RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence that antibody responses play a role in the resolution of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with primary or secondary antibody deficiency are at increased risk of persistent infection. This challenging clinical scenario is associated with adverse patient outcome and potentially creates an ecological niche for the evolution of novel SARS-CoV-2 variants with immune evasion capacity. Case reports and/or series have implied a therapeutic role for convalescent plasma (CP) to secure virological clearance, although concerns have been raised about the effectiveness of CP and its potential to drive viral evolution, and it has largely been withdrawn from clinical use in the UK. CASE PRESENTATION: We report two cases in which persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection was cleared following administration of the monoclonal antibody combination casirivimab and imdevimab (REGN-COV2, Ronapreve). A 55-year-old male with follicular lymphoma, treated with B cell depleting therapy, developed SARS-CoV-2 infection in September 2020 which then persisted for over 200 days. He was hospitalised on four occasions with COVID-19 and suffered debilitating fatigue and malaise throughout. There was no clinical response to antiviral therapy with remdesivir or CP, and SARS-CoV-2 was consistently detected in nasopharyngeal swabs. Intrahost evolution of several spike variants of uncertain significance was identified by viral sequence analysis. Delivery of REGN-COV2, in combination with remdesivir, was associated with clinical improvement and viral clearance within 6 days, which was sustained for over 150 days despite immunotherapy for relapsed follicular lymphoma. The second case, a 68-year-old female with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia on ibrutinib, also developed persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Despite a lack of response to remdesivir, infection promptly cleared following REGN-COV2 in combination with remdesivir, accompanied by resolution of inflammation and full clinical recovery that has been maintained for over 290 days. CONCLUSIONS: These cases highlight the potential benefit of REGN-COV2 as therapy for persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection in antibody deficient individuals, including after failure of CP treatment. Formal clinical studies are warranted to assess the effectiveness of REGN-COV2 in antibody-deficient patients, especially in light of the emergence of variants of concern, such as Omicron, that appear to evade REGN-COV2 neutralisation.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Infecção Persistente/virologia , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , COVID-19/terapia , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Imunização Passiva , Linfoma Folicular , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecção Persistente/tratamento farmacológico , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado do Tratamento , Soroterapia para COVID-19RESUMO
In September 2018, monkeypox virus was transmitted from a patient to a healthcare worker in the United Kingdom. Transmission was probably through contact with contaminated bedding. Infection control precautions for contacts (vaccination, daily monitoring, staying home from work) were implemented. Of 134 potential contacts, 4 became ill; all patients survived.
Assuntos
Monkeypox virus , Mpox , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Mpox/epidemiologia , Monkeypox virus/genética , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , VacinaçãoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To describe the presentation and management of bacterial brain abscess and subdural empyema in adults treated at two tertiary centers. In addition, to identify factors that may predict a poor clinical outcome. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data obtained from clinical records was performed, followed by multivariate regression analysis of patient and treatment-related factors. RESULTS: 113 patients were included with a median age of 53 years and a male preponderance. At presentation symptoms were variable, 28% had a focal neurological deficit, and 39% had a reduced Glasgow coma scale (GCS). Brain abscesses most frequently affected the frontal, temporal, and parietal lobes while 36% had a subdural empyema. An underlying cause was identified in 76%; a contiguous ear or sinus infection (43%), recent surgery or trauma (18%) and haematogenous spread (15%). A microbiological diagnosis was confirmed in 86%, with streptococci, staphylococci, and anaerobes most frequently isolated. Treatment involved complex, prolonged antibiotic therapy (> 6 weeks in 84%) combined with neurosurgical drainage (91%) and source control surgery (34%). Mortality was 5% with 31% suffering long-term disability and 64% achieving a good clinical outcome. A reduced GCS, focal neurological deficit, and seizures at presentation were independently associated with an unfavorable clinical outcome (death or disability). CONCLUSIONS: Complex surgical and antimicrobial treatment achieves a good outcome in the majority of patients with bacterial brain abscess and subdural empyema. Factors present at diagnosis can help to predict those likely to suffer adverse outcomes. Research to determine optimal surgical and antibiotic management would be valuable.
Assuntos
Abscesso Encefálico/diagnóstico , Abscesso Encefálico/terapia , Empiema Subdural/diagnóstico , Empiema Subdural/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Abscesso Encefálico/microbiologia , Empiema Subdural/microbiologia , Inglaterra , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Many doctors, across grades and specialities, supervise or advise students and juniors undertaking elective placements. Electives form part of medical curricula on a worldwide scale. The Medical Schools Council (MSC) Electives Committee in the UK identified a gap in the current literature in relation to provision of comprehensive recommendations for the design and management of undergraduate elective programmes. Electives afford many known benefits for medical and other health care students, but the context, and risks (impacting potentially on patient, public and student well-being) are usually different from those associated with 'home' clinical placements. AIM: The aim is to share experiences and good practice within UK Medical Schools, and inform and inspire others involved with similar programmes across the globe. METHOD: This paper reports the results of the formation of a sub-group to draft a set of recommendations, drawing on the reported experiences of academic elective leads across all UK schools, and including input from the MSC, and the student group Medsin (to capture the learner voice). The final document was the result of a national consultative process of four iterations. The end document was approved at school level, e.g. by curriculum committee, by each of the participating schools. RECOMMENDATIONS: The recommendations consolidate the experiences of 30 participating UK medical schools. The consultation process generated 17 pre-departure recommendations, seven during elective recommendations, 11 post elective recommendations and a further four recommendations relating to infectious disease. CONCLUSION: We believe developing elective programmes using collective recommendations will provide a basis for a safer and more structured approach to a medical elective without losing the uniqueness and creative experiences valued by participants. Issues relating to undergraduates leaving their home school to experience medicine in a new context or country replicate across sites, so many recommendations will be transferable internationally.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica/normas , Consenso , Currículo/normas , Intercâmbio Educacional Internacional/tendências , Estudantes de Medicina , Países em Desenvolvimento , Educação de Graduação em Medicina , Feminino , Saúde Global/educação , Saúde Global/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Reino UnidoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Malaria remains one of the most serious infections for travellers to tropical countries. Due to the lack of harmonized guidelines a large variety of treatment regimens is used in Europe to treat severe malaria. METHODS: The European Network for Tropical Medicine and Travel Health (TropNet) conducted an 8-year, multicentre, observational study to analyse epidemiology, treatment practices and outcomes of severe malaria in its member sites across Europe. Physicians at participating TropNet centres were asked to report pseudonymized retrospective data from all patients treated at their centre for microscopically confirmed severe Plasmodium falciparum malaria according to the 2006 WHO criteria. RESULTS: From 2006 to 2014 a total of 185 patients with severe malaria treated in 12 European countries were included. Three patients died, resulting in a 28-day survival rate of 98.4%. The majority of infections were acquired in West Africa (109/185, 59%). The proportion of patients treated with intravenous artesunate increased from 27% in 2006 to 60% in 2013. Altogether, 56 different combinations of intravenous and oral drugs were used across 28 study centres. The risk of acute renal failure (36 vs 17% p = 0.04) or cerebral malaria (54 vs 20%, p = 0.001) was significantly higher in patients ≥60 years than in younger patients. Respiratory distress with the need for mechanical ventilation was significantly associated with the risk of death in the study population (13 vs 0%, p = 0.001). Post-artemisinin delayed haemolysis was reported in 19/70 (27%) patients treated with intravenous artesunate. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with severe malaria in this study were tourists or migrants acquiring the infection in West Africa. Intravenous artesunate is increasingly used for treatment of severe malaria in many European treatment centres and can be given safely to European patients with severe malaria. Patients treated with intravenous artesunate should be followed up to detect and manage late haemolytic events.
Assuntos
Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Malária Falciparum/tratamento farmacológico , Malária Falciparum/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Antimaláricos/classificação , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus , Pessoal de Saúde , Programas de Rastreamento , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral , Retorno ao Trabalho , Betacoronavirus/genética , Betacoronavirus/isolamento & purificação , COVID-19 , Teste para COVID-19 , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Inglaterra , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Quarentena , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , SARS-CoV-2 , Medicina Estatal , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Intravenous artesunate improves survival in severe malaria, but clinical trial data from nonendemic countries are scarce. The TropNet severe malaria database was analyzed to compare outcomes of artesunate vs quinine treatment. Artesunate reduced parasite clearance time and duration of intensive care unit and hospital treatment in European patients with imported severe malaria.
Assuntos
Antimaláricos/administração & dosagem , Artemisininas/administração & dosagem , Malária/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Intravenosa , Adulto , Artesunato , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Quinina/administração & dosagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Malaria continues to be amongst the most frequent infectious diseases imported to Europe. Whilst European treatment guidelines are based on data from studies carried out in endemic areas, there is a paucity of original prospective treatment data. The objective was to summarize data on treatments to harmonize and optimize treatment for uncomplicated malaria in Europe. METHODS: A prospective observational multicentre study was conducted, assessing tolerance and efficacy of treatment regimens for imported uncomplicated falciparum malaria in adults amongst European centres of tropical and travel medicine. RESULTS: Between December 2003 and 2009, 504 patients were included in 16 centres from five European countries. Eighteen treatment regimens were reported, the top three being atovaquone-proguanil, mefloquine, and artemether-lumefantrine. Treatments significantly differed with respect to the occurrence of treatment changes (p = 0.005) and adverse events (p = 0.001), parasite and fever clearance times (p < 0.001), and hospitalization rates (p = 0.0066) and durations (p = 0.001). Four recrudescences and two progressions to severe disease were observed. Compared to other regimens, quinine alone was associated with more frequent switches to second line treatment, more adverse events and longer inpatient stays. Parasite and fever clearance times were shortest with artemether-mefloquine combination treatment. Vomiting was the most frequent cause of treatment change, occurring in 5.5% of all patients but 9% of the atovaquone-proguanil group. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the heterogeneity of standards of care within Europe. A consensus discussion at European level is desirable to foster a standardized management of imported falciparum malaria.
Assuntos
Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Malária/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Combinação Arteméter e Lumefantrina , Artemisininas/uso terapêutico , Atovaquona/uso terapêutico , Combinação de Medicamentos , Tratamento Farmacológico/métodos , Tratamento Farmacológico/normas , Etanolaminas/uso terapêutico , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Fluorenos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Mefloquina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proguanil/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cases of human monkeypox are rarely seen outside of west and central Africa. There are few data regarding viral kinetics or the duration of viral shedding and no licensed treatments. Two oral drugs, brincidofovir and tecovirimat, have been approved for treatment of smallpox and have demonstrated efficacy against monkeypox in animals. Our aim was to describe the longitudinal clinical course of monkeypox in a high-income setting, coupled with viral dynamics, and any adverse events related to novel antiviral therapies. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we report the clinical features, longitudinal virological findings, and response to off-label antivirals in seven patients with monkeypox who were diagnosed in the UK between 2018 and 2021, identified through retrospective case-note review. This study included all patients who were managed in dedicated high consequence infectious diseases (HCID) centres in Liverpool, London, and Newcastle, coordinated via a national HCID network. FINDINGS: We reviewed all cases since the inception of the HCID (airborne) network between Aug 15, 2018, and Sept 10, 2021, identifying seven patients. Of the seven patients, four were men and three were women. Three acquired monkeypox in the UK: one patient was a health-care worker who acquired the virus nosocomially, and one patient who acquired the virus abroad transmitted it to an adult and child within their household cluster. Notable disease features included viraemia, prolonged monkeypox virus DNA detection in upper respiratory tract swabs, reactive low mood, and one patient had a monkeypox virus PCR-positive deep tissue abscess. Five patients spent more than 3 weeks (range 22-39 days) in isolation due to prolonged PCR positivity. Three patients were treated with brincidofovir (200 mg once a week orally), all of whom developed elevated liver enzymes resulting in cessation of therapy. One patient was treated with tecovirimat (600 mg twice daily for 2 weeks orally), experienced no adverse effects, and had a shorter duration of viral shedding and illness (10 days hospitalisation) compared with the other six patients. One patient experienced a mild relapse 6 weeks after hospital discharge. INTERPRETATION: Human monkeypox poses unique challenges, even to well resourced health-care systems with HCID networks. Prolonged upper respiratory tract viral DNA shedding after skin lesion resolution challenged current infection prevention and control guidance. There is an urgent need for prospective studies of antivirals for this disease. FUNDING: None.
Assuntos
Mpox , Adulto , Animais , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Mpox/diagnóstico , Mpox/tratamento farmacológico , Mpox/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reino Unido/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Numbers of travellers visiting friends and relatives (VFRs) from Europe to malaria endemic countries are increasing and include long-term and second generation immigrants, who represent the major burden of malaria cases imported back into Europe. Most recommendations for malaria chemoprophylaxis lack a solid evidence base, and often fail to address the cultural, social and economic needs of VFRs. METHODS: European travel medicine experts, who are members of TropNetEurop, completed a sequential series of questionnaires according to the Delphi method. This technique aims at evaluating and developing a consensus through repeated iterations of questionnaires. The questionnaires in this study included questions about professional experience with VFRs, controversial issues in malaria prophylaxis, and 16 scenarios exploring indications for prescribing and choice of chemoprophylaxis. RESULTS: The experience of participants was rather diverse as was their selection of chemoprophylaxis regimen. A significant consensus was observed in only seven of 16 scenarios. The analysis revealed a wide variation in prescribing choices with preferences grouped by region of practice and increased prescribing seen in Northern Europe compared to Central Europe. CONCLUSIONS: Improving the evidence base on efficacy, adherence to chemoprophylaxis and risk of malaria and encouraging discussion among experts, using techniques such as the Delphi method, may reduce the variability in prescription in European travel clinics.
Assuntos
Antimaláricos/administração & dosagem , Quimioprevenção/métodos , Emigrantes e Imigrantes , Malária/epidemiologia , Malária/prevenção & controle , Viagem , Técnica Delphi , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Humanos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Introduction. During previous viral pandemics, reported co-infection rates and implicated pathogens have varied. In the 1918 influenza pandemic, a large proportion of severe illness and death was complicated by bacterial co-infection, predominantly Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus.Gap statement. A better understanding of the incidence of co-infection in patients with COVID-19 infection and the pathogens involved is necessary for effective antimicrobial stewardship.Aim. To describe the incidence and nature of co-infection in critically ill adults with COVID-19 infection in England.Methodology. A retrospective cohort study of adults with COVID-19 admitted to seven intensive care units (ICUs) in England up to 18 May 2020, was performed. Patients with completed ICU stays were included. The proportion and type of organisms were determined at <48 and >48 h following hospital admission, corresponding to community and hospital-acquired co-infections.Results. Of 254 patients studied (median age 59 years (IQR 49-69); 64.6â% male), 139 clinically significant organisms were identified from 83 (32.7â%) patients. Bacterial co-infections/ co-colonisation were identified within 48 h of admission in 14 (5.5â%) patients; the commonest pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (four patients) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (two patients). The proportion of pathogens detected increased with duration of ICU stay, consisting largely of Gram-negative bacteria, particularly Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. The co-infection/ co-colonisation rate >48 h after admission was 27/1000 person-days (95â% CI 21.3-34.1). Patients with co-infections/ co-colonisation were more likely to die in ICU (crude OR 1.78,95â% CI 1.03-3.08, P=0.04) compared to those without co-infections/ co-colonisation.Conclusion. We found limited evidence for community-acquired bacterial co-infection in hospitalised adults with COVID-19, but a high rate of Gram-negative infection acquired during ICU stay.
Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Coinfecção/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bactérias/classificação , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , COVID-19/microbiologia , Coinfecção/microbiologia , Estado Terminal , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Healthcare workers (HCWs) are known to be at increased risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2, although whether these risks are equal across all roles is uncertain. Here we report a retrospective analysis of a large real-world dataset obtained from 10 March to 6 July 2020 in an NHS Foundation Trust in England with 17,126 employees. 3,338 HCWs underwent symptomatic PCR testing (14.4% positive, 2.8% of all staff) and 11,103 HCWs underwent serological testing for SARS-CoV-2 IgG (8.4% positive, 5.5% of all staff). Seropositivity was lower than other hospital settings in England but higher than community estimates. Increased test positivity rates were observed in HCWs from BAME backgrounds and residents in areas of higher social deprivation. A multiple logistic regression model adjusting for ethnicity and social deprivation confirmed statistically significant increases in the odds of testing positive in certain occupational groups, most notably domestic services staff, nurses, and health-care assistants. PCR testing of symptomatic HCWs appeared to underestimate overall infection levels, probably due to asymptomatic seroconversion. Clinical outcomes were reassuring, with only a small minority of HCWs with COVID-19 requiring hospitalization (2.3%) or ICU management (0.7%) and with no deaths. Despite a relatively low level of HCW infection compared to other UK cohorts, there were nevertheless important differences in test positivity rates between occupational groups, robust to adjustment for demographic factors such as ethnic background and social deprivation. Quantitative and qualitative studies are needed to better understand the factors contributing to this risk. Robust informatics solutions for HCW exposure data are essential to inform occupational monitoring.
RESUMO
Recent large national and international cohorts describe the baseline characteristics and outcome of hospitalised patients with COVID-19, however there is limited granularity to these reports. We aimed to provide a detailed description of a UK COVID-19 cohort, focusing on management and outcome. We performed a retrospective single-centre analysis of clinical management and 28-day outcomes of consecutive adult inpatients with SARS-CoV-2 PCR-confirmed COVID-19 from 31 January to 16 April 2020 inclusive. In total, 316 cases were identified. Most patients were elderly (median age 75) with multiple comorbidities. One quarter were admitted from residential or nursing care. Mortality was 84 out of 316 (26.6%). Most deaths occurred in patients in whom a ceiling of inpatient treatment had been determined and for whom end of life care and specialist palliative care input was provided where appropriate. No deaths occurred in patients aged under 56 years. Decisions to initiate respiratory support were individualised after consideration of patient wishes, premorbid frailty and comorbidities. In total, 59 (18%) patients were admitted to intensive care, of which 31 (10% overall cohort) required intubation. Multiple logistic regression identified associations between death and age, frailty, and disease severity, with age as the most significant factor (odds ratio 1.07 [95% CI 1.03-1.10] per year increase, p < 0.001). These findings provide important clinical context to outcome data. Mortality was associated with increasing age. Most deaths were anticipated and occurred in patients with advance decisions on ceilings of treatment.
Assuntos
COVID-19/mortalidade , COVID-19/terapia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medicina Estatal , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Reino UnidoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To describe current practice in testing for transmitted antiretroviral drug resistance (TDR) and the prevalence of TDR in a large UK HIV-1 cohort. METHODS: The study includes a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed HIV-1-infected patients presenting to eight HIV clinics in the north of England between March 2005 and March 2007. Resistance mutations were defined by IAS-USA. Predicted phenotypes were calculated by the Stanford University database. RESULTS: Five hundred and fifty-eight patients were studied, of whom 394 (70.6%) had heterosexually acquired HIV and 377 (67.6%) were infected outside the UK. TDR testing was performed in 406 patients (72.8%). Thirteen of 392 viral resistance profiles (3.3%) showed genotypic TDR. There was no significant association between TDR and any demographic or risk factor or baseline CD4 count. In particular, rates of TDR were similar in white British (6/147, 4.1%) and black African (7/224, 3.1%) patients. The numbers of patients with TDR to individual drug classes were: nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, 2 (0.5%); non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, 7 (1.8%); and protease inhibitors, 4 (1.0%). No patients had multi-class resistance detected. Eleven patients (2.8%) were predicted to have significant phenotypic resistance to at least one drug. CONCLUSIONS: In a large unselected UK cohort, with high coverage of TDR testing, the prevalence of TDR was low and is in accordance with recent data, showing a decrease in the prevalence of TDR in the UK. Differences in population mix did not appear to explain this low rate.
Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Viral , Infecções por HIV/transmissão , Infecções por HIV/virologia , HIV-1/efeitos dos fármacos , HIV-1/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Contagem de Linfócito CD4 , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/imunologia , HIV-1/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Reino UnidoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify the incidence of, and risk factors for, acute kidney injury (AKI) in adults treated with parenteral aciclovir. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective cohort study of prospectively acquired electronic clinical, pharmacy and laboratory data was performed with approval of the Caldicott guardian. AKI was defined by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria, prior to analysis of baseline patient and treatment-related risk factors. RESULTS: 269 aciclovir treatment episodes were identified in 268 patients. Overall incidence of AKI was 13%. Half of AKI episodes were KDIGO grade 2/3. In univariate analysis, AKI occurred more frequently in patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes, and in patients treated with higher daily doses of aciclovir. There was also a trend to increased age in patients with AKI. In a binomial logistic regression model only CKD and daily dose remained significant independent factors. CONCLUSIONS: AKI is an important side effect of parenteral aciclovir, the incidence of which is comparable to established nephrotoxic drugs such as aminoglycosides. Patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease or receiving higher total doses are at greatest risk, reinforcing the clinical importance of appropriate dose adjustment for ideal body weight and baseline renal function.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Aciclovir/efeitos adversos , Injúria Renal Aguda/metabolismo , Aciclovir/administração & dosagem , Administração Intravenosa , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Rim/efeitos dos fármacos , Rim/metabolismo , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto JovemRESUMO
We aimed to describe the clinical features and outcomes of pyogenic spondylodiscitis and to identify factors associated with an unfavourable clinical outcome (defined as death, permanent disability, spinal instability or persistent pain). In our tertiary centre, 91 cases were identified prospectively and a retrospective descriptive analysis of clinical records was performed prior to binary regression analysis of factors associated with an unfavourable outcome. A median 26 days elapsed from the onset of symptoms to diagnosis and 51% of patients had neurological impairment at presentation. A microbiological diagnosis was reached in 81%, with Staphylococcus aureus most commonly isolated. Treatment involved prolonged hospitalisation (median stay 40.5 days), long courses of antibiotics (>6 weeks in 98%) and surgery in 42%. While this was successful in eradicating infection, only 32% of patients had a favourable clinical outcome and six patients (7%) died. Diabetes mellitus, clinical evidence of neurological impairment at presentation, a longer duration of symptoms and radiological evidence of spinal cord or cauda equina compression were independent factors associated with an unfavourable outcome. Our data indicate that spondylodiscitis is associated with significant morbidity and suggest that adverse outcomes may be predicted to an extent by factors present at the time of diagnosis.
RESUMO
The importance of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) as a component of healthcare worker (HCW) protection was highlighted during the Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak in West Africa. The large number of HCW deaths in Africa was in part due to lack of resources or prior training in PPE usage. As part of the Ebola legacy, the High Consequence Infectious Disease (HCID) programme was initiated by NHS England and Public Health England (PHE) to improve preparedness for Ebola and other infections that not only endanger the life of the patient, but also pose particular dangers to HCWs. A systematic review identified national standardisation of PPE protocols as a priority, but recognised that a lack of safety data limited the ability to mandate any one protocol. A simulation-based exercise was developed to assess the safety of PPE ensembles in use in the UK during first assessment of a patient with a possible HCID. A mannequin was adapted to expose volunteer HCWs to synthetic bodily fluids (vomit, sweat, diarrhoea and cough), each with a different coloured fluorescent tracer, invisible other than under ultraviolet (UV) light. After exposure, HCWs were examined under UV lights to locate fluorescent contamination, and were screened again after removing PPE (doffing) to detect any personal contamination. The exercise was videoed, allowing retrospective analysis of contamination events and user errors. The simulation testing identified significant HCW contamination events after doffing, related to protocol failure or complications in PPE doffing, providing conclusive evidence that improvements could be made. At a workshop with an expert stakeholder group, the data were examined and a unified PPE ensemble agreed. This ensemble was then tested in the same simulation exercise and no evidence of any HCW contamination was seen after doffing. Following further review by the working group, a consensus agreement has been reached and a unified 'HCID assessment PPE' ensemble, with accompanying donning and doffing protocols, is presented here.
Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Equipamento de Proteção Individual , África , Consenso , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Inglaterra , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Doença pelo Vírus Ebola/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Serviços de Saúde do Trabalhador/métodos , Serviços de Saúde do Trabalhador/organização & administração , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Schistosomiasis remains one of the most prevalent parasitic diseases worldwide and the infection is frequently found in travelers and migrants. The European Network for Tropical Medicine and Travel Health conducted a sentinel surveillance study on imported schistosomiasis between 1997 and 2010. This report summarizes epidemiological and clinical data from 1,465 cases of imported schistosomiasis. Direct pathogen detection and serology were the main diagnostic tools applied. Of these, 486 (33%) cases were identified among European travelers, 231 (16%) among long-term expatriates, and 748 (51%) among non-European immigrants. Overall, only 18.6% of travelers had received pretravel advice; 95% of infections were acquired in the African region. On species level, Schistosoma mansoni was identified in 570 (39%) and Schistosoma haematobium in 318 (22%) cases; 57.5% of patients were symptomatic. Acute symptoms were reported in 27% of patients leading to earlier presentation within 3 months. Praziquantel was used in all patients to treat schistosomiasis. Many infections were detected in asymptomatic patients. In 47.4% of asymptomatic patients infection was detected by microscopy and in 39% by serology or antigen testing. Schistosomiasis remains a frequent infection in travelers and migrants to Europe. Travelers should be made aware of the risk of schistosomiasis infection when traveling to sub-Saharan Africa. Posttravel consultations particularly for returning expatriates are useful given the high potential for detecting asymptomatic infections.
Assuntos
Anti-Helmínticos/uso terapêutico , Praziquantel/uso terapêutico , Esquistossomose/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , África Subsaariana/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Animais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Esquistossomose/tratamento farmacológico , Esquistossomose/epidemiologia , Migrantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Viagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto JovemAssuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus , Coronavirus , Pneumonia Viral , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , China , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Reino UnidoRESUMO
Pancreatic tuberculosis is a rare disease. It can be easily confused with malignancy or pancreatitis on imaging. This could result in unnecessary surgery. As this is a treatable disease it is imperative to diagnose this condition pre-operatively. We report three cases of pancreatic tuberculosis that were diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound. In conclusion, endoscopic ultrasound is the diagnostic modality of choice for pancreatic tuberculosis facilitating high resolution imaging, as well as sampling of tissue for staining, cytology, culture and polymerase chain reaction assay.