RESUMO
AIM: To investigate the current prevalence and management of dyspepsia in rural Eastern Uganda. METHODS: Residents older than 18 years of age across 95 study sites in Namutumba District, Eastern Uganda were surveyed. Each respondent was administered a questionnaire about dyspepsia and pertinent health-seeking behaviors. Health workers at 12 different clinics were also assessed on their competence in managing dyspepsia. Proportion-based analysis was used to determine self-reported outcome variables reported in this study, including: prevalence of dyspepsia; breakdown of symptoms; initial diagnosis location; management strategies; and appropriate medication usage. RESULTS: 397 residents (average age of 41.2 years) participated in this study (54.4% males, 45.6% females). 57.9% self-reported currently having dyspepsia, of average duration 4.5 years. Of this subset, 87% reported experiencing epigastric pain, and 42.2% believed that ulcers were "wounds in the stomach." Only 3% of respondents had heard of Helicobacter pylori (Hp). Respondents varied in their management of dyspepsia, with frequent eating (39.1%), doing nothing (23.9%), and taking Western medicine (20%) being the most common strategies. The diagnosis of "peptic ulcer disease" was made by a health worker in 64.3% of cases, and 27% of cases were self-diagnosed. Notably, 70.3% of diagnoses at formal health centers were based on clinical symptoms alone and only 22.7% of respondents received treatment according to Ugandan Ministry of Health guidelines. Among the 12 health care workers surveyed, 10 cited epigastric pain as a common symptom of "ulcer," although only two reported having heard of Hp. Only two out of 12 clinics had the capability to prescribe the triple therapy as treatment for presumed Hp. CONCLUSION: There is a high incidence of dyspepsia in Eastern Uganda, and current management strategies are poor and inconsistent, and may contribute to antibiotic resistance. Further studies are needed to investigate the causes of dyspepsia to guide appropriate management.
RESUMO
Anorectal complaints are very common and are caused by a variety of mostly benign anorectal disorders. Many anorectal conditions may be successfully treated by primary care physicians in the outpatient setting, but patients tend not to seek medical attention due to embarrassment or fear of cancer. As a result, patients frequently present with advanced disease after experiencing significant decreases in quality of life. A number of patients with anorectal complaints are referred to gastroenterologists. However, gastroenterologists' knowledge and experience in approaching these conditions may not be sufficient. This article can serve as a guide to gastroenterologists to recognize, evaluate, and manage medically or non-surgically common benign anorectal disorders, and to identify when surgical referrals are most prudent. A review of the current literature is performed to evaluate comprehensive clinical pearls and management guidelines for each topic. Topics reviewed include hemorrhoids, anal fissures, anorectal fistulas and abscesses, and pruritus ani.