A comparison of three highly active antiretroviral treatment strategies consisting of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, protease inhibitors, or both in the presence of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors as initial therapy (CPCRA 058 FIRST Study): a long-term randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Long-term data from randomised trials on the consequences of treatment with a protease inhibitor (PI), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), or both are lacking. Here, we report results from the FIRST trial, which compared initial treatment strategies for clinical, immunological, and virological outcomes. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2002, 1397 antiretroviral-treatment-naive patients, presenting at 18 clinical trial units with 80 research sites in the USA, were randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1:1 to a protease inhibitor (PI) strategy (PI plus nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor [NRTI]; n=470), a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) strategy (NNRTI plus NRTI; n=463), or a three-class strategy (PI plus NNRTI plus NRTI; n=464). Primary endpoints were a composite of an AIDS-defining event, death, or CD4 cell count decline to less than 200 cells per mm3 for the PI versus NNRTI comparison, and average change in CD4 cell count at or after 32 months for the three-class versus combined two-class comparison. Analyses were by intention-to-treat. This study is registered ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00000922. FINDINGS: 1397 patients were assessed for the composite endpoint. A total of 388 participants developed the composite endpoint, 302 developed AIDS or died, and 188 died. NNRTI versus PI hazard ratios (HRs) for the composite endpoint, for AIDS or death, for death, and for virological failure were 1.02 (95% CI 0.79-1.31), 1.07 (0.80-1.41), 0.95 (0.66-1.37), and 0.66 (0.56-0.78), respectively. 1196 patients were assessed for the three-class versus combined two-class primary endpoint. Mean change in CD4 cell count at or after 32 months was +234 cells per mm3 and +227 cells per mm3 for the three-class and the combined two-class strategies (p=0.62), respectively. HRs (three-class vs combined two-class) for AIDS or death and virological failure were 1.15 (0.91-1.45) and 0.87 (0.75-1.00), respectively. HRs (three-class vs combined two-class) for AIDS or death were similar for participants with baseline CD4 cell counts of 200 cells per mm3 or less and of more than 200 cells per mm3 (p=0.38 for interaction), and for participants with baseline HIV RNA concentrations less than 100 000 copies per mL and 100,000 copies per mL or more (p=0.26 for interaction). Participants assigned the three-class strategy were significantly more likely to discontinue treatment because of toxic effects than were those assigned to the two-class strategies (HR 1.58; p<0.0001). INTERPRETATION: Initial treatment with either an NNRTI-based regimen or a PI-based regimen, but not both together, is a good strategy for long-term antiretroviral management in treatment-naive patients with HIV.

Structured treatment interruption in patients with multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus.

BACKGROUND: We compared two strategies for treating patients infected with multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). METHODS: Patients with multidrug-resistant HIV and HIV RNA levels of more than 5000 copies per milliliter were randomly assigned to a four-month structured interruption of treatment followed by a change in antiretroviral regimen (treatment-interruption group) or to an immediate change in regimen (control group). Genotypic and phenotypic resistance testing was performed. Disease progression, death, and changes in genotypic resistance, CD4 cell counts, HIV RNA levels, and quality of life were assessed. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 11.6 months, disease progression or death occurred in 22 of the 138 patients in the treatment-interruption group and in 12 of the 132 patients in the control group (P=0.01), with a hazard ratio of 2.57 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 5.5) for the treatment-interruption group. There were eight deaths in each group. In the treatment-interruption group, the mutant HIV populations completely or partially reverted to wild type by four months in 64.0 percent of patients. As compared with the control group, the treatment-interruption group had a mean CD4 cell count that was 85 cells per cubic millimeter lower from months 0 through 4 (P<0.001), 47 cells per cubic millimeter lower from months 5 through 8 (P<0.001), and 31 cells per cubic millimeter lower after eight months (P=0.11). The mean HIV RNA levels were 1.2 log copies per milliliter higher (on a base-10 scale) in the treatment-interruption group during months 0 through 4 (P<0.001), but they were not significantly different from those in the control group after month 4. The overall quality of life was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients infected with multidrug-resistant HIV, structured interruption of treatment was associated with greater progression of disease and did not confer immunologic or virologic benefits or improve the overall quality of life.

Prevalence of antiretroviral drug resistance mutations in chronically HIV-infected, treatment-naive patients: implications for routine resistance screening before initiation of antiretroviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of drug resistance among persons with newly acquired human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is well documented. However, it is unclear to what extent these mutations persist in chronically infected, treatment-naive patients. METHODS: Prevalence of and factors associated with genotypic drug resistance were analyzed retrospectively in a subset of 491 chronically HIV-infected, antiretroviral-naive patients enrolled at 25 cities in the Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Flexible Initial Retrovirus Suppressive Therapies trial during 1999-2001. Resistance was defined on the basis of the International AIDS Society 2003 definition, as well as the presence of additional mutations at codons 215 (C/D/E/S) and 69 (A/N/S) in the pol gene. Prevalence of mutations was estimated by use of techniques for stratified random samples. Logistic regression models were used to determine factors associated with resistance. RESULTS: Among the 491 chronically HIV-infected patients (mean CD4 cell count, 269 cells/mm(3); 31% of patients had a prior AIDS diagnosis), 57 (11.6%) had >or=1 resistance mutation, resulting in an estimated prevalence for the cohort of 10.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.5%-12.1%). The prevalence was 8.8% if the 118I mutation was excluded. By drug class, the estimated prevalence of mutations conferring resistance to nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors was 7.8%, and the prevalence was 3.0% for nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors and 0.7% for protease inhibitors. In a multiple logistic regression analysis, non-Hispanic white subjects were twice as likely than African American subjects to have resistance (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-4.1; P=.03), and there was a 40% increase per year in prevalence of mutations by later year of enrollment (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-2.1; P=.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the persistence of drug resistance mutations in chronically HIV-infected patients and an increasing prevalence of resistance over time, and they support genotyping of virus at baseline for chronically HIV-infected patients.

Sustained benefit from a long-term antiretroviral adherence intervention. Results of a large randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of 2 adherence interventions, medication managers (MM) and medication alarms (ALR), among antiretroviral (ARV)-naive persons with HIV initiating ARV therapy. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, adherence intervention clinical trial was conducted among participants coenrolled in an HIV ARV strategy study for ARV-naive individuals. Sites were assigned by cluster randomization using a 2 x 2 factorial design to administer MM, ALR, MM + ALR, or neither (control). MM participants received individualized, structured, long-term adherence support from trained MMs. ALR participants received individually programmed ALR alarms for use throughout the study. RESULTS: The 928 participants, followed a median of 30 months, included 22% women and 75% nonwhites; the median baseline CD4 count was 155 cells/mm. First virologic failure was 13% lower in all MM versus no-MM groups (P = 0.13) and 28% lower in MM versus no-MM subgroups randomized to 2-class ARV arms in the parent ARV study (P = 0.01). MM (vs. no-MM) participants had significantly better CD4 cells count (P = 0.01) and adherence (P < 0.001) outcomes. ALR (vs. no-ALR) participants had worse virologic outcomes. CONCLUSION: This large randomized clinical trial demonstrated that interpersonal structured adherence support was associated with improved long-term medication adherence and virologic and immunologic HIV outcomes.

Disadvantages of structured treatment interruption persist in patients with multidrug-resistant HIV-1: final results of the CPCRA 064 study.

BACKGROUND: We report the final results of Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS (CPCRA-064) study, a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial that determines the long-term clinical impact of structured treatment interruption (STI) in patients with multidrug-resistant (MDR) HIV-1. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-four patients on stable antiretroviral therapy with MDR HIV-1 treatment failure were randomized to a 4-month STI, followed by an optimized antiretroviral regimen (STI arm, n = 140) or an immediate change to an optimized antiretroviral regimen (control arm, n = 134). Main outcome measures were progression of disease or death and changes from baseline in HIV RNA levels (log copies/mL) and CD4 cell counts (cells/mm). The median baseline HIV RNA level was 5.0 log copies/mL, the median CD4 count was 147 cells/mm, and the nadir CD4 count was 32 cells/mm. The median follow-up was 37 months. After the STI period, there were no differences in HIV RNA level responses between treatment arms. Differences in CD4 count responses always favored the control arm, with an advantage of 84 cells from 0 to 4 months (P < 0.0001), 50 cells from 4 to 12 months (P < 0.0001), 45 cells from 12 to 24 months (P = 0.006), and 43 cells after 24 months (P = 0.07). Rates in the STI and control arms for first progression-of-disease event or death were 17.5 and 14.3, respectively (hazard ratio = 1.28; P = 0.22). CONCLUSION: STI before changing regimens in patients with MDR HIV-1 treatment failure has a prolonged negative impact on CD4 cell count recovery and does not confer progression of disease or virologic benefits.