Effect of mechanical aortic valve orientation on coronary artery flow: comparison of tilting disc versus bileaflet prostheses in pigs.

OBJECTIVE: Orientation for optimal systolic performance of tilting disc and bileaflet aortic valves was defined in previous studies. The present study investigates the influence of valve orientation on coronary artery flow in an animal model. METHODS: A rotation device holding either a Medtronic Hall tilting disc (n = 4; Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, Minn), a St Jude Medical bileaflet (n = 4; St Jude Medical, Inc, St Paul, Minn), or a Medtronic Advantage bileaflet (n = 3) aortic valve was implanted. The device allowed rotation of the valve without reopening the aorta. Flow through the left anterior descending coronary artery was measured preoperatively and at normal versus high cardiac output after weaning from extracorporeal circulation. Measurements were performed at the best and worst hemodynamic position, as defined previously. RESULTS: Coronary flow rates were similar in all animals preoperatively (26 +/- 4.1 mL/min). After aortic valve replacement, left anterior descending flow increased significantly to 58.2 +/- 10.6 mL/min. Highest flow rates at normal cardiac output were found in the optimum orientation, especially for the Medtronic valves (Medtronic Hall, 64 +/- 8.7 mL/min; Medtronic Advantage, 64.6 +/- 11.6 mL/min; St Jude Medical, 48.3 +/- 10.3 mL/min), whereas the worst position demonstrated significantly lower left anterior descending flow, with no differences among valves (Medtronic Hall, 37.5 +/- 1.3 mL/min; St Jude Medical, 35.7 +/- 10.7 mL/min; Medtronic Advantage, 39.8 +/- 10 mL/min). Left anterior descending artery flow increased significantly with higher cardiac output. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary blood flow was significantly influenced by mechanical aortic valve implantation and the orientation of prostheses. For both valve designs, the previously defined optimum orientation with respect to pressure gradients and turbulence demonstrated the highest left anterior descending flow rates. Even in its optimum orientation, the St Jude Medical valve showed significantly lower coronary flow than the other valves.

Comparison of hemodynamic performance of Medtronic Hall 21 mm versus St. Jude Medical 23 mm prostheses in pigs.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The ideal prosthesis for aortic valve replacement in the small annulus remains controversial, and has yet to be defined. In previous studies, the Medtronic Hall (MH) tilting disc valve showed superior hemodynamic performance in the hemodynamically optimum orientation compared to the St. Jude Medical (SJM) bileaflet valve, especially in smaller-sized valves. Using an animal model, the hemodynamics of 21 mm MH and 23 mm SJM valves, both of which have shown identical performance in previous clinical studies, were compared. METHODS: A rotation device holding either a MH or a SJM aortic valve was implanted into eight pigs. The device allowed rotation of the implanted valve without reopening the aorta. In different orientations (best and worst orientation hemodynamically as defined previously), transvalvular pressure gradients and ventricular dimensions were measured using transesophageal echocardiography at constant hemodynamic conditions. RESULTS: In the optimum hemodynamic orientation, pressure gradients of the MH valve (6.3+/-1.7 mmHg) corresponded to those obtained with the SJM valve (6.3+/-3.7 mmHg), whereas in the worst orientation the MH showed a tendency towards higher gradients (14.0+/-2.9 versus 10.3+/-4.0 mmHg) (p = not significant). A significant increase in left ventricular enddiastolic diameter was observed for both valve designs with rotation from the optimal into the worst orientation. CONCLUSION: In the optimum hemodynamic orientation, the 21 mm MH valve matched the hemodynamic performance of the 23 mm SJM valve. Thus, implantation of the MH valve might be an alternative to root enlargement and implantation of a larger SJM valve in patients with a small aortic annulus, though optimum orientation is required.

Changes in microRNA-1 expression and IK1 up-regulation in human atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased inward-rectifier current activity that may stabilize atrial rotors maintaining the arrhythmia. Left atrial (LA) structures are important for AF maintenance, but previous studies have mostly evaluated changes in the right atrium. MicroRNA-1 (miR-1) reciprocally regulates inwardly rectifying potassium channel (Kir)2.1 expression in coronary disease, contributing to arrhythmogenesis. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate changes in miR-1 and Kir2 subunit expression in relation to I(K1) alterations in LA of patients with persistent AF. METHODS: Atrial tissue was obtained from 62 patients (31 with AF) undergoing mitral valve repair or bypass grafting. Currents were recorded from isolated cells. Proteins were quantified from immunoblots. mRNA and miR-1 levels were measured with real-time polymerase chain reaction. Immunohistochemistry was applied to localize connexin (Cx) 43. RESULTS: I(K1) density was increased in LA cells from patients with AF (at -100 mV: -5.9 +/- 1.3 vs. -2.7 +/- 0.7 sinus rhythm, P <.05). There was a corresponding increase in Kir2.1 protein expression, but no change in other Kir or Cx proteins. Expression of inhibitory miR-1 was reduced by approximately 86% in tissue samples of AF patients. Kir2.1 mRNA was significantly increased. No change in Cx43 localization occurred. Ex vivo tachystimulation of human atrial slices up-regulated Kir2.1 and down-regulated miR-1, suggesting a primary role of atrial rate in miR-1 down-regulation and I(K1) up-regulation. CONCLUSION: miR-1 levels are greatly reduced in human AF, possibly contributing to up-regulation of Kir2.1 subunits, leading to increased I(K1). Because up-regulation of inward-rectifier currents is important for AF maintenance, these results provide potential new insights into molecular mechanisms of AF with potential therapeutic implications.

Initial in vivo results of the new Medtronic Advantage(TM) bileaflet valve in aortic position and comparison to the SJM.

The present study investigated the Medtronic Advantage (MA) bileaflet valve in an animal model and compared the results to the St. Jude Medical (SJM) valve. Systolic performance and coronary artery flow in different orientations were studied.A rotation device holding either a MA or SJM aortic valve size 23 mm was implanted into eight pigs. Transvalvular pressure gradients and ventricular dimensions were investigated with the valves in different orientations. Coronary artery flow was measured at normal and high cardiac output. Orientation significantly influenced the hemodynamic performance of both valves. The best results for both valves were obtained with one orifice proximal to the right cusp. Pressure gradients and ventricular dimensions of the MA corresponded to the SJM. Coronary artery flow was higher for the MA. The systolic performance of the new MA bileaflet valve was similar to the SJM. During diastole, the MA showed significantly higher LAD coronary flow.