Non-classical monocyte homing to the gut via α4ß7 integrin mediates macrophage-dependent intestinal wound healing.

OBJECTIVE: To study the role of α4ß7 integrin for gut homing of monocytes and to explore the biological consequences of therapeutic α4ß7 inhibition with regard to intestinal wound healing. DESIGN: We studied the expression of homing markers on monocyte subsets in the peripheral blood and on macrophage subsets in the gut of patients with IBD and controls with flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry. Integrin function was addressed with dynamic adhesion assays and in vivo gut homing assays. In vivo wound healing was studied in mice deficient for or depleted of α4ß7 integrin. RESULTS: Classical and non-classical monocytes were clearly dichotomous regarding homing marker expression including relevant expression of α4ß7 integrin on human and mouse non-classical monocytes but not on classical monocytes. Monocyte-expressed α4ß7 integrin was functionally important for dynamic adhesion to mucosal vascular addressin cell adhesion molecule 1 and in vivo gut homing. Impaired α4ß7-dependent gut homing was associated with reduced (effect size about 20%) and delayed wound healing and suppressed perilesional presence of wound healing macrophages. Non-classical monocytes in the peripheral blood were increased in patients with IBD under clinical treatment with vedolizumab. CONCLUSION: In addition to reported effects on lymphocytes, anti-α4ß7 therapy in IBD also targets non-classical monocytes. Impaired gut homing of such monocytes might lead to a reduction of wound healing macrophages and could potentially explain increased rates of postoperative complications in vedolizumab-treated patients, which have been observed in some studies.

Similar Inhibition of Dynamic Adhesion of Lymphocytes From IBD Patients to MAdCAM-1 by Vedolizumab and Etrolizumab-s.

Background: Although anti-adhesion therapies are a novel mainstay in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), the mechanisms controlling integrin-dependent gut homing are poorly elucidated, and the available techniques for translational functional investigations are limited. Methods: We used dynamic adhesion assays to study adhesion of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, CD19+ B cells, and granulocytes to the addressins MAdCAM-1, VCAM-1, and ICAM-1. The effects of vedolizumab, natalizumab, etrolizumab-s, anti-CD11a, and anti-CD18 antibodies were explored. Results: Adhesion of peripheral blood leukocytes from IBD patients and control donors could be validly assessed, and integrin-mediated addressin adhesion could be specifically inhibited by anti-integrin antibodies. Numbers of adhering cells were partly, but not completely, related to integrin expression. Vedolizumab and etrolizumab-s resulted in similar reduction of adhesion to MAdCAM-1, and preliminary data proposed an association of dynamic adhesion to MAdCAM-1 with response to vedolizumab therapy. Conclusions: Dynamic adhesion assays are an easy and broadly applicable method for IBD research that is useful for future translational studies and potentially also for supporting clinical treatment decisions. 10.1093/ibd/izy077_video1izy077_Video_15786486962001.