Worldwide CTEPH Registry: Long-Term Outcomes With Pulmonary Endarterectomy, Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty, and Medical Therapy.

BACKGROUND: The European Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension registry (CTEPH), conducted between 2007 and 2012, reported the major impact of pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) on the long-term survival of patients with CTEPH. Since then, 2 additional treatments for inoperable CTEPH have become available: balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA), and an approved oral drug therapy with the guanylate cyclase stimulator riociguat. The current registry aimed to evaluate the effect of these new therapeutic approaches in a worldwide context. METHODS: Participation in this international global registry included 34 centers in 20 countries. Between February 2015 and September 2016, 1009 newly diagnosed, consecutive patients were included and followed until September 2019. RESULTS: Overall, 605 patients (60%) underwent PEA and 185 (18%) underwent BPA; 76% of the 219 remaining patients not receiving mechanical intervention (ie, neither PEA nor BPA) were treated with pulmonary hypertension drugs. Oof patients undergoing PEA and BPA, 38% and 78% also received drugs for pulmonary hypertension, respectively. Median age at diagnosis was higher in the BPA and No PEA/BPA groups than in the PEA group: 66 and 69, respectively, versus 60 years. Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was similar in all groups, with an average of 643 dynes/(s·cm-5). During an observation period (>3 years; ≤5.6 years), death was reported in 7%, 11%, and 27% of patients treated by PEA and BPA, and those receiving no mechanical intervention (P<0.001). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, 3-year survival was 94%, 92%, and 71% in the 3 groups, respectively. PEA 3-year survival improved by 5% from that observed between 2007 and 2012. There was no survival difference in patients receiving vitamin K antagonists and non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (P=0.756). In Cox regression, reduced mortality was associated with: PEA and BPA in the global cohort; history of venous thromboembolism and lower PVR in the PEA group; lower right atrial pressure in the BPA group; and use of pulmonary hypertension drugs, oxygen therapy, and lower right atrial pressure, as well as functional class in the group receiving no mechanical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This second international CTEPH registry reveals important improvement in patient survival since the introduction of BPA and an approved drug for pulmonary hypertension. The type of anticoagulation regimen did not influence survival. REGISTRATION: URL https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02656238.

Surgical specimens, haemodynamics and long-term outcomes after pulmonary endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is surgically curable by pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). It is unclear whether PEA impacts primarily steady state right ventricular afterload (ie, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR)) or pulsatile right ventricular afterload (ie, pulmonary arterial compliance (C(PA))). Our objectives were to (1) quantify PEA specimens and measure the impact of PEA on PVR and C(PA) in a structure/function study and (2) analyse the effects of haemodynamic changes on long-term survival/freedom of lung transplantation in an outcome study. METHODS: Thrombi were laid out, weighed, photographed and measured. PVR, C(PA) and resistance times compliance (RC-time) were assessed at baseline, within 4 days after PEA ('immediately postoperative') and 1 year after PEA, in 110 consecutive patients who were followed for 34.5 (11.9; 78.3) months. RESULTS: Lengths and numbers of PEA specimen tails were inversely correlated with immediate postoperative PVR (p<0.0001, r=-0.566; p<0.0001, r=-0.580). PVR and C(PA) normalised immediately postoperatively while RC-time remained unchanged. Immediate postoperative PVR was the only predictor of long-term survival/freedom of lung transplantation (p<0.0001). Patients with immediate postoperative PVR<590 dynes.s.cm(-5) had better long-term outcomes than patients with PVR≥590 dynes.s.cm(-5) (p<0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: PEA immediately decreased PVR and increased C(PA) under a constant RC-time. However, immediate postoperative PVR was the only predictor of long-term survival/freedom of lung transplantation. Our study confirms the importance of a complete, bilateral surgical endarterectomy. Low PVR measured immediately postoperative predicts excellent long-term outcome.

Asymmetric Dimethylarginine and NT-proBNP Levels Provide Synergistic Information in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) is elevated in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and is associated with unfavorable outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess changes in ADMA plasma levels for monitoring disease progression and outcomes during PAH-specific therapy. METHODS: ADMA was measured at baseline and after at least 6 months of follow-up using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and high-performance liquid chromatography. Changes in ADMA were analyzed in relation to changes in established PAH markers, including hemodynamic status, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and risk assessment scores. Impact on survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2019, ADMA samples were collected prospectively from 215 patients with PAH. Change in ADMA plasma level was a predictor of disease progression and survival. ΔADMA (median -0.03 µmol/L; 95% CI: -0.145 to 0.0135) was correlated with change in mean pulmonary arterial pressure (P < 0.005; rS = 0.287) but was not significantly correlated with ΔNT-proBNP (P = 0.056; rS = 0.135). Patients with decreased ADMA plasma levels at follow-up had better 3-year and 5-year survival rates (88% and 80%, respectively, vs 72% and 53% in those without decreases in ADMA) (P < 0.005; pulmonary hypertension-related mortality or lung transplantation). Patients with decreases in both ADMA and NT-proBNP had better survival rates compared with patients in whom only 1 parameter improved (P < 0.005). ΔADMA was a significant predictor of survival in Cox regression analysis and also when corrected for ΔNT-proBNP (HRs: 1.27 and 1.35, respectively; P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: ADMA and NT-proBNP provide synergistic prognostic information for patients with PAH. ADMA could be used as an objective and distinct biomarker for monitoring treatment response in PAH.

The risk profile change in patients with severe chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension treated with subcutaneous treprostinil.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is successfully treatable with pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), balloon pulmonary angioplasty, and medical therapy. Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management risk score (RRS) is able to predict long-term outcome in inoperable patients or in patients with residual PH after surgery. We performed a post hoc analysis of RRS in patients who were enrolled in the CTREPH study (NCT01416636), a randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing high-dose and low-dose subcutaneous (SC) treprostinil in patients with severe CTEPH that was classified by an interdisciplinary CTEPH team as nonoperable, or as persistent or recurrent pulmonary hypertension after PEA. Baseline mean RRS was similar in both treatment groups (8.7 in high-dose arm vs. 8.6 in low-dose arm), but mean RRS change from baseline to Week 24 was greater in the high-dose treprostinil group than in the low-dose treprostinil group (-0.88 vs. -0.17). The difference in RRS change from baseline to Week 24 between high dose versus low dose was statistically significant with mean difference of -0.70 (95% confidence interval: -1.36 to -0.05, p = 0.0352), and was driven mainly by improvement of World Health Organization functional class and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide concentration. SC treprostinil therapy administered in standard dose had positive effect on the risk profile measured by RRS in patients with inoperable or persistent/recurrent severe CTEPH. Although our study was limited by the small sample size and post hoc nature, assessment of risk profile is of great importance to this particular patient population with very poor prognosis.

Pulmonary pressure recovery in idiopathic, hereditary and drug and toxin-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension: determinants and clinical impact.

BACKGROUND: Over the past two decades randomized controlled trials of combination treatments for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) have demonstrated improvements of clinical status but only modest reductions in mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP). Recent experiences with upfront combination treatments including parenteral prostacyclins have shown more substantial mPAP reductions, and have provided grounds for reconsiderations of treatment. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the possibility of achieving mPAP <25 mmHg with current treatments, its determinants and the prognostic impact of mPAP reduction. METHODS: 267 consecutive idiopathic, hereditary and drug and toxin-induced PAH patients treated with targeted therapies from three expert centers were followed with periodic clinical and hemodynamic assessments for survival detection. RESULTS: Fifty-four (20.2%) patients achieved a mPAP <25 mmHg over 58 months (IQR 27-90) of treatment. Determinants of mPAP <25 mmHg were mPAP at diagnosis (HR 0.96, 95C.I. 0.93-0.98, p = 0.002) and an upfront combination strategy (double oral combination: HR 2.3, 95C.I. 1.10-4.76, p = 0.02; one oral plus parenteral prostanoid: HR 3.6, 95C.I. 1.39-9.37, p = 0.008; triple combination employing parenteral prostanoids: HR 12.9, 95C.I. 4.9-33.2, p = 0.0001). Seventy-three patients (27.3%) died. Survival rates were 90%, 79%, 70%, 55%, and 42% at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. Mean PAP during follow-up, days from diagnosis to prostanoid initiation and prostanoid maximum dose emerged as independent predictors of survival (Uno-C-index: 0.85). A mPAP ≤35 mmHg during follow-up was identified as the best cutoff value for prediction of survival. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction to a mean PAP ≤ 35 mmHg appears to be a meaningful treatment target in idiopathic, hereditary and drug and toxin-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Chronic Thromboembolic Disease and Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary vascular disease (CTED) are rare manifestations of venous thromboembolism. Presumably, CTEPH and CTED are variants of the same pathophysiological mechanism. CTEPH and CTED can be near-cured by pulmonary endarterectomy, balloon pulmonary angioplasty, and medical treatment with Riociguat or subcutaneous treprostinil, which are the approved drugs.

Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Pulmonary Artery Subtotal Occlusion and Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension.

[Figure: see text].

Current strategies for managing chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: results of the worldwide prospective CTEPH Registry.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) therapy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) are currently accepted therapies for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). This international CTEPH Registry identifies clinical characteristics of patients, diagnostic algorithms and treatment decisions in a global context. METHODS: 1010 newly diagnosed consecutive patients were included in the registry between February 2015 and September 2016. Diagnosis was confirmed by right heart catheterisation, ventilation-perfusion lung scan, computerised pulmonary angiography and/or invasive pulmonary angiography after at least 3 months on anticoagulation. RESULTS: Overall, 649 patients (64.3%) were considered for PEA, 193 (19.1%) for BPA, 20 (2.0%) for both PEA and BPA, and 148 (14.7%) for PAH therapy only. Reasons for PEA inoperability were technical inaccessibility (n=235), comorbidities (n=63) and patient refusal (n=44). In Europe and America and other countries (AAO), 72% of patients were deemed suitable for PEA, whereas in Japan, 70% of patients were offered BPA as first choice. Sex was evenly balanced, except in Japan where 75% of patients were female. A history of acute pulmonary embolism was reported for 65.6% of patients. At least one PAH therapy was initiated in 35.8% of patients (26.2% of PEA candidates, 54.5% of BPA candidates and 54.1% of those not eligible for either PEA or BPA). At the time of analysis, 39 patients (3.9%) had died of pulmonary hypertension-related causes (3.5% after PEA and 1.8% after BPA). CONCLUSIONS: The registry revealed noticeable differences in patient characteristics (rates of pulmonary embolism and sex) and therapeutic approaches in Japan compared with Europe and AAO.

Pulmonary vascular reactivity and prognosis in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Surgical pulmonary endarterectomy is the preferred treatment for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Persistent pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary endarterectomy has been recognized as a major determinant of poor outcome. We tested whether acute vasoreactivity identifies chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension patients prone to develop persistent/recurrent pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary endarterectomy and whether the degree of acute vasoreactivity affects survival or freedom from lung transplantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Right-sided heart catheterization at baseline and after inhalation of 40 ppm nitric oxide for 20 minutes was performed in 103 patients (56.3+/-15.3 years old, 53 women). Reductions in mean pulmonary arterial pressure (DeltamPAP; -8.8+/-12.6%; P<0.0001) and pulmonary vascular resistance (-16.1+/-18.1%; P<0.0001) and an increase in mixed venous saturation during inhaled nitric oxide (9.1+/-11.6%; P<0.0001) were observed. Sixty-two patients underwent pulmonary endarterectomy after a median of 49 days (25th and 75th percentiles: 24 and 123 days). Operated patients were followed up for a median of 70.9 months (25th and 75th percentiles: 14 and 97 months). Change in mPAP during inhaled NO was identified as a predictor of persistent/recurrent pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary endarterectomy. Patients experiencing a reduction in mPAP >10.4% with nitric oxide inhalation had a better postoperative outcome. A significant correlation was found between DeltamPAP and immediate postoperative pulmonary vascular resistance (r=0.5, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A total of 80 (77.7%) of 103 patients demonstrated acute pulmonary vascular reactivity of some degree. A decrease in mPAP >10.4% under inhaled nitric oxide is a predictor of long-term survival and freedom from lung transplantation in adult patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension who are undergoing pulmonary endarterectomy.

Treprostinil for the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Introduction: Parenteral treprostinil for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension has resulted in improvement of exercise capacity, functional class, hemodynamics, and survival. Recently, a first randomized trial performed in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension confirmed the efficacy of subcutaneous treprostinil in this subset of pulmonary hypertension. Areas covered: Treprostinil sodium is a prostacyclin analog produced synthetically. Drug characteristics include potent systemic and pulmonary vasodilatory effects. Local side-effects of subcutaneous treprostinil have been an obstacle for its use. However, in contrast to other prostacyclins, treprostinil has favorable features. We performed a literature survey by searching PubMed for clinical trials published in any language, investigating medicinal treatments for CTEPH. We used the search terms 'inoperable', and 'chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension' with 'randomized clinical trial', and have put treprostinil for CTEPH in the contest of published literature. Expert opinion: Drugs approved for PAH have recently shown excellent efficacy in patients with non-operable CTEPH. Rather than head-to-head comparisons of drugs, combination treatments are to be expected in the near future. Furthermore, drugs will have to be tested alongside with pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), and alongside balloon pulmonary angioplasty, a promising percutaneous mechanical treatment for CTEPH that is not suited for PEA.