Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 5(4): A122, 2008 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18793510

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: We developed a new evaluation method to identify promising practices for promoting healthy weight among employees at small and medium-sized worksites. METHODS: We used a structured rating and selection process to select 9 worksites with approximately 100 to 3,000 employees from a pool of worksites with health promotion programs reputed to be exemplary. A site visit over 2 sequential half-days at each site included interviews with senior management, program staff, vendors, and wellness committees; observation guided by a written environmental assessment; and structured review of program data on health outcomes of wellness program participants. The team corroborated findings from interviews, observations, and reviews of aggregate data on health outcomes of participants. Using the site visit reports, the project team and a separate panel of experts identified worksite health promotion practices that were promising, innovative, feasible to implement in a variety of settings, sustainable, and relevant for public health. RESULTS: Innovative practices included peer coaching, wellness screening coupled with motivational interviewing and follow-up, free access to fitness facilities, and incentives such as days of paid leave for participation in wellness programs. Introduction of incentives was associated with higher participation rates. To build the business case for their programs, staff at several worksites used aggregate data on decreases in high blood pressure, serum cholesterol concentrations, and body weight in longitudinal samples of program participants. CONCLUSION: The evaluation method identified promising practices implemented at small and medium-sized worksites to promote healthy weight and related favorable health outcomes.


Assuntos
Peso Corporal , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Local de Trabalho/organização & administração , Governo , Instalações de Saúde , Humanos , Indústrias , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos , Universidades , Redução de Peso
2.
J Am Coll Health ; 60(1): 90-3, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22171734

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Rates of serious mental illnesses (SMIs) among university students are increasing, and universities are struggling with how to respond to students who show SMI symptoms. Psychiatric advance directives (PADs) allow individuals, when well, to document their wishes for treatment during a psychiatric crisis. This project explored the feasibility of using PADs in university settings by examining students' views towards PADs. PARTICIPANTS: Forty university students with SMIs were recruited for this study from 1 large university. METHODS: A mixed-methods design was used, with both quantitative survey instruments and qualitative interviews with students. RESULTS: Respondents were positive about PAD utility for students. Respondents saw PADs as beneficial because PADs gave students control over their treatment. However, students also considered PADs potentially problematic because PAD use raised a risk of breaching student privacy and stigmatizing students with SMIs. CONCLUSIONS: Although a promising intervention for students with SMI, this approach requires further research.


Assuntos
Diretivas Antecipadas/psicologia , Intervenção em Crise/métodos , Pessoas Mentalmente Doentes/psicologia , Estudantes/psicologia , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Transtorno Bipolar/psicologia , Transtorno Bipolar/terapia , Confidencialidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Confidencialidade/normas , Intervenção em Crise/legislação & jurisprudência , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/psicologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/terapia , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Transtornos Psicóticos/psicologia , Transtornos Psicóticos/terapia , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Serviços de Saúde para Estudantes/métodos , Universidades , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Nutr Educ Behav ; 42(1): 51-6, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20129188

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: As part of a national effort to prevent and control obesity, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) Nutrition and Physical Activity Program to Prevent Obesity and Other Chronic Diseases (NPAO) provides funding to states to improve access to healthful food and increase opportunities for physical activity. The CDC also provides funding to states to build Coordinated School Health (CSH) programs across agencies and within schools to help reduce chronic disease risk factors. This paper investigates the possible role of these programs in state policy change. METHODS: Descriptive study of state legislation targeting obesity prevention passed in 2005. Units of analysis were 135 pieces of obesity-related state legislation identified within 4 legislative databases. Legislation was coded into programmatic setting and obesity-prevention strategy categories. RESULTS: On average, states receiving NPAO or CSH program funding passed twice as many bills as states not yet funded. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The statewide obesity prevention and school health programs may have contributed to states enacting more obesity-related legislation. Further research into the process by which state programs influence the enactment and effective implementation of policies could help build the evidence base for policy changes that help prevent obesity.


Assuntos
Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Promoção da Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Obesidade/prevenção & controle , Serviços de Saúde Escolar/legislação & jurisprudência , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Bases de Dados Factuais , Exercício Físico , Promoção da Saúde/economia , Humanos , Política Nutricional , Serviços de Saúde Escolar/economia , Governo Estadual , Estados Unidos
4.
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) ; (135): 1-166, 2006 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17628126

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The RTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence-based Practice Center (RTI-UNC EPC) systematically reviewed evidence on efficacy of treatment for anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), and binge eating disorder (BED), harms associated with treatments, factors associated with the treatment efficacy and with outcomes of these conditions, and whether treatment and outcomes for these conditions differ by sociodemographic characteristics. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Applied Health (CINAHL), PSYCHINFO, the Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC), the National Agricultural Library (AGRICOLA), and Cochrane Collaboration libraries. REVIEW METHODS: We reviewed each study against a priori inclusion/exclusion criteria. For included articles, a primary reviewer abstracted data directly into evidence tables; a second senior reviewer confirmed accuracy. We included studies published from 1980 to September 2005, in all languages. Studies had to involve populations diagnosed primarily with AN, BN, or BED and report on eating, psychiatric or psychological, or biomarker outcomes. RESULTS: We report on 30 treatment studies for AN, 47 for BN, 25 for BED, and 34 outcome studies for AN, 13 for BN, 7 addressing both AN and BN, and 3 for BED. The AN literature on medications was sparse and inconclusive. Some forms of family therapy are efficacious in treating adolescents. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) may reduce relapse risk for adults after weight restoration. For BN, fluoxetine (60 mg/day) reduces core bulimic symptoms (binge eating and purging) and associated psychological features in the short term. Individual or group CBT decreases core behavioral symptoms and psychological features in both the short and long term. How best to treat individuals who do not respond to CBT or fluoxetine remains unknown. In BED, individual or group CBT reduces binge eating and improves abstinence rates for up to 4 months after treatment; however, CBT is not associated with weight loss. Medications may play a role in treating BED patients. Further research addressing how best to achieve both abstinence from binge eating and weight loss in overweight patients is needed. Higher levels of depression and compulsivity were associated with poorer outcomes in AN; higher mortality was associated with concurrent alcohol and substance use disorders. Only depression was consistently associated with poorer outcomes in BN; BN was not associated with an increased risk of death. Because of sparse data, we could reach no conclusions concerning BED outcomes. No or only weak evidence addresses treatment or outcomes difference for these disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The literature regarding treatment efficacy and outcomes for AN, BN, and BED is of highly variable quality. In future studies, researchers must attend to issues of statistical power, research design, standardized outcome measures, and sophistication and appropriateness of statistical methodology.


Assuntos
Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anorexia Nervosa/terapia , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Bulimia Nervosa/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Psicoterapia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA