Cannabis use frequency and pain interference among people with HIV.

Cannabis is often used by people with HIV (PWH) for pain, yet study results are inconsistent regarding whether and how it affects pain. This study examines whether greater cannabis use frequency is associated with lower pain interference and whether cannabis use modifies the association of pain severity and pain interference among 134 PWH with substance dependence or a lifetime history of injection drug use. Multi-variable linear regression models examined the association between past 30-day cannabis use frequency and pain interference. Additional models evaluated whether cannabis use modified the association between pain severity and pain interference. Cannabis use frequency was not significantly associated with pain interference. However, in a model with interaction between cannabis use frequency and pain severity, greater cannabis use frequency attenuated the strength of the association between pain severity and pain interference (p = 0.049). The adjusted mean difference (AMD) in pain interference was +1.13, + 0.81, and +0.05 points for each 1-point increase in pain severity for those with no cannabis use, 15 days of use, and daily use, respectively. These findings suggest that attenuating the impact of pain severity on pain-related functional impairment is a potential mechanism for a beneficial role of cannabis for PWH.

Medication for addiction treatment and acute care utilization in HIV-positive adults with substance use disorders.

Medication for addiction treatment (MAT) could reduce acute care utilization in HIV-positive individuals with substance use disorders. The study objective was to determine if HIV-positive people with substance use disorders treated with MAT report less acute care utilization than those not receiving MAT. We assessed the association between MAT and acute care utilization among HIV-positive individuals with alcohol or opioid use disorder. Acute care utilization 6 months later was defined as any past 3-month self-reported (1) emergency department (ED) visit and (2) hospitalization. Of 153 participants, 88% had alcohol use disorder, 41% had opioid use disorder, and 48 (31%) were treated with MAT. Fifty-five (36%) participants had an ED visit and 38 (25%) participants had a hospitalization. MAT was not associated with an ED visit (AOR 1.12, 95% CI 0.46-2.75) or hospitalization (AOR 1.09, 95% CI 0.39-3.04). MAT was not associated with acute care utilization. These results highlight the need to increase MAT prescribing in HIV-positive individuals with substance use disorders, and to address the many factors that influence acute care utilization.

Readiness-to-change as a moderator of a web-based brief intervention for marijuana among students identified by health center screening.

INTRODUCTION: Electronic screening and brief intervention has been identified as a low cost strategy to address marijuana use among students, however there is little known about who may be most responsive to this intervention approach. This study examined whether readiness-to-change moderated the influence of a web-based intervention on frequency of use at 3-month outcomes. METHODS: One-hundred twenty-three students who smoked marijuana at least monthly were identified by screening in a student health center. Baseline and 3-month outcome assessments were conducted on-line. Participants were randomly assigned to either eCHECKUP TO GO-marijuana or a control condition after completing marijuana measures and the Readiness-to-Change Questionnaire (RTCQ). Negative binomial regression analyses were conducted to examine whether the effect of the intervention on marijuana use at 3-month outcomes was moderated by the Action and Problem Recognition dimensions of the RTCQ, adjusting for baseline use. RESULTS: Analyses showed a significant Intervention × Action interaction. Probing of interaction effects showed that among those with high scores on the Action scale participants in the intervention group reported significantly fewer days of use than those in the control condition at follow-up (IRR=0.53, 95%CI: 0.94, 2.08). The Problem Recognition dimension did not moderate the influence of the intervention on outcomes. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that this eSBI may bolster change efforts among students who have begun taking steps toward changing their marijuana use.

Screening and intervention for illicit drug abuse: a national survey of primary care physicians and psychiatrists.

BACKGROUND: Illicit drug abuse causes much morbidity and mortality, yet little is known about physicians' screening and intervention practices regarding illicit drug abuse. METHODS: We mailed a survey to a national sample of 2000 practicing general internists, family physicians, obstetricians and gynecologists, and psychiatrists to assess their screening and intervention practices for illicit drug abuse. RESULTS: Of 1082 respondents (adjusted response rate, 57%), 68% reported that they regularly ask new outpatients about drug use. For diagnosed illicit drug abuse, 55% reported that they routinely offer formal treatment referral, but 15% reported that they do not intervene. In multivariate logistic regression models, more optimal screening and intervention practices were associated with psychiatry specialty, confidence in obtaining the history of drug use, optimism about the effectiveness of therapy, less concern that patients will object, and fewer perceived time constraints. CONCLUSIONS: Most physicians reported that they ask patients about illicit drug use, but a substantial minority inadequately intervene in diagnosed drug abuse. Initiatives to promote physician involvement in illicit drug abuse should include strategies to increase physicians' confidence in managing drug problems, engender optimism about the benefits of treatment, dispel concerns about patients' sensitivity regarding substance use, and address perceived time limitations.

The impact of alcohol-related diagnoses on pneumonia outcomes.

BACKGROUND: There is controversy regarding the role of alcoholism as a prognostic factor in hospitalized patients with pneumonia. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of alcohol abuse on hospitalization charges, length of hospital stay, intensive care unit use, and in-hospital mortality. METHODS: We studied a cohort of all adults hospitalized in 1992 in Massachusetts with a principal diagnosis of pneumonia, and all Massachusetts residents hospitalized for pneumonia in 6 bordering states. RESULTS: For the 23,198 pneumonia cases the mean total hospitalization charges were $9925, mean length of hospital stay was 9.6 days, 12% of the cases had intensive care unit stays, and 10% of the cases died during the hospitalization. In bivariate analyses, pneumonia cases with alcohol-related diagnoses had higher charges (mean, $11,232 vs $9877, P = .07), had shorter length of hospital stay (9.2 vs 9.6 days, P = .02), were more likely to experience an intensive care unit stay (19% vs 12%, P < .001), and had lower in-hospital mortality (6.0% vs 10.2%, P < .001). Multivariable analyses adjusting for comorbidity, pneumonia etiology, and demographics revealed that for pneumonia cases with alcohol-related diagnoses, risk-adjusted hospital charges were $1293 higher (adjusted mean, $11,179 vs $9888, P < .001), length of hospital stay was 0.6 days longer (10.1 vs 9.5 days, P = .001), intensive care unit use was higher (18% vs 12%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-1.98), and mortality was no different (10% with or without an alcohol-related diagnosis). CONCLUSIONS: Having an alcohol-related diagnosis is associated with more use of intensive care, longer inpatient stays, and higher hospital charges. To understand resource utilization in cases of pneumonia, alcohol abuse is a comorbid factor that must be considered.

Benefits of linking primary medical care and substance abuse services: patient, provider, and societal perspectives.

Individuals with alcohol and drug use problems may receive health care from medical, mental health, and substance abuse providers, or a combination of all three. Systems of care are often distinct and separate, and substantial opportunities for benefit to patient, provider, and payer are missed. In this article, we outline (1) the possible benefits of linking primary care, mental health, and substance abuse services from the perspective of the major stakeholders-medical and mental health providers, addiction clinicians, patients, and society-and (2) reasons for suboptimal linkage and opportunities for improving linkage within the current health care system. We also review published models of linked medical and substance abuse services. Given the potential benefits of creating tangible systems in which primary care, mental health, and substance abuse services are meaningfully linked, efforts to implement, examine, and measure the real impact should be a high priority.

Alcohol abuse and dependence in Latinos living in the United States: validation of the CAGE (4M) questions.

BACKGROUND: Brief alcoholism screening questionnaires have not been adequately studied in the rapidly growing Latino population living in the United States. OBJECTIVE: To assess (1) the prevalence of alcoholism and (2) the performance of 2 alcohol screening instruments in Latinos. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional interview study in an urban teaching hospital-based primary care practice. Consecutive self-identified Latino subjects provided informed consent. All subjects were interviewed in English or Spanish using 2 alcoholism screening tools, the CAGE (or the Spanish version, the 4M), and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, and a criterion standard for the diagnosis of alcohol abuse and dependence, the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. RESULTS: Of 210 subjects interviewed, 36% had a lifetime diagnosis of alcohol abuse or dependence by the criterion standard. Thirty-one percent were currently drinking hazardous amounts of alcohol. A CAGE (4M) score of 1 or more was 92% sensitive and 74% specific, and a score of 2 or more was 80% sensitive and 93% specific for a lifetime diagnosis of alcohol abuse or dependency. CAGE (4M) scores of 0, 2, 3, and 4 were associated with likelihood ratios (0.1, 4.8, 18.5, and 36.8, respectively) that resulted in substantial changes from pretest (36%) to posttest probability (to 6%, 73%, 91%, and 95%, respectively) of a diagnosis of alcohol abuse or dependency. At the standard cutoff point, the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test detected only 51% of subjects with alcohol disorders. CONCLUSIONS: In Latinos in primary care settings, alcohol abuse and dependence are common and the CAGE (4M) is a brief, valid, screening tool for detecting alcohol use disorders.

