SARS-CoV-2 spike does not interact with the T cell receptor or directly activate T cells.

SARS-CoV-2infection can induce multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, which resembles superantigen-induced toxic shock syndrome. Recent work has suggested that the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein could act as a superantigen by binding T cell receptors (TCRs) and inducing broad antigen-independent T cell responses. Structure-based computational modeling identified potential TCR-binding sites near the S receptor-binding domain, in addition to a site with homology to known neurotoxins. We experimentally examined the mechanism underpinning this theory-the direct interaction between the TCR and S protein. Surface plasmon resonance of recombinantly expressed S protein and TCR revealed no detectable binding. Orthogonally, we pseudotyped lentiviruses with SARS-CoV-2 S in both wild-type and prefusion-stabilized forms, demonstrated their functionality in a cell line assay, and observed no transduction, activation, or stimulation of proliferation of CD8+ T cells. We conclude that it is unlikely that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein engages nonspecifically with TCRs or has superantigenic character.

Structural and physical features that distinguish tumor-controlling from inactive cancer neoepitopes.

Neoepitopes arising from amino acid substitutions due to single nucleotide polymorphisms are targets of T cell immune responses to cancer and are of significant interest in the development of cancer vaccines. However, understanding the characteristics of rare protective neoepitopes that truly control tumor growth has been a challenge, due to their scarcity as well as the challenge of verifying true, neoepitope-dependent tumor control in humans. Taking advantage of recent work in mouse models that circumvented these challenges, here, we compared the structural and physical properties of neoepitopes that range from fully protective to immunologically inactive. As neoepitopes are derived from self-peptides that can induce immune tolerance, we studied not only how the various neoepitopes differ from each other but also from their wild-type counterparts. We identified multiple features associated with protection, including features that describe how neoepitopes differ from self as well as features associated with recognition by diverse T cell receptor repertoires. We demonstrate both the promise and limitations of neoepitope structural analysis and predictive modeling and illustrate important aspects that can be incorporated into neoepitope prediction pipelines.

CD8+ T Cell-Dependent Antitumor Activity In Vivo of a Mass Spectrometry-Identified Neoepitope despite Undetectable CD8+ Immunogenicity In Vitro.

Identification of neoepitopes that can control tumor growth in vivo remains a challenge even 10 y after the first genomics-defined cancer neoepitopes were identified. In this study, we identify a neoepitope, resulting from a mutation in the junction plakoglobin (Jup) gene (chromosome 11), from the mouse colon cancer line MC38-FABF (C57BL/6). This neoepitope, Jup mutant (JupMUT), was detected during mass spectrometry of MHC class I-eluted peptides from the tumor. JupMUT has a predicted binding affinity of 564 nM for the Kb molecule and a higher predicted affinity of 82 nM for Db. However, whereas structural modeling of JupMUT and its unmutated counterpart Jup wild-type indicates that there are little conformational differences between the two epitopes bound to Db, large structural divergences are predicted between the two epitopes bound to Kb. Together with in vitro binding data with RMA-S cells, these data suggest that Kb rather than Db is the relevant MHC class I molecule of JupMUT. Immunization of naive C57BL/6 mice with JupMUT elicits CD8-dependent tumor control of a MC38-FABF challenge. Despite the CD8 dependence of JupMUT-mediated tumor control in vivo, CD8+ T cells from JupMUT-immunized mice do not produce higher levels of IFN-γ than do naive mice. The structural and immunological characteristics of JupMUT are substantially different from those of many other neoepitopes that have been shown to mediate tumor control.

Dynamic allostery in the peptide/MHC complex enables TCR neoantigen selectivity.

The inherent cross-reactivity of the T cell receptor (TCR) is balanced by high specificity, which often manifests in confounding ways not easily interpretable from static structures. We show here that TCR discrimination between an HLA-A*03:01 (HLA-A3)-restricted public neoantigen derived from mutant PIK3CA and its wild-type (WT) counterpart emerges from motions within the HLA binding groove that vary with the identity of the peptide's first primary anchor. The motions form a dynamic gate that in the complex with the WT peptide impedes a large conformational change required for TCR binding. The more rigid neoantigen is insusceptible to this limiting dynamic, and with the gate open, is able to transit its central tryptophan residue underneath the peptide backbone to the contralateral side of the HLA-A3 peptide binding groove, facilitating TCR binding. Our findings reveal a novel mechanism driving TCR specificity for a cancer neoantigen that is rooted in the dynamic and allosteric nature of peptide/MHC-I complexes, with implications for resolving long-standing and often confounding questions about the determinants of T cell specificity.