Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 34
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 23(10): 1489-98, 2006 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16669964

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The effect of low-dose aspirin on endoscopic ulcer incidence in cyclo-oxygenase-2-selective inhibitor or non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users remains controversial. AIM: To compare prospectively the incidence of endoscopic ulcers in healthy subjects receiving low-dose aspirin plus celecoxib or naproxen. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, 1-week study, subjects (50-75 years) were randomized to receive aspirin 325 mg o.d. plus either celecoxib 200 mg o.d., naproxen 500 mg b.d., or placebo. Baseline and end of study endoscopies were performed. The primary end point was incidence of one or more gastric and duodenal ulcers. RESULTS: A lower incidence of gastric and duodenal ulcers was seen in celecoxib/aspirin-treated subjects (19%) vs. naproxen/aspirin (27%; RR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.44-0.92). Both naproxen/aspirin and celecoxib/aspirin groups demonstrated a higher incidence of gastric and duodenal ulcers vs. placebo/aspirin (8%; RR: 3.7, 95% CI: 1.8-7.6 and RR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.2-5.8, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Fewer endoscopic ulcers were observed in patients treated with celecoxib/aspirin vs. naproxen/aspirin. However, celecoxib/aspirin was associated with a significantly higher incidence of gastric and duodenal ulcers than aspirin alone. Further studies are required to determine the generalizability of these findings in the aspirin users and to determine the appropriate strategy to minimize risk in susceptible patients.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Ciclo-Oxigenase 2/efeitos adversos , Úlcera Duodenal/induzido quimicamente , Úlcera Gástrica/induzido quimicamente , Idoso , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Celecoxib , Inibidores de Ciclo-Oxigenase 2/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Naproxeno/administração & dosagem , Naproxeno/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Pirazóis/administração & dosagem , Pirazóis/efeitos adversos , Sulfonamidas/administração & dosagem , Sulfonamidas/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Arch Gen Psychiatry ; 41(8): 811-5, 1984 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6742980

RESUMO

Judicial decisions and statutory reforms point to a return to psychiatric discretion when clinical needs and patients' rights must be balanced. In seeking to commit patients, psychiatrists have been accused of contravening the legal rights of their patients by applying criteria other than those prescribed by law. This study examined the factors involved in the psychiatrists' decisions to seek commitment or to release 90 voluntarily hospitalized patients; we found psychiatrists' decisions to be appropriately correlated to legal criteria and legally relevant clinical and psychosocial factors. Interpersonal variables did not play a material role in the decision. Independent assessment of the patients' clinical status were consistent with clinicians' judgments of dangerousness. These findings indicate that this group of psychiatrists, faced with the decision to seek commitment, based their judgments on clinically relevant data rather than interpersonal factors and conformed to the dangerousness requirements of the commitment law.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Internação Compulsória de Doente Mental/legislação & jurisprudência , Psiquiatria , Comportamento Perigoso , Tomada de Decisões , Humanos , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Pessoas Mentalmente Doentes , New York , Defesa do Paciente/legislação & jurisprudência , Cooperação do Paciente
3.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 49(2): 153-61, 2001 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11207869

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The major purpose of this study was to examine the effect of depressed mood in older, medically ill, hospitalized patients on their preferences regarding life-sustaining treatments, physician-assisted suicide (PAS), and euthanasia and to determine the degree to which financial constraints affected their choices. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: General medical hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-eight medically hospitalized, nondemented patients age 60 or older, mean age 74.1 (range 60-94). The sample was divided, based on Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) scores, into a depressed group (n = 71) and a nondepressed control group. MEASUREMENTS: Subjects underwent a structured interview evaluating their life-sustaining treatment choices and whether they would accept or refuse PAS or euthanasia under a variety of hypothetical conditions. These choices were reevaluated with the introduction of financial impact. In addition, assessment included measures of depression, suicide, cognition, social support, functioning, and religiosity. RESULTS: Depression was found to be highly associated with acceptance of PAS and euthanasia in most hypothetical clinical scenarios in addition to patients' current condition. Compared with nondepressed people, depressed respondents were 13 times as likely to accept PAS when considering their current condition (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.68-110.98), and over twice as likely to accept PAS when facing a hypothetical terminal illness or coma. Depression alone was weakly associated with life-sustaining treatment choices but, when financial impact was introduced, significantly more depressed subjects refused treatment options they had previously desired than did nondepressed subjects. The presence of suicidal ideation, even passive ideation, was strongly predictive of life-sustaining treatment refusals and increased interest in PAS and euthanasia. Depression's effect on acceptance of PAS was confirmed by logistic regression, which also showed that religious coping was significantly correlated with less interest in PAS in two hypothetical scenarios. CONCLUSION. Depressed subjects and even subjects with subtle, passive suicidal ideation were markedly more interested in PAS and euthanasia than nondepressed subjects in hypothetical situations. Depressed subjects were also particularly vulnerable to rejecting treatments if financial consequences might have resulted.


Assuntos
Idoso/psicologia , Comportamento de Escolha , Depressão/psicologia , Eutanásia/psicologia , Cuidados para Prolongar a Vida/psicologia , Suicídio Assistido/psicologia , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/psicologia , Atividades Cotidianas , Adaptação Psicológica , Afeto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/classificação , Depressão/diagnóstico , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Religião e Psicologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Apoio Social , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 13(4): 219-24, 1991 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1874422

RESUMO

In an effort to control prescription abuse of benzodiazepines, the New York State Department of Health (DOH) enacted a regulation requiring the use of triplicate prescriptions for these medications. DOH predicted that this regulation would reduce the overall abuse of benzodiazepines and eliminate widescale organized fraud and abuse without any negative impact or reduced availability to patients. Following implementation of the regulation, the authors reviewed all psychiatric emergency room cases and outpatient clinic walk-in evaluations over a 3-month period in an urban medical center and identified 59 cases in which the use of benzodiazepines was a significant presenting problem. Of these, 24 (41%) were judged to be directly related to the new triplicate regulation. In all but one of these cases the patient presented because of symptoms or concerns directly stemming from the refusal by a clinician to continue prescribing a benzodiazepine in a previously established pattern. Typically, abrupt discontinuation of benzodiazepine treatment led to a withdrawal syndrome and/or the unmasking of a previously treated anxiety disorder. In attempting to redress what are essentially criminal substance abuse problems through the regulation of legitimate clinical practice, regulatory agencies may ultimately deprive patients of appropriate, legitimate, and efficacious treatments.


Assuntos
Benzodiazepinas/efeitos adversos , Documentação/normas , Prescrições de Medicamentos/normas , Controle de Medicamentos e Entorpecentes/legislação & jurisprudência , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Animais , Controle de Medicamentos e Entorpecentes/organização & administração , Serviços de Emergência Psiquiátrica/normas , Feminino , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde
5.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 8(3): 198-202, 1986 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3710154

RESUMO

Regarding the determination of resuscitation status (RS) and the writing of do-not-resuscitate orders, we compared the recent Presidential Guidelines with the attitudes and perceptions of 143 medical professionals in a major medical center. Seventy-four percent of respondents believed that RS was primarily determined by the physician. Only 1% believed the patient decides and a minority (40%) believed the patient should decide; 61% would want to decide for themselves if they were ill. Most respondents agreed that neither patients nor staff were well-informed about the individual patient's RS. When presented case vignettes requiring a decision about RS, the respondents frequently chose a RS contrary to the wishes of a competent patient. The findings of this survey point to the significant differences between the Presidential Commission's guidelines and the actual attitudes and perceived practices of clinicians.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Eutanásia Passiva , Eutanásia , Ressuscitação , Comitês Consultivos , Tomada de Decisões , Humanos , Internato e Residência , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros/psicologia , Defesa do Paciente/legislação & jurisprudência , Participação do Paciente , Médicos/psicologia , Psiquiatria
6.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 21(5): 333-9, 1999.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10572774

RESUMO

The process by which a consultation is performed may significantly impact the extent to which the content of the consultation contributes positively to patient care. The practice of consultants writing orders independent of the explicit permission of the consultation requester is a common event. A survey of 211 multispecialty physicians on the medical staff of a large, urban, Northeastern, teaching hospital about their attitudes, beliefs, and practices regarding consultation on the inpatient service reveal that the majority of respondents in all specialties were unaware of departmental or hospital policy regarding the practice of consultant order writing. Significant differences between specialties existed in the perception of the impact of consultant order writing on patient outcomes, in the practice of discussion with the primary attending prior to order writing, and in the documentation practices. The authors discuss such results and their policy implications in light of important medico-legal and ethical principles, and best practice standards.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Relações Hospital-Médico , Hospitais de Ensino/organização & administração , Encaminhamento e Consulta/legislação & jurisprudência , Encaminhamento e Consulta/normas , Adulto , Competência Clínica , Connecticut , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Hospitais de Ensino/legislação & jurisprudência , Hospitais de Ensino/normas , Humanos , Legislação Médica , Responsabilidade Legal , Medicina/normas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Especialização , Inquéritos e Questionários
7.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 23(6): 326-32, 2001.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11738463

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to examine the interest of non-terminally ill hospitalized elderly patients in euthanasia and physician assisted suicide (PAS) and to determine the stability of these interests over time. Patients age 60 or older (n=158), including both a depressed sample and non-depressed control sample, underwent a structured interview evaluating their interest in euthanasia and PAS in the event of a series of hypothetical outcome scenarios. Substantial proportions of subjects (varying from 13.3%-42% depending on the scenario) expressed hypothetical acceptance of euthanasia and PAS. After six months a subset of patients changed their minds about euthanasia and PAS (8% - 26% depending on the scenario), most often in the direction of initial acceptance to later rejection. Patients depressed in the hospital and interested in PAS for the outcome of their current (non-terminal) condition were significantly more likely express unstable opinions, with most rejecting it six months later. Other correlations of instability, in specific scenarios, included being male, experiencing higher baseline suffering, poorer subjective health and lower instrumental support. Because euthanasia and PAS actions are irreversible, findings of instability have important implications both clinically and for design of PAS legislation.


Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Morte , Eutanásia/psicologia , Suicídio Assistido/psicologia , Idoso , Tomada de Decisões , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Nível de Saúde , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários
8.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol ; 2(3): 140-4, 1989.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2590375

RESUMO

Involuntary hospitalization of the elderly has been the focus of controversy. In many jurisdictions, commitment criteria are stringently and narrowly defined, require a showing of "dangerousness," and are difficult to apply toward securing proper treatment for the elderly. In other areas, broader criteria apply, but some authors argue that such criteria are inappropriately used with the elderly and leave them vulnerable to the abuse of unnecessary institutionalization. The authors examined 274 consecutive admissions aged 55 years and over, comparing voluntary and involuntary patients. Patients admitted involuntarily were significantly more likely to have organic mental disorders, be violent before admission, and be disoriented, withdrawn, and apathetic. Voluntary patients were significantly more likely to have major mood disorders. Patients who lived with others were more likely to be committed than those living alone. The authors discuss these findings with attention to the appropriateness of broader commitment standards and the more stringent dangerousness criteria as they apply to the geriatric population.


Assuntos
Internação Compulsória de Doente Mental , Institucionalização , Transtornos do Humor/psicologia , Transtornos Neurocognitivos/psicologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Internação Compulsória de Doente Mental/legislação & jurisprudência , Comportamento Perigoso , Feminino , Humanos , Institucionalização/legislação & jurisprudência , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Entrevista Psiquiátrica Padronizada , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Autocuidado , Fatores Socioeconômicos
9.
J Forensic Sci ; 33(4): 1008-14, 1988 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3171497

RESUMO

In virtually all situations involving forensic psychiatric assessments, the patient is represented by counsel. But does this fact entitle the lawyer to be present at the clinical evaluation? In a series of New York cases spanning a generation, judges have allowed presence of counsel at the psychiatric examination. The most common reason given for such a conclusion is to assure better cross-examination of the expert witness. Psychiatric evaluations mandated by law necessitate several guidelines different from those of the usual doctor/patient relationship. While we may have to accept the presence of attorneys in our consulting rooms, they should be observers only. To allow active intervention would distort the clinical process.


Assuntos
Psiquiatria Legal/legislação & jurisprudência , Entrevista Psicológica/métodos , Defesa do Paciente/legislação & jurisprudência , Internação Compulsória de Doente Mental/legislação & jurisprudência , Família , Relações Médico-Paciente , Estados Unidos
10.
Conn Med ; 61(9): 553-8, 1997 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9334510

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Physician adherence to established practice standards has become an important national issue. Despite the proliferation of formal standards of practice, there is little evidence that the mere availability of guidelines results in changes in physician practices. This paper presents the results of a study of the effectiveness of a computerized monitoring and notification system in increasing physician compliance with treatment guidelines. METHODS: This study prospectively compared medical staff practices in two one-year periods utilizing a computer system which tabulated noncompliance and provided reminders. RESULTS: Overall, there was a statistically-significant decrease in the number of alerts issued in year two compared to year one; alerts were issued on 15% vs 29% of all patients (P < .001). The average number of alerts per patient decreased to .20 from .41. CONCLUSIONS: The study results indicate that a clinical decision support system such as that described can improve adherence to treatment guidelines.


Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Transtornos Mentais/tratamento farmacológico , Psicotrópicos/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Psicotrópicos/sangue , Estados Unidos
11.
Conn Med ; 64(7): 403-12, 2000 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10946478

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study examined aspects of physician attitudes toward physician-assisted suicide (PAS) not fully examined to date: evaluation of risks related to PAS, particularly the presence of depression, and the influence of religious and professionally-based values. DESIGN: Anonymous, self-administered mailed questionnaire using Dillman methodology. PARTICIPANTS: Targeted sample of physicians licensed by the Connecticut Department of Public Health in 1997 (n = 2,805 completed surveys; 40% response rate). DATA INCLUDE: Physician and patient characteristics, attitudes toward physician assisted suicide, and confidence in treating depression. RESULTS: Religious affiliation, religiosity, ethnicity and medical specialty were strongly associated with views on PAS. Seven percent of respondents had been asked to write a lethal prescription during the past year, 15% of whom (n = 24) had complied with at least one request. CONCLUSIONS: Most respondents expressed concern regarding certain risks associated with PAS, including movement toward involuntary euthanasia and the influence of undetected depression. Findings raise practical issues to be addressed through statutory or professional safeguards if PAS were to be legalized.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Médicos/psicologia , Suicídio Assistido/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise de Variância , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Connecticut , Demografia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Suicídio Assistido/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários
12.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law ; 27(4): 527-39; discussion 540-5, 1999.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10638782

RESUMO

Development of fully informed public policy regarding physician-assisted suicide (PAS) requires a thorough understanding of the experiences, attitudes, and beliefs of physicians with respect to this issue. This study gathered data on physician characteristics, attitudes toward PAS, factors influencing attitudes toward PAS, and sensitivity to the role of depression in a sample of 397 psychiatrists, internists, and family practitioners in Connecticut. Central considerations included: the influence of religious values, professional discipline and practice patterns, and ability to diagnose depression in a single evaluation. Psychiatrists were significantly more likely to be supportive of PAS than were internists or family practitioners. Most respondents expressed concern regarding the influence of depression on PAS requests. A subset of physicians endorse PAS yet do not share such concern about risks, suggesting substantial challenges for policy-makers.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Médicos/psicologia , Suicídio Assistido/legislação & jurisprudência , Connecticut/epidemiologia , Ética Médica , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Medicina Interna/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Médicos de Família/psicologia , Projetos Piloto , Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Política Pública , Suicídio Assistido/estatística & dados numéricos
13.
Vaccine ; 28(20): 3602-8, 2010 Apr 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20188175

RESUMO

M01ZH09, S. Typhi (Ty2 Delta aroC Delta ssaV) ZH9, is a single oral dose typhoid vaccine with independently attenuating deletions. A phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating trial evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of M01ZH09 to 1.7 x 10(10) colony-forming units (CFU). 187 Healthy adults received vaccine or placebo in four cohorts. Serologic responses and IgA ELISPOT were measured. At all doses, the vaccine was well tolerated and without bacteremias. One subject had a transient low-grade fever. 62.2-86.1% of subjects seroconverted S. Typhi-specific LPS IgG and 83.3-97.4% IgA; 92.1% had a positive S. Typhi LPS ELISPOT. M01ZH09 is safe and immunogenic up to 1.7 x 10(10)CFU. Efficacy testing of this single-dose oral typhoid vaccine is needed.


Assuntos
Vacinas Tíficas-Paratíficas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Tíficas-Paratíficas/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina A/sangue , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Febre Tifoide/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Atenuadas/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Atenuadas/imunologia , Adulto Jovem
18.
Am Fam Physician ; 35(5): 103-8, 1987 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3577982

RESUMO

Family physicians provide a significant amount of mental health care in the form of psychotropic medication and supportive psychotherapy. Providers of primary psychiatric care face a number of legal dangers and ethical pitfalls. Most often, these derive from negligent diagnosis or treatment, failure to prevent suicide and exploitation of the patient. By adhering to sound clinical guidelines and ethical principles, physicians can both protect themselves and provide better care for their patients.


Assuntos
Ética Médica , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Imperícia , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Pessoas Mentalmente Doentes , Adulto , Transtorno Depressivo/diagnóstico , Hospitalização , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Seguro de Responsabilidade Civil , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/tratamento farmacológico , Relações Médico-Paciente , Psicotrópicos/uso terapêutico , Comportamento Sexual , Prevenção do Suicídio
19.
Hosp Community Psychiatry ; 43(4): 382-5, 1992 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1349557

RESUMO

In 1989 New York became the first state to add benzodiazepines to the list of controlled substances requiring a triplicate prescription, allowing the state to track prescribing patterns and target providers, pharmacies, and patients for investigation when misuse is suspected. Studies by the state reporting that regulation has significantly reduced inappropriate prescribing and illicit diversion of benzodiazepines without affecting legitimate prescribing practices are being challenged by other studies showing that patients with legitimate needs for benzodiazepines are being denied them, often after abrupt discontinuation. Several reports indicate a significant increase in the prescribing of benzodiazepine substitutes that are less safe and effective, along with increased overdoses of some substitute drugs. Changes in physicians' legitimate prescribing practices may reflect their fears of the damage to career and peace of mind that follows investigations by regulatory agencies.


Assuntos
Ansiolíticos/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Controle de Medicamentos e Entorpecentes/legislação & jurisprudência , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/prevenção & controle , Benzodiazepinas , Uso de Medicamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , New York , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos
20.
J Nerv Ment Dis ; 176(4): 249-51, 1988 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3351503

RESUMO

The case of a patient who developed the neuroleptic malignant syndrome following an overdose of amoxapine is presented. It is suggested that amoxapine, an antidepressant structurally related to the neuroleptic loxapine, be added to the list of medications that can cause this potentially lethal syndrome. This case illustrates the need for careful evaluation and attention to differential diagnosis when psychiatric patients develop physical signs and symptoms.


Assuntos
Amoxapina/intoxicação , Dibenzoxazepinas/intoxicação , Síndrome Maligna Neuroléptica/etiologia , Adulto , Doenças dos Gânglios da Base/diagnóstico , Catatonia/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Síndrome Maligna Neuroléptica/diagnóstico , Tentativa de Suicídio/psicologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA