Patient, caregiver, and healthcare professional perspectives on seizure control and treatment goals.

OBJECTIVE: To examine perspectives of adult patients with epilepsy, caregivers, and healthcare professionals (HCPs) on seizure freedom, seizure control, communication, and treatment goals. METHODS: Participants were recruited from online M3 panel and by Rare Patient Voice, and completed the self-administered online STEP Survey (Seize the Truth of Epilepsy Perceptions). Group comparisons used analysis of variance and chi-square tests. RESULTS: The STEP Survey was completed by 400 adult patients with epilepsy, 201 caregivers, and 258 HCPs (112 general neurologists, 96 epileptologists, 50 nurse practitioners/physician assistants). Significantly more patients (61%) and caregivers (66%) than HCPs (45%) agreed that seizure freedom is always a reasonable goal (P < 0.05). On average, patients considered 3.6 seizures/year to be "in control." Of their patients with focal seizures, HCPs reported 47% were seizure-free and 33% were "in control" (63% were having 1-12 seizures/year), and 20% were with "uncontrolled" seizures. Among patients, caregivers, and HCPs, ≥60% agreed that a defining characteristic indicating seizure control was having good quality of life. Patients, caregivers, and HCPs agreed that the emotional, psychological, and relational impact of seizures were least discussed (<50% of each group reporting discussion), but disagreed in their top priority for greater discussion (patients: sudden unexplained death in epilepsy [SUDEP]; HCPs: relational impact of seizures). Although ≥80% of patients and caregivers selected multiple patient life goals as very or extremely important, 49% of patients said they do not share life goals with their HCP. HCPs agreed that patients are not telling them everything they should about their epilepsy (73% of HCPs) or their life goals (81% of HCPs). CONCLUSIONS: Differing perspectives on seizure freedom, seizure control, communication priorities, and treatment goals that were identified in the STEP Survey provide opportunities to improve patient care and outcomes through more effective two-way communication and alignment of goals among patients with epilepsy, caregivers, and HCPs.

The rescue therapy in epilepsy project Part 2: Insights from people with epilepsy and families on expert-derived preferred practices.

BACKGROUND: The number and type of therapies available to treat seizure clusters (SCs) or periods of increased seizure activity have risen in recent years. Gaps still exist on defining SCs, when to use them, and educating patients and families. The Epilepsy Foundation developed and published expert-derived consensus on preferred practices for rescue therapies (RTs), 79% of which were agreed upon by a larger group of healthcare professionals (HCPs). This paper describes insights from people with epilepsy (PWE) and families/caregivers (FCGs) on these practices to assess similarities and trends between PWE, FCGs, an expert panel, and HCPs. METHODS: Online survey including expert-derived preferred practices for RT was completed by a convenience sample of 176 PWE/FCGs. Respondents rated agreement with each preferred practice using a 0-8 point Likert scale. Results were examined by relationship to epilepsy, prior use of RTs, and comparison to the expert panel and larger group of HCPs. RESULTS: 41.5% of respondents were PWE and 54.6% were FCGs; 70% represented PWE age 18 and over or those who cared for adults with epilepsy. Levels of agreement were similar to those of HCPs - consensus was obtained on 79% of preferred practices. Differences were noted on which items achieved consensus and strength of consensus for some items. Differences between PWE and FCG, and between those who had and had not previously used a RT were found. A proposed definition of SCs did not reach consensus, but there was strong consensus for individualized seizure action plans and more RT education.

Preferred practices for rescue treatment of seizure clusters: A consensus-driven, multi-stakeholder approach.

BACKGROUND: Some of the most difficult issues in the care of people living with epilepsy (PWE) regard the definition, treatment, and communication of unexpected increase(s) in seizure frequency over a relatively short duration of time. In order to address this issue, the Epilepsy Foundation established the Rescue Therapy Project in Epilepsy to understand the gaps, needs, and barriers facing people with epilepsy who use or may benefit from rescue therapies (RTs) for "seizure clusters". The intent was to provide consensus-derived recommendations from a broad stakeholder group including PWE, their caregivers, epilepsy specialist physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and representatives of epilepsy & neurology advocacy and professional organizations. METHODS: During Phase 1, a group of epilepsy experts and stakeholders (N = 54) were divided into 3 workgroups that met by conference calls and in-person. Content of workgroups was developed into preferred practices related to RTs. In Phase 2, these recommendations were evaluated by a larger more diverse group of healthcare professionals, PWE, and caregivers. Agreement with recommended preferred practices at 80% or greater was set as the level to achieve consensus. RESULTS: The preferred practices were centered around four core themes identified by the experts and key stakeholders: the importance of a common language; when RTs should be prescribed; assessing the need for RTs; and education/communication about RTs. Consensus from experts and key stakeholders was reached for 27 recommended preferred practices using the Delphi method. "Rescue therapy" or "rescue medicine" was the preferred term to describe what to name a treatment intervention in this context, and seizure action plans was the preferred term to communicate how to respond to a seizure or SCs and the use of RTs. In Phase 2, 23 of the recommendations reached final consensus, including the need for a common language, and the need to consider RTs and seizure action plans in all PWE in an individualized manner, several circumstances in which RTs should be prescribed, and the importance of education regarding RTs and SAPs.

Perspectives on seizure clusters: Gaps in lexicon, awareness, and treatment.

Seizure clusters in epilepsy can result in serious outcomes such as missed work or school, postictal psychosis, emergency room visits, or hospitalizations, and yet they are often not included in discussions between health-care professionals (HCPs) and their patients. The purpose of this paper was to describe and compare consumer (patient and caregivers) and professional understanding of seizure clusters and to describe how consumers and HCPs communicate regarding seizure clusters. We reviewed social media discussion sites to explore consumers' understanding of seizure clusters. We analyzed professional (medical) literature to explore the HCPs' understanding of seizure clusters. Major themes were revealed in one or both groups, including: communication about diagnosis; frequency, duration, and time frame; seizure type and pattern; severity; and self-management. When comparing discussions of professionals and consumers, both consumers and clinicians discussed the definition of seizure clusters. Discussions of HCPs were understandably clinically focused, and consumer discussions reflected the experience of seizure clusters; however, both groups struggled with a common lexicon. Seizure cluster events remain a problem associated with serious outcomes. Herein, we outline the lack of a common understanding and recommend the development of a common lexicon to improve communication regarding seizure clusters.

Use of intranasal rescue therapy for seizure clusters in students with epilepsy: Nurses' knowledge, perceptions, and practice.

School nurses play a crucial role in the prompt, appropriate response to epilepsy-related seizure emergencies among students in the school setting. Two intranasal benzodiazepine rescue therapies are now approved and offer potential benefits of being easy to use and socially acceptable. In July 2021, a survey was sent to 49,314 US school nurses to assess knowledge, perceptions, and practice with seizure rescue therapy. Responses were received from 866 (1.8% response rate). Of respondents, 45.7% had used rectal diazepam gel; 9.3%, midazolam nasal spray; and 6.0%, diazepam nasal spray. The majority (58.7%) had not delegated authority to administer rescue therapy, with state/local regulations and lack of willingness of school personnel being the most common barriers to delegation (37.7% and 20.1%, respectively). Additional training of nurses and school staff and progress on delegation policies may help optimize appropriate use of intranasal rescue therapy for seizures and enhance care of students with epilepsy in schools.

Managing Acute Seizures: New Rescue Delivery Option and Resources to Assist School Nurses.

Approximately 470,000 children and adolescents in the United States have epilepsy, 30% of whom experience seizures despite antiseizure drug regimens. School nurses, teachers, caregivers, and parents play integral roles in implementing a care plan that avoids triggers, recognizes signs, and provides supportive care-ideally, guided by a patient-specific seizure action plan, which may include the use of rescue medication. Benzodiazepines are the mainstay of seizure rescue medication; for decades, rectally administered diazepam was the only approved rescue medication for seizure clusters outside the hospital setting. However, rectal administration has limitations that could delay treatment (e.g., social acceptability, removal of clothing, positioning). More recently, intranasal midazolam (for patients ≥12 years) and intranasal diazepam (for patients ≥6 years) were approved for this indication. Training and education regarding newer forms of rescue medication should improve confidence in the ability to treat seizures in school with the goal of increasing the safety of students with epilepsy.

Epilepsy Treatment Complacency in Patients, Caregivers, and Health Care Professionals.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the perspectives of adult patients with epilepsy, caregivers, and health care professionals (HCPs) on treatment for seizures and treatment decisions, we developed and administered the STEP Survey (Seize the Truth of Epilepsy Perceptions). METHODS: Participants were recruited from online panel M3 and by Rare Patient Voice and completed the self-administered online STEP Survey. Analysis of variance and chi-square tests were used for group comparisons. RESULTS: The STEP Survey was completed by 400 adult patients, 201 caregivers, and 258 HCPs. Patients estimated reporting 45% of their seizures to their HCP, whereas caregivers estimated 83% and HCPs estimated 73% were reported. The most common reason for not reporting seizures was that the seizures were not serious enough to mention (patients 57%; caregivers 66%). A minority of patients (25%) and caregivers (30%) were very or extremely likely to ask their HCP about changing antiseizure medication (ASM) in the next 12 months. The HCP was most frequently selected by patients, caregivers, and HCPs as the person who initiates discussion of changing ASMs (patients 73%/caregivers 66%/HCPs 75%) and increasing ASM dosage (patients 77%/caregivers 68%/HCPs 81%). A majority of patients (65%) and caregivers (68%) somewhat or strongly agreed that they do not change ASMs due to fear of getting worse. HCPs perceive this fear less often, stating that 50% of their patients feel afraid when a second ASM was added. CONCLUSIONS: Improved reporting of all seizures, discussion of treatment changes, and the impact of fear on treatment decisions provide opportunities to reduce complacency and optimize patient outcomes.