Adolescents' preferences regarding human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related physician counseling and HIV testing.

OBJECTIVE: To assess adolescents' preferences regarding human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related physician counseling and HIV testing. DESIGN: Anonymous, self-report survey. SETTING: Metropolitan Boston public schools. PARTICIPANTS: Students in 9th and 12th grade from 10 schools. RESULTS: Of the 845 students (99%) who completed the survey, 53% were female, 50% seniors, and 76% white. Although 86% had regular physicians, only 27% reported ever discussing HIV with a physician. The majority wanted a physician to give them information about sexually transmitted diseases (82%), condoms (73%), sex (70%), safe sex (80%), and HIV (85%). Most wanted physicians to ask about personal experiences with sexually transmitted diseases (64%), condoms (59%), safe sex (67%), and HIV (72%). Seniors, students with female physicians, and students who had previously discussed sex with physicians were significantly more likely to want physicians to ask personal questions about HIV-related risk behaviors. Most, however, felt uncomfortable initiating a discussion about safe sex (59%), condoms (67%), sex (69%), and homosexuality (78%). More students preferred to speak with physicians (36%) than with family members (16%) or teachers (2%) about their personal risk of acquiring HIV, although 32% preferred to speak with friends. More preferred to be tested for HIV by someone who did not know them (40%) than by someone who did (32%). When asked about specific testing sites, 25% preferred a place that does only HIV testing, and 22% preferred their regular physicians' offices. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents want physicians to give them information and to ask personal questions about HIV and HIV-related risk behaviors, and they prefer that the physicians initiate the discussion. Although they have no clear preference for testing sites, many teenagers prefer to be tested by someone who does not know them.

Pharmacotherapies for alcohol abuse. Withdrawal and treatment.

Pharmacologic management of alcoholism is only one part of the management of both alcohol dependence and withdrawal, which also includes the provision of a calm, quiet environment; reassurance; ongoing reassessment; attention to fluid and electrolyte disorders; treatment of coexisting addictions and common medical, surgical, and psychiatric comorbidities; and referral for ongoing psychosocial and medical treatment. For further discussion of these topics, the reader is referred to previously published sources. A survey of alcoholism treatment programs revealed that although benzodiazepines were the most commonly used drugs, standardized monitoring of patients' withdrawal severity was not common practice, and a significant minority of clinicians were using a variety of other drugs, some not known to prevent or treat the complications of withdrawal. Treatment should be based on the available evidence (Working Group on Pharmacological Management of Alcohol Withdrawal: American Society of Addiction Medicine Committee on Practice Guidelines: Pharmacological management of alcohol withdrawal: An evidence-based practice guideline. Unpublished draft, 1997). Patients with significant symptoms, patients with complications such as seizures or delirium tremens, and patients at higher risk for complications of alcohol withdrawal should receive benzodiazepines, particularly chlordiazepoxide, diazepam, or lorazepam, because of their safety and documented efficacy in preventing and treating the most serious complications of alcohol withdrawal. These drugs may be dosed on a fixed schedule for a predetermined number of doses on a tapering schedule over several days, or they may be administered by front-loading. An alternative approach for selected patients without seizures or acute comorbidity is symptom-triggered therapy, which individualizes treatment and decreases the duration and dose of medication administration. With either of the regimens, patients should have their withdrawal severity monitored until symptoms are resolving. Once withdrawal from alcohol is safely completed, the focus should turn to helping to prevent relapse. Disulfiram may be useful in highly motivated subsets of patients and when compliance-enhancing strategies are used. Naltrexone is useful in the broader population of patients entering treatment for alcohol dependence. These pharmacologic interventions should be given in the context of ongoing psychosocial support. There is substantial evidence that pharmacologic management of alcohol abuse and dependence is effective. As would be predicted from alcohol's myriad cellular effects, no panacea exists for alcoholism. For alcohol withdrawal, however, although treatment regimens have only recently been refined, evidence for effective treatment of symptoms and prevention of complications with benzodiazepines has been available for decades. Within the last decade, effective treatments, including naltrexone, have been shown to reduce alcohol intake in alcohol-dependent persons. Given the prevalence and cost of alcohol-related problems, all effective therapies (including pharmacologic treatments) should be considered to treat alcohol abuse and dependence.

Introduction to alcohol withdrawal.

Heavy drinkers who suddenly decrease their alcohol consumption or abstain completely may experience alcohol withdrawal (AW). Signs and symptoms of AW can include, among others, mild to moderate tremors, irritability, anxiety, or agitation. The most severe manifestations of withdrawal include delirium tremens, hallucinations, and seizures. These manifestations result from alcohol-induced imbalances in the brain chemistry that cause excessive neuronal activity if the alcohol is withheld. Management of AW includes thorough assessment of the severity of the patient's symptoms and of any complicating conditions as well as treatment of the withdrawal symptoms with pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches. Treatment can occur in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Recognition and treatment of withdrawal can represent a first step in the patient's recovery process.

Managing alcohol withdrawal in the elderly.

The alcohol withdrawal syndrome is common in elderly individuals who are alcohol dependent and who decrease or stop their alcohol intake. While there have been few clinical studies to directly support or refute the hypothesis that withdrawal symptom severity, delirium and seizures increase with advancing age, several observational studies suggest that adverse functional and cognitive complications during alcohol withdrawal do occur more frequently in elderly patients. Most elderly patients with alcohol withdrawal symptoms should be considered for admission to an inpatient setting for supportive care and management. However, elderly patients with adequate social support and without significant withdrawal symptoms at presentation, comorbid illness or past history of complicated withdrawal may be suitable for outpatient management. Although over 100 drugs have been described for alcohol withdrawal treatment, there have been no studies assessing the efficacy of these drugs specifically in elderly patients. Studies in younger patients support benzodiazepines as the most efficacious therapy for reducing withdrawal symptoms and the incidence of delirium and seizure. While short-acting benzodiazepines, such as oxazepam and lorazepam, may be appropriate for elderly patients given the risk for excessive sedation from long-acting benzodiazepines, they may be less effective in preventing seizures and more prone to produce discontinuation symptoms if not tapered properly. To ensure appropriate benzodiazepine treatment, dose and frequency should be individualised with frequent monitoring, and based on validated alcohol withdrawal severity measures. Selected patients who have a history of severe or complicated withdrawal symptoms may benefit from a fixed schedule of benzodiazepine provided that medication is held for sedation. beta-Blockers, clonidine, carbamazepine and haloperidol may be used as adjunctive agents to treat symptoms not controlled by benzodiazepines. Lastly, the age of the patient should not deter clinicians from helping the patient achieve successful alcohol treatment and rehabilitation.

The value of acupuncture detoxification programs in a substance abuse treatment system.

Our purpose is to compare baseline characteristics and detoxification readmission rates of clients treated at outpatient acupuncture programs and at short-term residential programs, two options available to persons seeking substance abuse detoxification. This was a retrospective cohort study using data on clients discharged from publicly funded detoxification programs in Boston between January 1993 and September 1994. Multivariate models were used to examine the effect on 6-month detoxification readmission rates of treatment at residential detoxification programs (used by 6,907 clients) versus at outpatient acupuncture programs (used by 1,104 clients) after adjusting for baseline differences. Acupuncture clients were less likely to be readmitted for detoxification within 6 months (odds ratio [OR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.95). Similar results were found when the analysis was performed on a subsample of clients that were relatively similar in terms of baseline characteristics (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.94). We determined that acupuncture detoxification programs are a useful component of a substance abuse treatment system.

Association of alcohol consumption with HIV sex- and drug-risk behaviors among drug users.

The relationship between alcohol use and HIV transmission is well recognized but not fully understood. In particular, the role of alcohol abuse as a mediator of HIV risk behavior among drug users is not well documented. We hypothesized that alcohol use in drug users will result in greater HIV risk-taking behavior. Participants were 354 drug users, of whom 105 were recent injection drug users. Multiple regression models were used to characterize whether measures of sexual and injection drug use HIV risk behavior were related to alcohol consumption, controlling for other potentially associated factors. We found that sexual HIV risk-taking behavior is associated with increased alcohol consumption among women (p = 0.02), with women having more risky sexual behavior than males. However, contrary to our hypothesis, there was no significant association of alcohol consumption with risky injection drug behavior. Addressing alcohol problems among drug users, particularly women, may be an important opportunity to reduce HIV sexual risk behavior among this high-risk population.

Validation of the screening strategy in the NIAAA "Physicians' Guide to Helping Patients with Alcohol Problems".

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine the diagnostic test characteristics of the alcohol screening strategy recommended in the National Institute on Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse (NIAAA) "Physicians' Guide to Helping Patients with Alcohol Problems." METHOD: A research interview was performed on patients who presented to one urban emergency department (N = 395; 61% women). It asked three alcohol consumption questions, the CAGE questionnaire, and about past alcohol problems. The NIAAA-recommended screen was considered positive for alcohol consumption in excess of 14 drinks per week or 4 drinks per occasion for men, or 7 drinks per week or 3 drinks per occasion for women, or a CAGE score of 1 or greater. A sample of patients (n = 250) received the Composite International Diagnostic Interview substance abuse module, a gold standard interview, to determine lifetime or prior 12-month alcohol abuse or dependence; results were adjusted for verification bias. RESULTS: The prevalence of lifetime:alcohol abuse or dependence was 13%, for which the NIAAA strategy was 81% sensitive and 80% specific. The prevalence of alcohol abuse or dependence in the prior 12 months was 10%, for which the strategy was 83% sensitive and 84% specific. Its positive likelihood ratio exceeded that of the CAGE, augmented CAGE or consumption questions alone, and its negative likelihood ratio was the lowest. CONCLUSIONS: The screening strategy combining alcohol consumption and CAGE questions recommended in the NIAAA "Physicians' Guide" is valid, and has superior test characteristics compared to the CAGE alone, in this predominantly black (86%) emergency department population. Its brevity and simple interpretation recommend wider dissemination of the NIAAA "Physicians' Guide," although future research should examine its test characteristics in other clinical settings and with other populations.

Evidence-based medicine and the real world: understanding the controversy.

Controversy has surrounded the 'paradigm' of evidence-based medicine since its introduction in 1992 as a new approach to the teaching and practice of medicine. Here, we address two questions: (1) is evidence-based medicine a good thing?; and (2) why has so much controversy arisen? In addressing these questions, we propose that the discussion surrounding evidence-based medicine should no longer be about whether the application of evidence in clinical practice is a good thing, because it obviously is. Instead, the debate ought to focus on the more difficult question of how to enhance its acceptability among busy clinicians practising in the 'real world'. For the future, we optimistically anticipate an enhanced adoption of evidence-based medicine, as clinicians will become increasingly capable of efficiently accessing existing and forthcoming evidence resources.

Factors associated with discontinuation of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients with alcohol problems.

Although mortality rates among HIV-infected populations have declined with the advent of combination antiretroviral therapy (ART), patients with substance use disorders have benefited less from these therapies. While adherence to ART has been well studied, less is known about factors associated with discontinuation of ART. The aim of this study is to investigate predictors of discontinuation of ART in HIV-infected patients with alcohol problems, focusing on their substance use and depressive symptoms. The study cohort (n=266) was prospectively assessed with biannual standardised interviews between 2001 and 2005. Four predictor variables (cocaine, heroin, heavy alcohol use and substantial depressive symptoms) were assessed six months prior to the outcome (ART discontinuation). Longitudinal logistic regression models examined the association between predictor variables and ART discontinuation adjusting for age, gender, race/ethnicity, homelessness, CD4, HIV RNA and HIV Symptom Index. Subjects were 77% male; 43% black; 22% homeless; 45% used cocaine; 20% used heroin; 29% had heavy alcohol use; and 40% had substantial depressive symptoms. Discontinuation occurred in 135 (17%) of the observations (n=743). In bivariate analyses, cocaine use, heroin use and depressive symptoms were significantly associated with ART discontinuation but heavy alcohol use was not. In the multivariable model, substantial depressive symptoms (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04, 2.65) but not cocaine (AOR=1.28; 95%CI: 0.76, 2.16) or heroin use (AOR=1.27 95%CI: 0.66, 2.44), remained significantly associated with ART discontinuation. Among HIV-infected adults with alcohol problems, depressive symptoms, but not substance use, predicted subsequent ART discontinuation. Recognition and treatment of depressive symptoms in this population may result in better maintenance of ART and its associated clinical benefits.

