Pattern of dysphagia after swallowing-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of head and neck cancers: results of a mono-institutional prospective study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A prospective instrumental assessment of late dysphagia using swallowing organs at risk (SWOARs)-sparing IMRT for nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Objective instrumental assessment included fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and videofluoroscopy (VFS) at baseline, and at 6 and 12 months after treatment. FEES assessed the pharyngeal residue according to the Farneti pooling score (P-score) as follows: 4-5 no dysphagia; 6-7 mild dysphagia; 8-9 moderate dysphagia; 10-11 severe dysphagia. Three different consistencies were tested for the P­score: liquid (L), semisolid (SS), and solid (S). VFS assessed penetration-aspiration according to the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and two different consistencies of the bolus were tested: thin liquid barium (L) and paste barium (S). RESULTS: 38 patients were evaluable. There was a significant worsening of the P­score at 6 months both for SS (p = 0.015) and S (p < 0.001), which persisted only for S at 12 months (p < 0.0001). Similarly, there was a significant worsening of the PAS score at 6 and 12 months (p = 0.065 and 0.039, respectively) for the S bolus. Overall, 3-7 and 10-14% aspiration after L and S was observed, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Promising results using a SWOARs-sparing IMRT technique are reported. Therefore, treatment plans should be optimized for reducing doses to these structures.

Complications with Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing in 2,820 Examinations.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a retrospective evaluation of the incidence of complications and adverse events during fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in 2,820 examinations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects included in- and outpatients at Pisa University Hospital referred for FEES by other physicians due to dysphagia symptoms. Neurologic diseases were the most commonly diagnosed conditions in the patients tested (48.3%). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects. RESULTS: Our study showed minor side effects (discomfort, occasional gagging and vomiting) and a few complications [three cases of anterior epistaxis (0.1%), one case of posterior epistaxis (0.04%), three cases of vasovagal syncope (0.1%) and two cases of laryngospasm (0.07%)]. These cases of laryngospasm occurred in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and spontaneously resolved after some difficulty. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the published data regarding the safety of FEES and the incidence of complications with this procedure, but also highlights that in neurologic patients with neurodegenerative diseases such as ALS, laryngospasm is more likely to occur as a severe complication. The overall risk of FEES is minimal, but it is recommended that clinicians be well trained in recognising the signs and symptoms of adverse reactions and be ready to take appropriate action if these occur.