Immune-Related Diarrhea and Colitis in Non-small Cell Lung Cancers: Impact of Multidisciplinary Management in a Real-World Setting.

INTRODUCTION: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) constitute a challenge in the clinical management of solid tumors. This study aims to collect real-world data on the occurrence of immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis (IMDC) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and to assess the clinical impact of a multidisciplinary approach (MDA) on IMDC management. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data on patients with aNSCLC consecutively treated with ICIs, either as single agent or in combination with chemotherapy, between September 2013 and July 2022. Among patients developing IMDC, we conducted blinded revision of colonic biopsies and evaluated the clinical impact of the introduction of MDA through predefined indicators. RESULTS: Among the 607 patients included, 84 (13.8%) experienced IMDC. Pathological review highlighted a high prevalence of microscopic colitis (28%), with a collagenous pattern linked to longer symptoms duration (P = .01). IMDC occurred more frequently in females (P = .05) and PD-L1 expressors (P = .014) and was correlated with longer progression-free survival (17.0 vs 5.8, P < .001) and overall survival (28.3 vs 9.5, P < .001). The introduction of MDA was associated with increased employment of diagnostical tools such as fecal calprotectin test (P < .001), colonoscopy (P < .001), and gastroenterological evaluation (P = .017) and a significant decrease in both grade 3 conversion rate (P = .046) and recurrence after rechallenge (P = .016). Hospitalization rate dropped from 17.2% to 3.8% (P: ns). CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the clinical relevance of IMDC and support the incorporation of a MDA to optimize the clinical management of this irAE to improve patient care. Prospective validation has been planned.

CASE STUDY ON AN IPILIMUMAB COST-CONTAINMENT STRATEGY IN AN ITALIAN HOSPITAL.

OBJECTIVES: Ipilimumab is the first licensed immune checkpoint inhibitor for treatment of melanoma. The promising results of the registration clinical study need confirmation in real practice and its clinical success comes together with a relevant budget impact due to the high price of this drug. The aim of this work is to describe a new model of economical sustainability of ipilimumab developed in an Italian reference center for melanoma treatment. METHODS: This retrospective, observational, and monocentric study was carried out at the Veneto Institute of Oncology. Ipilimumab was administered to fifty-seven patients with advanced melanoma. Overall survival, progression free survival, and toxicity were evaluated. A local management procedure was evaluated together with the cost-saving strategies implemented by the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA). RESULTS: We demonstrated that the use of ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma in real practice had an efficacy and toxicity similar to that reported in the literature. In this scenario, our management model (centralization of compounding + drug-day) permitted savings up to the 11.1 percent of the gross cost for the drug (calculated assuming that no cost saving procedures were applied) while the policy of cost containment designed by AIFA produced an additional 6.2 percent of savings. CONCLUSIONS: In real practice conditions, the centralized administration of ipilimumab allows to replicate the results of clinical studies and in the meantime to contain the cost associated with this drug. The local strategy of management can be readily applied to most of the high cost drugs compounded in the hospital pharmacy. Impact of findings on practice: (i) We describe a new model of economic sustainability (drug-day, centralization of compounding, payback systems) of an expensive and innovative drug, ipilimumab, for treatment of melanoma within an Italian cancer center. (ii) This pivotal study demonstrated that a cost containment strategy is feasible and it needs the cooperation of all healthcare providers (oncologists, pharmacists, nurses, and technicians) to guarantee the full efficiency of the process.

Real-World Safety and Outcome of First-Line Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Metastatic NSCLC with PDL-1 Expression ≥ 50%: A National Italian Multicentric Cohort ("PEMBROREAL" Study).

Results from the phase III Keynote-024 clinical trial established pembrolizumab monotherapy as the first-line standard of care for patients with metastatic NSCLC who have PD-L1 expression ≥ 50%, EGFR, and ALK wild-type tumors. However, given the differences between patients treated in routine clinical practice and those treated in a clinical trial, real-world data are needed to confirm the treatment benefit in standard practice. Given the lack of data on large cohorts of patients with long follow-ups, we designed an observational retrospective study of patients with metastatic NSCLC who were treated with pembrolizumab, starting from its reimbursement eligibility until December 2020. The primary endpoints were PFS and OS, determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Response and safety were also evaluated. We followed 880 patients (median follow-up: 35.1 months) until February 2022. Median PFS and OS were 8.6 months (95% CI: 7.6-10.0) and 25.5 months (95% CI: 21.8-31.6), respectively. We also found that ECOG PS, PD-L1 expression, and habitual smoking were prognostic factors for PFS, while age, sex, ECOG PS, habitual smoking and histology had an impact on OS. Multivariable analysis confirms the prognostic role of PD-L1 for PFS and of ECOG for both PFS and OS. 39.9% of patients reported an adverse event, but only 6.3% of patients discontinued therapy due to toxicity. Our results suggest a long-term benefit of pembrolizumab in the first-line setting, as well as a safety profile consistent with the results of Keynote-024. Many collected variables appear to influence clinical outcome, but results from these exploratory unadjusted analyses should be interpreted with caution.

Analysis of the relation between adverse events and overall survival in patients treated with pembrolizumab as a first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: Many trials supported pembrolizumab as a first-line monotherapy to significantly improve overall survival (OS) in selected patients with previously untreated metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (mNSCLC) and a PD-L1 TPS of ≥50% without EGFR/ALK mutations. The aim of this study was to reveal the correlation between OS and adverse events in real-world settings after 42 months. METHODS: This retrospective observational study involved 98 patients with mNSCLC, TPS ≥ 50%, and no EGFR/ALK aberrations. Patients were treated with pembrolizumab (200 mg q3w) as a first-line treatment. Clinical data, including PD-L1 expression, Performance Status (ECOG-PS), treatment duration, toxicity, and outcomes were retrieved from local electronic medical records and from the Italian Regulatory Agency Registry. RESULTS: The cohort's main characteristics were as follows: median age 73 [44-89] years, 64.3% were male and 35.7% were female, an ECOG-PS score of 0 (n = 73) and 1 or 2 (n = 25), and a PD-L1 > 90% in 29.6% of patients. The entire cohort had stage IV NSCLC at diagnosis. The median number of cycles was 8.5 at a median follow-up of 13 months. The median OS of 13.6 months (95% CI: 11.7-NA) was not influenced by sex and PD-L1, but was significantly associated with ECOG-PS (p = 0.02). Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) occurred in 77.5% of patients (30.1% cutaneous, 27.5% gastrointestinal, and 20.4% endocrinological), but no grade 4 or 5 irAEs were identified. Patients experiencing any type of toxicity had a significantly longer median OS (20.39 months, 95% CI: 13.08-NA) than those with no toxicities (6.46 months, 95% CI: 1.41-NA, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The percentage of irAEs detected was comparable to that reported in KEYNOTE-024 and KEYNOTE-042. These real-world findings demonstrated the significant correlation between OS and cutaneous toxicities.

Omega-3 for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases: meta-analysis and trial-sequential analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The effectiveness of omega-3 fatty acids (PUFAs) in cardiovascular diseases (CVD) remains a matter of debate. The aim of this work was to evaluate PUFAs in the reduction of cardiovascular mortality in primary and secondary prevention of CVD to determine if further original studies are needed or the available data can be considered conclusive. METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed according to a dichotomous endpoint followed by a trial-sequential analysis (TSA). Clinical data were identified through a PubMed search based on the following keywords: omega-3 fatty acids; cardiovascular disease; death; and cardiovascular risk. The clinical trials identified by this procedure were subjected to standard meta-analysis and TSA. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: A total of 11 randomised studies for 100 609 patients were analysed. Our meta-analysis showed a statistically significant reduction in mortality due to cardiovascular issues (RR=0.937; 95% CI: 0.88 to 0.98; P=0.018). The TSA indicated that no further trials are needed to better evaluate the efficacy of PUFAs in preventing death related to CVD.

Preparation of intravenous chemotherapy bags: evaluation of a dose banding approach in an Italian oncology hospital.

Introduction: Dose banding is an original approach that manages intravenous (IV) chemotherapy preparation by generating on a weekly basis a series of bags containing scaled dosages of the active agent. These predetermined, fixed dosage bags are intended to replace the traditional bags prepared daily that contain fully individualized dosages. Methods: Three different scenarios were examined: (1) the current method of daily preparation of individualized bags at the hospital pharmacy; (2) the weekly preparation at the hospital pharmacy of non-individualized bags containing discrete, predefined doses covering an adequate range of doses (dose banding); (3) the use of commercial ready-to-use bags based on the same approach of dose banding. The objective of this study was to compare these three different approaches in terms of cost per patient. We considered five cancer drugs (gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, paclitaxel, trastuzumab and 5-fluorouracil) that were suitable for the dose ranging approach. Appropriate dose bands for these five agents were identified. Costs were estimated for each of the three approaches. Results: A total of 13,490 fully individualized bags were studied, which corresponded to the real bags prepared at our institution for these five agents in 2018. Dose banding was predicted to determine savings ranging from €10,998 (-0.84%) for trastuzumab to €169,429.60 (-8.39%) for paclitaxel. Conclusion: The introduction of dose banding can determine economic savings along with other advantages, such as improved work conditions, management reorganization and containment of waste. The pharmaceutical industry can hopefully support these experiences by producing ready-to-use bags in predetermined dosages.

