general discussion of alternative approaches to treat uncertainty, either quantitatively or qualitatively, is included.
Assuntos
Dieta/efeitos adversos , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Contaminação de Alimentos , Modelos Estatísticos , Resíduos de Praguicidas/toxicidade , Praguicidas/toxicidade , Triazóis/toxicidade , Adulto , Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/toxicidade , Produtos Agrícolas/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Daucus carota/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Inquéritos sobre Dietas , Monitoramento Ambiental , Fazendeiros , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Raízes de Plantas/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Medição de Risco , Incerteza , Reino Unido , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The number of residue measurements in an individual field trial, carried out to provide data for a pesticide registration for a particular crop, is generally too small to estimate upper tails of the residue distribution for that crop with any certainty. We present a new method, using extreme value theory, which pools information from various field trials, with different crop and pesticide combinations, to provide a common model for the upper tails of residue distributions generally. The method can be used to improve the estimation of high quantiles of a particular residue distribution. It provides a flexible alternative to the direct fitting of a distribution to each individual dataset, and does not require strong distributional assumptions. By using a hierarchical Bayesian model, our method also accounts for parameter uncertainty. The method is applied to a range of supervised trials containing residues on individual items (e.g. on individual apples), and the results illustrate the variation in tail properties amongst all commodities and pesticides. The outputs could be used to select conservative high percentile residue levels as part of a deterministic risk assessment, taking account of the variability between crops and pesticides and also the uncertainty due to relatively small datasets.