Differences in total shoulder arthroplasty utilization and 30-day outcomes among White, Black, and Hispanic patients: do disparities exist in the outpatient setting?

BACKGROUND: In the United States, efforts to improve efficiency and reduce healthcare costs are shifting more total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) surgeries to the outpatient setting. However, whether racial and ethnic disparities in access to high-quality outpatient TSA care exist remains to be elucidated. The purpose of this study was to assess racial/ethnic differences in relative outpatient TSA utilization and perioperative outcomes using a large national surgical database. METHODS: White, Black, and Hispanic patients who underwent TSA between 2017 and 2021 were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were collected, and rates of outpatient utilization, adverse events, readmission, reoperation, nonhome discharge, and mortality within 30 days of surgery were compared between racial/ethnic groups. Race/ethnicity-specific trends in utilization of outpatient TSA were assessed, and multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for baseline demographic factors and comorbidities. RESULTS: A total of 21,186 patients were included, consisting of 19,135 (90.3%) White, 1093 (5.2%) Black, and 958 (4.5%) Hispanic patients and representing 17,649 (83.3%) inpatient and 3537 (16.7%) outpatient procedures. Black and Hispanic patients were generally younger and less healthy than White patients, yet incidences of complications, nonhome discharge, readmission, reoperation, and death within 30 days were similar across groups following outpatient TSA (P > .050 for all). Relative utilization of outpatient TSA increased by 28.7% among White patients, 29.5% among Black patients, and 38.6% among Hispanic patients (ptrend<0.001 for all). Hispanic patients were 64% more likely than White patients to undergo TSA as an outpatient procedure across the study period (OR: 1.64, 95% CI 1.40-1.92, P < .001), whereas odds did not differ between Black and White patients (OR: 1.04, 95% CI 0.87-1.23, P = .673). CONCLUSION: Relative utilization of outpatient TSA remains highest among Hispanic patients but has been significantly increasing across all racial and ethnic groups, now accounting for more than one-third of all TSA procedures. Considering outpatient TSA is associated with fewer complications and lower costs, increasing utilization may represent a promising avenue for reducing disparities in orthopedic shoulder surgery.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Total Joint Arthroplasty Care: A Contemporary Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is one of the most common surgical procedures in the United States; however, racial and ethnic disparities in utilizations and outcomes have been well documented. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated associations between race/ethnicity and several metrics in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: In August 2021, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus databases were queried. Sixty three studies investigating racial/ethnic disparities in TJA utilizations, complications, mortalities, lengths of stay (LOS), discharge dispositions, readmissions, and reoperations were included. Study quality was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: A majority of studies demonstrated disparities in TJA utilizations and outcomes. Black patients exhibited higher rates of 30-day complications (THA odds ratio [OR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.29; TKA OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.10-1.31), 30-day mortality (THA OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.08-1.48), prolonged LOS (THA mean difference [MD] +0.27 days, 95% CI 0.21-0.33; TKA MD +0.30 days, 95% CI 0.20-0.40), nonhome discharges (THA OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.37-1.57; TKA OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.38-1.96), and 30-day readmissions (THA OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.08-1.19; TKA OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.16-1.21) than White patients. Rates of complications (THA 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.36), prolonged LOS (TKA MD +0.20 days, 95% CI 0.17-0.23), and nonhome discharges (THA OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.10-1.45; TKA OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.22-1.53) were also increased among Hispanic patients, while Asian patients experienced longer LOS (TKA MD +0.09 days, 95% CI 0.05-0.12) but fewer readmissions. Outcomes among American Indian-Alaska Native and Pacific Islander patients were infrequently reported but similarly inequitable. CONCLUSION: Racial and ethnic disparities in TJA utilizations and outcomes are apparent, with minority patients often demonstrating lower rates of utilizations and worse postoperative outcomes than White patients. Continued research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of recent efforts dedicated to eliminating inequalities in TJA care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Same-Day Discharge Total Knee Arthroplasty in Octogenarians.

BACKGROUND: One of the most important aspects of the transition to outpatient (OP) arthroplasty is patient selection, with guidance traditionally recommending that OP total knee arthroplasty (TKA) be reserved for patients <80 years old. However, there are limited data as to whether older age should really be considered a contraindication to OP-TKA. The purpose of this study is to assess the risk of complications and readmissions following OP-TKA in patients ≥80 years old. METHODS: This is a retrospective, propensity-matched cohort study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2011 to 2019. Patients ≥80 years undergoing OP (same-day discharge) TKA were propensity matched to patients ≥80 years undergoing inpatient (IP) TKA based on age, gender, race, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, functional status, smoking status, anesthetic type, and medical comorbidities. There were 1,418 patients (709 IPs and 709 OPs) included. All baseline factors were successfully matched between IP-TKA versus OP-TKA (P ≥ .18 for all). Thirty-day complications, readmissions, reoperations, and mortality were subsequently analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-day readmission rates were identical between patients undergoing IP-TKA and OP-TKA (3.5% versus 3.5%, P = 1.0). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the incidence of major complications (2.7% versus 2.0%, P = .38), reoperations (1.3% versus 0.8%, P = .44), or mortalities (0.3% versus 0.3%, P = 1.0) within 30 days. CONCLUSION: Octogenarians undergoing OP-TKA had comparable complication rates to similar patients undergoing IP-TKA. OP-TKA can be performed safely in select octogenarians and age ≥80 years likely does not need to be a uniform contraindication to OP-TKA.

Total Joint Arthroplasty Utilization After Orthopaedic Surgery Referral: Identifying Disparities Along the Care Pathway.

BACKGROUND: Although racial and ethnic disparities in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) have been thoroughly described, only a few studies have sought to determine exactly where along the care pathway these disparities are perpetuated. The purpose of this study was to investigate disparities in TJA utilization occurring after patients who had diagnosed hip or knee osteoarthritis were referred to a group of orthopaedic providers within an integrated academic institution. METHODS: A retrospective, multi-institutional study evaluating patients with diagnosed hip or knee osteoarthritis was conducted between 2015 and 2019. Information pertaining to patient demographics, timing of clinic visits, and subsequent surgical intervention was collected. Utilization rates and time to surgery from the initial clinic visit were calculated by race, and logistic regressions were performed to control for various demographic as well as health related variables. RESULTS: White patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis were significantly more likely to receive total knee arthroplasty (TKA) than Black and Hispanic patients, even after adjusting for various demographic variables (Black patients: odds ratio [OR] = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.55-0.72, P = .002; Hispanic patients: OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.57-0.83, P = .039). Similar disparities were found among patients diagnosed with hip osteoarthritis who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA; Black patients: OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.60-0.89, P = <.001; Hispanic patients: OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.53-0.98, P <.001). There were no differences in time to surgery between races (P > .05 for all). CONCLUSION: In this study, racial and ethnic disparities in TJA utilization were found to exist even after referral to an orthopaedic surgeon, highlighting a critical point along the care pathway during which inequalities in TJA care can emerge. Similar time to surgery between White, Black, and Hispanic patients suggest that these disparities in TJA utilization may largely be perpetuated before surgical planning while patients are deciding whether to undergo surgery. Further studies are needed to better elucidate which patient and provider-specific factors may be preventing these patients from pursuing surgery during this part of the care pathway. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Artificial intelligence in predicting early-onset adjacent segment degeneration following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

PURPOSE: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common surgical treatment for degenerative disease in the cervical spine. However, resultant biomechanical alterations may predispose to early-onset adjacent segment degeneration (EO-ASD), which may become symptomatic and require reoperation. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model to predict EO-ASD following ACDF. METHODS: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data of patients undergoing ACDF at a quaternary referral medical center was performed. Patients > 18 years of age with > 6 months of follow-up and complete pre- and postoperative X-ray and MRI imaging were included. An ML-based algorithm was developed to predict EO-ASD based on preoperative demographic, clinical, and radiographic parameters, and model performance was evaluated according to discrimination and overall performance. RESULTS: In total, 366 ACDF patients were included (50.8% male, mean age 51.4 ± 11.1 years). Over 18.7 ± 20.9 months of follow-up, 97 (26.5%) patients developed EO-ASD. The model demonstrated good discrimination and overall performance according to precision (EO-ASD: 0.70, non-ASD: 0.88), recall (EO-ASD: 0.73, non-ASD: 0.87), accuracy (0.82), F1-score (0.79), Brier score (0.203), and AUC (0.794), with C4/C5 posterior disc bulge, C4/C5 anterior disc bulge, C6 posterior superior osteophyte, presence of osteophytes, and C6/C7 anterior disc bulge identified as the most important predictive features. CONCLUSIONS: Through an ML approach, the model identified risk factors and predicted development of EO-ASD following ACDF with good discrimination and overall performance. By addressing the shortcomings of traditional statistics, ML techniques can support discovery, clinical decision-making, and precision-based spine care.

