RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary complications are among the main causes of increased mortality, and morbidity, as well as prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay after cardiac surgery. Recently, a sternum-sparing concept of minimally invasive total coronary revascularization via anterior minithoracotomy (TCRAT) was introduced. A higher risk of pulmonary injury could be anticipated due to the thoracic incision and the longer duration of surgery. Pulmonary complications in TCRAT were compared to standard coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) via full median sternotomy (FS). METHODS: Records of 151 consecutive TCRAT (from September 2021 to November 2022) and 229 consecutive FS patients (from January 2017 to December 2018) patients, who underwent elective or urgent CABG, were analyzed. Preoperative baseline characteristics (age, sex, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, smoking status, left ventricular ejection fraction, pulmonary hypertonus, and EuroScore II) were comparable between groups. RESULTS: Differences between examined groups examined were found for the pulmonary parameters: Horowitz index 6 hours after operation (TCRAT 270 ± 72 vs. FS 293 ± 73, p < 0.05), pneumothorax (TCRAT 0% vs. FS 2.6%, p < 0.05), bronchoscopies (TCRAT 5.9% vs. FS 1.7%, p < 0.05), and pleural effusion (TCRAT 8.6% vs. FS 3.5%, p < 0.05). Moreover, there were differences between groups with regard to mean ICU stay (TCRAT 2.4 ± 3.0 days vs. FS 1.8 ± 1.8 days, p < 0.05), stroke (TCRAT 0% vs. FS 1.3%, p < 0.05), and hospital stay (TCRAT 10.9 ± 8.5 days vs. FS 13.2 ± 9.3 days, p < 0.05). There were no differences regarding atelectasis, reintubations, tracheostomies, ventilation time, and mortality. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary complications in terms of pleural effusions were more common with TCRAT, however, without substantial impact on clinical outcome.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Predicting fluid responsiveness is essential when treating surgical or critically ill patients. When using a pulmonary artery catheter, pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation can be calculated from right ventricular and pulmonary artery pressure waveforms. METHODS: We conducted a prospective interventional study investigating the ability of right ventricular pulse pressure variation (PPVRV) and systolic pressure variation (SPVRV) as well as pulmonary artery pulse pressure variation (PPVPA) and systolic pressure variation (SPVPA) to predict fluid responsiveness in coronary artery bypass (CABG) surgery patients. Additionally, radial artery pulse pressure variation (PPVART) and systolic pressure variation (SPVART) were calculated. The area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve with 95%-confidence interval (95%-CI) was used to assess the capability to predict fluid responsiveness (defined as an increase in cardiac index of > 15%) after a 500 mL crystalloid fluid challenge. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were included in the final analysis. Thirteen patients (39%) were fluid-responders with a mean increase in cardiac index of 25.3%. The AUROC was 0.60 (95%-CI 0.38 to 0.81) for PPVRV, 0.63 (95%-CI 0.43 to 0.83) for SPVRV, 0.58 (95%-CI 0.38 to 0.78) for PPVPA, and 0.71 (95%-CI 0.52 to 0.89) for SPVPA. The AUROC for PPVART was 0.71 (95%-CI 0.53 to 0.89) and for SPVART 0.78 (95%-CI 0.62 to 0.94). The correlation between pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation measurements derived from the different waveforms was weak. CONCLUSIONS: Right ventricular and pulmonary artery pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation seem to be weak predictors of fluid responsiveness in CABG surgery patients.