Medication adherence and utilization in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder receiving aripiprazole, quetiapine, or ziprasidone at hospital discharge: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are chronic debilitating disorders that are often treated with second-generation antipsychotic agents, such as aripiprazole, quetiapine, and ziprasidone. While patients who are hospitalized for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder often receive these agents at discharge, comparatively little information exists on subsequent patterns of pharmacotherapy. METHODS: Using a database linking hospital admission records to health insurance claims, we identified all patients hospitalized for schizophrenia (ICD-9-CM diagnosis code 295.XX) or bipolar disorder (296.0, 296.1, 296.4-296.89) between January 1, 2001 and September 30, 2008 who received aripiprazole, quetiapine, or ziprasidone at discharge. Patients not continuously enrolled for 6 months before and after hospitalization ("pre-admission" and "follow-up", respectively) were excluded. We examined patterns of use of these agents during follow-up, including adherence with treatment (using medication possession ratios [MPRs] and cumulative medication gaps [CMGs]) and therapy switching. Analyses were undertaken separately for patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, respectively. RESULTS: We identified a total of 43 patients with schizophrenia, and 84 patients with bipolar disorder. During the 6-month period following hospitalization, patients with schizophrenia received an average of 101 therapy-days with the second-generation antipsychotic agent prescribed at discharge; for patients with bipolar disorder, the corresponding value was 68 therapy-days. Mean MPR at 6 months was 55.1% for schizophrenia patients, and 37.3% for those with bipolar disorder; approximately one-quarter of patients switched to another agent over this period. CONCLUSIONS: Medication compliance is poor in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder who initiate treatment with aripiprazole, quetiapine, or ziprasidone at hospital discharge.

Cost impact of hydroxocobalamin in the treatment of patients with known or suspected cyanide poisoning due to smoke inhalation from closed-space fires.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Cyanide poisoning can occur due to exposure to smoke in closed-space fires. With no point of care cyanide test at the scene of a fire, first responders and clinicians base decisions to treat with cyanide antidote on patient history, clinical signs, and other indirect data points that have not been proven to correspond with actual systemic levels of cyanide. The aim of this exploratory study was to determine the economic implications of treating patients with known or suspected cyanide poisoning due to smoke inhalation with hydroxocobalamin. METHODS: A decision analysis model was developed from the US hospital perspective. Healthcare resource utilization was estimated from a retrospective evaluation of clinical outcomes in hydroxocobalamin-treated patients and in historical controls without hydroxocobalamin use (Nguyen, et al. 2017). Epidemiologic parameters and costs were estimated from the published literature, and publicly-available hospital charges were identified. Outcomes reported in the analysis included expected healthcare resource utilization in the US population and per-patient costs with and without the use of hydroxocobalamin. A cost-to-charge ratio was applied so that all costs would reflect hospital costs rather than hospital charges. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed to identify the most influential model parameters. All costs were reported in 2017 US dollars. RESULTS: Use of hydroxocobalamin reduces healthcare resource utilization and contributes to decreased per-patient hospital costs ($15,381 with hydroxocobalamin treatment versus $22,607 with no cyanide antidote). The most substantive cost-savings resulted from decreased hospital length of stay (i.e., intensive care unit [ICU] and non-ICU). Costs attributed to mechanical ventilation also decreased with use of hydroxocobalamin. A univariate sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the most impactful variables in the cost analysis were related to hospital length of stay (ICU followed by non-ICU stay), followed by the daily cost of ICU stay. CONCLUSIONS: Use of hydroxocobalamin in patients with known or suspected cyanide poisoning from closed-space fire smoke inhalation may decrease hospital costs and contribute to more efficient healthcare resource utilization.

Dose trends for second-generation antipsychotic treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotic dosing used in clinical practice can differ from dosing originally recommended in product labeling. This has been reported for olanzapine and quetiapine, where higher doses are commonly used. This may be the case for ziprasidone as well. METHOD: To characterize changes over time in dosing for the initial and subsequent prescriptions of first-line second-generation antipsychotics used during treatment episodes for outpatients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, the 2001-2005 Thomson MarketScan Medicaid Database (Medicaid) and the 2001-2006 MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database (Commercial) were analyzed. Dose trends were evaluated using autoregressive time-series models. RESULTS: Data were available for 49180 treatment episodes of schizophrenia (4683 Commercial and 44497 Medicaid) and 83289 treatment episodes of bipolar disorder (57961 Commercial and 25328 Medicaid). The initial prescription mean daily and overall mean daily doses of ziprasidone in schizophrenia episodes significantly increased across the Medicaid and Commercial populations, with similar trends observed for bipolar episodes. The first (May 2001) and last (December 2005) observed 3-month mean daily doses for ziprasidone were 112 mg/d and 138 mg/d for patients with schizophrenia and 93 mg/d and 113 mg/d for those with bipolar disorder in the Medicaid cohort, with similar findings for the Commercial cohort. Consistently significant trends in dose changes were not observed for the other medications, although quetiapine and olanzapine doses generally increased while aripiprazole and risperidone doses generally decreased. CONCLUSIONS: There remains a need for controlled randomized clinical trials that test fixed doses of antipsychotics to ascertain the dose-response relationship within the dose range used in contemporary clinical practice.

Real world data: an opportunity to supplement existing evidence for the use of long-established medicines in health care decision making.

Evidence from medication use in the real world setting can help to extrapolate and/or augment data obtained in randomized controlled trials and establishes a broad picture of a medication's place in everyday clinical practice. By supplementing and complementing safety and efficacy data obtained in a narrowly defined (and often optimized) patient population in the clinical trial setting, real world evidence (RWE) may provide stakeholders with valuable information about the safety and effectiveness of a medication in large, heterogeneous populations. RWE is emerging as a credible information source; however, there is scope for enhancements to real world data (RWD) sources by understanding their complexities and applying the most appropriate analytical tools in order to extract relevant information. In addition to providing information for clinicians, RWE has the potential to meet the burden of evidence for regulatory considerations and may be used in approval of new indications for medications. Further understanding of RWD collection and analysis is needed if RWE is to achieve its full potential.

Associations Between Sildenafil Use and Changes in Days of Hospitalization in a Population With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Associated With Connective Tissue Disease.

PURPOSE: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) can be a complication in patients with connective tissue disease (CTD). Although the phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor sildenafil shows evidence of efficacy and tolerability among patients with PAH associated with CTD in clinical trials, no studies have examined the association between its use and health care resource utilization in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to assess the associations between the use of sildenafil and health care resource utilization, specifically days of hospitalization, in a population with PAH associated with CTD. METHODS: A retrospective, matched, case-control analysis was conducted using data from a commercial claims database. Patients with a claim dated between 2003 and 2009 were selected. Cases and controls were matched on age, sex, and baseline total days of hospitalization. A longitudinal, zero-inflated, negative binomial model was used for analyzing the data after control for age, sex, region, Charlson comorbidity score, and use of PAH-specific medication other than sildenafil. FINDINGS: A total of 420 individuals, 210 cases and 210 controls, were included in the sample. The sample was 85.71% women, and the mean age was 57.6 years. Estimates for variances of an intercept random effect (5.08 × 10(-13)) and for a time-variable random effect (2.84 × 10(-16)) were both essentially zero. Thus a zero-inflated negative binomial model without random effects was used. When individuals were not using sildenafil, each 1-month interval was associated with a 2.8% increase in the mean number of days of hospitalization. In contrast, when individuals were using sildenafil, each 1-month interval was associated with a decrease of 3.3% in days of hospitalization. IMPLICATIONS: In this data analysis of the association between sildenafil use and days of hospitalization among individuals with PAH associated with CTD in a large-scale population, sildenafil use in the treatment of PAH associated with CTD was associated with reduced days of hospitalization during the year after the initiation of treatment.

Prevalence of pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients with connective tissue diseases: a systematic review of the literature.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive and life-threatening disease. Understanding of PAH prevalence remains limited, but PAH has been reported as a frequent complication in connective tissue diseases. This study estimated prevalence of PAH in patients with connective tissue diseases and prevalence of idiopathic PAH using a systematic review of the literature. We searched PubMed through May 19, 2012 for all studies on prevalence of PAH in patients with connective tissue diseases or prevalence of idiopathic PAH. To be included, studies had to be in English, have humans as subjects, and determine prevalence within a time interval of up to 2 years. Studies only investigating pediatric patients were excluded. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated. Twenty studies were identified in the review. Seventeen of the 20 studies reported prevalence of PAH in connective tissue diseases and three reported prevalence of idiopathic PAH. The pooled prevalence estimate of idiopathic PAH was 12 cases per million population (95 % CI 5 cases per million to 22 cases per million) with estimates ranging from 5.9 cases per million population to 25 cases per million population. The pooled prevalence estimate of PAH in patients with connective tissue diseases was 13 % (95 % CI, 9.18 % to 18.16 %) with reported estimates ranging from 2.8 % to 32 %. Prevalence of PAH in patients with connective tissue diseases was substantially higher than that of idiopathic PAH based on pooled prevalence estimates. Comparisons of PAH prevalence in persons with connective tissue disease and idiopathic PAH using a large observational study would be helpful in better assessing relative prevalence.

Outcome assessment of an antipsychotic drug algorithm: effects of the Mississippi State Hospital algorithm project.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated a state psychiatric hospital's algorithm for prescribing antipsychotic drugs for inpatients with schizophrenia to determine whether its emphasis on cost efficiency is compatible with quality of care. METHODS: Outcomes were compared for patients who received medication that was algorithm adherent or nonadherent. Risperidone and ziprasidone were first-step oral antipsychotics. Documentation of clinical rationale was acceptable for nonpreferred drug use. Outcomes of interest were length of hospitalization and "much improved" or "very much improved" status on the Clinical Global Impression severity scale (CGI-S). RESULTS: Of 401 patients, 70% were male. The CGI-S modal rating of severity was "markedly ill." Duration of illness was longer for patients given algorithm-nonadherent (17.6±9.7 years) versus -adherent (14.9±11.6 years, p=.013) medication. No statistically significant between-group differences were observed for mean length of stay (51.4±35.5 days versus 43.8±27.4 days, adjusted difference p=.18) or median improvement time (adherent, 41 days; nonadherent, 42 days; CI=34-48 days for both group medians). CONCLUSIONS: Prescription algorithm adherence was not associated with significantly increased length of inpatient stay or delayed time to improvement.

A pilot study of antipsychotic prescribing decisions for acutely-Ill hospitalized patients.

BACKGROUND: Evidence on antipsychotic prescribing decisions is limited. This pilot study quantified factors considered in choosing an antipsychotic and evaluated the influence of metabolic status on treatment decisions. METHODS: Prescribing decisions by 4 psychiatrists were examined based on 80 adult patients initiated on antipsychotic medication diagnosed with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or bipolar disorder by DSM-IV criteria, who were admitted to an acute inpatient psychiatric program of an urban Veterans Affairs Medical Center. The primary analysis examined the association between antipsychotic treatment choice and predictions of symptom control and metabolic risk. Secondary analyses included comparison of the chosen and next best treatments in predicted symptom control and metabolic risk, the frequency of reasons cited for drug choice, and the association between treatment choice and patients' baseline metabolic parameters. Mean differences and odds-ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals were used to compare relationships between treatment choice, ratings of risk and metabolic data. RESULTS: Antipsychotic choice correlated significantly with ratings of predicted symptom control (OR = .92, p = 0.02) and metabolic risk (OR = .88, p = 0.01). Mean differences between the chosen and next best drugs were significant but small in predicted symptom control (F = 2.81, df = 3, 76; p<0.05) compared with larger differences in anticipated metabolic risk (F = 14.80, df = 3, 76; p = 0.0001). Nevertheless, among 24 identified reasons influencing drug selection, anticipated metabolic risk of chosen antipsychotics was cited less often than efficacy measures. In contrast to psychiatrists' expectations of metabolic risk with selected treatments, we found that patients' actual baseline BMI, fasting glucose, blood pressure, and Framingham risk levels did not necessarily predict antipsychotic treatment choice independent of other factors. CONCLUSION: In the context of an acute psychiatric hospitalization, pilot data suggest that predictions of symptom control and metabolic risk correlated significantly with antipsychotic choice, but study psychiatrists were willing to assume relative degrees of metabolic risk in favor of effective symptom control. However, prescribing decisions were influenced by numerous patient and treatment factors. These findings support the potential utility of the ATCQ questionnaire in quantifying antipsychotic prescribing decisions. Further validation studies of the ATCQ questionnaire could enhance translation of research findings and application of treatment guidelines.

Adherence, persistence of use, and costs associated with second-generation antipsychotics for bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective study using Medicaid claims identified patients with bipolar disorder for whom oral second-generation antipsychotics were prescribed and compared rates of adherence, persistence of use, and costs across five groups of patients taking aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, or ziprasidone. METHODS: Medicaid claims data for 2,446 bipolar patients were analyzed from eight states. The 18-month observation period included the six months before and the 12 months after the index prescription date. Adherence was defined as a medication possession ratio >80%. Persistence of use was measured by the number of days of medication therapy before a 30-day gap. Mental health-related prescription costs, total prescription costs, total mental health-related costs, and total costs were assessed. Ziprasidone was the comparator. RESULTS: Clinically recommended doses of second-generation antipsychotic medications were prescribed for 45% of the patients (N = 1,102). Of these, 58% (N = 642 of 1,102) were adherent with the prescribed medication, with no significant differences between medication groups. Median time to nonpersistence of use averaged 96 days. Patients taking olanzapine were about 35% more likely than patients taking ziprasidone to discontinue taking their medication (hazard ratio = 1.34, 95% confidence interval = 1.02-1.76, p = .04). Mental health-related prescription costs and total prescription costs were lower for risperidone than ziprasidone. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups for all mental health-related costs or total costs. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients in a sizeable Medicaid cohort for whom a second-generation antipsychotic medication was prescribed, less than half had a clinically recommended dose, and less than two-thirds with a clinically recommended dose were adherent to the medication, confirming that many patients with bipolar disorder do not receive clinically recommended doses of second-generation antipsychotics.

Findings of a U.S. national cardiometabolic screening program among 10,084 psychiatric outpatients.

OBJECTIVE: A national cardiometabolic screening program for patients in a variety of public mental health facilities, group practices, and community behavioral health clinics was funded by Pfizer Inc. between 2005 and 2008. METHODS: A one-day, voluntary metabolic health fair in the United States offered patients attending public mental health clinics free cardiometabolic screening and same-day feedback to physicians from a biometrics testing third party that was compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. RESULTS: This analysis included 10,084 patients at 219 sites; 2,739 patients (27%) reported having fasted for over eight hours. Schizophrenia or bipolar disorder was self-reported by 6,233 (62%) study participants. In the overall sample, the mean waist circumference was 41.1 inches for men and 40.4 inches for women; 27% were overweight (body mass index [BMI] 25.0-29.9 kg/m(2)), 52% were obese (BMI >or=30.0 kg/m(2)), 51% had elevated triglycerides (>or=150 mg/dl), and 51% were hypertensive (>or=130/85 mm Hg). In the fasting sample, 52% had metabolic syndrome, 35% had elevated total cholesterol (>or=200 mg/dl), 59% had low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (<40 mg/dl for men or <50 mg/dl for women), 45% had elevated triglycerides (>or=150 mg/dl), and 33% had elevated fasting glucose (>or=100 mg/dl). Among the 1,359 fasting patients with metabolic syndrome, 60% were not receiving any treatment. Among fasting patients who reported treatment for specific metabolic syndrome components, 33%, 65%, 71%, and 69% continued to have elevated total cholesterol, low levels of high-density lipoprotein, high blood pressure, and elevated glucose levels, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome and cardiometabolic risk factors, such as overweight, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and glucose abnormalities, was substantial and frequently untreated in this U.S. national mental health clinic screening program.

Impact of real-world ziprasidone dosing on treatment discontinuation rates in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between maximum dose of ziprasidone and time to discontinuation in the treatment of schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder and bipolar disorder in clinical practice. METHOD: The 2001-2006 MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Databases were analyzed for maximum ziprasidone doses achieved in patients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder or bipolar disorder. Ziprasidone maximum-dose groups were defined as low (20-60 mg/d), medium (61-119 mg/d), or high (120-160 mg/d). Patients receiving >160 mg/d were excluded. Mean time to discontinuation was evaluated across propensity score-matched dosing groups. Cox proportional hazard models were used to adjust for confounding when comparing the high- and medium-dose groups with the low-dose group. RESULTS: Data were available for 33,340 patients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder, of whom 16.6% received low dose of ziprasidone, 22.0% medium dose, and 61.4% high dose. Of those subjects with bipolar disorder (n=27,751), 26.1% were receiving a low dose of ziprasidone, 25.7% a medium dose, and 48.3% a high dose. Among the propensity score-matched dosing groups, the respective mean time to discontinuation for low, medium, and high doses was 90.5, 117.2, and 201.6d within the schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder cohort and 84.6, 110.7, and 173.2d within the bipolar cohort (p<0.0001 for all comparisons). The hazard ratios for discontinuing therapy were significantly lower for the medium- (0.84, 0.84) and high-dose (0.57, 0.60) groups relative to the low-dose group in schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder and bipolar disorder, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective or bipolar disorders receiving ziprasidone 120-160 mg/d experienced a statistically significant lower discontinuation rate compared with those receiving lower doses.

Therapeutic dose assessment of patient switching from atorvastatin to simvastatin.

OBJECTIVE: Patient switching of prescription drug brands within a therapeutic class has become more prevalent with tiered drug plan formularies. Although switching from more expensive brand name drugs to generic equivalents may reduce aggregate prescription costs, therapeutic benefit may be compromised if the patient is not switched to a drug with an equivalent therapeutic profile. This study examined whether patients switching from branded atorvastatin to either a branded or generic simvastatin were prescribed a therapeutically equivalent or higher dose, as opposed to a lower therapeutic dose. METHODS: Study patients were selected from a national longitudinal database of 1.4 billion annual prescription drug claims. All patients active in the database during the study period (9/01/2005 to 9/30/2006) with a prescription drug claim for atorvastatin in the index month (9/2005) were selected. The 453,409 patients in the study period were followed for 12 months to determine the percent switching to simvastatin and their relative therapeutic doses after switching. Patients switching to the same or lower milligram dose of simvastatin were classified as receiving a lower therapeutic dose compared with their atorvastatin dosing. RESULTS: Among patients using atorvastatin at the beginning of the study, 13,530 (3%) switched to simvastatin by the end of the study period. Medication changes resulted in a lower therapeutic dose in 38% of the switches. The percent of switches resulting in a lower therapeutic dose were 18% for those switching from 10 mg, 43% for those switching from 20 mg, 73% for those switching from 40 mg, and 100% for those switching from 80 mg. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients switching from atorvastatin to simvastatin received a lower therapeutic dose, which may have an adverse impact on patients' quality of care and health status. Further research is needed to assess the potential negative effect on patient outcomes.