A multi-center phase Ib study of oxaliplatin (NSC#266046) in combination with fluorouracil and leucovorin in pediatric patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Platinum agents have been used for a variety of cancers, including pivotal use in pediatric tumors for many years. Oxaliplatin, a third generation platinum, has a different side effect profile and may provide improved activity in pediatric cancers. PROCEDURE: Patients 21 years or younger with progressive or refractory malignant solid tumors, including tumors of the central nervous system were enrolled on this multi-center open label, non-randomized Phase 1 dose escalation study. The study used a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation design with 2 dose levels (85 and 100 mg/m(2) ) with an expansion cohort of 15 additional patients at the recommended dose. Patients received oxaliplatin at the assigned dose level and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus 400 mg/m(2) followed by a 46-hour 5-FU infusion of 2,400 mg/m(2) every 14 days. The leucovorin dose was fixed at 400 mg/m(2) for all cohorts. RESULTS: Thirty-one evaluable patients were enrolled, 8 at 85 mg/m(2) and 23 at 100 mg/m(2) for a total of 121 courses. The median age was 12 years (range 2-19 years). The main toxicities were hematologic, primarily neutrophils and platelets. The most common non-hematologic toxicities were gastrointestinal. Stable disease was noted in 11 patients (54% of evaluable patients) and 1 confirmed partial response in a patient with osteosarcoma. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum planned dose of oxaliplatin at 100 mg/m(2) per dose in combination with 5-FU and leucovorin was safe and well tolerated and in this patient population. This combination demonstrated modest activity in patients with refractory or relapsed solid tumor and warrants further study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2013;60:230-236. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Phase I dose-escalation trial of clofarabine followed by escalating doses of fractionated cyclophosphamide in children with relapsed or refractory acute leukemias.

BACKGROUND: By inhibiting DNA repair, clofarabine (CLO) may augment cyclophosphamide (CY)-induced DNA damage and apoptosis. We performed a Phase I study for refractory and/or relapsed (R/R) leukemia in children to determine maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of time-sequential CLO followed by CY. PROCEDURE: Thirteen patients with (R/R) ALL (n = 8) and AML (N = 5), median age 9 years (range: 2-12 years), were treated with escalating doses of CLO on days 1, 2, 3 and 8, 9, 10 and CY 200 mg/m(2) /day on days 0 and 1 then 400 mg/m(2) /day on days 2, 3, 8, 9, and 10. Ten patients were treated at dose level 1 (DL1) (CLO 20 mg/m(2) /day) and three patients at DL2 (CLO 30 mg/m(2) /day). The average number of prior chemotherapies was 8.9. DNA damage testing was performed before treatment on day 0, and 2 hours after CY on day 0, before sequential CLO, CY treatment on day 1, and 2 hours after CLO followed by CY on day 1. RESULTS: Two patients at DL2 had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) that included hypotension with cardio-respiratory failure (1) and hepato-renal failure (1). Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 2/11 (18.2%) and partial remission (PR) in 2/11 (18.2%) for an overall response (OR) of 36.4%. The use of CLO before CY augmented CY-induced DNA damage in leukemic blasts compared to CY alone. CONCLUSION: In pediatric patients with R/R leukemia, 20 mg/m(2) /day is the MTD for CLO in timed sequential combination with CY. Increased DNA damage with the use of this combination suggests a mechanism for the sequential timing of these two chemotherapeutic agents.

Analysis of behavioral constraints and the neuroanatomy of fear to the predator odor trimethylthiazoline: a model for animal phobias.

Specific phobias, including animal phobias, are the most common anxiety disorders, and have a strong innate and genetic component. Research on the neurobiology and environmental constraints of innate fear of predators in rodents may be useful in elucidating mechanisms of animal phobias in humans. The present article reviews research on innate fear in rats to trimethylthiazoline (TMT), an odor originally isolated from fox feces. TMT induces unconditioned freezing and other defensive responses that are regulated by the dose of TMT and the shape of the testing environment. Contextual conditioning induced by TMT occurs, but is constrained by the environment. Lesion studies indicate the amygdala circuitry subserving fear conditioning is not necessary for unconditioned fear to TMT. Additionally, a medial hypothalamic defensive circuit also appears not necessary for unconditioned freezing to TMT, whereas circuits that include the medial nucleus of the amygdala and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis are essential. The importance of these findings of innate predator odor fear in rodents to animal phobias in humans is discussed.

A multicenter, first-in-pediatrics, phase 1, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of ridaforolimus in patients with refractory solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Ridaforolimus (MK-8669, AP23573) is a potent and selective mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor. Preclinically, ridaforolimus displays antiproliferative activity against a variety of human tumors in vitro and tumor xenograft models in vivo, with additive or synergistic activity when combined with other anticancer agents. Antitumor activity has been confirmed in adults. This phase I study determined the safety, pharmacological, biologic, and toxicity profiles of ridaforolimus in pediatric patients with refractory malignancies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Eligible children ages 1 to 18 years with advanced solid tumors were enrolled in a 3 + 3 dose escalation design, to determine the safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of ridaforolimus. Toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics were characterized. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were treated. No DLT was observed at any dose level tested; therefore, an MTD was not identified. Most adverse events were mild to moderate; the most common grades 3 and 4 adverse events were hematologic, including thrombocytopenia and anemia. Nonhematologic adverse events were mostly electrolyte disturbances. The observed pharmacokinetic profile of ridaforolimus in children was consistent with that previously showed in adults. Pharmacodynamic confirms that the dose range tested has pharmacological/pharmacodynamic activity. Forty percent of patients achieved stable disease including four of six with central nervous system tumors and two of eight with sarcomas. CONCLUSIONS: This first-in-pediatrics study shows that the second-generation mTOR inhibitor ridaforolimus is well tolerated in heavily pretreated children with refractory solid tumors. No DLTs were observed over the dose range tested. Ridaforolimus may represent a therapeutic option for use in pediatric malignancies.