RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Severe traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among young people around the world. Prehospital care focuses on the prevention and treatment of secondary brain injury and commonly includes tracheal intubation after induction of general anesthesia. The choice of induction agent in this setting is controversial. This study therefore investigated the association between the chosen induction medication etomidate versus S(+)-ketamine and the 30-day mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury who received prehospital airway management in the Netherlands. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected observational data of the Brain Injury: Prehospital Registry of Outcomes, Treatments and Epidemiology of Cerebral Trauma (BRAIN-PROTECT) cohort study. Patients with suspected severe traumatic brain injury who were transported to a participating trauma center and who received etomidate or S(+)-ketamine for prehospital induction of anesthesia for advanced airway management were included. Statistical analyses were performed with multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis. RESULTS: In total, 1,457 patients were eligible for analysis. No significant association between the administered induction medication and 30-day mortality was observed in unadjusted analyses (32.9% mortality for etomidate versus 33.8% mortality for S(+)-ketamine; P = 0.716; odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.32; P = 0.711), as well as after adjustment for potential confounders (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.73; P = 0.765; and risk difference 0.017; 95% CI, -0.051 to 0.084; P = 0.686). Likewise, in planned subgroup analyses for patients with confirmed traumatic brain injury and patients with isolated traumatic brain injury, no significant differences were found. Consistent results were found after multiple imputations of missing data. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis found no evidence for an association between the use of etomidate or S(+)-ketamine as an anesthetic agent for intubation in patients with traumatic brain injury and mortality after 30 days in the prehospital setting, suggesting that the choice of induction agent may not influence the patient mortality rate in this population.
Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas , Lesões Encefálicas , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Etomidato , Ketamina , Adolescente , Humanos , Lesões Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos de Coortes , Etomidato/uso terapêutico , Intubação Intratraqueal/métodos , Ketamina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Observacionais como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Clinical prediction modeling plays a pivotal part in modern clinical care, particularly in predicting the risk of in-hospital mortality. Recent modeling efforts have focused on leveraging intraoperative data sources to improve model performance. However, the individual and collective benefit of pre- and intraoperative data for clinical decision-making remains unknown. We hypothesized that pre- and intraoperative predictors contribute equally to the net benefit in a decision curve analysis (DCA) of in-hospital mortality prediction models that include pre- and intraoperative predictors. METHODS: Data from the VitalDB database featuring a subcohort of 6043 patients were used. A total of 141 predictors for in-hospital mortality were grouped into preoperative (demographics, intervention characteristics, and laboratory measurements) and intraoperative (laboratory and monitor data, drugs, and fluids) data. Prediction models using either preoperative, intraoperative, or all data were developed with multiple methods (logistic regression, neural network, random forest, gradient boosting machine, and a stacked learner). Predictive performance was evaluated by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Clinical utility was examined with a DCA in the predefined risk preference range (denoted by so-called treatment threshold probabilities) between 0% and 20%. RESULTS: AUROC performance of the prediction models ranged from 0.53 to 0.78. AUPRC values ranged from 0.02 to 0.25 (compared to the incidence of 0.09 in our dataset) and high AUPRC values resulted from prediction models based on preoperative laboratory values. A DCA of pre- and intraoperative prediction models highlighted that preoperative data provide the largest overall benefit for decision-making, whereas intraoperative values provide only limited benefit for decision-making compared to preoperative data. While preoperative demographics, comorbidities, and surgery-related data provide the largest benefit for low treatment thresholds up to 5% to 10%, preoperative laboratory measurements become the dominant source for decision support for higher thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: When it comes to predicting in-hospital mortality and subsequent decision-making, preoperative demographics, comorbidities, and surgery-related data provide the largest benefit for clinicians with risk-averse preferences, whereas preoperative laboratory values provide the largest benefit for decision-makers with more moderate risk preferences. Our decision-analytic investigation of different predictor categories moves beyond the question of whether certain predictors provide a benefit in traditional performance metrics (eg, AUROC). It offers a nuanced perspective on for whom these predictors might be beneficial in clinical decision-making. Follow-up studies requiring larger datasets and dedicated deep-learning models to handle continuous intraoperative data are essential to examine the robustness of our results.
Assuntos
Bases de Dados Factuais , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , Medição de Risco , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Fatores de Risco , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Curva ROC , Período IntraoperatórioRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Intoxicated patients are often encountered by emergency medical services (eg, in cases of recreational drug use, accidental ingestion, or inhalation of toxic substances or [attempted] suicide). Earlier research showed that a physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service (P-HEMS) is regularly dispatched for intoxicated patients. However, it is still unclear if there is added value of P-HEMS compared with standard care provided by an ambulance crew. The aim of this study was to analyze the contribution of additional expertise and equipment that P-HEMS brings to the prehospital scene. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we searched the database of the helicopter emergency medical service Lifeliner 1 serving the northwestern quadrant of the Netherlands for cases that involved intoxications from January 2013 to July 2020. Patients were included in this study if the primary reason for P-HEMS dispatch was intoxication. The types of intoxication were categorized as (illicit/recreational) drug related, suicide attempt, or accidental. The agents were categorized as stimulants, depressants, hallucinogenic, cannabinoids, and other substances such as bleach or insulin. Patient characteristics, vital signs, and the therapeutic interventions performed were recorded for analysis. RESULTS: In our study period, P-HEMS was dispatched 23,878 times. Of these dispatches, a total of 259 cases were included for further analysis. The majority of patients were male (64.5%). Sixty-six patients (25.5%) had an intoxication of depressant agents alone, whereas 60 patients (23.2%) had an intoxication with a combination of agents. With 159 (61.4%) patients, the majority of cases involved recreational drug intoxications. Unintentional intoxications were treated in 27 (10.4%) patients, whereas 73 (28.2%) cases involved suicide attempts. In 159 patients (61.4%), prehospital endotracheal intubation was required; the vast majority was performed by the helicopter emergency medical service physician. Specific antidotes were administered in 56 (21.6%) of the cases. CONCLUSION: In this study, we found that P-HEMS crews might complement usual prehospital care by ambulance crews for patients with severe intoxications by bringing advanced skills (eg, airway management and specific antidotes) to the scene.
Assuntos
Resgate Aéreo , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Países Baixos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Tentativa de Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos , Adolescente , IdosoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic cerebral arterial gas embolism (CAGE) caused by invasive medical procedures may be treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). Previous studies suggested that initiation of HBOT within 6-8 h is associated with higher probability of favorable outcome, when compared to time-to-HBOT beyond 8 h. We performed a group level and individual patient level meta-analysis of observational studies, to evaluate the relationship between time-to-HBOT and outcome after iatrogenic CAGE. METHODS: We systematically searched for studies reporting on time-to-HBOT and outcome in patients with iatrogenic CAGE. On group level, we meta-analyzed the differences between median time-to-HBOT in patients with favorable versus unfavorable outcome. On individual patient level, we analyzed the relationship between time-to-HBOT and probability of favorable outcome in a generalized linear mixed effects model. RESULTS: Group level meta-analysis (ten studies, 263 patients) shows that patients with favorable outcome were treated with HBOT 2.4 h (95% CI 0.6-9.7) earlier than patients with unfavorable outcome. The generalized linear mixed effects model (eight studies, 126 patients) shows a significant relationship between time-to-HBOT and probability of favorable outcome (p = 0.013) that remains significant after correcting for severity of manifestations (p = 0.041). Probability of favorable outcome decreases from approximately 65% when HBOT is started immediately, to 30% when HBOT is delayed for 15 h. CONCLUSIONS: Increased time-to-HBOT is associated with decreased probability of favorable outcome in iatrogenic CAGE. This suggests that early initiation of HBOT in iatrogenic CAGE is of vital importance.
Assuntos
Embolia Aérea , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Humanos , Cognição , Embolia Aérea/etiologia , Embolia Aérea/terapia , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efeitos adversos , Doença Iatrogênica , Modelos Lineares , Estudos Observacionais como AssuntoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) are commonly intubated during prehospital treatment despite a lack of evidence that this is beneficial. Accumulating evidence even suggests that prehospital intubation may be hazardous, in particular when performed by inexperienced EMS clinicians. To expand the limited knowledge base, we studied the relationship between prehospital intubation and hospital mortality in patients with severe TBI in a large Dutch trauma database. We specifically hypothesized that the relationship differs depending on whether a physician-based emergency medical service (EMS) was involved in the treatment, as opposed to intubation by paramedics. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using the Dutch Nationwide Trauma Registry that includes all trauma patients in the Netherlands who are admitted to any hospital with an emergency department. All patients treated for severe TBI (Head Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥4) between January 2015 and December 2019 were selected. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between prehospital intubation and mortality while adjusting for potential confounders. An interaction term between prehospital intubation and the involvement of physician-based EMS was added to the model. Complete case analysis as well as multiple imputation were performed. RESULTS: 8946 patients (62% male, median age 63 years) were analyzed. The hospital mortality was 26.4%. Overall, a relationship between prehospital intubation and higher mortality was observed (complete case: OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.35-2.57, p < 0.001; multiple imputation: OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.56-2.36, p < 0.001). Adding the interaction revealed that the relationship of prehospital intubation may depend on whether physician-based EMS is involved in the treatment (complete case: p = 0.044; multiple imputation: p = 0.062). Physician-based EMS involvement attenuated but did not completely remove the detrimental association between prehospital intubation and mortality. CONCLUSION: The data do not support the common practice of prehospital intubation. The effect of prehospital intubation on mortality might depend on EMS clinician experience, and it seems prudent to involve prehospital personnel well proficient in prehospital intubation whenever intubation is potentially required. The decision to perform prehospital intubation should not merely be based on the largely unsupported dogma that it is generally needed in severe TBI, but should rather individually weigh potential benefits and harms.
Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas , Lesões Encefálicas , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Lesões Encefálicas/terapia , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/terapia , Sistema de Registros , Intubação Intratraqueal , Escala de Coma de GlasgowRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Prediction modelling increasingly becomes an important risk assessment tool in perioperative systems approaches, e.g. in complex patients with open abdomen treatment for peritonitis. In this population, combining predictors from multiple medical domains (i.e. demographical, physiological and surgical variables) outperforms the prediction capabilities of single-domain prediction models. However, the benefit of these prediction models for clinical decision-making remains to be investigated. We therefore examined the clinical utility of mortality prediction models in patients suffering from peritonitis with a decision curve analysis. METHODS: In this secondary analysis of a large dataset, a traditional logistic regression approach, three machine learning methods and a stacked ensemble were employed to examine the predictive capability of demographic, physiological and surgical variables in predicting mortality under open abdomen treatment for peritonitis. Calibration was examined with calibration belts and predictive performance was assessed with the area both under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and under the precision recall curve (AUPRC) and with the Brier Score. Clinical utility of the prediction models was examined by means of a decision curve analysis (DCA) within a treatment threshold range of interest of 0-30%, where threshold probabilities are traditionally defined as the minimum probability of disease at which further intervention would be warranted. RESULTS: Machine learning methods supported available evidence of a higher prediction performance of a multi- versus single-domain prediction models. Interestingly, their prediction performance was similar to a logistic regression model. The DCA demonstrated that the overall net benefit is largest for a multi-domain prediction model and that this benefit is larger compared to the default "treat all" strategy only for treatment threshold probabilities above about 10%. Importantly, the net benefit for low threshold probabilities is dominated by physiological predictors: surgical and demographics predictors provide only secondary decision-analytic benefit. CONCLUSIONS: DCA provides a valuable tool to compare single-domain and multi-domain prediction models and demonstrates overall higher decision-analytic value of the latter. Importantly, DCA provides a means to clinically differentiate the risks associated with each of these domains in more depth than with traditional performance metrics and highlighted the importance of physiological predictors for conservative intervention strategies for low treatment thresholds. Further, machine learning methods did not add significant benefit either in prediction performance or decision-analytic utility compared to logistic regression in these data.
Assuntos
Técnicas de Abdome Aberto , Peritonite , Humanos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Aprendizado de Máquina , Peritonite/cirurgiaRESUMO
Numerous patient-related clinical parameters and treatment-specific variables have been identified as causing or contributing to the severity of peritonitis. We postulated that a combination of clinical and surgical markers and scoring systems would outperform each of these predictors in isolation. To investigate this hypothesis, we developed a multivariable model to examine whether survival outcome can reliably be predicted in peritonitis patients treated with open abdomen. This single-center retrospective analysis used univariable and multivariable logistic regression modeling in combination with repeated random sub-sampling validation to examine the predictive capabilities of domain-specific predictors (i.e., demography, physiology, surgery). We analyzed data of 1,351 consecutive adult patients (55.7% male) who underwent open abdominal surgery in the study period (January 1998 to December 2018). Core variables included demographics, clinical scores, surgical indices and indicators of organ dysfunction, peritonitis index, incision type, fascia closure, wound healing, and fascial dehiscence. Postoperative complications were also added when available. A multidomain peritonitis prediction model (MPPM) was constructed to bridge the mortality predictions from individual domains (demographic, physiological and surgical). The MPPM is based on data of n = 597 patients, features high predictive capabilities (area under the receiver operating curve: 0.87 (0.85 to 0.90, 95% CI)) and is well calibrated. The surgical predictor "skin closure" was found to be the most important predictor of survival in our cohort, closely followed by the two physiological predictors SAPS-II and MPI. Marginal effects plots highlight the effect of individual outcomes on the prediction of survival outcome in patients undergoing staged laparotomies for treatment of peritonitis. Although most single indices exhibited moderate performance, we observed that the predictive performance was markedly increased when an integrative prediction model was applied. Our proposed MPPM integrative prediction model may outperform the predictive power of current models.
Assuntos
Técnicas de Abdome Aberto , Peritonite , Abdome/cirurgia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Laparotomia , Masculino , Peritonite/cirurgia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of trauma-related deaths, and pharmacologic interventions to limit intracranial bleeding should improve outcomes. Tranexamic acid reduces mortality in injured patients with major systemic bleeding, but the effects of antifibrinolytic drugs on outcomes after TBI are less clear. We therefore summarize recent evidence to guide clinicians on when (not) to use antifibrinolytic drugs in TBI patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Tranexamic acid is the only antifibrinolytic drug that has been studied in patients with TBI. Several recent studies failed to conclusively demonstrate a benefit on survival or neurologic outcome. A large trial with more than 12â000 patients found no significant effect of tranexamic acid on head-injury related death, all-cause mortality or disability across the overall study population, but observed benefit in patients with mild to moderate TBI. Observational evidence signals potential harm in patients with isolated severe TBI. SUMMARY: Given that the effect of tranexamic acid likely depends on a variety of factors, it is unlikely that a 'one size fits all' approach of administering antifibrinolytics to all patients will be helpful. Tranexamic acid should be strongly considered in patients with mild to moderate TBI and should be avoided in isolated severe TBI.
Assuntos
Antifibrinolíticos , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas , Ácido Tranexâmico , Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/complicações , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Hemorragia/etiologia , Humanos , Ácido Tranexâmico/efeitos adversosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Purpose of this report is to describe the feasibility of lingual pulse oximetry and lingual near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in a COVID-19 patient to assess lingual tissue viability after several days of mechanical ventilation in the prone position. MATERIALS & METHODS: In a COVID-19 ICU-patient, the tongue became grotesquely swollen, hardened and protruding from the oral cavity after 20 h of mechanical ventilation uninterrupted in the prone position. To assess the doubtful viability of the tongue, pulse-oximetric hemoglobin O2-saturation (SpO2; Nellcor, OxiMax MAX-NI, Covidien, MA, USA) and NIRS-based, regional tissue O2-saturation measurements (rSO2; SenSmart, Nonin, MN, USA) were performed at the tongue. RESULTS: At the tongue, regular pulse-oximetric waveforms with a pulse-oximetric hemoglobin O2-saturation (SpO2) of 88% were recorded, i.e. only slightly lower than the SpO2 reading at the extremities at that time (90%). Lingual NIRS-based rSO2 measurements yielded stable tissue rSO2-values of 76-78%, i.e. values expected also in other adequately perfused and oxygenated (muscle-) tissues. CONCLUSION: Despite the alarming, clinical finding of a grotesquely swollen, rubber-hard tongue and clinical concerns on the adequacy of the tongue perfusion and oxygenation, our measurements of both arterial pulsatility (SpO2) and NIRS-based tissue oxygenation (rSO2) suggested adequate perfusion and oxygenation of the tongue, rendering non-vitality of the tongue, e.g. by lingual venous thrombosis, unlikely. To our knowledge, this is the first clinical report of lingual rSO2 measurement.
Assuntos
COVID-19/terapia , Edema/fisiopatologia , Oximetria , Fluxo Pulsátil , Espectroscopia de Luz Próxima ao Infravermelho , Doenças da Língua/fisiopatologia , Língua/irrigação sanguínea , Idoso , COVID-19/fisiopatologia , Síndromes Compartimentais/diagnóstico , Edema/metabolismo , Humanos , Masculino , Posicionamento do Paciente , Decúbito Ventral , SARS-CoV-2 , Língua/metabolismo , Doenças da Língua/metabolismo , Trombose Venosa/diagnósticoRESUMO
Researchers reporting results of statistical analyses, as well as readers of manuscripts reporting original research, often seek guidance on how numeric results can be practically and meaningfully interpreted. With this article, we aim to provide benchmarks for cutoff or cut-point values and to suggest plain-language interpretations for a number of commonly used statistical measures of association, agreement, diagnostic accuracy, effect size, heterogeneity, and reliability in medical research. Specifically, we discuss correlation coefficients, Cronbach's alpha, I2, intraclass correlation (ICC), Cohen's and Fleiss' kappa statistics, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC, concordance statistic), standardized mean differences (Cohen's d, Hedge's g, Glass' delta), and z scores. We base these cutoff values on what has been previously proposed by experts in the field in peer-reviewed literature and textbooks, as well as online statistical resources. We integrate, adapt, and/or expand previous suggestions in attempts to (a) achieve a compromise between divergent recommendations, and (b) propose cutoffs that we perceive sensible for the field of anesthesia and related specialties. While our suggestions provide guidance on how the results of statistical tests are typically interpreted, this does not mean that the results can universally be interpreted as suggested here. We discuss the well-known inherent limitations of using cutoff values to categorize continuous measures. We further emphasize that cutoff values may depend on the specific clinical or scientific context. Rule-of-the thumb approaches to the interpretation of statistical measures should therefore be used judiciously.
Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/estatística & dados numéricos , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Algoritmos , Área Sob a Curva , Benchmarking , Correlação de Dados , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Curva ROC , Valores de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain management is key for patient satisfaction. Pressure pain threshold (PPT) has been studied in some surgical cohorts but has not been studied in relationship to acute postoperative pain in short-stay patients undergoing anorectal surgery. We hypothesized that preoperative finger PPT measurements can identify respective patients with higher postoperative pain. Aiming to understand the relationship with subjective postoperative pain perception, we tested the hypotheses that preoperative PPT is associated with postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores and correlates with postoperative analgesic consumption in short-stay patients undergoing anorectal surgery. METHODS: We prospectively assessed preoperative PPT in a cohort undergoing anorectal surgery, known as a moderately to severely painful procedure. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess the relationship with postoperative VAS pain scores at 1 and 3 days as well as 4 weeks postoperatively. Logistic regression was used to study the relationship with additional postoperative analgesic consumption. RESULTS: We studied 128 patients and found that preoperative PPT is significantly associated with postoperative pain (P value for interaction = .025). Logistic regression modeling additionally revealed an association between the preoperative PPT and the need for additional postoperative analgesics, with odds of requiring additional analgesia decreasing by about 10% for each 1-point increase in PPT (odds ratio [OR] = 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 00.81-0.98; P = .012). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative finger PPT is associated with postoperative pain and might help identify patients who are at risk of developing more severe postoperative pain on anorectal surgery. Especially in ambulatory and short-stay settings, this approach can help to address patients' high variability in pain sensitivity to facilitate appropriate postoperative analgesia, timely discharge, and prevent readmission.
Assuntos
Canal Anal/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/efeitos adversos , Limiar da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Reto/cirurgia , Adulto , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Percepção da Dor , Limiar da Dor/efeitos dos fármacos , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/fisiopatologia , Pressão , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Prompt and precise detection of an infection in the blood is of great clinical importance in terms of early therapy initiation and the patient's prognosis. Infection-triggered inflammatory cellular and humoral signaling cascades offer great opportunities to redefine standard tests. However, while inexpensive and easy-to-use biomarkers for the detection of infections and the concomitant inflammatory processes exist, they are rarely used in clinical practice. We aimed to investigate the correlation of Granularity Index (GI) and Delta-hemoglobin equivalent (Delta-He) as inexpensive and easy-to-use cell-derived infection markers with established acute-phase parameters in a randomly selected patient. METHODS: We analyzed plasma concentrations of the established C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) and leukocyte and thrombocyte counts in blood samples of 1,787 patients undergoing routine laboratory inflammation diagnostics. We also measured the Granularity Index (GI) and Delta-hemoglobin equivalent (Delta-He) in this cohort between February 2019 and February 2020. RESULTS: Delta-He and GI Index significantly correlated with CRP concentration (AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.71 - 0.74; p < 0.001 for both analytes) and thrombocyte count (p < 0.001 for both analytes) but not with leukocyte count (AUC 0.54, 95% CI 0.50 - 0.59, p < 0.67). Furthermore, Delta-He significantly correlated with PCT (AUC 0.65, 95% CI 0.63 - 0.68, p < 0.001) while GI Index did not. Additionally, thrombocyte count significantly correlated with CRP (p < 0.001) and with PCT concentrations (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Delta-He and GI are two novel, inexpensive and easy-to-use cell-derived hematological biomarkers with the potential to be used as fully automated and highly standardized parameters. These biomarkers would be available on a 24 hours basis in the routine laboratory for the detection of bacterial infections by measuring a complete blood count (CBC) with differential and reticulocyte counts.
Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas , Biomarcadores , Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Hemoglobinas , Humanos , Contagem de Leucócitos , Pró-CalcitoninaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: A thorough understanding of the epidemiology, patient characteristics, trauma mechanisms, and current outcomes among patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is important as it may inform potential strategies to improve prehospital emergency care. The aim of this study is to describe the prehospital epidemiology, characteristics and outcome of (suspected) severe TBI in the Netherlands. METHODS: The BRAIN-PROTECT study is a prospective observational study on prehospital management of patients with severe TBI in the Netherlands. The study population comprised all consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of TBI and a prehospital GCS score ≤ 8, who were managed by one of the 4 Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS). Patients were followed-up in 9 trauma centers until 1 year after injury. Planned sub-analyses were performed for patients with "confirmed" and "isolated" TBI. RESULTS: Data from 2,589 patients, of whom 2,117 (81.8%) were transferred to a participating trauma center, were analyzed. The incidence rate of prehospitally suspected and confirmed severe TBI were 3.2 (95% CI: 3.1;3.4) and 2.7 (95% CI: 2.5;2.8) per 100,000 inhabitants per year, respectively. Median patient age was 46 years, 58.4% were involved in traffic crashes, of which 37.4% were bicycle related. 47.6% presented with an initial GCS of 3. The median time from HEMS dispatch to hospital arrival was 54 minutes. The overall 30-day mortality was 39.0% (95% CI: 36.8;41.2). CONCLUSION: This article summarizes the prehospital epidemiology, characteristics and outcome of severe TBI in the Netherlands, and highlights areas in which primary prevention and prehospital care can be improved.
Assuntos
Resgate Aéreo , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Encéfalo , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/epidemiologia , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/terapia , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
In helicopter emergency medical services, HEMS, coagulopathy presents both in trauma (e.g. consumption of coagulation factors) and non-trauma cases (e.g. anticoagulant use). Therefore, in HEMS coagulation measurements appear promising and Prothrombin Time (PT) and derived INR are attractive variables herein. We tested the feasibility of prehospital PT/INR coagulation measurements in HEMS. This study was performed at the Dutch HEMS, using a portable blood analyzer (i-Stat®1, Abbott). PT/INR measurements were performed on (hemodiluted) author's blood, and both trauma- and non-trauma HEMS patients. Device-related benefits of the i-Stat PT/INR system were portability, speed and ease of handling. Limitations included a rather narrow operational temperature range (16-30 °C). PT/INR measurements (n = 15) were performed on hemodiluted blood, and both trauma and non-trauma patients. The PT/INR results confirmed effects of hemodilution and anticoagulation, however, most measurement results were in the normal INR-range (0.9-1.2). We conclude that prehospital PT/INR measurements, although with limitations, are feasible in HEMS operations.
Assuntos
Resgate Aéreo , Análise Química do Sangue/instrumentação , Transtornos da Coagulação Sanguínea/diagnóstico , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Testes Imediatos , Aeronaves , Humanos , Países BaixosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) is used for objective assessment of functional outcome in traumatic brain injury (TBI). In situations where face-to-face contact is not feasible, telephonic assessment of the GOS-E might be desirable. The aim of this study is to assess the level of agreement between face-to-face and telephonic assessment of the GOS-E. SETTING: Multicenter study in 2 Dutch University Medical Centers. Inclusion was performed in the outpatient clinic (face-to-face assessment, by experienced neurologist), followed by assessment via telephone of the GOS-E after ±2 weeks (by trained researcher). PARTICIPANTS: Patients ±6 months after TBI. DESIGN: Prospective validation study. MAIN MEASURES: Interrater agreement of the GOS-E was assessed with Cohen's weighted κ. RESULTS: From May 2014 until March 2018, 50 patients were enrolled; 54% were male (mean age 49.1 years). Median time between trauma and in-person GOS-E examination was 158 days and median time between face-to-face and telephonic GOS-E was 15 days. The quadratic weighted κ was 0.79. Sensitivity analysis revealed a quadratic weighted κ of 0.77, 0.78, and 0.70 for moderate-severe, complicated mild, and uncomplicated mild TBI, respectively. CONCLUSION: No disagreements of more than 1 point on the GOS-E were observed, with the κ value representing good or substantial agreement. Assessment of the GOS-E via telephone is a valid alternative to the face-to-face interview when in-person contact is not feasible.
Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/diagnóstico , Escala de Resultado de Glasgow , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , TelefoneRESUMO
ABSTRACT: No Abstract.
Assuntos
Laringoscópios , Laringoscopia , Cadáver , Tecnologia de Fibra Óptica , Humanos , Intubação IntratraquealRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Objective of this case report is to draw attention to a less known thrombotic complication associated with COVID-19, i.e., thrombosis of both radial arteries, with possible (long-term) consequences. THE CASE: In our COVID-19 ICU a 49-year-old male patient was admitted, with past medical history of obesity, smoking and diabetes, but no reported atherosclerotic complications. The patient had been admitted with severe hypoxemia and multiple pulmonary emboli were CT-confirmed. ICU-treatment included mechanical ventilation and therapeutic anticoagulation. Preparing the insertion of a new radial artery catheter for invasive blood pressure measurement and blood sampling, we detected that both radial arteries were non-pulsating and occluded: (a) Sonography showed the typical anatomical localization of both radial and ulnar arteries. However, Doppler-derived flow-signals could only be obtained from the ulnar arteries. (b) To test collateral arterial supply of the hand, a pulse-oximeter was placed on the index finger. Thereafter, the ulnar artery at the wrist was compressed. This compression caused an immediate loss of the finger's pulse-oximetry perfusion signal. The effect was reversible upon release of the ulnar artery. (c) To test for collateral perfusion undetectable by pulse-oximetry, we measured regional oxygen saturation (rSO2) of the thenar muscle by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Confirming our findings above, ulnar arterial compression demonstrated that thenar rSO2 was dependent on ulnar artery flow. The described development of bilateral radial artery occlusion in a relatively young and therapeutically anticoagulated patient with no history of atherosclerosis was unexpected. CONCLUSIONS: Since COVID-19 patients are at increased risk for arterial occlusion, it appears advisable to meticulously check for adequacy of collateral (hand-) perfusion, avoiding the harm of hand ischemia if interventions (e.g., catheterizations) at the radial or ulnar artery are intended.
Assuntos
Arteriopatias Oclusivas/diagnóstico por imagem , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/etiologia , COVID-19/complicações , Artéria Radial , SARS-CoV-2 , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/fisiopatologia , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagem , COVID-19/fisiopatologia , Mãos/irrigação sanguínea , Mãos/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Músculo Esquelético/irrigação sanguínea , Músculo Esquelético/metabolismo , Países Baixos , Oximetria , Consumo de Oxigênio , Pandemias , Artéria Radial/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Radial/fisiopatologia , Fluxo Sanguíneo Regional , Espectroscopia de Luz Próxima ao Infravermelho , Artéria Ulnar/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia DopplerRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: There is generally limited but conflicting literature on the incidence, causes, and outcomes of pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This study was performed to determine the incidence and outcome of pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest reported by all helicopter emergency medical services in the Netherlands and to provide a description of causes and treatments and, in particular, a description of the specific interventions that can be performed by a physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of all documented pediatric (0 < 18 years of age) out-of-hospital cardiac arrests from July 2015 to July 2017, attended by all 4 Dutch helicopter emergency medical service teams. RESULTS: Two hundred two out-of-hospital cardiac arrests were identified. The overall incidence in the Netherlands is 3.5 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in children per 100,000 pediatric inhabitants. The overall survival rate for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was 11.4%. Eleven (52%) of the survivors were in the drowning group and between 12 and 96 months of age. CONCLUSION: Helicopter emergency medical services are frequently called to pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in the Netherlands. The survival rate is normal to high compared with other countries. The 12- to 96-month age group and drowning seem to have a relatively favorable outcome.
Assuntos
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar , Aeronaves , Criança , Hospitais , Humanos , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is traditionally associated with young male patients. While PSD is rare in Asia and Africa, lifestyles are changing considerably throughout the so-called developed world. We question that PSD is an overwhelmingly male disease and that the proportion of women suffering from PSD is worldwide evenly distributed in a homogenous matter. METHODS: We analysed the world literature published between 1833 and 2018, expanding on the database created by Stauffer et al. Following correction for gender bias with elimination of men-only and women-only studies, data were processed using random-effects meta-analysis in the technique of DerSimonian and Laird. RESULTS: The share of female pilonidal sinus disease patients analysed from all studies available in the world literature is 21%. There are marked regional differences including South America (39%), North America as well as Australia/New Zealand (29%) and Asia (7%), which are highly significant. These results stand fast even if analysis without gender bias corrections was applied. CONCLUSION: The share of female patients suffering from PSD is considerable. It is time to think of PSD as a disease of both men and women. Previously unknown, there are significant regional differences worldwide; the reason(s) for the regional differences is still unclear.
Assuntos
Seio Pilonidal , Fatores Sexuais , Feminino , Saúde Global , Humanos , Masculino , Seio Pilonidal/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Health care worker (HCW) safety is of pivotal importance during a pandemic such as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and employee health and well-being ensure functionality of health care institutions. This is particularly true for an intensive care unit (ICU), where highly specialized staff cannot be readily replaced. In the light of lacking evidence for optimal staffing models in a pandemic, we hypothesized that staff shortage can be reduced when staff scheduling takes the epidemiology of a disease into account. METHODS: Various staffing models were constructed, and comprehensive statistical modeling was performed. A typical routine staffing model was defined that assumed full-time employment (40 h/wk) in a 40-bed ICU with a 2:1 patient-to-staff ratio. A pandemic model assumed that staff worked 12-hour shifts for 7 days every other week. Potential in-hospital staff infections were simulated for a total period of 120 days, with a probability of 10%, 25%, and 40% being infected per week when at work. Simulations included the probability of infection at work for a given week, of fatality after infection, and the quarantine time, if infected. RESULTS: Pandemic-adjusted staffing significantly reduced workforce shortage, and the effect progressively increased as the probability of infection increased. Maximum effects were observed at week 4 for each infection probability with a 17%, 32%, and 38% staffing reduction for an infection probability of 0.10, 0.25, and 0.40, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Staffing along epidemiologic considerations may reduce HCW shortage by leveling the nadir of affected workforce. Although this requires considerable efforts and commitment of staff, it may be essential in an effort to best maintain staff health and operational functionality of health care facilities and systems.