The Charlson and Elixhauser Scores Outperform the American Society of Anesthesiologists Score in Assessing 1-year Mortality Risk After Hip Fracture Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Risk adjustment has implications across orthopaedics, including informing clinical care, improving payment models, and enabling observational orthopaedic research. Although comorbidity indices (such as the American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] classification, Charlson comorbidity index [CCI], and Elixhauser comorbidity index [ECI]) have been examined extensively in the immediate perioperative period, there is a dearth of data on their three-way comparative effectiveness and long-term performance. Moreover, the discriminative ability of the CCI and ECI after orthopaedic surgery has not been validated in the ICD-10 era, despite new diagnosis codes from which they are calculated. QUESTION/PURPOSE: Which comorbidity index (ASA, CCI, or ECI) is associated with the greatest accuracy on receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis with respect to the endpoint of death at 90 days and 1 year after hip fracture surgery in the ICD-10 era? METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on all patients undergoing surgical fixation of primary hip fractures at two Level I trauma centers and three community hospitals from October 2016 to May 2019. This time frame allowed for a 1-year baseline period of ICD-10 data to assess comorbidities and at least a 1-year follow-up period to assess mortality. Initially 1516 patients were identified using Common Procedural Terminology and ICD codes, of whom 4% (60 of 1516) were excluded after manual review; namely, those with pathologic fractures (n = 38), periprosthetic fractures (n = 12), and age younger than 18 years (n = 10). Of the patients who were studied, 69% (998 of 1456) were women and the mean ± SD age was 77 ± 14 years; 45% (656 of 1456) were treated with intramedullary nails, 32% (464 of 1456) underwent hemiarthroplasties, 10% (149 of 1456) underwent THAs, 7% (104 of 1456) underwent percutaneous fixations, and 6% (83 of 1456) were treated with plates and screws. The mean ± SD ASA score was 2.8 ± 0.6, CCI was 3.1 ± 3.2, and ECI was 5.2 ± 3.5. Hip fracture fixation was chosen as the operation of interest given the high incidence of this injury, the well-documented effects of comorbidities on complications, and the critical importance of risk stratification and perioperative medical management for these patients. Demographics, comorbidities, surgical details, as well as 90-day and 1-year mortality were collected. Logistic regressions with ROC curves were used to determine the accuracy and comparative effectiveness of the three measures. The 90-day mortality rate was 7.4%, and the 1-year mortality rate was 15.0%. RESULTS: The accuracy (area under the curve [AUC]) for 1-year mortality was 0.685 (95% CI 0.656 to 0.714) for the ASA, 0.755 (95% CI 0.722 to 0.788) for the ECI, and 0.769 (95% CI 0.739 to 0.800) for the CCI. The CCI and ECI were more accurate than ASA (p < 0.001 for both), while the CCI and ECI did not differ (p = 0.30). The ECI (AUC 0.756 [95% CI 0.712 to 0.800]) was more accurate for 90-day mortality than the ASA (AUC 0.703 [95% CI 0.663 to 0.744]; p = 0.04), while CCI (AUC 0.742 [95% CI 0.698 to 0.785]) with ASA (p = 0.17) and CCI with ECI (p = 0.46) did not differ at 90 days. CONCLUSION: Performance measures and research results may vary depending on what comorbidity index is used. We found that the CCI and ECI were more accurate than the ASA score for 1-year mortality after hip fracture surgery. Moreover, these data validate that the CCI and ECI can perform reliably in the ICD-10 era. If other studies from additional practice settings confirm these findings, as would be expected because of the objective nature of these indices, the CCI or ECI may be a useful preoperative measure for surgeons to assess 1-year mortality for hip fracture patients and should likely be used for institutional orthopaedic research involving outcomes 90 days and beyond. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Clinical Outcomes of Revision Biceps Tenodesis for Failed Long Head of Biceps Surgery: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: We summarize the indications, assess the modes of failure, and analyze the clinical and functional outcomes of revision biceps tenodesis after failed primary surgical treatment of long head of biceps (LHB) pathology. METHODS: A computerized search of PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases and manual screening of selected article reference lists was performed in September 2020. Randomized controlled trial, cohort, case-control, and case series studies reporting clinical outcomes of revision biceps tenodesis following failed LHB surgery were eligible. Patient demographics, indications for revision, intraoperative findings, surgical techniques, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded. Functional assessment and pain scores were assessed and summarized as forest plots with means and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Five of 465 identified studies met inclusion criteria, encompassing 70 revision biceps tenodesis procedures with mean follow-up of 2.4-6.4 years. The failed index procedure was biceps tenodesis in 62 patients and tenotomy in 8 patients. The most common indications for revision were pain or cramping and rerupture, cited by 4 and 3 articles, respectively. After failed conservative treatment, open subpectoral revision tenodesis was performed with concomitant arthroscopic debridement in 65 of 70 cases. Common intraoperative findings at time of revision were adhesions or scarring (39.0-83.0%), fixation failure (8.7-75.0%), and biceps rupture (17.4-80.0%). Revision tenodesis patients reported good to excellent functional outcomes with improvements in Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder, and visual analog scale pain scores, and satisfaction ranged from 88.0 to 100%. All studies demonstrated moderate quality of evidence and risk of bias when critically appraised. CONCLUSION: This systematic review of 5 moderate risk of bias studies demonstrated that the most common reasons for revision biceps tenodesis were pain or cramping and rerupture. Open subpectoral revision tenodesis with concomitant arthroscopic debridement provided improvements in functional scores with high patient satisfaction at mid-term follow up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Systematic Review of level III and IV investigations.

Postoperative racial disparities following spine surgery are less pronounced in the outpatient setting.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Racial disparities in spine surgery have been thoroughly documented in the inpatient (IP) setting. However, despite an increasing proportion of procedures being performed as same-day surgeries, whether similar differences have developed in the outpatient (OP) setting remains to be elucidated. PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate racial differences in postoperative outcomes between Black and White patients following OP and IP lumbar and cervical spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent IP or OP microdiscectomy, laminectomy, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), or cervical disc replacement (CDR) between 2017 and 2021. OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day rates of serious and minor adverse events, readmission, reoperation, nonhome discharge, and mortality. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent IP or OP microdiscectomy, laminectomy, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), or cervical disc replacement (CDR) between 2017 and 2021 was conducted using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Disparities between Black and White patients in (1) adverse event rates, (2) readmission rates, (3) reoperation rates, (4) nonhome discharge rates, (5) mortality rates, (6) operative times, and (7) hospital LOS between Black and White patients were measured and compared between IP and OP surgical settings. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to adjust for potential effects of baseline demographic and clinical differences. RESULTS: Of 81,696 total surgeries, 49,351 (60.4%) were performed as IP and 32,345 (39.6%) were performed as OP procedures. White patients accounted for a greater proportion of IP (88.2% vs 11.8%) and OP (92.7% vs 7.3%) procedures than Black patients. Following IP surgery, Black patients experienced greater odds of serious (OR 1.214, 95% CI 1.077-1.370, p=.002) and minor adverse events (OR 1.377, 95% CI 1.113-1.705, p=.003), readmission (OR 1.284, 95% CI 1.130-1.459, p<.001), reoperation (OR 1.194, 95% CI 1.013-1.407, p=.035), and nonhome discharge (OR 2.304, 95% CI 2.101-2.528, p<.001) after baseline adjustment. Disparities were less prominent in the OP setting, as Black patients exhibited greater odds of readmission (OR 1.341, 95% CI 1.036-1.735, p=.026) but were no more likely than White patients to experience adverse events, reoperation, individual complications, nonhome discharge, or death (p>.050 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Racial inequality in postoperative complications following spine surgery is evident, however disparities in complication rates are relatively less following OP compared to IP procedures. Further work may be beneficial in elucidating the causes of these differences to better understand and mitigate overall racial disparities within the inpatient setting. These decreased differences may also provide promising indication that progress towards reducing inequality is possible as spine care transitions to the OP setting.

Preoperative factors predict prolonged length of stay, serious adverse complications, and readmission following operative intervention of proximal humerus fractures: a machine learning analysis of a national database.

Background: Proximal humerus fractures are a common injury, predominantly affecting older adults. This study aimed to develop risk-prediction models for prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS), serious adverse complications, and readmission within 30 days of surgically treated proximal humerus fractures using machine learning (ML) techniques. Methods: Adult patients (age >18) who underwent open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), hemiarthroplasty, or total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture between 2016 and 2021 were included. Preoperative demographic and clinical variables were collected for all patients and used to establish ML-based algorithms. The model with optimal performance was selected according to area under the curve (AUC) on the receiver operating curve (ROC) curve and overall accuracy, and the specific predictive features most important to model derivation were identified. Results: A total of 7473 patients were included (72.1% male, mean age 66.2 ± 13.7 years). Models produced via gradient boosting performed best for predicting prolonged LOS and complications. The model predicting prolonged LOS demonstrated good discrimination and performance, as indicated by (Mean: 0.700, SE: 0.017), recall (Mean: 0.551, SE: 0.017), accuracy (Mean: 0.717, SE: 0.010), F1-score (Mean: 0.616, SE: 0.014), AUC (Mean: 0.779, SE: 0.010), and Brier score (Mean: 0.283, SE: 0.010) Preoperative hematocrit, preoperative platelet count, and patient age were considered the strongest predictive features. The model predicting serious adverse complications exhibited comparable discrimination [precision (Mean: 0.226, SE: 0.024), recall (Mean: 0.697, SE: 0.048), accuracy (Mean: 0.811, SE: 0.010), F1-score (Mean: 0.341, SE: 0.031)] and superior performance relative to the LOS model [AUC (Mean: 0.806, SE: 0.024), Brier score (Mean: 0.189, SE: 0.010), noting preoperative hematocrit, operative time, and patient age to be most influential. However, the 30-day readmission model achieved the weakest relative performance, displaying low measures of precision (Mean: 0.070, SE: 0.012) and recall (Mean: 0.389, SE: 0.053), despite good accuracy (Mean: 0.791, SE: 0.009). Conclusion: Predictive models constructed using ML techniques demonstrated favorable discrimination and satisfactory-to-excellent performance in forecasting prolonged LOS and serious adverse complications occurring within 30 days of surgical intervention for proximal humerus fracture. Modifiable preoperative factors such as hematocrit and platelet count were identified as significant predictive features, suggesting that clinicians could address these factors during preoperative patient optimization to enhance outcomes. Overall, these findings highlight the potential for ML techniques to enhance preoperative management, facilitate shared decision-making, and enable more effective and personalized orthopedic care by exploring alternative approaches to risk stratification.

How Does Resorption Differ Among Single-Level and Multilevel Lumbar Disc Herniations? A Prospective Multi-Imaging and Clinical Phenotype Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, case series. OBJECTIVE: To identify and characterize any differences in specific patient factors, MRI findings, features of spontaneous disc resorption, and outcomes between patients with single-level and multilevel LDH. BACKGROUND: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is one of the most common spinal pathologies worldwide. Though many cases of LDH resolve by spontaneous resorption, the mechanism underlying this "self-healing" phenomenon remains poorly understood, particularly in the context of multilevel herniations. METHODS: A one-year prospective study was conducted of patients presenting with acute symptomatic LDH between 2017 and 2019. Baseline demographics, herniation characteristics, and MRI phenotypes were recorded before treatment, which consisted of gabapentin, acupuncture, and the avoidance of inflammatory-modulating medications. MRIs were performed approximately every three months after the initial evaluation to determine any differences between patients with single-level and multilevel LDH. RESULTS: Ninety patients were included, 17 demonstrated multilevel LDH. Body mass index was higher among patients with multilevel LDH ( P <0.001). Patients with multilevel LDH were more likely to exhibit L3/L4 inferior endplate defects ( P =0.001), L4/L5 superior endplate defects ( P =0.012), and L4/L5 inferior endplate defects ( P =0.020) on MRI. No other differences in MRI phenotypes ( e.g. Modic changes, osteophytes, etc .) existed between groups. Resorption rate and time to resolution did not differ between those with single-level and multilevel LDH. CONCLUSIONS: Resorption rates were similar between single-level and multilevel LDH at various time points throughout one prospective assessment, providing insights that disc healing may have unique programmed signatures. Compared with those with single-level LDH, patients with multilevel herniations were more likely to have a higher BMI, lesser initial axial and sagittal disc measurements, and endplate defects at specific lumbar levels. In addition, our findings support the use of conservative management in patients with LDH, regardless of the number of levels affected. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

The efficacy and safety of oral antibiotic treatment in patients with chronic low back pain and Modic changes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of oral antibiotic intervention for chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients with/without type-1 Modic changes (MC1). Methods: AMED, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Medline were searched from inception to March 3, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or non-RCTs that investigated the effectiveness or safety of oral antibiotics in treating CLBP patients were eligible for inclusion. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts, full-text articles, and extracted data. The methodological quality of each included article were evaluated by RoB2 and NIH quality assessment tools. The quality of evidence was appraised by GRADE. Meta-analyses were performed, where applicable. A subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the RCTs and case series separately, and to evaluate the effect of removing a low-quality RCT. Results: Three RCTs and four case series were included. All Amoxicillin-clavulanate/Amoxicillin treatments lasted for approximately 3 months. Moderate- and low-quality evidence suggested that antibiotic was significantly better than placebo in improving disability and quality of life in CLBP patients with MC1 at 12-month follow-up, respectively. Low-quality evidence from meta-analyses of RCTs showed that oral antibiotic was significantly better than placebo in improving pain and disability in CLBP patients with MC1 immediately post-treatment. Very low-quality evidence from the case series suggested that oral Amoxicillin-clavulanate significantly improved LBP/leg pain, and LBP-related disability. Conversely, low-quality evidence found that oral Amoxicillin alone was not significantly better than placebo in improving global perceived health in patients with CLBP at the 12-month follow-up. Additionally, oral antibiotic users had significantly more adverse effects than placebo users. Conclusions: Although oral antibiotics were statistically superior to placebo in reducing LBP-related disability in patients with CLBP and concomitant MC1, its clinical significance remains uncertain. Future large-scale high-quality RCTs are warranted to validate the effectiveness of antibiotics in individuals with CLBP.

Evidence-Based Hamstring Injury Prevention and Risk Factor Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Hamstring injuries are common among athletes. Considering the potentially prolonged recovery and high rate of recurrence, effective methods of prevention and risk factor management are of great interest to athletes, trainers, coaches, and therapists, with substantial competitive and financial implications. PURPOSE: To systematically review the literature concerning evidence-based hamstring training and quantitatively assess the effectiveness of training programs in (1) reducing injury incidence and (2) managing injury risk factors. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: A computerized search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and SPORTDiscus with manual screening of selected reference lists was performed in October 2020. Randomized controlled trials investigating methods of hamstring injury prevention and risk factor management in recreational, semiprofessional, and professional adult athletes were included. RESULTS: Of 2602 articles identified, 108 were included. Eccentric training reduced the incidence of hamstring injury by 56.8% to 70.0%. Concentric hamstring strength increased with eccentric (mean difference [MD], 14.29 N·m; 95% CI, 8.53-20.05 N·m), concentric, blood flow-restricted, whole-body vibration, heavy back squat, FIFA 11+ (Fédération Internationale de Football Association), and plyometric training methods, whereas eccentric strength benefited from eccentric (MD, 26.94 N·m; 95% CI, 15.59-38.30 N·m), concentric, and plyometric training. Static stretching produced greater flexibility gains (MD, 10.89°; 95% CI, 8.92°-12.86°) than proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (MD, 9.73°; 95% CI, 6.53°-12.93°) and dynamic stretching (MD, 6.25°; 95% CI, 2.84°-9.66°), although the effects of static techniques were more transient. Fascicle length increased with eccentric (MD, 0.90 cm; 95% CI, 0.53-1.27 cm) and sprint training and decreased with concentric training. Although the conventional hamstring/quadriceps (H/Q) ratio was unchanged (MD, 0.03; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.06), the functional H/Q ratio significantly improved with eccentric training (MD, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.03-0.16). In addition, eccentric training reduced limb strength asymmetry, while H/Q ratio and flexibility imbalances were normalized via resistance training and static stretching. CONCLUSION: Several strategies exist to prevent hamstring injury and address known risk factors. Eccentric strengthening reduces injury incidence and improves hamstring strength, fascicle length, H/Q ratio, and limb asymmetry, while stretching-based interventions can be implemented to improve flexibility. These results provide valuable insights to athletes, trainers, coaches, and therapists seeking to optimize hamstring training and prevent injury.

National Patterns in Utilization of Knee and Hip Arthroscopy: An Analysis of Racial, Ethnic, and Geographic Disparities in the United States.

Background: Racial and ethnic disparities in the field of orthopaedic surgery have been reported extensively across many subspecialties. However, these data remain relatively sparse in orthopaedic sports medicine, especially with respect to commonly performed procedures including knee and hip arthroscopy. Purpose: To assess (1) differences in utilization of knee and hip arthroscopy between White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian or Pacific Islander patients in the United States (US) and (2) how these differences vary by geographical region. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: The study sample was acquired from the 2019 National Ambulatory Surgery Sample database. Racial and ethnic differences in age-standardized utilization rates of hip and knee arthroscopy were calculated using survey weights and population estimates from US census data. Poisson regression was used to model age-standardized utilization rates for hip and knee arthroscopy while controlling for several demographic and clinical variables. Results: During the study period, rates of knee arthroscopy utilization among White patients were significantly higher than those of Black, Hispanic, and Asian or Pacific Islander patients (ie, per 100,000, White: 180.5, Black: 113.2, Hispanic: 122.2, and Asian: 58.6). Disparities were even more pronounced among patients undergoing hip arthroscopy, with White patients receiving the procedure at almost 4 to 5 times higher rates (ie, per 100,000, White: 12.6, Black: 3.2, Hispanic: 2.3, Asian or Pacific Islander: 1.8). Disparities in knee and hip arthroscopy utilization between White and non-White patients varied significantly by region, with gaps in knee arthroscopy being most pronounced in the Midwest (adjusted rate ratio, 2.0 [95% CI, 1.9-2.1]) and those in hip arthroscopy being greatest in the West (adjusted rate ratio, 5.3 [95% CI, 4.9-5.6]). Conclusion: Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of knee and hip arthroscopy were found across the US, with decreased rates among Black, Hispanic, and Asian or Pacific Islander patients compared with White patients. Disparities were most pronounced in the Midwest and South and greater for hip than knee arthroscopy, possibly demonstrating emerging inequality in a rapidly growing and evolving procedure across the country.

Unplanned readmissions following ambulatory spine surgery: assessing common reasons and risk factors.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Although outpatient spine surgery is becoming increasingly popular in the United States, unplanned readmission following outpatient surgery remains a significant postoperative concern. PURPOSE: This study aimed to (1) describe the incidence and timing of 30-day unplanned readmission after ambulatory lumbar and cervical spine surgery (2) evaluate the common reasons for readmission, and (3) identify factors associated with readmission in this population. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent ambulatory cervical or lumbar spine surgery between 2015 and 2020 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital readmission within 30 postoperative days. METHODS: Patients who underwent ambulatory cervical or lumbar spine surgery between 2015 and 2020 were identified using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Reasons for and timing of unplanned readmissions were recorded. Multivariable poisson regressions were employed to determine any independent predictors of readmission. RESULTS: A total of 33,092 ambulatory cervical and 68,115 ambulatory lumbar spine surgery patients were identified. Incidences of 30-day readmission were 3.37% and 3.07% among cervical and lumbar patients, respectively. The most common surgical site-related reasons for readmission included uncontrolled pain, recurrence of disc herniation or major symptom, and postoperative hematoma/seroma. Common nonsurgical site-related reasons included gastrointestinal, neurological, and cardiovascular complications. Factors associated with readmission among cervical patients included age ≥55, BMI ≥35, functional dependence, diabetes, smoking, COPD, and steroid use, whereas factors associated with readmission following lumbar spine surgery included age ≥65, female sex, BMI ≥35, functional dependence, ASA ≥3, diabetes, smoking, COPD, and hypertension (p<.05 for all). CONCLUSION: This study highlights the common reasons and factors associated with unplanned readmission following ambulatory spine surgery. Consideration of these factors may be critical to ensuring appropriate patient selection for ambulatory spine surgery.

Improving Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Driven by Increasing Utilization of Ambulatory Surgical Centers in New York State.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess trends in disparities in utilization of hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs) and ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) for outpatient ACDF (OP-ACDF) between White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander patients from 2015 to 2018 in New York State. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Racial and ethnic disparities within the field of spine surgery have been thoroughly documented. To date, it remains unknown how these disparities have evolved in the outpatient setting alongside the rapid emergence of ASCs and whether restrictive patterns of access to these outpatient centers exist by race and ethnicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review from 2015 to 2018 using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) New York State Ambulatory Database. Differences in utilization rates for OP-ACDF were assessed and trended over time by race and ethnicity for both HOPDs and freestanding ASCs. Poisson regression was used to evaluate the association between utilization rates for OP-ACDF and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2018, Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients were less likely to undergo OP-ACDF compared with White patients in New York State. However, the magnitude of these disparities lessened over time, as Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients had greater relative increases in utilization of HOPDs and ASCs for ACDF when compared with White patients ( Ptrend <0.001). The magnitude of the increase in freestanding ASC utilization was such that minority patients had higher ACDF utilization rates in freestanding ASCs by 2018 ( P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence of improving racial disparities in the relative utilization of outpatient ACDF in New York State. The increase in access to outpatient ACDF appeared to be driven by an increasing number of patients undergoing ACDF in freestanding ASCs in large metropolitan areas. These improving disparities are encouraging and contrast previously documented inequalities in inpatient spine surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Racial disparities in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: an analysis of utilization and perioperative outcomes.

Background: There remains a paucity of literature addressing racial disparities in utilization and perioperative metrics in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair procedures. Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to evaluate patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair from 2010 to 2019. Baseline demographics, utilization trends, and perioperative measures, including adverse events, operative time, length of hospital stay, days from operation to discharge, and readmission, were analyzed. Results: Of 42,443 included patients, 38,090 (89.7%) were White, and 4353 (10.3%) were Black or African American. Black or African American patients had a significantly higher percentage of diabetes mellitus (23.6% vs. 15.6%), smoking (16.9% vs. 14.8%), congestive heart failure (0.3% vs. 0.1%), and hypertension (59.2% vs. 45.9%). In addition, logistic regression showed that Black or African American patients had increased odds of longer operative time (adjusted rate ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 1.05-1.08) and time from operation to discharge (adjusted rate ratio 1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.37). Disparities in relative utilization decreased as the proportion of Black or African American patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair increased (7.4% in 2010 vs. 10.4% in 2019) compared with White patients (P trend < .0001). Conclusion: Racial disparities exist regarding baseline comorbidities and perioperative metrics in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Further investigation is needed to fully understand and address the causes of these inequalities to provide equitable care.

Trends in Outpatient Cervical Spine Surgery: Are There Emerging Disparities?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis on prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to (1) assess disparities in relative utilization of outpatient cervical spine surgery between White and Black patients from 2010 to 2019 and (2) to measure how these racial differences have evolved over time. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although outpatient spine surgery has become increasingly popularized over the last decade, it remains unknown how racial disparities in surgical utilization have translated to the outpatient setting and whether restrictive patterns of access to outpatient cervical spine procedures may exist. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study from 2010 to 2019 was conducted using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Relative utilization of outpatient (same-day discharge) for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (OP-ACDF) and cervical disk replacement (OP-CDR) were assessed and trended over time between races. Multivariable regressions were subsequently utilized to adjust for baseline patient factors and comorbidities. RESULTS: Overall, Black patients were significantly less likely to undergo OP-ACDF or OP-CDR surgery when compared with White patients ( P <0.03 for both OP-ACDF and OP-CDR). From 2010 to 2019, a persisting disparity over time was found in outpatient utilization for both ACDF and CDR ( e.g. White vs. Black OP-ACDF: 6.0% vs. 3.1% in 2010 compared with 16.7% vs. 8.5% in 2019). These results held in all adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting racial disparities in outpatient spine surgery and demonstrates an emerging disparity in outpatient cervical spine utilization among Black patients. These restrictive patterns of access to same-day outpatient hospital and surgery centers may contribute to broader disparities in the overall utilization of major spine procedures that have been previously reported. Renewed interventions are needed to both understand and address these emerging inequalities in outpatient care before they become more firmly established within our orthopedic and neurosurgery spine delivery systems.

Prediction of lumbar disc herniation resorption in symptomatic patients: a prospective, multi-imaging and clinical phenotype study.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Symptomatic lumbar disc herniations (LDH) are very common. LDH resorption may occur by a "self-healing" process, however this phenomenon remains poorly understood. By most guidelines, if LDH remains symptomatic after 3 months and conservative management fails, surgical intervention may be an option. PURPOSE: The following prospective study aimed to identify determinants that may predict early versus late LDH resorption. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Prospective study with patients recruited at a single center. PATIENT SAMPLE: Ninety-three consecutive patients diagnosed with acute symptomatic LDH were included in this study (n=23 early resorption and n=67 late resorption groups) with a mean age of 48.7±11.9 years. OUTCOMES MEASURE: Baseline assessment of patient demographics (eg, smoking status, height, weight, etc.), herniation characteristics (eg, the initial level of herniation, the direction of herniation, prevalence of multiple herniations, etc.) and MRI phenotypes (eg, Modic changes, end plate abnormalities, disc degeneration, vertebral body dimensions, etc.) were collected for further analysis. Lumbar MRIs were performed approximately every 3 months for 1 year from time of enrollment to assess disc integrity. METHODS: All patients were managed similarly. LDH resorption was classified as early (<3 months) or late (>3 months). A prediction model of pretreatment factors was constructed. RESULTS: No significant differences were noted between groups at any time-point (p>.05). Patients in the early resorption group experienced greater percent reduction of disc herniation between MRI-0-MRI-1 (p=.043), reduction of herniation size for total study duration (p=.007), and percent resorption per day compared to the late resorption group (p<.001). Based on multivariate modeling, greater L4 posterior vertebral height (coeff:14.58), greater sacral slope (coeff:0.12), and greater herniated volume (coeff:0.013) at baseline were found to be most predictive of early resorption (p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first comprehensive imaging and clinical phenotypic prospective study, to our knowledge, that has identified distinct determinants for early LDH resorption. Early resorption can occur in 24.7% of LDH patients. We developed a prediction model for early resorption which demonstrated great overall performance according to pretreatment measures of herniation size, L4 posterior body height, and sacral slope. A risk profile is proposed which may aid clinical decision-making and managing patient expectations.