Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Med ; 12(4)2023 Feb 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36836030

RESUMO

Urologic trauma is a well-known cause of urethral injury with a range of management recommendations. Retrograde urethrogram remains the preferred initial diagnostic modality to evaluate a suspected urethral injury. The management thereafter varies based on mechanism of injury. Iatrogenic urethral injury is often caused by traumatic catheterization and is best managed by an attempted catheterization performed by an experienced clinician or suprapubic catheter to maximize urinary drainage. Penetrating trauma, most commonly associated with gunshot wounds, can cause either an anterior and/or posterior urethral injury and is best treated with early operative repair. Blunt trauma, most commonly associated with straddle injuries and pelvic fractures, can be treated with either early primary endoscopic realignment or delayed urethroplasty after suprapubic cystostomy. With any of the above injury patterns and treatment options, a well thought out and regimented follow-up with a urologist is of utmost importance for accurate assessment of outcomes and appropriate management of complications.

2.
J Am Coll Surg ; 231(3): 326-332, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32585304

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality for critically injured trauma patients. The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) practice guideline is the most up-to-date classification for AKI. The aims of this study were to determine the incidence and risk factors for AKI in critically injured trauma patients using the current KDIGO definitions. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study was performed at our academic, level 1 trauma center, from September 2017 to August 2018. All adult trauma patients admitted to the surgical ICU were included. The primary outcome was the development of AKI, as defined by KDIGO. Secondary outcomes included hospital and ICU length of stay, ventilator days, and mortality. RESULTS: There were 466 patients included and 314 (67%) developed AKI. Those who developed AKI were more often hypotensive on admission (7% vs 2%), had higher Injury Severity Scores (ISS) (19 vs 13), were more likely to have severe injuries to the chest (40% vs 24%) and extremities (20% vs 6%), received transfusion (41% vs 21%), sustained crush injuries (8% vs 1%), received radiocontrast (75% vs 47%), nephrotoxic medication (74% vs 60%), or vasopressors (15% vs 3%). After multivariate analysis, risk factors independently associated with AKI include age, Injury Severity Score (ISS), severe extremity injuries, radiocontrast, and vasopressors. Those who developed AKI had higher mortality (9% vs 2%). CONCLUSIONS: Using current KDIGO criteria, the incidence of AKI in critically injured trauma patients was higher than previously reported. Older patients, with more severe injuries to their extremities and chest and who have suffered crush injuries, appear to be the most a risk. AKI in the critically injured patient results in an almost 5-fold increase in mortality.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicações , Injúria Renal Aguda/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Int J Med Robot ; 10(2): 203-7, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24030910

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A rapid training protocol has been developed for robotic surgery novices to learn robotic single-incision techniques. This study assesses the learning curve and early clinical results for a robotic surgery novice starting single-site cholecystectomy. METHODS: A chart review was performed on the surgeon's first 55 patients to undergo this procedure. RESULTS: Average patient age was 46.01 ± 4.25 (range 21-86) years and BMI was 26.57 ± 4.25 (range 19.4-36.6) kg/m(2) . The mean port placement with docking time was 11.34 ± 3.74 (range 7-23) min. Mean console time was 28.74 ± 11.04 (range 15-66) min. Average total OR time was 61.84 ± 14.66 (range 40-105) min. All procedures were successfully completed without conversion or added ports. Complications included several minor procedural gall bladder perforations and miscellaneous postoperative symptomatic complaints. CONCLUSION: Robotic single site cholecystectomy can be safely performed by a robotic novice within a minimal learning curve and have early clinical results that are comparable to the published data of robotic experts.


Assuntos
Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/educação , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica/métodos , Instrução por Computador , Feminino , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizado , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA