An International survey on living kidney donation and transplant practices during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The scope of the impact of the Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic on living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) practices across the world is not well-defined. We received survey responses from 204 transplant centers internationally from May to June 2020 regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on LDKT practices. Respondents represented 16 countries on five continents. Overall, 75% of responding centers reported that LDKT surgery was on hold (from 67% of North American centers to 91% of European centers). The majority (59%) of centers reported that new donor evaluations were stopped (from 46% of North American centers to 86% of European centers), with additional 23% of centers reporting important decrease in evaluations. Only 10% of centers reported slight variations on their evaluations. For the centers that continued donor evaluations, 40% performed in-person visits, 68% by video, and 42% by telephone. Center concerns for donor (82%) and recipient (76%) safety were the leading barriers to LDKT during the pandemic, followed by patients concerns (48%), and government restrictions (46%). European centers reported more barriers related to staff limitations while North and Latin American centers were more concerned with testing capacity and insufficient resources including protective equipment. As LDKT resumes, 96% of the programs intend to screen donor and recipient pairs for coronavirus infection, most of them with polymerase chain reaction testing of nasopharyngeal swab samples. The COVID-19 pandemic has had broad impact on all aspects of LDKT practice. Ongoing research and consensus-building are needed to guide safe reopening of LDKT programs.

Geographic disparities in transplantation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The Final Rule clearly states that geography should not be a determinant of a chance of a potential candidate being transplanted. There have been multiple concerns about geographic disparities in patients in need of solid organ transplantation. Allocation policy adjustments have been designed to address these concerns, but there is little evidence that the disparities have been solved. The purpose of this review is to describe the main drivers of geographic disparities in solid organ transplantation and how allocation policy changes and other potential actions could impact these inequalities. RECENT FINDINGS: Geographical disparities have been reported in kidney, pancreas, liver, and lung transplantation. Organ Procurement and Transplant Network has modified organ allocation rules to underplay geography as a key determinant of a candidates' chance of receiving an organ. Thus, heart, lung, and more recently liver and Kidney Allocation Systems have incorporated broader organ sharing to reduce geographical disparities. Whether these policy adjustments will indeed eliminate geographical disparities are still unclear. SUMMARY: Modern allocation policy focus in patients need, regardless of geography. Innovative actions to further reduce geographical disparities are needed.

Impact of continuous training through distributed practice for acquisition of minimally invasive surgical skills.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) requires the mastery of manual skills and a specific training is required. Apart from residencies and fellowships in MIS, other learning opportunities utilize massive training, mainly with use of simulators in short courses. A long-term postgraduate course represents an opportunity to learn through training using distributed practice. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to assess the use of distributed practice for acquisition of basic minimally invasive skills in surgeons who participated in a long-term MIS postgraduate course. METHODS: A prospective, longitudinal and quantitative study was conducted among surgeons who attended a 1-year postgraduate course of MIS in Brazil, from 2012 to 2014. They were tested through five different exercises in box trainers (peg-transfer, passing, cutting, intracorporeal knot, and suture) in the first (t0), fourth (t1) and last, eighth, (t2) meetings of this course. The time and penalties of each exercise were collected for each participant. Participant skills were assessed based on time and accuracy on a previously tested score. RESULTS: Fifty-seven surgeons (participants) from three consecutive groups participated in this study. There was a significant improvement in scores in all exercises. The average increase in scores between t0 and t2 was 88% for peg-transfer, 174% for passing, 149% for cutting, 130% for intracorporeal knot, and 120% for suture (p < 0.001 for all exercises). CONCLUSION: Learning through distributed practice is effective and should be integrated into a MIS postgraduate course curriculum for acquisition of core skills.

Retention of laparoscopic skills in naive medical students who underwent short training.

BACKGROUND: Simulators are useful tools in the development of laparoscopic skills. However, little is known about the effectiveness of short laparoscopic training sessions and how retention of skills occurs in surgical trainees who are naïve to laparoscopy. This study analyses the retention of laparoscopic surgical skills in medical students without prior surgical training. METHODS: A group of first- and second-year medical students (n = 68), without prior experience in surgery or laparoscopy, answered a demographic questionnaire and had their laparoscopic skills assessed by the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) training protocol. Subsequently, they underwent a 150-minute training course after which they were re-tested. One year after the training, the medical students' performance in the simulator was re-evaluated in order to analyse retention. RESULTS: Of the initial 68 students, a total of 36 participated throughout the entire study, giving a final participation rate of 52 %. Thirty-six medical students with no gender predominance and an average age of 20 years were evaluated. One year after the short training programme, retention was 69.3 % in the peg transfer (p < 0.05) and 64.2 % in ligature (p < 0.05) compared with immediate post-training evaluation. There was no significant difference in suturing. The average sample score in the baseline test was 8.3, in the post-training test it was 89.7, and in the retention test it was 84.2, which corresponded to a skill retention equivalence of 93 %. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant retention of the laparoscopic surgical skills developed. Even 1 year after a short training session, medical students without previous surgical experience showed that they have retained a great part of the skills acquired through training.

Racial variation in medical outcomes among living kidney donors.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding health outcomes among living kidney donors are lacking, especially among nonwhite persons. METHODS: We linked identifiers from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) with administrative data of a private U.S. health insurer and performed a retrospective study of 4650 persons who had been living kidney donors from October 1987 through July 2007 and who had post-donation nephrectomy benefits with this insurer at some point from 2000 through 2007. We ascertained post-nephrectomy medical diagnoses and conditions requiring medical treatment from billing claims. Cox regression analyses with left and right censoring to account for observed periods of insurance benefits were used to estimate absolute prevalence and prevalence ratios for diagnoses after nephrectomy. We then compared prevalence patterns with those in the 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for the general population. RESULTS: Among the donors, 76.3% were white, 13.1% black, 8.2% Hispanic, and 2.4% another race or ethnic group. The median time from donation to the end of insurance benefits was 7.7 years. After kidney donation, black donors, as compared with white donors, had an increased risk of hypertension (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23 to 1.88), diabetes mellitus requiring drug therapy (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.33 to 3.98), and chronic kidney disease (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.48 to 3.62); findings were similar for Hispanic donors. The absolute prevalence of diabetes among all donors did not exceed that in the general population, but the prevalence of hypertension exceeded NHANES estimates in some subgroups. End-stage renal disease was identified in less than 1% of donors but was more common among black donors than among white donors. CONCLUSIONS: As in the general U.S. population, racial disparities in medical conditions occur among living kidney donors. Increased attention to health outcomes among demographically diverse kidney donors is needed. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others.)

The interaction among donor characteristics, severity of liver disease, and the cost of liver transplantation.

Accurate assessment of the impact of donor quality on liver transplant (LT) costs has been limited by the lack of a large, multicenter study of detailed clinical and economic data. A novel, retrospective database linking information from the University HealthSystem Consortium and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry was analyzed using multivariate regression to determine the relationship between donor quality (assessed through the Donor Risk Index [DRI]), recipient illness severity, and total inpatient costs (transplant and all readmissions) for 1 year following LT. Cost data were available for 9059 LT recipients. Increasing MELD score, higher DRI, simultaneous liver-kidney transplant, female sex, and prior liver transplant were associated with increasing cost of LT (P < 0.05). MELD and DRI interact to synergistically increase the cost of LT (P < 0.05). Donors in the highest DRI quartile added close to $12,000 to the cost of transplantation and nearly $22,000 to posttransplant costs in comparison to the lowest risk donors. Among the individual components of the DRI, donation after cardiac death (increased costs by $20,769 versus brain dead donors) had the greatest impact on transplant costs. Overall, 1-year costs were increased in older donors, minority donors, nationally shared organs, and those with cold ischemic times of 7-13 hours (P < 0.05 for all). In conclusion, donor quality, as measured by the DRI, is an independent predictor of LT costs in the perioperative and postoperative periods. Centers in highly competitive regions that perform transplantation on higher MELD patients with high DRI livers may be particularly affected by the synergistic impact of these factors.

Regional differences in deceased donor liver transplantation and their implications for organ utilization and allocation.

We examined the UNOS database from 7/15/00-7/17/05 for Regional deceased donor liver utilization. For each region, we performed logistic regression and derived odds ratios (OR) for donor characteristics associated with livers being transplanted outside of the region or not transplanted at all. Regions with smallest and least significant OR were considered aggressive users of suboptimal organs. We estimated how many untransplanted livers from less aggressive regions might be used by more aggressive regions. Only Region 9 was significantly more aggressive than others (median OR: 6 vs. 16; p < 0.01; median OR size: 1.4 vs. 3.6; p < 0.01). Region 9 transplanted at higher median Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (20.4 [6-73] vs. 18.3 [6-70], p < 0.01), but had the lowest one- and five-yr graft survival (p < 0.01). Of 30,474 livers, 5056 were not transplanted, of which 3690 were procured outside Region 9 but met Region 9 use criteria. Of these, 1488 and 1807 livers had donor risk indices ≤ 2, for hypothetical 12 and 8 h cold ischemia time (CIT), respectively. Regional differences in liver utilization are profound. Region 9 is significantly more aggressive. At the most, 297-361 organs per year may have been used under Region 9's use criteria but overall graft survival may have declined.

Survival implications of prescription opioid and benzodiazepine use in lung transplant recipients: Analysis of linked transplant registry and pharmacy fill records.

BACKGROUND: Prescription opioid and benzodiazepine use have been associated with morbidity and mortality among some groups of solid organ transplant recipients, but implications for outcomes among lung transplant patients are not well described. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked national transplant registry and pharmaceutical records to characterize the associations between benzodiazepine and opioid prescription fills in the years before and after lung transplant (2006-2017), with risk-adjusted posttransplant survival (adjusted hazard ratio, LCLaHRUCL). RESULTS: Among 11,568 recipients, 33.7% filled an opioid prescription, and 25.8% filled a benzodiazepine prescription before transplant. Compared to patients without prescriptions, those who filled both short- and long-acting benzodiazepine prescriptions before transplant had 2-fold higher mortality in the first year posttransplant (aHR, 1.392.123.21), after adjustment for baseline factors and opioid fills, while pretransplant opioid fills were not associated with posttransplant mortality after adjustment for benzodiazepine fills. Pretransplant opioid and benzodiazepine use strongly predicted more use after transplant. Fills of both short- and long-acting benzodiazepines in the first year posttransplant were associated with 77% increased mortality >1-to-2 years posttransplant (aHR, 1.061.772.96). Compared with no posttransplant opioid fills, there was a dose-dependent association between first-year opioid fills and subsequent adjusted mortality risk (level 2: aHR, 1.171.501.92 to level 4: aHR, 1.562.012.59). These effects were independent, and interactions were not detected. CONCLUSIONS: Benzodiazepine prescription fills before and after lung transplant, and opioid fills after transplant, are independently associated with posttransplant mortality. Review of benzodiazepine and opioid use history is relevant to risk-stratifying patients before and after lung transplant.

Intraoperative portal vein blood flow predicts allograft and patient survival following liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that operative variables might predict survival following liver transplantation. METHODS: We examined perioperative variables from 469 liver transplants carried out at the University of Washington during 2003-2006. Logistic regression determined the variables' contributions to survival at 30, 90 and 365 days. RESULTS: Portal vein blood flow (>1 l/min) was significant to patient survival at 30, 90 and 365 days. Complete reperfusion was only a significant predictor of survival at 30 days. This provided model receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) statistics of 0.93 and 0.87 for 30 and 90 days, respectively. At 365 days, hepatic artery blood flow (>250 ml/min) combined with portal vein blood flow was significantly predictive of survival, with an AUC of 0.74. A subset analysis of 110 transplants demonstrated improved 1-year survival with more aggressive vascular revisions. DISCUSSION: Portal vein blood flow is a significant predictor of survival after liver transplantation. Initially, the liver's survival is based on portal vein blood flow; however, subsequent biliary problems and patient demise result from both poor portal vein and inadequate hepatic artery blood flow.

Liver transplantation cost in the model for end-stage liver disease era: looking beyond the transplant admission.

We examined the relationship between the total cost incurred by liver transplantation (LT) recipients and their Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at the time of transplant. We used a novel database linking billing claims from a large private payer with the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry. Included were adults who underwent LT from March 2002 through August 2007 (n = 990). Claims within the year preceding and following transplantation were analyzed according to the recipient's calculated MELD score. Cost was the primary endpoint and was assessed by the length of stay and charges. Transplant admission charges represented approximately 50% of the total cost of LT. MELD was a significant cost driver for pretransplant, transplant, and total charges. A MELD score of 28 to 40 was associated with additional charges of $349,213 (P < 0.05) in comparison with a score of 15 to 20. Pretransplant and transplant admission charges were higher by $152,819 (P < 0.05) and $64,286 (P < 0.05), respectively, in this higher MELD group. No differences by MELD score were found for posttransplant charges. Those in the highest MELD group also experienced longer hospital stays both in the pretransplant period and at the time of LT but did not have higher rates of re-admissions. In conclusion, high-MELD patients incur significantly higher costs prior to and at the time of LT. Following LT, the MELD score is not a significant predictor of cost or re-admission.

Increased risk of graft failure in kidney transplant recipients after a diagnosis of dyspepsia or gastroesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal complications are common in patients who undergo kidney transplantation and may affect posttransplant outcomes. We examined the incidence and predictors of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and dyspepsia and their associations with graft survival and mortality after transplant. METHODS: We examined United States Renal Data System data and Medicare billing claims to identify diagnoses of dyspepsia and GERD among Medicare beneficiaries transplanted in 1995-2002 (n=42,257). Among GERD cases, we identified patients with reflux esophagitis (RE). We determined independent predictors of upper gastrointestinal complications and modeled these conditions as time-dependent outcomes predictors with Cox regression. RESULTS: The 3-year cumulative incidences of GERD, RE, and dyspepsia were 20%, 5%, and 6%, respectively. Overall, 23% of transplant recipients received a diagnosis of at least one of these complications by 3 years after transplant. Female gender and a pretransplant upper gastrointestinal disease diagnosis predicted posttransplant gastrointestinal complications. Older age, obesity, Caucasian, and African-American race were associated to increased risk of developing GERD. Patients diagnosed with any of the examined upper gastrointestinal complications experienced an increased risk of graft-failure (hazard ratio 1.58; 95% confidence interval 1.48-1.69) and death (hazard ratio 1.61; 95% confidence interval 1.46-1.77). CONCLUSIONS: Upper gastrointestinal complications are relatively common after kidney transplantation and are associated with a significantly increased risk of graft loss and death. Further research is needed to elucidate mechanisms underlying the observed adverse prognoses conferred by diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal complications after kidney transplant.

Obesity and cardiac risk after kidney transplantation: experience at one center and comprehensive literature review.

BACKGROUND: The cardiac implications of obesity in kidney transplant recipients are not well-described. METHODS: We examined associations of body mass index (BMI) at transplant with posttransplant cardiac risk among 1102 renal allograft recipients at a single center in 1991 to 2004. Cumulative posttransplant incidences of congestive heart failure (CHF), atrial fibrillation (AF), myocardial infarction, and a composite of these cardiac diagnoses were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Bivariate (hazards ratio) and covariate (adjusted hazards ratio) relationships of BMI increments with cardiac risk were modeled by Cox's regression. We also systematically reviewed the literature on BMI and cardiac events after transplant. RESULTS: In the local data, 5-year cumulative incidence of any cardiac diagnosis rose from 8.67% to 29.35% across the lowest to highest BMI quartiles (P=0.02), driven primarily by increases in CHF and AF. In contrast, the rate of myocardial infarction did not differ by BMI quartile (P=0.56). Each 5 U BMI increase predicted 25% higher risk of the cardiac composite (hazards ratio 1.25, 95% CI 1.07-1.47, P=0.005), a relationship that persisted with significance after covariate adjustment (adjusted hazards ratio 1.19, 95% CI 1.00-1.43, P=0.049). BMI independently predicted cardiac risk in subcohorts with pretransplant heart disease and with nondiabetic renal failure. Data from 26 original articles support BMI as a risk factor for posttransplant CHF and AF, whereas findings for coronary/ischemic outcomes are inconsistent and predominantly negative. CONCLUSIONS: High BMI at transplant predicts increased cardiac risk, especially of CHF and AF. Further research should examine whether obesity treatment modifies cardiac risk after kidney transplantation.

Recovery of the Cholangiocytes After Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury: Ultra-Structural, Hystological and Molecular Assessment in Rats.

INTRODUCTION: Ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury of the liver is a common area of interest to transplant and hepatic surgery. Nevertheless, most of the current knowledge of I/R of the liver derives from the hepatocyte and little is known of what happens to the cholangiocytes. Herein, we assess the sequence of early events involved in the I/R injury of the cholangiocytes. METHODS: Sixty Wistar rats were randomized in a SHAM group and I/R group. Serum biochemistry, histopathology, immunohistochemistry, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and laser capture microdissection (LCM) were used for group comparison. RESULTS: There was peak of alkaline phosphatase 24 h after IR injury, and an increase of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase after 6 h of reperfusion, followed by a return to normal levels 24 h after injury. The I/R group presented the liver parenchyma with hepatocellular degeneration up to 6 h, followed by hepatocellular necrosis at 24 h. TEM showed cholangiocyte injury, including a progressive nuclear degeneration and cell membrane rupture, beginning at 6 h and peaking at 24 h after reperfusion. Cytokeratin-18 and caspase-3-positive areas were observed in the I/R group, peaking at 24-h reperfusion. Anti-apoptotic genes Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl activity were expressed from 6 through 24 h after reperfusion. BAX expression showed an increase for 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: I/R injury to the cholangiocyte occurs from 6 through 24 h after reperfusion and a combination of TEM, immunohistochemistry and LCM allows a better isolation of the cholangiocyte and a proper investigation of the events related to the I/R injury. Apoptosis is certainly involved in the I/R process, particularly mediated by BAX.

Hepatic artery thrombosis after adult living donor liver transplantation: the effect of center volume.

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether center volume impacts the rate hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) and patient survival after adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT). METHODS: Patients with HAT who were listed as Status 1 in the Organ Procurement Transplant Network database were included in the study. Recipients of ALDLT were compared to those who received a deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT). RESULTS: Recipients of ALDLT had a higher rate of HAT than recipients of DDLT. Centers that performed less than four adult ALDLT had a higher rate of HAT than other higher volume centers. "Novice" centers had a worse graft and patient survival than those with more experience in ALDLT. Recipients who had HAT experienced a worse patient survival than those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: Centers with higher volume have a lower rate of HAT and a better patient and graft survival in ALDLT. Clearer regulations and focus on overcoming the learning curve might be needed to increase the utilization of ALDLT.

The impact of human leukocyte antigen matching on transplant complications and immunosuppression dosage.

Administrative claims data facilitate ascertainment of outcomes not collected by the transplant registry and provide the opportunity to examine prescribed doses of immunosuppressive medications. Here, we examine the impact of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching on traditional outcomes, rejection and survival, and use novel methods to examine immunosuppresion doses and complication rates. The central hypothesis tested in this analysis is that HLA-matched recipients receive lower doses of immunosuppression and have fewer posttransplant complications. We break from tradition by examining HLA matching in both living and deceased donor kidney transplants. As secondary aims, we compare the relative impact of class I and II mismatches and describe outcomes achieved with older donors. Medicare claims linked to the United States Renal Data System database for 23,443 kidney transplants were included in the study. A total of 15,793 transplants were DR mismatched (DRMM), 5,340 manifested no DR mismatches (NODRMM), and 2,310 manifested no ABDR mismatches (NOABDRMM). Patients with NOABDRMM experienced lower adjusted risk of rejection (0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.59-0.74, P < 0.001) and lower hazard of graft loss (0.69, 0.61-0.77, P < 0.001) and death (0.76, 0.63-0.92, P < 0.001) compared with those with DRMM. The hazard of cardiac and diabetic complications was similar between recipients of NOADRMM and DRMM transplants, but the hazard of diarrhea was significantly lower (0.82, 0.73-0.92, P < 0.001) in patients with NOABDRMM. The 6-month dose of mycophenolate mofetil was lower in patients with NOABDRMM. This study validates previous studies that indicated significantly lower risks of rejection, graft loss, and death among patients with 0 HLA-A,B,DR mismatches. Use of administrative claims revealed similar rates of cardiovascular complications. However, HLA-matched deceased donor recipients received lower dosages of mycophenolate mofetil and manifested a lower risk of developing posttransplant diarrhea.

Consensus, Dilemmas, and Challenges in Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Latin America.

We reviewed the history, volume, outcomes, uniqueness, and challenges of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in Latin America. We used the data from the Latin American and Caribbean Transplant Society, local transplant societies, and opinions from local transplant experts. There are more than 160 active liver transplant teams in Latin America, but only 30 centers have used LDLT in the past 2 years. In 2014, 226 LDLTs were done in the region (8.5% of liver transplant activities). Living donor liver transplantation is mainly restricted to pediatric patients. Adult-to-adult LDLT activities decreased after the implementation of the model for end-stage liver disease score and a concomitant increase on the rate of deceased donors per million population. Posttransplant outcome analysis is not mandatory, transparent or regulated in most countries. More experienced teams have outcomes comparable to international expert centers, but donor and recipient morbidity might be underreported. Latin America lags behind in terms of the number of adult LDLT and the rate of living donor utilization in comparison with other continents with similar donation rates. Local alliances and collaborations with major transplant centers in the developed world will contribute to the development of LDLT in Latin America.

Liver graft volume estimation in 100 living donors: measure twice, cut once.

Estimation of graft volume (GV) is critical in living donor liver transplantation. This study examines the accuracy of formula-derived GV estimates and compares them to both radiogically-derived estimates and actual measurements. We first compared formula-derived estimates of GV and compared them to actual volumes to provide estimates for both right lobe (RL) and left lateral segment (LLS) GV. We then applied these formulae to a validation cohort. Finally, we evaluated both formula-derived and radiologically-derived estimates by comparing them to actual GV measurements. There is a marginal concordance between formula-derived calculation and GV for RL donors, but the error ratio was lower than for radiologic estimates. In contrast, MRI measurements for LLS grafts demonstrated a lower error ratio than formula-derived estimation. Formula-derived estimates of GV should be routinely used in the initial screening of potential living donors as long as their limitations are appreciated.

Comparative analysis of live liver donation risk using a comprehensive grading system for severity.

We investigated whether right lobe (RL) liver donation is associated with a higher incidence or severity of donor complications than left lobe (LL) liver and left lateral segment (LLS) liver donations. We studied 80 living donors: 35 RL liver donors and 45 LL/LLS liver donors. A modification of the Clavien classification was used to grade the severity of complications. RL and LL/LLS liver donations had equivalent blood loss, readmission and reoperation rates, use of blood products, and lengths of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital. RL liver donors underwent longer surgeries and experienced more postoperative pain than LL/LLS liver donors. The overall rate of complications was 33%. There was a higher rate of complications in RL liver donors (51%) than LL/LLS liver donors (20%). When graded by severity, there were more grade 2 complications in RL liver donors than in LL/LLS liver donors. Our report confirms that RL liver donation is associated with higher morbidity than LL/LLS liver donation. When the complications are systematically graded by severity, there is a significant difference in Clavien grade 2 complications in RL liver donors.

Islet filtration: a simple and rapid new purification procedure that avoids ficoll and improves islet mass and function.

Islet isolation is a time-consuming process. Islet yields vary, and previous in vitro studies suggest that Ficoll may be an islet toxin. Here, we describe an alternative, Ficoll-free method to purify murine islets by filtration through a cell strainer. Collagenase digestion of pancreata was carried out using standard procedures. The pancreatic digest was divided into aliquots and purified either by Ficoll or by filtration. Following filtration, islets were intact and separated from nondigested tissue. Purity was similar to that achieved using Ficoll. However, purification by filtration was faster, increased islet yield, and resulted in higher insulin secretion in vitro. Moreover, when syngeneic diabetic hosts were transplanted with a marginal islet mass, islets purified by filtration restored normoglycemia significantly faster than those isolated by Ficoll. This suggests that Ficoll exposure negatively impacts islet function. In conclusion, islet filtration is a simple and rapid procedure for purification of islets that demonstrate improved functional mass.

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy 1997 to 2003: lessons learned with 500 cases at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LDN) is a less invasive alternative to traditional open nephrectomy that has several potential advantages. However, there have been few large series reports describing the complications of LDN and the details of their management. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 500 LDNs performed at our center between October 1997 and September 2003. We evaluated preoperative donor characteristics, intraoperative parameters and complications, and postoperative recovery and complications. A modification of the Clavien classification was developed and used to grade the severity of all complications. RESULTS: The overall rate of intraoperative complications was 2.8%. There were 9 open conversions (1.8%), of which 6 were in the first 100 cases. Six of the 9 open conversions were for management of complications; 3 were elective. Seven renovascular incidents (1.4%) all required open conversion except one. The overall rate of postoperative complications was 3.4%. Thirty of 500 patients in our LDN series experienced an intraoperative or procedure-related complication (6.0%). When graded by severity, 18 of 31 (58.1%) of all complications were grade 1, 11 of 31 (35.4%) grade 2, and 2 of 31 (6.5%) grade 3. Only 1 recipient experienced delayed graft function, and only 1 recipient had a urologic complication. CONCLUSIONS: Our series supports the safety and efficacy of LDN with very low intraoperative complication and conversion rates. Most of the intraoperative complications can be managed laparoscopically. Readmissions are extremely rare (1.5%). Aberrant vascular anatomy and obesity are not contraindications to LDN, but they require experience. With careful surgical technique, delayed graft function and urologic complications in recipients can be avoided. A graded classification scheme for reporting complications of donor nephrectomy might be useful for maintaining registry information on donor outcomes and when informing potential donors about the risks and benefits of this procedure.