RESUMO
Background: ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a cardiac emergency that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. We describe a challenging and complex case of managing acute STEMI in a patient with severe anaemia, deranged clotting profile, and infective prodrome. Case summary: A 54-year-old Caucasian gentleman was referred by his general practitioner as an emergency after presenting with acute onset of chest pain. His electrocardiogram revealed anterior ST elevation. His past medical history includes a mechanical aortic valve, requiring anticoagulation, and a recent gastrointestinal bleed secondary to type C gastritis. His initial presentation was further complicated by severe anaemia, deranged clotting profile, and elevated infective markers. He required a prompt transfer to the catheterization laboratory to assess and stabilize the situation. We discuss the emerging challenges during treatment, particularly as the diagnosis of septic embolism from infective prosthetic valve endocarditis was unfolding, requiring urgent cardiac surgery. Discussion: Acute coronary vessel closure leading to STEMI from septic embolism secondary to prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis is very rare. It is essential to consider the whole picture of the presentation for timely diagnosis and tailored treatment.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Evidence to support immediate P2Y12 inhibitor loading in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is limited. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare outcomes of STEMI patients receiving immediate or delayed P2Y12 inhibitor treatment. METHODS: Using data from the prospective Bern-PCI registry between 2016 and 2020, we stratified STEMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention according to time periods with different institutional recommendations regarding P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment. In cohort 1 (October 2016-September 2018), immediate P2Y12 inhibitor treatment was recommended. In cohort 2 (October 2018-September 2020), P2Y12 inhibitor treatment was recommended after coronary anatomy was confirmed. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, or definite stent thrombosis at 30 days. Sensitivity analysis included only patients in whom these recommendations were followed. RESULTS: Cohort 1 included 1,116 patients; pretreatment was actually given in 708 (63.4%). Cohort 2 included 847 patients; pretreatment was withheld in 798 (94.2%). The mean age was 65 ± 13 years, and 24% were female. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between groups. The median difference for P2Y12 loading to angiography was 52 minutes between cohort 1 and 2 and 100 minutes between patients receiving vs not receiving pretreatment. Rates of MACCEs were similar between cohort 1 and cohort 2 (10.1% vs 8.1%; adjusted HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.65-1.28; P = 0.59) and between patients receiving vs not receiving pretreatment (7.1% vs 8.4%; adjusted HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.78-1.74; P = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study of patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment was not associated with improved MACCEs.