A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active Comparator-Controlled Phase I Study of Analgesic/Antihyperalgesic Properties of ASP8477, a Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase Inhibitor, in Healthy Female Subjects.

Objectives: To evaluate the analgesic/antihyperalgesic effect of ASP8477. Design: Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, cross-over, placebo- and active comparator-controlled study. Setting: HPR Dr. Schaffler GmbH, Munich, Germany. Subjects: Healthy female subjects aged 18-65 years. Methods: Eligible subjects were randomly assigned to one of six treatment sequences and received multiple ascending doses of ASP8477, duloxetine, and placebo over three treatment periods (each consisting of 21-day dosing separated by 14-day washout periods). On the last day of each dose level, laser evoked potentials (LEPs) and visual analog scales (VAS pain) on capsaicin-treated skin at baseline and at multiple postdose time points were assessed. The primary end point was the difference in LEP N2-P2 peak-to-peak (PtP) amplitudes for ASP8477 100 mg vs placebo. Results: Twenty-five subjects were randomized. In all subjects, LEP N2-P2 PtP amplitudes were numerically lower for ASP8477 100 mg vs placebo (P = 0.0721); in subjects who demonstrated positive capsaicin skin effects, a greater mean difference of -2.24 µV (P = 0.0146) was observed. Across all doses, LEP N2-P2 PtP amplitudes were lower for duloxetine compared with ASP8477 (mean difference -3.80 µV; P < 0.0001) or placebo (mean difference -5.21 µV; P < 0.0001). The effect of ASP8477 (all doses) on down-scoring the VAS pain score was significant compared with placebo (mean difference -2.55%; P < 0.0007). Conclusions: ASP8477 was well tolerated in this study. Analysis of all subjects did not demonstrate a significant difference in LEP for ASP8477 100 mg over placebo but did in subjects who demonstrated positive capsaicin skin effects.

A Phase I, Randomized, Double-Blind, Laser-Evoked Potential Study to Evaluate the Analgesic/Antihyperalgesic Effect of ASP9226, a State-Dependent N-Type Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel Inhibitor, in Healthy Male Subjects.

Objective: Evaluate the analgesic/antihyperalgesic effects of ASP9226, a state-dependent N-type voltage-gated calcium channel inhibitor, in healthy male subjects. Design: Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and active comparator-controlled crossover study. Setting: HPR Dr. Schaffler GmbH, Munich, Germany. Subject: Healthy male subjects aged 18-55 years. Methods: Twenty-four eligible subjects were randomly assigned to one of four treatment sequences and received single doses of ASP9226 (30 mg or 50 mg), pregabalin (150 mg), or placebo during four treatment periods. Laser-evoked potentials (LEP) and postlaser pain visual analog scales (VAS) on capsaicin-treated skin were assessed during main assessment days (the first day of each study period). Primary and secondary end points were the differences in LEP N2-P2 peak-to-peak (PtP) amplitudes and VAS score, respectively, in all subjects. Results: Overall, treatment with pregabalin resulted in a significantly lower LEP N2-P2 PtP amplitude vs placebo (-3.30 µV, P < 0.0001). There were no clinically relevant differences in N2-P2 PtP amplitudes between placebo and either ASP9226 dose (-0.31 µV and -0.27 µV). Furthermore, subjects reported significantly lower VAS pain scores with pregabalin vs placebo (-9.90%, P < 0.0001) in contrast to ASP9226 30 mg (-2.1%) and ASP9226 50 mg (1.2%) vs placebo. Subgroup analysis of LEP and VAS pain in participants with positive prestudy capsaicin response (n = 13) were in keeping with results in all subjects. Conclusions: ASP9226 was well tolerated; however, there was no improvement in LEP and VAS pain scores with ASP9226 at either dose vs placebo.

Investigation of the predictive validity of laser-EPs in normal, UVB-inflamed and capsaicin-irritated skin with four analgesic compounds in healthy volunteers.

AIMS: The aim of the present study was to assess the predictivity of laser-(radiant-heat)-evoked potentials (LEPs) from the vertex electroencephalogram, using an algesimetric procedure, testing the anti-nociceptive/anti-hyperalgesic effects of single oral doses of four marketed analgesics (of different compound classes) vs. placebo, in healthy volunteers with three skin types. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind, five-way-crossover trial. Twenty-five healthy male/female Caucasians were included (receiving celecoxib 200 mg, pregabalin 150 mg, duloxetine 60 mg, lacosamide 100 mg or placebo) in a Williams design, with CO2 laser-induced painful stimuli to normal, ultraviolet (UV) B-inflamed and capsaicin-irritated skin. LEPs and visual analogue scale ratings were taken at baseline and hourly for 6 h postdose from all three skin types. RESULTS: In normal skin, the averaged postdose LEP peak-to-peak-(PtP)-amplitudes were reduced by pregabalin (-2.68 µV; 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.16, 1.19) and duloxetine (-1.73 µV; 95% CI -3.21, -0.26) but not by lacosamide and celecoxib vs. placebo. On UVB-irradiated skin, reflecting inflammatory pain, celecoxib induced a pronounced reduction in LEP PtP amplitudes vs. placebo (-6.2 µV; 95% CI -7.88, -4.51), with a smaller reduction by duloxetine (-4.54 µV; 95% CI -6.21, -2.87) and pregabalin (-3.72 µV; 95% CI -5.40, -2.04), whereas lacosamide was inactive. LEP PtP amplitudes on capsaicin-irritated skin, reflecting peripheral/spinal sensitization, as in neuropathic pain, were reduced by pregabalin (-3.78 µV; 95% CI -5.31, -2.25) and duloxetine (-2.32 µV; 95% CI -3.82, -0.82) but not by celecoxib or lacosamide vs. placebo, which was in agreement with known clinical profiles. Overall, PtP amplitude reductions were in agreement with subjective ratings. CONCLUSIONS: LEP algesimetry is sensitive to analgesics with different modes of action and may enable the effects of novel analgesics to be assessed during early clinical development.

An oral TRPV1 antagonist attenuates laser radiant-heat-evoked potentials and pain ratings from UV(B)-inflamed and normal skin.

AIMS: Laser (radiant-heat) evoked potentials (LEPs) from vertex-EEG peak-to-peak (PtP) amplitude were used to determine acute antinociceptive/antihyperalgesic efficacy of ABT-102, a novel TRPV1 antagonist efficacious in preclinical pain models, compared with active controls and placebo in normal and UV(B)-inflamed skin. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, double-blind, intra-individual, crossover trial. Twenty-four healthy subjects received six sequences of single doses of ABT-102 (0.5, 2, 6 mg), etoricoxib 90 mg, tramadol 100 mg and placebo. Painful stimuli were induced by CO(2) -laser on normal and UV(B) -inflamed skin. LEPs and visual analogue scale (VAS-pain) ratings were taken at baseline and hourly up to 8 h post-dose from both skin types. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, significant mean decreases in the primary variable of LEP PtP-amplitude from UV(B)-inflamed skin were observed with ABT-102 6 mg (P < 0.001), ABT-102 2 mg (P = 0.002), tramadol 100 mg (P < 0.001), and etoricoxib 90 mg (P = 0.001) over the 8 h period; ABT-102 0.5 mg was similar to placebo. ABT-102 6 mg was superior to active controls over the 8 h period (P < 0.05) whereas ABT-102 2 mg was comparable. Improvements in VAS scores compared with placebo were observed with ABT-102 6 mg (P < 0.001) and ABT-102 2 mg (P = 0.002). ABT-102 average plasma concentrations were 1.3, 4.4 and 9.4 ng ml(-1) for the 0.5, 2 and 6 mg doses, respectively. There were no clinically significant safety findings. CONCLUSIONS: TRPV-1 antagonism appears promising in the management of clinical pain, but requires further investigation.

Predicting therapeutic efficacy - experimental pain in human subjects.

The pharmaceutical industry faces tough times. Despite tremendous advances in the science and technology of new lead identification and optimization, attrition rates for novel drug candidates making it into the clinic remain unacceptably high. A seamless boundary between basic preclinical and clinical arms of the discovery process, embodying the concept of 'translational research' is viewed by many as the way forward. The rational application of human experimental pain models in early clinical development is reviewed. Capsaicin, UV-irradiation and electrical stimulation methods have each been used to establish experimental hyperalgesia in Phase-I human volunteers and the application of these approaches is discussed in the context of several pharmacological examples. However, data generated from such studies must be integrated into a well-conceived and executed series of Phase-II efficacy trials in patients in order to derive maximal benefit. The challenges involved in optimal Phase-II/III trial design are reviewed with specific attention to the issues of sample size and placebo response. Finally, the application and potential of cortical EEG studies are discussed as an objective alternative to more conventional pain assessment tools with specific examples of how this technique has been applied to the study of NSAID and opiate-based therapeutics.

Hypericum extract reverses S-ketamine-induced changes in auditory evoked potentials in humans - possible implications for the treatment of schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Auditory evoked potentials (AEP) provide a correlate of cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia. Both cognitive dysfunction and AEP-characteristics might be related to reduced glutamatergic neurotransmission as induced by glutamate-antagonist like ketamine. Hypericum extract LI160 has demonstrated a ketamine-antagonising effect. We examined whether LI160 reverses changes of a low dose ketamine on AEP in healthy subjects. METHODS: We performed a double-blind randomized treatment with either 2 x 750 mg LI 160 or placebo given one week, using a crossover design, in 16 health subjects. A test-battery including AEPs, the oculodynamic test (ODT) and a cognitive test were performed before and after an infusion with 4 mg of S-ketamine over a period of 1 hour. RESULTS: S-ketamine lead to a significant decrease in the N100-P200 peak to peak (ptp) amplitude after the placebo treatment, whereas ptp was significantly increased by S-ketamine infusion in the LI160 treated subjects. The ODT and the cognitive testing revealed no significant effect of ketamine-infusion and therefore no interaction between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: AEP measures are sensitive means to assess the effect of low dose ketamine. Provided that ketamine mimics cognitive deficits in schizophrenia, LI160 might be effective to treat these symptoms.

Comparison of the analgesic effects of a fixed-dose combination of orphenadrine and diclofenac (Neodolpasse) with its single active ingredients diclofenac and orphenadrine: a placebo-controlled study using laser-induced somatosensory-evoked potentials from capsaicin-induced hyperalgesic human skin.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the analgesic efficacy of Neodolpasse, a fixed-dose combination of orphenadrine and diclofenac, compared with those of its single active ingredients in a human pain model. METHODS: The study was designed as a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-period crossover study. Twenty-four healthy female and male subjects received single infusions of Neodolpasse, orphenadrine, diclofenac or saline solution over 60 minutes. Infusions were separated by a 1-week washout period. Neurogenic inflammation and hyperalgesia were induced by topical occlusive application of a 1% capsaicin solution for 30 minutes on defined skin areas on the back. The pain response to CO2 laser pulses applied to the capsaicin-pretreated skin was measured by event-related vertex EEG recordings. This allowed us to study the influence of a single infusion on the central P2- and peripheral N1-components of laser-induced somatosensory-evoked potentials (LSEP) as a measure of pain response. RESULTS: Although none of the active treatments had a significant effect on the peripheral N1-component, all active treatments reduced the P2-component of the LSEP, reflecting central/spinal analgesic (anti-hyperalgesic) effects. These effects were statistically significant for orphenadrine (p < 0.0001) and for the combination of orphenadrine and diclofenac (p < 0.0013). The single ingredient diclofenac reduced the P2-component by a value just below clinical relevance (p < 0.0848). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the efficacy of Neodolpasse in a human pain model. The observed effect was mainly caused by central mechanisms and was found to be superior for the fixed-dose combination of orphenadrine and diclofenac compared with the individual ingredients. Both components contributed to the effect of the combination in an additive fashion, which can be explained by the different molecular mechanisms of action of each drug.

Dose-response relationship after single oral dose administrations of morphine and oxycodone using laser-evoked potentials on UVB- and capsaicin-irritated skin in healthy male subjects.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the analgesic/antihyperalgesic efficacy and to establish the dose-response relationship of morphine immediate release (IR) and oxycodone IR in a human experimental algesimetric model. Calculated effect ratios for peak-to-peak (PtP) amplitudes of laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) and visual analog scales (VAS) postlaser pain on UVB-irradiated skin (main target variables) were 1.68 and 1.18 respectively for oxycodone 10mg/morphine 20mg, 3.00 and 1.63 respectively for oxycodone 15 mg/morphine 30 mg, and 1.12 and 1.25 respectively for oxycodone 20mg/morphine 40 mg. The effect on the laser-PtP amplitude of morphine at the highest dose (40 mg) and of oxycodone at all doses (10, 15, 20mg) was considered to be clinically relevant based on a difference from placebo of ≥ 2.5 µV. For both compounds, a statistically significant linear trend was observed between dose groups in at least 1 of the 2 main target variables (adjusted P value for both end points <.001 at all doses). Hyperalgesia developed over time vs baseline due to acute exposure to UVB irradiation and to topical/occlusive 1% capsaicin solution. For both compounds, the principal onset of analgesic/antihyperalgesic drug effects was around 0.5 hours with an average peak at about 1 to 2 hours and the effect lasting for more than 3 hours (morphine 20 and 30 mg) or 6 hours (morphine 40 mg and oxycodone all doses). In conclusion, the study demonstrated a solid outcome of a mixed objective/subjective human experimental algesimetric model to approach dose-response relationships and analgesic/antihyperalgesic effects of 2 opioids.

Effects of multiple-dose esomeprazole and pantoprazole on diazepam pharmacokinetic profile and pharmacodynamic effects on cognitive and psychomotor function in healthy volunteers.

A randomized, double-blind, 2-way crossover trial of 24 healthy volunteers investigated the influence of esomeprazole (CAS 119141-88-7) and pantoprazole (CAS 102625-70-7), both 1 x 40 mg orally for 11 days, on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of diazepam (CAS 439-14-5). Single-dose intravenous diazepam 0.1 mg/kg was administered on day 6. Blood sampling for pharmacokinetic assessment was conducted 0-120 h post diazepam application and data were analyzed using a model-independent approach and ANOVA. Pharmacodynamic parameters were assessed by an oculodynamic test and auditory evoked potentials 0-10 h post diazepam application. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed regression model. The AUC of diazepam was increased by 28.0%, Cmax by 31.4% and t1/2 by 41.1% in the esomeprazole vs. pantoprazole group. Myogenic parameters such as angular velocity of saccadic eye movements and complex choice reaction time were impaired with esomeprazole when compared to pantoprazole after diazepam administration (P < 0.0028) at 4-6 h. The sedation parameter microsleep doubled (2.6 vs. 1.1%; P < 0.0073). No differences in auditory evoked potentials were observed. In conclusion, it cannot be ruled out that a relevant pharmacodynamic interaction between diazepam and esomeprazole may occur when both drugs are concomitantly administered. Pantoprazole may provide a higher safety profile.

Analgesic effects of low-dose intravenous orphenadrine in the state of capsaicin hyperalgesia. A randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind cross-over study using laser somatosensory evoked potentials obtained from capsaicin-irritated skin in healthy volunteers.

The present investigation aimed to elucidate the analgesic efficacy of 30 mg of intravenous orphenadrine citrate (CAS 4682-36-4) in a human pain model. Eighteen healthy female and male subjects were enrolled and received single infusions of 30 mg orphenadrine citrate and matching placebo in two periods which were separated by a 1 week washout period. The study was designed as a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period, cross-over trial. The intended neurogenic inflammation and hyperalgesia were induced by topical, occlusive application of 1% capsaicin solution (INCI: Capsicum frutescens, containing capsaicinoides from Capsicum annuum annuum, CAS 84603-55-4) for 30 min on defined skin areas of the back. The pain response to CO2 laser pulses applied to the capsaicin pre-treated skin was measured by event related Vertex-EEG recordings. This technique allowed studying the influence of orphenadrine citrate on the (central) P2-component and the (peripheral) Ni-component of the pain response (LSEP). Both, orphenadrine citrate and placebo were given as intravenous infusions over 60 min. Orphenadrine citrate exerted a significant reduction in central and peripheral components of the pain response when compared to placebo. The effect on the central component was highly significant and more pronounced than the peripheral effect of the drug. The analgesic effect developed fast, was already present during infusion, was ongoing, and exceeded the observational period of 4 h after start of infusion. In summary, orphenadrine citrate was able to exert an analgesic/anti-hyperalgesic effect in a low-dose paradigm (30 mg dose) which was predominantly due to central/spinal mechanisms in this capsaicin model with laser somatosensory evoked potentials.

Effect of the new H1-antagonist ReN1869 on capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia in human skin/Human phase-I trial using somatosensory evoked potentials induced by a CO2 laser.

Extensive pre-clinical investigations have shown that the tricyclic compound ReN1869 ((R)-1-(3-(10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5-ylidene)-1-propyl)-3-piperidine carboxylic acid, CAS 170149-99-2) is a potent H1-antagonist with pronounced antinociceptive properties. In this human phase-I trial the effect of different acute and multiple doses of ReN1869 on capsaicin induced neurogenic inflammation and hyperalgesia was investigated. Twenty-one healthy male subjects were enrolled in this randomised, double-blind, three-period, crossover trial design--consisting of acute and one week b.i.d. oral administration of 25 and 50 mg doses of ReN1869 and matching placebo--separated by 3 week washout periods. Capsaicin solution (1%) (INCI: Capsicum frutescens--containing capsaicinoides from Capsicum annuum annuum, CAS 84603-55-4) was applied in an occlusive mode for 30 min on the skin of the back in all three acute and subchronic medication periods to induce neurogenic inflammation. When the nociceptive laser pulses were applied to the capsaicin pre-treated skin, ReN1869 exerted a highly significant reduction of the pain response--as predominantly detected by suppression of the (central) P2-component in the laser-induced somatosensory evoked potentials (LSEPs) from Vertex-EEG. The primary efficacy endpoint, the N1/P2 peak to peak amplitude, was significantly reduced with the administration of ReN1869--primarily by a suppression of the P2-component of the LSEP. This suppression was dose-dependent and was more pronounced after a one week treatment (subchronic mode) with ReN1869 than after the first dose (acute mode). In contrast to the (central) P2-component there was no significant effect on the (peripheral) N1-component of the LSEPs taken from capsaicin-treated skin. As ReN1869 had no significant effect when the laser pulses were applied to normal skin, and the compound's effect was mainly restricted to the (central) P2-component, when LSEPs were taken from capsaicin treated skin, it can be concluded that ReN1869 exerts its positive effect to reduce capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia by a primarily central mechanism.

Comparison of two different preparations of ibuprofen with regard to the time course of their analgesic effect. A randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind cross-over study using laser somatosensory evoked potentials obtained from UW-irritated skin in healthy volunteers.

In the treatment of painful conditions the time to onset of a drug's analgesic effect is of great relevance. Plain ibuprofen acid (Ibu, CAS 15687-27-1) is relatively slowly absorbed after oral administration (t(max) is about 90-120 min). If, however, ibuprofen is given in form of a lysine salt, absorption is much quicker. It has been shown in pharmacokinetic studies that the maximum plasma concentration after administration of an ibuprofen lysine tablet (IbuLys) is reached at about 35 min after oral administration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the onset and extent of the analgesic effect of 400 mg ibuprofen administered as marketed ibuprofen lysine tablets (two tablets of Dolormin as a single dose) in comparison with standard Ibu tablets (two tablets as a single dose) and placebo (Plc) utilising the objective, quantitative (high resolution) method of Laser algesimetry. The N1-P2 peak-to-peak amplitude of the Laser-induced somatosensory evoked potentials (LSEPs)--measured during the first two hours after administration of study drugs--was the main efficacy parameter for the onset of the analgesic effects. The values obtained during 5 h after administration of the study drugs were used to measure the extent of the analgesic effects. As a main result with respect to the onset of analgesic action, the reduction of the N1-P2 peak-to-peak amplitude was significantly and relevantly more pronounced during the first 2 h after administration of IbuLys than after Ibu (IbuLys vs. Plc: p < or = 0.0020, IbuLys vs. Ibu: p < or = 0.0366). During the same time the amplitudes of the single N1-components of the LSEPs were also significantly smaller after IbuLys than after Plc (p < or = 0.0031) whereas the difference between plain Ibu and Plc was not significant (p < or = 0.1027). As a measure of the extent of analgesic action, the N1-P2 peak-to-peak amplitudes recorded during 5 h after medication were more effectively reduced by IbuLys than by Ibu (IbuLys vs. Plc: p < or = 0.0001, IbuLys vs. Ibu: p < or = 0.0041, Ibu vs. Plc: p (0.383). The reduction of the amplitudes of the single N1-components by IbuLys was significant in comparison to Plc (p < or = 0.0031), but not in comparison to Ibu. During the time of 5 h after medication the attenuating (analgesic) effect of IbuLys on the amplitude of the P2 component of the LSEPs was stronger than that of Plc (p < or = 0.0053) and stronger than that of Ibu (p < or = 0.0058). In summary IbuLys was significantly superior to Ibu with respect to the onset and extent of the analgesic effect. drugs were used to measure the extent of the analgesic effects. superior to Ibu with respect to the onset and extent of the analgesic effect.

Effects of Hypericum extract (LI160) on the change of auditory evoked potentials by cortisol administration.

Target symptoms treated with Hypericum extract, i.e. somatisation, fatigue and depression could be related to an increased activity of glucocorticoids in the brain. One potential mechanism is the increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier for glucocorticoids. Hypericum extract LI160 reduces intracerebral glucocorticoid concentration possibly by its action to induce the expression of the transport protein P-glycoprotein (P-gp). To test this hypothesis directly, we performed a randomised double-blind crossover study to examine the effect of intravenously administered cortisol on auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) and salivary cortisol concentration. Nineteen healthy subjects were treated for 2 weeks with 300 mg LI160 twice a day or placebo. On the 14th day, AEPs were recorded every 30 min, at times -60, -30 and 0 min before the start of the infusion and at +30, +60 and +90 min after starting the infusion. The rate of infusion was 20 mg cortisol/h. No changes in the AEP, especially the N1-P2 component, could be observed under cortisol infusion and consequently no modification with the treatment of Hypericum extract. The salivary concentration of cortisol under cortisol infusion was slightly but significantly decreased in the Hypericum condition compared to placebo. The results of the present study are therefore inconclusive with respect to the influence of LI160 treatment on the expected cortisol-induced AEP changes, but support the concept of an action of Hypericum on P-gp function by the observed changes in salivary cortisol.

A randomised, placebo-controlled study comparing two formulations of dimenhydrinate with respect to efficacy in motion sickness and sedation.

It is known that sedation by H1 antihistaminic drugs can be reduced or avoided if slow release formulations are used for their administration, probably because of a slower increase of the drug concentration in plasma and brain. The aim of this study was to compare two different formulations of dimenhydrinate (CAS 523-87-5), a single fast release tablet with three chewing gums (divided dose principle), with regard to their efficacy in a motion sickness model and their detrimental effect on vigilance and central nervous system (CNS) performance. Caloric stimulation of the eardrum (air at 44 degrees C) was used to induce the symptoms of motion sickness in 24 symptomatic volunteers in a three-way cross-over design comparing three chewing gums (Superpep forte, chewed for 30 min each) containing 20 mg dimenthydrinate each with a 50 mg dimenhydrinate tablet and placebo. During caloric stimulation the following parameters were measured in order to compare efficacy: Quantitative analysis of sodium excretion by sweat (main target parameter), subjective well being (vertigo) by visual analogue scales (VAS) and frequency of binocular nystagmus by computer nystagmography. Unwanted effects on vigilance and CNS performance were measured by means of the N1-P2 peak to peak amplitudes of auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) as an objective, quantitative parameter of vigilance and the latency to correct responses and the number of correct responses (complex choice reaction task) in the oculodynamic test (ODT) as parameters of complex choice reaction ability. As a main efficacy result sodium excretion by sweat was markedly reduced by the chewing gums and by the tablet. The differences to placebo were highly significant (chewing gums vs. placebo p < 0.0001, tablet vs. placebo p < 0.0001). There was no relevant and no significant difference between both medications (p = 0.308). The secondary efficacy parameters, frequency of binocular nystagm and the VAS vertigo were markedly reduced by both medications in comparison to placebo, i.e. both medications were markedly effective. In both cases, however, this result failed statistical significance. The unwanted depressing effects on vigilance and CNS performance of the chewing gums were less pronounced than that of tablets. The N1/P2 peak-to-peak amplitudes of the AEPs were significantly reduced by both the chewing gums and the tablets. The effect of the tablets was, however, larger than that of the chewing gums. This highly significant (tablet vs. chewing gums, p = 0.0003) difference shows that the tablet had a larger depressing effect on vigilance (greater sedation). In line with this result, the number of correct responses in the ODT was markedly and significantly reduced by the tablet (p = 0.0027) but not significantly by the chewing gums (p = 0.8140). The difference between the tablet and the chewing gums was highly significant (p = 0.0052). The complex choice reaction time was markedly and nearly significantly (p = 0.0558) prolonged by the tablet whereas the chewing gums produced only a very small and insignificant prolongation. That the objective measurements of vigilance and CNS performance showed significantly larger detrimental effects of the tablet than of the chewing gums is probably a consequence of a faster increase of the dimenhydrinate concentration in the CNS after administration of the tablet in comparison to the divided dose principle of the chewing gums.