Recognition and management of occult alcohol withdrawal.

Many patients experience withdrawal because an acute illness has interrupted their usual alcohol intake. Medical and psychiatric complications of alcoholism may also coexist with withdrawal. Several findings predict the likelihood of seizures of delirium tremens and thus are useful in making initial treatment decisions.

Alcohol withdrawal: a nationwide survey of inpatient treatment practices.

OBJECTIVE: To describe current practices employed in the inpatient treatment for alcohol withdrawal. DESIGN: Survey. SETTING: Inpatient alcoholism treatment programs in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Medical directors of 176 (69%) of 257 eligible programs randomly selected from a national listing. RESULTS: The medical directors estimated that of all inpatients treated for alcohol withdrawal at the programs, 68% received one of the following medications. Benzodiazepines, including the long-acting chlordiazepoxide (33%) and diazepam (16%), and less frequently the short-acting oxazepam (7%) and lorazepam (4%), were the most commonly used agents. Barbiturates (11%), phenytoin (10%), clonidine (7%), beta-blockers (3%), carbamazepine (1%), and antipsychotics (1%) were less frequently given. Drug was most often given on a fixed dosing schedule with additional medication "as needed" (52% of the programs). Only 31% of the programs routinely used a standardized withdrawal severity scale to monitor patients. Mean duration of sedative treatment was three days; inpatient treatment, four days. Use of fixed-schedule regimens was associated with longer sedative treatment (mean four vs three days, p < 0.01). Northeast census region location and psychiatrist program director were significantly associated with longer sedative and inpatient treatment duration. CONCLUSIONS: The most commonly reported regimen for alcohol withdrawal included three days of long-acting benzodiazepines on a fixed schedule with additional medication "as needed." Standardized monitoring of the severity of withdrawal was not common practice. The directors reported using a variety of other regimens, some not known to prevent the major complications of withdrawal. Although geographic location and director specialty were significantly associated with treatment duration, much of the variation in treatment for alcohol withdrawal remains unexplained.

The impact of leaving against medical advice on hospital resource utilization.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of hospital discharge against medical advice (AMA) on the interpretation of charges and length of stay attributable to alcoholism. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. Three analytic strategies assessed the effect of having an alcohol-related diagnosis (ARD) on risk-adjusted utilization in multivariate regressions. Strategy 1 did not adjust for leaving AMA, strategy 2 adjusted for leaving AMA, and strategy 3 restricted the sample by excluding AMA discharges. SETTING: Acute care hospitals. PATIENTS: We studied 23,198 pneumonia hospitalizations in a statewide administrative database. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among these admissions, 3.6% had an ARD, and 1.2% left AMA. In strategy 1 an ARD accounted for a $1,293 increase in risk-adjusted charges for a hospitalization compared with cases without an ARD ( p =.012). ARD-attributable increases of $1,659 ( p =.002) and $1,664 ( p =. 002) in strategies 2 and 3 respectively, represent significant 28% and 29% increases compared with strategy 1. Similarly, using strategy 1 an ARD accounted for a 0.6-day increase in risk-adjusted length of stay over cases without an ARD ( p =.188). An increase of 1 day was seen using both strategies 2 and 3 ( p =.044 and p =.027, respectively), representing significant 67% increases attributable to ARDs compared with strategy 1. CONCLUSIONS: Discharge AMA affects the interpretation of the relation between alcoholism and utilization. The ARD-attributable utilization was greater when analyses adjusted for or excluded AMA cases. Not accounting for leaving AMA resulted in an underestimation of the impact of alcoholism on resource utilization.