Diagnostic performance of S100B as a rule-out test for intracranial pathology in head-injured patients presenting to the emergency department who meet NICE Head Injury Guideline criteria for CT-head scan.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury is a common ED presentation. CT-head utilisation is escalating, exacerbating resource pressure in the ED. The biomarker S100B could assist clinicians with CT-head decisions by excluding intracranial pathology. Diagnostic performance of S100B was assessed in patients meeting National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence Head Injury Guideline (NICE HIG) criteria for CT-head within 6 and 24 hours of injury. METHODS: This multicentre prospective observational study included adult patients presenting to the ED with head injuries between May 2020 and June 2021. Informed consent was obtained from patients meeting NICE HIG CT-head criteria. A venous blood sample was collected and serum was tested for S100B using a Cobas Elecsys-S100 module; >0.1 µg/mL was the threshold used to indicate a positive test. Intracranial pathology reported on CT-head scan by the duty radiologist was used as the reference standard to review diagnostic performance. RESULTS: This study included 265 patients of whom 35 (13.2%) had positive CT-head findings. Within 6 hours of injury, sensitivity of S100B was 93.8% (95% CI 69.8% to 99.8%) and specificity was 30.8% (22.6% to 40.0%). Negative predictive value (NPV) was 97.3% (95% CI 84.2% to 99.6%) and area under the curve (AUC) was 0.73 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.85; p=0.003). Within 24 hours of injury, sensitivity was 82.9% (95% CI 66.4% to 93.44%) and specificity was 43.0% (95% CI 36.6% to 49.7%). NPV was 94.29% (95% CI 88.7% to 97.2%) and AUC was 0.65 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.74; p=0.046). Theoretically, use of S100B as a rule-out test would have reduced CT-head scans by 27.1% (95% CI 18.9% to 36.8%) within 6 hours and 37.4% (95% CI 32.0% to 47.2%) within 24 hours. The risk of missing a significant injury with this approach would have been 0.75% (95% CI 0.0% to 2.2%) within 6 hours and 2.3% (95% CI 0.5% to 4.1%) within 24 hours. CONCLUSION: Within 6 hours of injury, S100B performed well as a diagnostic test to exclude significant intracranial pathology in low-risk patients presenting with head injury. In theory, if used in addition to NICE HIGs, CT-head rates could reduce by one-quarter with a potential miss rate of <1%.

Use of the Theoretical Domains Framework to explore factors influencing paediatric fever management practices and antipyretic use in New Zealand emergency departments.

AIM: To explore factors influencing fever management practices and antipyretic use among New Zealand Emergency Department (ED) doctors and nurses using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of doctors and nurses across 11 New Zealand EDs. The questionnaire examined eight of 12 TDF domains, based on a generic questionnaire validated to assess TDF-based determinants of health-care professional behaviour. Relevant domains were identified by the frequency of beliefs; the presence of conflicting beliefs within a domain; and the likely strength of impact of a belief on paediatric fever management in the ED. RESULTS: About 602 participants (243 doctors, 353 nurses and 6 unknown) completed the survey (response rate 47.5%). Over half (351/591, 59.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 55.5-63.5%) knew the content of clinical practice guidelines regarding antipyretic use in febrile children (TDF Domain Knowledge), or had been trained to ensure antipyretics are given to febrile children only if they appear distressed (347/592, 58.6%, 95% CI 54.5-62.6%) (Skills). Over 40% (246/590, 95% CI 37.7-45.8%) aim to reduce the fever before discharge (Goals). Most (444/591, 75.1%, 95% CI 71.4-78.6%) participants felt capable of explaining appropriate antipyretic use to parents/care givers (Beliefs about Capabilities). Only a minority (155/584, 26.5%, 95% CI 23.0-30.3%) thought that they can ensure antipyretics are given to febrile children only if they appear distressed when the ED is busy (Environmental Context and Resources). CONCLUSIONS: Using the TDF, we identified factors influencing fever management practices and antipyretic use in the ED. These factors can guide the design of targeted, theory-informed knowledge translation strategies.

Exaggerated blood pressure response to dynamic exercise despite chronic refractory hypotension: results of a human case study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic refractory hypotension is a rare but significant mortality risk in renal failure patients. Such aberrant physiology usually deems patient unfit for renal transplant surgery. Exercise stimulates the mechano-chemoreceptors in the skeletal muscle thereby modulating the sympathetic effects on blood pressure regulation. The haemodynamic response to dynamic exercise in such patients has not been previously investigated. We present a case with severe chronic hypotension who underwent exercise testing before and after renal transplantation, with marked differences in blood pressure response to exercise. CASE PRESENTATION: A 40-year old haemodialysis-dependent patient with a 2 year history of refractory hypotension (≤80/50 mmHg) was referred for living donor renal transplantation at our tertiary centre. Each dialysis session was often less than 2 h and 30 min due to symptomatic hypotension. As part of the cardiovascular assessment, she underwent haemodynamic evaluation with cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Blood pressure normalized during unloaded pedalling but was exaggerated at maximal workload whereby it rose from 82/50 mmHg to a peak of 201/120 mmHg. Transthoracic echocardiography, tonometric measure of central vascular compliance and myocardial perfusion scan were normal. She subsequently underwent an antibody-incompatible renal transplantation and was vasopressor reliant for 14 days during the post-operative period. Eight weeks following transplant, resting blood pressure was normal and a physiological exercise-haemodynamic response was observed during a repeat cardiopulmonary exercise testing. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the potential therapeutic role of unloaded leg cycling exercise during dialysis session to correct chronic hypotension, allowing patients to have greater tolerance to fluid shift. It also adds to existing evidence that sympathetic dysfunction is reversible with renal transplant. Furthermore chronic hypotension with preserved exercise-haemodynamic response and cardiovascular reserve should not preclude these patients from renal transplant surgery.

The effect of prior walking on coronary heart disease risk markers in South Asian and European men.

PURPOSE: Heart disease risk is elevated in South Asians possibly due to impaired postprandial metabolism. Running has been shown to induce greater reductions in postprandial lipaemia in South Asian than European men, but the effect of walking in South Asians is unknown. METHODS: Fifteen South Asian and 14 white European men aged 19-30 years completed two, 2-day trials in a randomised crossover design. On day 1, participants rested (control) or walked for 60 min at approximately 50 % maximum oxygen uptake (exercise). On day 2, participants rested and consumed two high-fat meals over a 9-h period during which 14 venous blood samples were collected. RESULTS: South Asians exhibited higher postprandial triacylglycerol [geometric mean (95 % confidence interval) 2.29 (1.82 to 2.89) vs. 1.54 (1.21 to 1.96) mmol L(-1) h(-1)], glucose [5.49 (5.21 to 5.79) vs. 5.05 (4.78 to 5.33) mmol L(-1) h(-1)], insulin [32.9 (25.7 to 42.1) vs. 18.3 (14.2 to 23.7) µU mL(-1) h(-1)] and interleukin-6 [2.44 (1.61 to 3.67) vs. 1.04 (0.68 to 1.59) pg mL(-1) h(-1)] than Europeans (all ES ≥ 0.72, P ≤ 0.03). Between-group differences in triacylglycerol, glucose and insulin were not significant after controlling for age and percentage body fat. Walking reduced postprandial triacylglycerol [1.79 (1.52 to 2.12) vs. 1.97 (1.67 to 2.33) mmol L(-1) h(-1)] and insulin [21.0 (17.0 to 26.0) vs. 28.7 (23.2 to 35.4) µU mL(-1) h(-1)] (all ES ≥ 0.23. P ≤ 0.01), but group differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Healthy South Asians exhibited impaired postprandial metabolism compared with white Europeans, but these differences were diminished after controlling for potential confounders. The small-moderate reduction in postprandial triacylglycerol and insulin after brisk walking was not different between the ethnicities.

What effect did the New Zealand COVID-19 lockdown have on computed tomography-head scan utilisation in patients presenting to the emergency department with traumatic head injuries?

OBJECTIVES: To explore the unique impact the first COVID-19 national lockdown in New Zealand (NZ) had on the utility of computed tomography (CT)-head scanning in patients presenting to the ED with head injuries. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of CT-head use in head-injured patients presenting to the ED during the 2020 COVID-19 lockdown compared to the corresponding time period in 2019. RESULTS: During the lockdown period in 2020, the total number of ED presentations reduced by 30.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 28.8-31.6) from 13 477 to 9403. The total number of head injury presentations also reduced by 32% (95% CI 27-36.7) from 523 to 356. The proportion of head-injured patients remained similar (3.9% [n = 523] in 2019 vs 3.8% [n = 356] in 2020). Of the head injured patients, 185 (51.9%, 95% CI 44.5-59.4) had CT-head scans performed in 2020 compared to 269 (51.4%, 95% CI 45.2-57.5) in 2019; a reduction of 31.2% (95% CI 24.5-37.9). The proportion of patients who had a CT-head scan remained similar (51.4% [95% CI 45.2-57.5] in 2019 vs 51.9% [95% CI 44.5-59.4] in 2020). There were no significant differences in the proportion of CT-head scans with acute traumatic pathology (13.0% [95% CI 8.7-17.3] in 2019 vs 12.4% [95% CI 7.4-17.5] in 2020, P = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: During the first COVID-19 lockdown in NZ, the total number of patients presenting to the ED decreased by one third. Reassuringly, the proportion of patients who presented with head injuries, had a CT-head scan performed, and had positive CT-head findings remained the same as the previous year.

Exploring the feasibility of smartglass facilitated remote supervision in the emergency department: A simulation study.

OBJECTIVE: Smartglasses are a wearable computer technology that has potential to facilitate remote supervision to junior doctors working in different clinical settings. The present study aimed to explore the feasibility of smartglass technology to enable remote supervision of junior clinicians by senior clinicians during emergency simulation scenarios. METHODS: This was a feasibility simulation study using high-fidelity mannequins and standardised patients. Trainee interns (TIs) and supervising clinicians (SCs) were invited to participate in two scenarios: a trauma case and a stroke case. There was a pre-sim questionnaire. The TI wore the smartglasses in a simulated ED bay and performed patient assessment and management. Remote supervision was provided by the SC via a livestream on a remote computer. Upon completion, participants completed a survey regarding their experience comprising of Likert scale and free-text questions. RESULTS: Fifteen TIs and 19 SCs participated. In general feedback from TIs and SCs was positive. TIs were able to identify and treat the key diagnostic problems set during the scenarios. Free-text survey responses provided specific feedback about what did and did not work when using the glasses. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that smartglasses facilitated remote assistance has promise as an emergent technology and warrants further investigation in simulated and non-simulated environments.

Evolving swabbing practices for COVID-19 in a New Zealand emergency department during the early stages of an emerging pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To review if tests for suspected COVID-19 were performed according to the Ministry of Health (MoH) case definitions, identify patterns associated with testing outside of the case definition, and discuss the potential impacts on hospital services. METHODS: This was a retrospective audit of patients presenting to the Wellington Hospital ED between 24 March 2020 and 27 April 2020 who were swabbed for COVID-19 in ED. Swabs were audited against the March 15th and April 8th MoH COVID-19 case definitions. RESULTS: Five hundred and thirty-six COVID-19 swabs for 518 patients were taken during the study period. There was poor alignment of testing with the March 15th case definition, with only 11.6% of the 164 swabs taken during this period meeting the case definition. Of the 145 swabs that did not meet the case definition, the majority (n = 119, 82.1%) met symptom criteria only. Alignment of testing with the wider April 8th case definition was much higher with 88.2% meeting criteria. Factors associated with being swabbed despite not meeting the case definitions included fever >38°, a diagnosis of cancer, subsequent hospital admission, and for the March case definition only 'contact with a traveller'. CONCLUSION: There were associations found between testing outside of criteria and specific variables potentially perceived as high-risk. Poor alignment of testing with case definitions can impact hospital services through the (mis)use of limited laboratory testing capacity and implications for resource management. Improved communication and feedback between clinicians and policymakers may improve case definition implementation in a clinical setting.

Is the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5th Edition a useful concussion assessment tool in head-injured patients presenting to the emergency department?

OBJECTIVE: Concussion is a common ED complaint, but diagnosis is challenging as there are no validated objective measures. Use of concussion tools derived from sports medicine is common, but these tools are not well validated in ED settings. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5th Edition (SCAT5) to identify concussion in ED patients presenting following head injury. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of head-injured adult patients presenting to ED between March and July 2021. ED diagnosis of concussion was used as the diagnostic standard, and we assessed the diagnostic performance of the SCAT5 test and its three subsections (Standardised Assessment of Concussion (SAC), Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS) and Modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS)) against this. RESULTS: Thirty-two head-injured participants were enrolled, 19 of whom had a discharge diagnosis of concussion, alongside 17 controls. Median time for SCAT5 testing was 21 (interquartile range 16-27) min. Fifteen (30.6%) participants were interrupted during testing. Area under the curve (AUC) (95% confidence interval) for the SAC, PCSS and mBESS were 0.51 (0.34-0.68), 0.92 (0.84-0.99) and 0.66 (0.47-0.85), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of sections were as follows: entire SCAT5 (100.0%, 20.0%), SAC (48.1%, 60.0%), PCSS (89.7%, 85.0%) and mBESS (83.3%, 58.8%). Using PCSS alone would have identified 17 of 19 concussions. CONCLUSION: The SCAT5 test had a low specificity, was long and was frequently interrupted. We suggest it is not an ideal assessment to use in ED. The PCSS score performed well and was easy to complete. It may be useful as a standalone tool to simplify ED concussion identification.

Cruise ship patient presentation, admission, and intervention rates to the emergency department.

AIMS: Patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) from cruise ships are a unique cohort of patients with several management challenges. Little evidence details the effect this has on EDs in terms of resource use. Therefore, we aimed to review the frequency, characteristics, admission, and intervention rates of cruise ship patient presentations to ED. METHODS: This retrospective study reviewed patient presentations to Wellington ED from cruise ships between 2016 and 2019. Data regarding presenting features, intervention and disposition were extracted via chart review. RESULTS: There were 214 patient presentations included with a median age of 68 (IQR 43.0-76.0); 97/214(45.3%) were female. Regarding referral, cruise ship doctors referred 79/214 (36.9%) patients; 16/79 (24.1%) to in-patient specialties and 63/79 (79.7%) to emergency medicine (EM); and 135/214 (63%) self-referred to ED. Common presenting complaints were chest pain, abdominal pain and trauma. Advanced imaging was requested for 21.5% of patients and 9.9% required urgent intervention. Regarding disposition, 38% were admitted (22% to in-patient wards, 16% to ED observation unit [OU]) and 61% were discharged (30% by ED and 31% after specialty consultation). CONCLUSION: Overall, the number of cruise ship patients presenting to the ED was low and unlikely to be a significant resource burden. Referrals by cruise ship doctors were appropriate. Education for cruise ship patients and port services regarding non-emergent care options would be valuable to reduce self-referral rates.

Exploring nursing and medical perceptions of sepsis management in a New Zealand emergency department: A qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: Early sepsis recognition and treatment are essential in order to reduce the burden of disease. Initial assessment of patients with infection is often undertaken by ED nurses and resident doctors. This descriptive qualitative study aimed to explore their perceptions and perspectives regarding the factors that impede the identification and management of patients with sepsis. METHODS: This was a qualitative study conducted between 30 January 2020 and 27 February 2020. Semi-structured focus group interviews were performed to collect data. All participants provided written informed consent and completed a basic demographic and work experience form. Two study investigators facilitated the interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded and later transcribed. Thematic analysis was performed with the aid of NVivo 12 software. RESULTS: Six focus group interviews were conducted involving 40 ED nurses and doctors. Interview length ranged from 27 to 38 min (mean 33.5 min). Three major themes were identified: (i) clinical management; (ii) challenges and delays; and (iii) communication. Each of these themes was broken down into subthemes, which are presented in more detail. CONCLUSION: ED nurses and doctors have identified important factors that limit and enhance their capacity to recognise and respond to patients with sepsis. Complex interactions exist between clinical and organisational structures that can affect the care of patients and the ability of clinicians to provide optimal care. The three major themes and specific subthemes provide a useful framework and stimulus for service improvements and research that could help foster future sepsis management improvement strategies.

Can serum biomarkers be used to rule out significant intracranial pathology in emergency department patients with mild traumatic brain injury? A Systemic Review & Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Interest has mounted into the use of objective clinical biomarkers for traumatic brain injury (TBI). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesise the existing evidence investigating the use of serum & plasma biomarkers to exclude significant intracranial injuries seen on CT head scans in patients that present to ED with TBI. METHODS: The primary outcome was to review the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity & specificity) of S100B, GFAP and UCH-L1 to exclude significant intracranial pathology on CT head scan in adults presenting with TBI. Secondary outcomes investigated biomarker performance at different time points, in isolated TBI and multi-trauma and with pre-specified cut offs. Systematic searches were conducted on MEDLINE ® (via PubMed), Cochrane electronic databases and EMBASE from 1st January 2000 until June 2020. Bias was assessed using QUADAS 2 tool. A narrative synthesis and meta-analysis were performed. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020212206. RESULTS: After screening, 22 papers were included. The total number of patients with TBI was 9,416. There was significant variation regarding study design, population selection and the clinical threshold/decision rule for CT head request. The diagnostic accuracy of S100B as measured by the range of individual sensitivities and specificities were 63-100% and 5-58%, respectively. Individual sensitivities and specificities for GFAP were 67-100% and 0-89% and for UCH-L1 were 61-100% and 21-63.7% respectively. When measured within 3 hours individual sensitivities & specificities for S100B were 98-100% & 20-58% respectively. The quality of evidence for the primary outcome overall was low. The quality of evidence was low for all secondary outcomes apart from studies that used a pre-specified cut off for S100B which had a moderate strength of evidence. CONCLUSION: The overall quality of evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy of single biomarkers as a rule out for significant intracranial injury seen on CT head scans in ED patients with TBI is low. Based on current evidence, S100B is the only single biomarker with a validated clinical platform, pre-determined cut off threshold and moderate quality evidence; at this stage making it the biomarker of choice. More robust clinical outcome and economic impact data is required to support its incorporation into clinical decision tools.

Paediatric fever management practices and antipyretic use among doctors and nurses in New Zealand emergency departments.

OBJECTIVES: To assess (i) paediatric fever management practices among New Zealand ED doctors and nurses, including adherence to best practice guidelines; and (ii) the acceptability of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of antipyretics for relief of discomfort in young children. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of doctors and nurses across 11 New Zealand EDs. The primary outcome of adherence to paediatric fever management best practice guidelines was assessed with clinical vignettes and defined as single antipyretic use for the relief of fever-related discomfort. RESULTS: Out of 602 participants (243 doctors, 353 nurses and six unknown; response rate 47.5%), only 64 (10.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.3-13.4%) demonstrated adherence to best practice guidelines. In a febrile settled child with normal fluid intake, the percentage of participants that would use antipyretics doubled with abnormal vital signs (33.7% vs 72.9%, difference -39.2%, 95% CI -44.4% to -34.0%). Most participants would use antipyretics for reduced fluid intake (n = 494, 82.1%, 95% CI 78.8-85.0%) in a febrile settled child. Over half (n = 339, 57.1%, 95% CI 53.0-61.1%) would advise giving antipyretics to prevent febrile convulsions. Most (n = 467, 80.0%, 95% CI 76.5-83.1%) participants agreed that a RCT of antipyretics in febrile children <2 years of age with relief of discomfort as a primary outcome is needed. CONCLUSIONS: Just over 10% of New Zealand ED doctors and nurses demonstrated adherence to paediatric fever management best practice guidelines. A RCT of antipyretics in febrile children <2 years of age specifically addressing relief of discomfort as a primary outcome is strongly supported.

Effect of simulation training on nurse leadership in a shared leadership model for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: Empowering a senior nurse in a shared leadership role has been proposed as a more efficient set up for the cardiac arrest team in ED. In this model, a senior nurse leads the cardiac arrest algorithm which allows cognitive off-loading of the lead emergency physician. The emergency physician is then more available to perform tasks such as echocardiography and exclude reversible causes. Simulation provides an opportunity for training and practice of this shared leadership model. We hypothesised that a structured simulation training programme that focused on implementing a nurse and doctor shared leadership model for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), would improve leadership and teamwork quality in the setting of cardiac arrest as measured by a Trauma Non-technical Skills (T-NOTECHS) teamwork scale. METHODS: Fifteen senior ED nurses participated in this pre-interventional post-observational study. Training consisted of a didactic course on team leadership and crisis resource management (CRM) followed by 4 × 10-min resuscitation scenarios with a structured debrief focusing on team leadership skills and CRM. The primary outcome was measured on scenarios 1 and 4 using a modified T-NOTECHS teamwork scale. RESULTS: A statistically significant increase in the T-NOTECHS scale was detected for the measures of leadership (P = 0.0028), CRM (P = 0.0001), adherence to New Zealand Resuscitation Council ALS algorithm (P = 0.0088) and situational awareness (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: The present study shows that a short simulation training programme improved nurse leadership and teamwork performance in the setting of a shared leadership model for CPR in the ED which could easily be replicated in other departments.

Alcohol and acute traumatic brain injury in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: There is limited research from Australasian EDs describing the demographic make-up, injury severity and impact of alcohol in patients requiring computed tomography (CT) for suspected traumatic brain injury (TBI). The present study aims to review the frequency and presenting patterns of patients who consume alcohol prior to presenting with suspected TBI. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of patients referred for head CT to exclude TBI from a major referral centre and regional ED in New Zealand, between 1 September 2018 and 31 August 2019. Comparison groups were defined as 'alcohol involved' or 'no alcohol involved'. RESULTS: 97/425 (22.8% [95% CI 18.3-27.4]) of included TBI presentations involved alcohol. 73/97 (75.3% [95% CI 58.6-93.5]) were male and 41/97 (42.3% [95% CI 29.3-55.2]) were aged 18-30 years. The alcohol group were more likely to report assault as the injury mechanism (19.6% [95% CI 10.8-28.4] vs 5.2% [95% CI 2.7-7.7], P < 0.05) and have Glasgow Coma Scale scores reflecting more moderate (13.5% [95% CI 5.9-21.1] vs 3.5% [95% CI 1.5-5.6]) and severe (5.6% [95% CI 0.7-10.5] vs 3.2% [95% CI 1.2-5.2] TBI. Presentation times post-injury were delayed compared to the no alcohol group (3.4 h [interquartile range 1.9-14.8] vs 2.8 h [interquartile range 1.8-6.6], P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: One quarter of patients with suspected TBI had consumed alcohol prior to their injury. Predominantly, those affected were young males who reported higher rates of assault; however, alcohol use was recorded in all age groups and sex. Alcohol-affected patients presented later, potentially delaying time to diagnosis. The present study supports the call for public health interventions that aim to reduce alcohol misuse.

Facilitators, barriers and opportunities in workplace wellbeing: A national survey of emergency department staff.

INTRODUCTION: Emergency department (ED) staff face daily exposure to the illness, injury, intoxication, violence and distress of others. Rates of clinician burnout are high and associated with poor patient outcomes. This study sought to measure the prevalence of burnout in ED personnel as well as determine the important facilitators of and barriers to workplace wellbeing. METHOD: An anonymous online survey including six open-ended questions on workplace wellbeing was completed by 1372 volunteer participants employed as nurses, doctors, allied health or nonclinical roles at 22 EDs in Aotearoa, New Zealand in 2020. Responses to the questions were analysed using a general inductive approach. RESULTS: The three key themes that characterise what matters most to participants' workplace wellbeing are: (1) Supportive team culture (2) Delivering excellent patient-centred care and (3) Professional development opportunities. Opportunities to improve wellbeing also focused on enhancements in these three areas. CONCLUSION: In order to optimise workplace wellbeing, emergency departments staff value adequate resourcing for high-quality patient care, supportive and cohesive teams and professional development opportunities. Initiatives in these areas may facilitate staff wellbeing as well as improving safety and quality of patient care.

Workplace wellbeing in emergency departments in Aotearoa New Zealand 2020.

AIM: To quantify staff burnout and wellbeing in emergency departments (EDs) throughout New Zealand (NZ). METHODS: A national cross sectional electronic survey of New Zealand clinical and non-clinical ED staff was conducted between 9 March and 3 April 2020. Burnout and wellbeing were assessed using the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) and a variety of quantitative measures. Differences between measures were assessed by demography and work role using univariate analyses. Multivariate analyses assessed associations between burnout and wellbeing. RESULTS: 1,372 staff responded from 22 EDs around New Zealand (response rate 43%). Most were female (n=678, 63%), NZ European (n=799, 59%), aged 20-39 years (n=743, 54%) and nurses (n=711, 52%). The overall prevalence of personal burnout was 60%, work-related burnout 55% and patient-related burnout 19%. There was a wide variation of burnout across all EDs. Females and nurses showed the highest degree of burnout by gender and role, respectively. Measures of wellbeing with significant negative correlations with burnout were work-related happiness, work-life balance, job satisfaction and perceived workplace excellence. Work stress had significant positive correlation with burnout. CONCLUSION: New Zealand ED staff have a high degree of burnout. Safety, financial sustainability and quality of care are likely being adversely affected. Stakeholders can be informed by findings from this study to inspire meaningful interventions in EDs and throughout the New Zealand healthcare system.

When mentalizing fails.

The author presents a long-term psychotherapy process that illustrates the challenges of helping a patient with a severe personality disorder to engage in the process of mentalizing. Illustrative therapist-patient dialogue from several sessions over the course of the psychotherapy supports the author's conclusion that, despite the therapist's perseverance, the patient remained stuck in her determination to use the therapist as a means toward self-sabotaging practical ends rather than establishing a relationship that would support reflection and growth.