Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer Invest ; 42(4): 309-318, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38666473

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To understand perspective on breast cancer using a survey. MATERIALS & METHODS: Questionnaire was distributed to 304 Japanese radiation oncologists (RadOncs) (response rate: 64.1%). Result was compared with a similar US survey. RESULTS: In a scenario with an 81-year-old patient with comorbidities, while most US RadOncs chose to tell that radiation might not be necessary, 2% of Japanese chose it. In a scenario with a healthy 65-year-old breast cancer patient with lumpectomy, while most US RadOncs chose to discuss omission of radiation, 24.5% of Japanese chose it. CONCLUSIONS: Differences were observed on radiotherapy for older early-stage breast cancer.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Radio-Oncologistas , Humanos , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Japão , Estados Unidos , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Idoso , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Padrões de Prática Médica , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
Mol Clin Oncol ; 21(4): 68, 2024 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39091416

RESUMO

The treatment outcomes of patients with unresectable rectal cancer are complex, and concurrent chemoradiation therapy is the main treatment option. Radiosensitizers can enhance the effect of localized intratumoral hypoxia, contributing to local control and symptomatic relief. The present study evaluated the feasibility and safety of radiosensitization using hydrogen peroxide combined with radiation therapy (RT) in patients with unresectable rectal cancer. A total of 13 patients with rectal cancer were recruited in the present study. Radiosensitization was performed twice weekly in combination with RT. Gauze soaked in 3% hydrogen peroxide solution was inserted into the anus, ensuring firm contact with the lesion. In total, 45-65 Gy was delivered in 25-33 fractions to the whole pelvis from four directions using 10 MV X-rays 5 days per week. Acute and late adverse events were evaluated 1 and 6 months after the completion of RT. Treatment was well tolerated, with no acute grade 3 or worse events noted, and no patient developed rectal fistula, necrosis, obstruction, perforation, stenosis, ulcer or retroperitoneal hemorrhage. No notable late adverse events, beyond 6 months, were observed at the end of the analysis. All patients experienced pain relief, hemostatic effects and tumor shrinkage. Therefore, the use of a hydrogen peroxide solution-soaked gauze in the rectum may be a promising option for patients with inoperable rectal tumors. The limitations of the present study are that the patient population was small and the observation time was relatively short. This study was retrospectively registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Center (trial registration no. R000061902) on April 21, 2024.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA