Usability of telepresence in a level 1 trauma center.

OBJECTIVES: Limited resources and the diminishing physician workforce in trauma require unique and innovative solutions. Our hypothesis is that telepresence by a remote physician is an appropriate application in an urban trauma setting. The purpose of this study is to assess user satisfaction and usability of a mobile telemedicine robot in trauma care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A usability study of trauma patient assessments utilizing the Remote Presence-7 (RP-7) robot (InTouch Health, Santa Barbara, CA) with real-time, two-way communication between remote and local physicians was conducted at a Level 1 trauma center. Usability and acceptability was measured using survey questionnaires, open-ended feedback, and general observations. Comparisons were made between remote and local physician responses. RESULTS: One hundred fourteen patient encounters utilizing telepresence were performed. Remote and local physicians expressed a high level of satisfaction with the mobility (92% and 79%, respectively), communication (97% and 90%, respectively), and visual abilities (91% and 97%, respectively) of the RP-7 robot for remote consultation purposes. On average, 89% of remote and local physician participants rated their overall telemedicine experience as "excellent" or "above average." CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that telepresence of a remote trauma surgeon may be a useful and functional adjunct in the trauma setting. Further development of these technologies could mitigate current and future concerns about gaps in rural and urban trauma care and critical care staffing shortages and during mass casualty or disaster scenarios.

Use of Telemedicine in Surgical Education: A Seven-Year Experience.

Uniformity in surgical education is challenging because surgical experience is based on rotation assignments. With work hour restrictions, the likelihood of residents being exposed to rare or unusual cases is diminished. Telemedicine may create a new learning paradigm for surgical education and supplement exposure for rare or unusual cases. A retrospective review (2010-2016) of teleconferences involving trauma centers worldwide was conducted. Participating hospitals included centers from underdeveloped countries to first world nations. Trauma cases were discussed among surgeons with different levels of experience and resource availability. Data collected included types of cases, anatomic injury patterns, hospital location, and the number of telemedicine centers and viewers participating. Seventy-three hospitals in 64 cities, spanning 27 countries, participated in 276 telemedicine grand round conferences. Cases discussed included penetrating trauma (47%), blunt trauma (42%), and blast injury (4%). The anatomic regions included were the thorax (28%), abdomen (26%), thoracoabdominal region (13%), neck (7%), and pelvis (6%). The most common injury discussed was vascular in nature (18%), followed by the lung, liver, diaphragm, and heart. The most common vascular lesion was in the aorta (18%), followed by the iliac vessels (8%) and the vena cava (7%). Telemedicine is a valuable tool, allowing the dissemination of diverse experiences. Most cases presented evaluated rare injuries or complex surgical approaches, which are not commonly seen on trauma sites. Learning different approaches in the management of complex trauma will make surgeons more prepared to deal with challenging cases.