Application of an external fixator vascular compressor (EFVC) in the critically injured trauma patient: a novel damage control technique.

Methods of controlling hemorrhage in penetrating abdominal injuries are varied, ranging from electrocautery, ligation, laparotomy sponge packing, angiography, hemostatic agents, and direct manual pressure. Unfortunately, traditional methods are sometimes unsuccessful due to the location or nature of the hemorrhage, and manual pressure cannot be held indefinitely. We describe a novel damage control technique for hemorrhage control in these situations, followed by three cases where an external fixator vascular compressor (EFVC) was used to hold continual pressure. Three patients are presented to a Level 1 trauma center following multiple ballistic injuries, all requiring emergent exploratory laparotomy. The first had a two-pin iliac crest EFVC placed during repeat exploratory laparotomy to control bleeding. The second patient had a supra-acetabular EFVC placed during initial exploratory laparotomy after emergent embolization failed to control bleeding from the L3 vertebral body. The third patient had a two-pin iliac crest EFVC placed at initial exploratory laparotomy due to uncontrollable bleeding from the sacral venous plexus and internal iliac veins. Of the three patients, two stabilized and survived, while one passed away due to multi-organ failure. We describe a novel damage control technique that may be a useful means of temporarily stemming intraabdominal bleeding that is otherwise recalcitrant to traditional hemostatic methods. Additionally, we provided a limited case series of patients who have undergone this technique to illustrate its utility and versatility. This technique is simple, fast, effective, and adaptable to a variety of circumstances that may be encountered in patients with intraabdominal bleeding recalcitrant to conventional hemorrhage control.

Post-Operative Spinal Epidural Hematoma: Are We Discontinuing Aspirin Early Enough?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: (1) To compare the risk of Spinal Epidural Hematoma (SEH) associated with specific pre-operative and post-operative anticoagulation (AC) and antiplatelet medications (APM). (2) To define the incidence of SEH and identify risk factors for SEH in our population. METHODS: Thoracolumbar surgeries between October 2009 and March 2020 were collected. Patients who underwent incision and drainage of a symptomatic SEH were identified. AC and APM was recorded 14 days pre-operatively and post-operatively. Demographics and intra-operative factors were recorded. Relative risk with 95% confidence interval was used, with Bonferroni-corrected P-values <.05 used for significance. RESULTS: 9307 surgeries were identified. 177 (1.9%) patients returned to the OR within 30 days, 37 of whom (.39%) returned due to SEH. Seven patients were on either AC or APM pre-op, and sixteen post-op. Five were on aspirin pre-operatively (RR 3.2, 95% CI 1.25-8.22, P = .015). Risk was not increased in patients on multiple agents. No AC or APM demonstrated increased risk of hematoma post-operatively, despite trends toward significance with multiple agents. The use of a drain and complicated hypertension were associated with increased risk of SEH. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative aspirin is associated with increased risk of SEH, even when appropriately discontinued. Appropriately dosed post-operative anticoagulation does not increase the risk of SEH, though being on multiple agents trends toward statistical significance and should be better studied. Surgeons should be vigilant and carefully monitor patients on pre-operative antiplatelet medications for spinal epidural hematoma.

Treating Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Dislocations.

Proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint dislocation a common injury. Usually, concentric stable reduction can be achieved with closed reduction. Occasionally, PIP joint dislocations are irreducible and open reduction is necessary. Complications include prolonged splinting and delay in presentation with subluxation or persistent dislocation. Surgery is often recommended for contracture or joint reduction. Surgical techniques focus on contracture release, joint reduction, and range of motion. Techniques have evolved from primary repair to tenodesis and suture anchor reconstruction. Most studies on PIP joint dislocations are retrospective case reports with good outcomes but chronic mild contracture and deformity are consistent in the literature.