Safety and Tolerability of Anti-Angiogenic Protein Kinase Inhibitors and Vascular-Disrupting Agents in Cancer: Focus on Gastrointestinal Malignancies.

Angiogenesis is an essential process for tumor growth and metastasis. Inhibition of angiogenesis as an anticancer strategy has shown significant results in a plethora of tumors. Anti-angiogenic agents are currently part of many standard-of-care options for several metastatic gastrointestinal cancers. Bevacizumab, aflibercept, ramucirumab, and regorafenib have significantly improved both progression-free and overall survival in different lines of treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer. Second-line ramucirumab and third-line apatinib are effective anti-angiogenic treatments for patients with metastatic gastric cancer. Unfortunately, the anti-angiogenic strategy has major practical limitations: resistance inevitably develops through redundancy of signaling pathways and selection for subclonal populations adapted for hypoxic conditions. Anti-angiogenic agents may be more effective in combination therapies, with not only cytotoxics but also other emerging compounds in the anti-angiogenic class or in the separate class of the so-called vascular-disrupting agents. This review aims to provide an overview of the approved and "under development" anti-angiogenic compounds as well as the vascular-disrupting agents in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers, focusing on the actual body of knowledge available on therapy challenges, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic mechanisms, safety profiles, promising predictive biomarkers, and future perspectives.

Ipilimumab in real-world clinical practice: efficacy and safety data from a multicenter observational study.

In patients with metastatic melanoma, ipilimumab has been shown to improve long-term survival. This observational multicenter study reports clinical outcomes of 418 patients treated with second-line ipilimumab from February 2013 to August 2014. Median overall survival (OS) was 6.43 months (95%CI: 5.45-7.42; n = 300), while median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.7 months (95%CI: 3.23-4.17; n = 188). Demographic factors, such as sex or number of previous therapies did not affect OS. Survival was shorter in patients with ECOG > 0 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Performance Status) (p < 0.001), while a longer OS was found in patients who completed all four therapy cycles (p < 0.001). Adverse events of any grade were reported for 66% of patients (mainly cutaneous and gastrointestinal), but most were low grade and easily managed. Adverse events of grades 3-4 were observed in 13% of patients. This study confirmed the efficacy and safety of this treatment in real practice.

A survey on patients medication reconciliation process in an oncological hospital.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of medication reconciliation in the clinical practice from a hospital pharmacist point of view. METHODS: A survey of the medication taken by cancer patients was performed on admission and on discharge in an oncological hospital, and then the subjects were followed up until discharge for 8 weeks. The pharmacist entered the data collected into a computer based tool which, by using Screening Tool of Older Persons' Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP criteria) and Micromedex™ interactions database, automatically produces a report indicating the possible inconsistencies. The report is to check all potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) correlated to the drugs assumption by the patient. The appropriateness of the medication was scored using a Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI index) which was used to reconcile the medication list accordingly. RESULTS: Patients reconciled at admission were 98, while patients reconciled at discharge were 90, 8 patients dropped out due to death. After the intervention of the hospital pharmacist, the average value of MAI index showed a significant reduction (3,391 to 2,552 p=0.039) and the median number of drugs prescribed per patient was decreased (7 vs 6; p=0.8058). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that the forms used in the reconciliation process, in particular the record card, is a promising method to increase the quality of the information related to drug use in clinical decisions. We think that medication reconciliation softwares should be widely used by health care professionals involved in the recording of drug history or prescription process.

[Is the price of cancer drugs related to the cost of develo-pment and production or to the economic value of their clincal efficacy?]. / Il prezzo dei farmaci oncologici va correlato al costo di sviluppo e produzione o al valore economico dell'efficacia clinica?

In the past years, the expenditure for cancer drugs has quickly increased, especially for biologic agents. Pharmaceutical companies and national health systems have different approaches in handling the issue of drug reimbursement. Companies support a price based on research and development (R&D) expenditures including those for unsuccessful drug projects while national health systems generally argue that pricing should be based on the incremental benefit generated by the agent under examination (value-based pricing - VBP). Nevertheless, current oncologic drugs prices are too high and not really justified by their incremental benefits or innovation, nor can they demonstrate that higher thresholds in QALYs could bring wider societal benefits. In this article we discuss these two points of view in the light of the most recent national and international literature. In Italy, drug reimbursement is currently managed through a mixed approach between the recognition of R&D expenditures and VBP. Reimbursement is also integrated with post-marketing patient-based national registries, particularly in the field of anti-cancer agents, that provide rebates based on financial risk sharing, cost-sharing, payment by results and success fee methods.