Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Br J Surg ; 104(6): 742-750, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28240357

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Quality assurance is acknowledged as a crucial factor in the assessment of oncological surgical care. The aim of this study was to develop a composite measure of multiple outcome parameters defined as 'textbook outcome', to assess quality of care for patients undergoing oesophagogastric cancer surgery. METHODS: Patients with oesophagogastric cancer, operated on with the intent of curative resection between 2011 and 2014, were identified from a national database (Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit). Textbook outcome was defined as the percentage of patients who underwent a complete tumour resection with at least 15 lymph nodes in the resected specimen and an uneventful postoperative course, without hospital readmission. Hospital variation in textbook outcome was analysed after adjustment for case-mix factors. RESULTS: In total, 2748 patients with oesophageal cancer and 1772 with gastric cancer were included in this study. A textbook outcome was achieved in 29·7 per cent of patients with oesophageal cancer and 32·1 per cent of those with gastric cancer. Adjusted textbook outcome rates varied from 8·5 to 52·4 per cent between hospitals. The outcome parameter 'at least 15 lymph nodes examined' had the greatest negative impact on a textbook outcome both for patients with oesophageal cancer and for those with gastric cancer. CONCLUSION: Most patients did not achieve a textbook outcome and there was wide variation between hospitals.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Esofagectomia/mortalidade , Esofagectomia/normas , Feminino , Gastrectomia/mortalidade , Gastrectomia/normas , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Excisão de Linfonodo/mortalidade , Excisão de Linfonodo/normas , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante/mortalidade , Terapia Neoadjuvante/normas , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Eur J Cancer ; 144: 242-251, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33373869

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The treatment landscape has completely changed for advanced melanoma. We report survival outcomes and the differential impact of prognostic factors over time in daily clinical practice. METHODS: From a Dutch nationwide population-based registry, patients with advanced melanoma diagnosed from 2013 to 2017 were analysed (n = 3616). Because the proportional hazards assumption was violated, a multivariable Cox model restricted to the first 6 months and a multivariable landmark Cox model from 6 to 48 months were used to assess overall survival (OS) of cases without missing values. The 2017 cohort was excluded from this analysis because of the short follow-up time. RESULTS: Median OS of the 2013 and 2016 cohort was 11.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.4-13.5) and 17.7 months (95% CI: 14.9-19.8), respectively. Compared with the 2013 cohort, the 2016 cohort had superior survival in the Cox model from 0 to 6 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.55 [95% CI: 0.43-0.72]) and in the Cox model from 6 to 48 months (HR = 0.68 [95% CI: 0.57-0.83]). Elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels, distant metastases in ≥3 organ sites, brain and liver metastasis and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of ≥1 had stronger association with inferior survival from 0 to 6 months than from 6 to 48 months. BRAF-mutated melanoma had superior survival in the first 6 months (HR = 0.50 [95% CI: 0.42-0.59]). CONCLUSION(S): Prognosis for advanced melanoma in the Netherlands has improved from 2013 to 2016. Prognostic importance of most evaluated factors was higher in the first 6 months after diagnosis. BRAF-mutated melanoma was only associated with superior survival in the first 6 months.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Melanoma/mortalidade , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Melanoma/epidemiologia , Melanoma/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Prognóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Taxa de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo
3.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 44(2): 260-267, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29273212

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Substantial variation in the use of (neo) adjuvant treatment in patients with gastric cancer exists. The aim of this study was to identify underlying (organizational and process) factors associated with the use of perioperative therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with resectable gastric cancer who underwent surgery between 2012 and 2014 were selected from the Dutch Upper gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA). The proportion of perioperatively treated patients was defined per hospital. Five hospitals with the lowest percentage (LP group) and 5 hospitals with the highest percentage (HP group) of perioperative therapy were identified. In the selected hospitals additional information was obtained from patients' medical records using a structured list with predefined variables. RESULTS: In total, 429 patients (231 in LP group, 198 in HP group) from 9 different hospitals were included. Perioperative therapy was given in 16.0% of patients in the LP group compared to 40.4% in the HP group. In the LP group, patients were enrolled in a clinical trial less frequently (10.8% versus 26.8%, P<.001), and a higher percentage grade III-IV toxicity was observed during neoadjuvant treatment (25.7% versus 46.3%, P=.007). Multivariable analysis showed that, besides known casemix factors, consultation with ≥3 upper GI specialists prior to treatment decision was positively associated with initiating perioperative therapy (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.19-3.66). CONCLUSION: Results of this study confirm considerable hospital variation in the use of perioperative therapy in patients with gastric cancer. Besides known casemix factors, use of perioperative therapy was associated with the level of involvement of multidisciplinary care.


Assuntos
Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Gastrectomia/métodos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Países Baixos , Assistência Perioperatória , Padrões de Prática Médica , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Sexuais , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia
4.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 44(4): 532-538, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29439836

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dutch national guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer recommend the use of perioperative chemotherapy in patients with resectable gastric cancer. However, adjuvant chemotherapy is often not administered. The aim of this study was to evaluate hospital variation on the probability to receive adjuvant chemotherapy and to identify associated factors with special attention to postoperative complications. METHODS: All patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent an elective surgical resection for stage IB-IVa (M0) gastric adenocarcinoma between 2011 and 2015 were identified from a national database (Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit). A multivariable linear mixed model was used to evaluate case-mix adjusted hospital variation and to identify factors associated with adjuvant therapy. RESULTS: Of all surgically treated gastric cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 882), 68% received adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy. After adjusting for case-mix and random variation, a large hospital variation in the administration rates for adjuvant was observed (OR range 0.31-7.1). In multivariable analysis, weight loss, a poor health status and failure of neoadjuvant chemotherapy completion were strongly associated with an increased likelihood of adjuvant therapy omission. Patients with severe postoperative complications had a threefold increased likelihood of adjuvant therapy omission (OR 3.07 95% CI 2.04-4.65). CONCLUSION: Despite national guidelines, considerable hospital variation was observed in the probability of receiving adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy. Postoperative complications were strongly associated with adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy omission, underlining the need to further reduce perioperative morbidity in gastric cancer surgery.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante , Gastrectomia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiologia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Assistência Perioperatória , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Sistema de Registros , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA