Intraluminal carotid thrombus leading to postpartum stroke: a case study.

BACKGROUND: Intraluminal non-occlusive thrombus (ILT) is a rare cause of ischemic stroke. Although in most cases ILT is associated with arterial wall disorders, it has also been documented in patients with thrombophilic conditions. CASE REPORT: We present a case of carotid ILT in a 38-year-old puerperal woman with pregnancy-induced hypercoagulability. Following in vitro fertilization pregnancy, she experienced acute left-sided weakness 9 days after delivery. CT angiography revealed an intraluminal filling defect in the right carotid bulb, suggestive of a thrombus, along with ipsilateral MCA sub-occlusion. Mechanical thrombectomy was performed, achieving complete vessel recanalization without any endovascular intervention on the carotid ILT. Comprehensive evaluation excluded any underlying carotid vessel wall disease (such as atherosclerosis, inflammatory diseases, arterial dissection, focal dysplasia), inherited or acquired thrombophilia, and the sole prothrombotic risk factor identified was the puerperium. Histological thrombus analysis showed fibrin/platelet-rich material with significant macrophage infiltration (consistent with an intermediate/organized thrombus, suggesting potential embolization from a pre-existing carotid ILT). Anti-thrombotic treatment (acetylsalicylic acid 100 mg and enoxaparin 6000 UI) resulted in complete thrombus resolution at follow-up. CONCLUSION: ILT should be considered a potential case of embolic stroke in pregnancy or puerperium. Vessel imaging is essential for diagnosis. Histological thrombus analysis can provide insights into the pathophysiological mechanisms of stroke.

Exploring thrombus composition in cerebral venous thrombosis: the first case report with initial insights and implications for treatment advancements.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a treatment option in patients with a cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) who deteriorate despite anticoagulant treatment. Assessment of thrombus composition in CVT may provide insights into the pathophysiology of the disease and suggest new therapeutic strategies. CASE REPORT: A 47-year-old woman (smoking habit and estradiol/progesterone-releasing intra-uterine device) diagnosed with massive CVT underwent EVT (complete recanalization via aspiration catheter and stentriever) due to acute-onset left-sided weakness and dysarthria despite 72 h of full-dose subcutaneous low-molecular heparin. Two main reddish clots (maximum diameter 15 mm) were retrieved. Microscopic assessment showed an erythrocyte-rich thrombus (83.9% of entire thrombus surface) with layers of platelets/fibrin (lines of Zahn: 13.9% fibrin and 38.5% platelet [CD61+]). The immunological profile was dominated by neutrophils (30% MPO+), with neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in 1.9% of thrombus surface. T- (CD3+), B-lymphocytes (CD20+), and monocytes/macrophages (CD68+) were rather rare (2.2%, 0.7%, and 2.0% respectively). We found no evidence (0.0%) of hemosiderin and endothelial cells (CD34+). Full clinical recovery occurred prior to discharge. CONCLUSION: This is the first case report of a CVT with histologic assessment of the thrombus retrieved via EVT. Evaluating thrombi in CVT can provide key insights into disease pathophysiology and guide treatment advancements.

Safety and efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy for primary and secondary MeVO.

BACKGROUND: Medium-vessel occlusions (MeVO) are emerging as a new target for endovascular treatment (EVT). Primary MeVO occur de novo, while secondary MeVO arise from large vessel occlusion (LVO) through clot migration or fragmentation - spontaneously, following intravenous thrombolysis or EVT. We aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of EVT in primary and EVT-induced secondary MeVO. METHODS: Retrospective single-center study on consecutive EVT-treated acute ischemic stroke, from 2019-to-2021. We considered: (1) exclusive-LVO, patients with LVO and - in case of residual distal occlusion - no rescue endovascular procedure; (2) primary MeVO: initial A2, A3, M2 non-dominant, M3, P2, P3 occlusions; (3) EVT-induced secondary MeVO, presenting LVO with subsequent (treated) EVT-induced MeVO. We compared (univariable/multivariable logistic regression) EVT efficacy (eTICI≥2b, 3-month modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2) and safety (EVT-complications [vessel dissection, perforation, persistent-SAH], symptomatic ICH) in all MeVO versus exclusive-LVO, primary MeVO versus exclusive-LVO, EVT-induced secondary MeVO versus exclusive-LVO and EVT-induced secondary MeVO versus primary MeVO. RESULTS: We included 335 patients: 221 (66.0 %) exclusive-LVO and 114 (34.0 %) MeVO (55 [48.2 %] primary, 59 [51.8 %] secondary). Compared to exclusive-LVO, primary MeVO had higher rates of EVT complications (aOR 3.77 [95%CI 1.58-9.00],p=0.003), lower rates of eTICI≥2b (aOR 0.32 [95%CI 0.12-0.88],p=0.027) and mRS 0-2 (aOR 0.28 [95%CI 0.13-0.63],p=0.002). EVT-induced secondary MeVO had no major differences in efficacy and safety outcomes compared to exclusive-LVO, but a better mRS 0-2 (aOR 8.00 [95%CI 2.12-30.17],p=0.002) compared to primary MeVO. CONCLUSIONS: Primary and EVT-induced secondary MeVO showed different safety/efficacy EVT-related profiles. Dedicated randomized data are needed to identify the best acute reperfusion strategy in the two categories.

Perfusion Imaging Mismatch Profiles in the Early Thrombectomy Window: A Single-Center Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Little is known on the role of mismatch profile in patients undergoing early endovascular treatment (EVT). We aimed to describe pretreatment perfusion parameters and mismatch profiles in anterior circulation large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke undergoing EVT in the early time window and assess their association with time from stroke onset and outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective single-center study, including early (<6 hours) EVT-treated large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke with baseline perfusion data, assessing perfusion parameters (ischemic core volume, mismatch volume and mismatch ratio) and mismatch profiles (favorable versus unfavorable, based on criteria adopted in EXTEND-IA [Extending the Time for Thrombolysis in Emergency Neurological Deficits - Intra-Arterial], SWIFT PRIME [Solitaire With the Intention for Thrombectomy as Primary Endovascular Treatment], DEFUSE 3 [Endovascular Therapy Following Imaging Evaluation for Ischemic Stroke 3], and DAWN [Clinical Mismatch in the Triage of Wake Up and Late Presenting Strokes Undergoing Neurointervention With Trevo] trials). We evaluated their association with time from stroke onset (rs [for parameters] or χ2 for trend [for profiles]) and association with modified Rankin Scale score >2, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality (multivariate regression analyses [each parameter/profile entered into a separate logistic regression model, adjusted for baseline variables associated with each outcome in the univariate analysis at the P<0.1 level]). RESULTS: Among 357 patients, unfavorable mismatch profiles ranged from 21% to 60%, depending on the criterion, and were not correlated with time from stroke onset (P=0.490). All individual perfusion parameters and unfavorable mismatch profiles were associated with poor functional outcome: ischemic core volume adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.49 ([95% CI, 1.13-1.97] P=0.005); penumbral volume aOR, 0.30 ([95% CI, 0.10-0.84] P=0.022); mismatch ratio aOR, 0.67 ([95% CI, 0.50-0.90] P=0.007); EXTEND-IA aOR, 2.61 ([95% CI, 1.23-5.51] P=0.012); SWIFT PRIME aOR, 2.50 ([95% CI, 1.30-4.57] P=0.006); DEFUSE 3 aOR, 2.28 ([95% CI, 1.14-4.57] P=0.020); and DAWN aOR, 4.19 ([95% CI, 2.13-8.26] P<0.001). EXTEND-IA and DEFUSE 3 unfavorable profiles were also independently associated with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (aOR, 3.82 [95% CI, 1.42-10.3]; P=0.008 and aOR, 2.83 [95% CI, 1.09-7.36]; P=0.033) and death (aOR, 3.26 [95% CI, 1.33-8.02]; P=0.010 and aOR, 2.52 [95% CI, 1.10-5.82]; P=0.030). CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment perfusion parameters and mismatch profiles in early EVT-treated patients were not correlated with time from stroke onset but were independently associated with functional outcome. Mismatch assessment in the early time window may improve EVT patient selection, independently of onset-to-treatment time.

Reperfusion Treatments in Disabling Versus Nondisabling Mild Stroke due to Anterior Circulation Vessel Occlusion.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of distinguishing between disabling versus nondisabling deficit in mild acute ischemic stroke due to endovascular thrombectomy-targetable vessel occlusion (EVT-tVO; including anterior circulation large and medium-vessel occlusion) is unknown. We compared safety and efficacy of acute reperfusion treatments in disabling versus nondisabling mild EVT-tVO. METHODS: From the Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke-International Stroke Thrombolysis Register, we included consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients (2015-2021) treated within 4.5 hours, with full NIHSS items availability and score ≤5, evidence of intracranial internal carotid artery, M1, A1-2, or M2-3 occlusion. After propensity score matching, we compared efficacy (3-month modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1, modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2, and early neurological improvement) and safety (nonhemorrhagic early neurological deterioration, any intracerebral or subarachnoid hemorrhage, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and death at 3-month) outcomes in disabling versus nondisabling patients-adopting an available definition. RESULTS: We included 1459 patients. Propensity score matched analysis of disabling versus nondisabling EVT-tVO (n=336 per group) found no significant differences in efficacy (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1: 67.4% versus 71.5%, P=0.336; modified Rankin Scale score 0-2: 77.1% versus 77.6%, P=0.895; early neurological improvement: 38.3% versus 44.4%, P=0.132) and safety (nonhemorrhagic early neurological deterioration: 8.5% versus 8.0%, P=0.830; any intracerebral hemorrhage or subarachnoid hemorrhage: 12.5% versus 13.3%, P=0.792; symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage: 2.6% versus 3.4%, P=0.598; and 3-month death: 9.8% versus 9.2%, P=0.844) outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We found similar safety and efficacy outcomes after acute reperfusion treatment in disabling versus nondisabling mild EVT-tVO; our findings suggest to adopt similar acute treatment approaches in the 2 groups. Randomized data are needed to clarify the best reperfusion treatment in mild EVT-tVO.

Intravenous thrombolysis + endovascular thrombectomy versus thrombolysis alone in large vessel occlusion mild stroke: a propensity score matched analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The best reperfusion treatment for patients with mild acute ischaemic stroke harbouring proximal anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) is unknown. The aim was to compare the safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) plus endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) versus IVT alone in LVO patients with mild symptoms. METHODS: From the Safe Implementation of Treatment in Stroke-International Stroke Thrombolysis and Thrombectomy Register (SITS-ISTR), were included: (i) consecutive acute ischaemic stroke patients, (ii) treated within 4.5 h from symptoms onset, (iii) baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≤5 and (iv) intracranial internal carotid artery [ICA], M1 or T occlusion [defined as occlusion of ICA terminal bifurcation]. After propensity score matching, 3-month functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-1 and 0-2) and safety outcomes (symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage and death) were compared (via univariable and multivariable logistic [and ordinal] regression analyses) in patients treated with IVT + EVT versus IVT alone. RESULTS: In all, 1037 patients were included. After propensity score matching (n = 312 per group), IVT + EVT was independently associated with poor functional outcomes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.46 for mRS 0-1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-0.72, p = 0.001; aOR 0.52 for mRS 0-2, 95% CI 0.32-0.84, p = 0.007; aOR 1.61 for 1-point shift in mRS score, 95% CI 1.12-2.32, p = 0.011), with no significant differences in safety outcomes compared to IVT alone, despite numerically higher rates of symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (3.3% vs. 1.1%; p = 0.082), a higher rate of any haemorrhagic transformation (17.6% vs. 7.3%; p < 0.001) and subarachnoid haemorrhage (7.9% vs. 1.5%; p = 0.002) in the IVT + EVT group. DISCUSSION: In anterior circulation LVO patients presenting with NIHSS score ≤5, IVT + EVT (vs. IVT alone) was associated with poorer 3-month functional outcome. Randomized controlled trials are needed to elucidate the best treatments in mild LVO patients.

MRI and CT imaging biomarkers of cerebral amyloid angiopathy in lobar intracerebral hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), a common cause of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), is diagnosed using the Boston criteria including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers (cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) and cortical superficial siderosis (cSS). The simplified Edinburgh criteria include computed tomography (CT) biomarkers (subarachnoid extension (SAE) and finger-like projections (FLPs)). The underlying mechanisms and diagnostic accuracy of CT compared to MRI biomarkers of CAA are unknown. METHODS: We included 140 survivors of spontaneous lobar supratentorial ICH with both acute CT and MRI. We assessed associations between MRI and CT biomarkers and the diagnostic accuracy of CT- compared to MRI-based criteria. RESULTS: FLPs were more common in patients with strictly lobar CMB (44.7% vs 23.5%; p = 0.014) and SAE was more common in patients with cSS (61.3% vs 31.2%; p = 0.002). The high probability of the CAA category of the simplified Edinburgh criteria showed 87.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 78.3-93.4) specificity, 29.6% (95% CI: 18.0-43.6) sensitivity, 59.3% (95% CI: 38.8-77.6) positive predictive value, and 66.4% (95%: CI 56.9-75.0) negative predictive value, 2.3 (95% CI: 1.2-4.6) positive likelihood ratio and 0.8 (95% CI 0.7-1.0) negative likelihood ratio for probable CAA (vs non-probable CAA), defined by the modified Boston criteria; the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.54-0.71). CONCLUSION: In lobar ICH survivors, we found associations between putative biomarkers of parenchymal CAA (FLP and strictly lobar CMBs) and putative biomarkers of leptomeningeal CAA (SAE and cSS). In a hospital population, CT biomarkers might help rule-in probable CAA (diagnosed using the Boston criteria), but their absence is probably not as useful to rule it out, suggesting an important continued role for MRI in ICH survivors with suspected CAA.

Magnetic resonance imaging-based scores of small vessel diseases: Associations with intracerebral haemorrhage location.

INTRODUCTION: Total small vessel disease (SVD) score and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) score are magnetic resonance imaging-based composite scores built to preferentially capture deep perforator arteriopathy-related and CAA-related SVD burden, respectively. Non-lobar intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is related to deep perforator arteriopathy, while lobar ICH can be associated with deep perforator arteriopathy or CAA; however, the associations between ICH location and these scores are not established. METHODS: In this post-hoc analysis from a prospective cohort study, we included 153 spontaneous non-cerebellar ICH patients. Wald test, univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed to investigate the association between each score (and individual score components) and ICH location. RESULTS: Total SVD score was associated with non-lobar ICH location (Wald test: unadjusted, p = 0.017; adjusted, p = 0.003); however, no individual component of total SVD score was significantly associated with non-lobar ICH. CAA score was not significantly associated with lobar location (Wald test: unadjusted, p = 0.056; adjusted, p = 0.126); cortical superficial siderosis (OR 8.85 [95%CI 1.23-63.65], p = 0.030) and ≥ 2 strictly lobar microbleeds (OR 1.63 [95%CI 1.04-2.55], p = 0.035) were related with lobar ICH location, while white matter hyperintensities showed an inverse relation (OR 0.53 [95%CI 0.26-1.08; p = 0.081]). CONCLUSIONS: Total SVD score was associated with non-lobar ICH location. The lack of significant association between CAA score and lobar ICH may in part be due to the mixed aetiology of lobar ICH, and to the inclusion of white matter hyperintensities, a non-specific marker of SVD type, in the CAA score.

Neutrophils predominate the immune signature of cerebral thrombi in COVID-19 stroke patients.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events. Ischemic stroke in COVID-19 patients entails high severity and mortality rates. Here we aimed to analyze cerebral thrombi of COVID-19 patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) acute ischemic stroke to expose molecular evidence for SARS-CoV-2 in the thrombus and to unravel any peculiar immune-thrombotic features. We conducted a systematic pathological analysis of cerebral thrombi retrieved by endovascular thrombectomy in patients with LVO stroke infected with COVID-19 (n = 7 patients) and non-covid LVO controls (n = 23). In thrombi of COVID-19 patients, the SARS-CoV-2 docking receptor ACE2 was mainly expressed in monocytes/macrophages and showed higher expression levels compared to controls. Using polymerase chain reaction and sequencing, we detected SARS-CoV-2 Clade20A, in the thrombus of one COVID-19 patient. Comparing thrombus composition of COVID-19 and control patients, we noted no overt differences in terms of red blood cells, fibrin, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), von Willebrand Factor (vWF), platelets and complement complex C5b-9. However, thrombi of COVID-19 patients showed increased neutrophil density (MPO+ cells) and a three-fold higher Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (tNLR). In the ROC analysis both neutrophils and tNLR had a good discriminative ability to differentiate thrombi of COVID-19 patients from controls. In summary, cerebral thrombi of COVID-19 patients can harbor SARS-CoV2 and are characterized by an increased neutrophil number and tNLR and higher ACE2 expression. These findings suggest neutrophils as the possible culprit in COVID-19-related thrombosis.

A score to predict one-year risk of recurrence after acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: An acute ischemic stroke carries a substantial risk of further recurrences. We aimed at developing and validating a prognostic tool to predict one-year stroke recurrence after acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: An integer score was derived by Cox regression analysis on a hospital-referred cohort of 3246 acute ischemic stroke patients from Switzerland, and tested for external validity in three similar independent cohorts from Athens (n = 2495), Milan (n = 1279), and Helsinki (n = 714) by means of calibration and discrimination. RESULTS: In the derivation cohort, the recurrence rate was 7% (n = 228/3246). We developed a nine-point score comprising: previous stroke or transient ischemic attack (1-point), stroke mechanism (small vessel disease and unknown mechanism: 0-points; rare stroke mechanism: 3-points; other mechanisms: 1-point), pre-stroke antiplatelets (1-point), active malignancy (2-points), chronic cerebrovascular lesions on imaging (1-point) and absence of early ischemic changes on first imaging (1-point). In the derivation cohort, the one-year risk of re-stroke was 3.0% (95%CI 1.9-4.1) in 932 (29%) patients with a score 0-1, 7.2% (6.1-8.3) in 2038 (63%) with a score 2-4, and 19.2% (14.6-23.9) in 276 (8%) with a score ≥ 5. The score calibrated well in the Athens (recurrences = 208/2495), but not in the Helsinki (recurrences = 15/714) or Milan (recurrences = 65/1279) cohorts. The AUC was 0.67 in the derivation cohort, and 0.56, 0.70, and 0.63 in the Athens, Helsinki, and Milan cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSION: We developed a score to predict one-year stroke recurrence risk in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Since the score was not completely validated when applied to external datasets where it displayed poor to fair calibration and discrimination, additional efforts are required to ameliorate our accuracy for predicting stroke recurrence, by better refining this prognostic tool or developing new ones. Clinical and radiological markers of established cerebrovascular disease and stroke etiology were better predictors than the usual demographic vascular risk factors.

Cerebral Small Vessel Disease and Functional Outcome Prediction After Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether CT-based cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) biomarkers are associated with 6-month functional outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and whether these biomarkers improve the performance of the preexisting ICH prediction score. METHODS: We included 864 patients with acute ICH from a multicenter, hospital-based prospective cohort study. We evaluated CT-based SVD biomarkers (white matter hypodensities [WMH], lacunes, brain atrophy, and a composite SVD burden score) and their associations with poor 6-month functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score >2). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and Hosmer-Lemeshow test were used to assess discrimination and calibration of the ICH score with and without SVD biomarkers. RESULTS: In multivariable models (adjusted for ICH score components), WMH presence (odds ratio [OR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-2.06), cortical atrophy presence (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.19-2.73), deep atrophy presence (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.17-2.34), and severe atrophy (either deep or cortical) (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.36-2.74) were independently associated with poor functional outcome. For the revised ICH score, the AUROC was 0.71 (95% CI 0.68-0.74). Adding SVD markers did not significantly improve ICH score discrimination; for the best model (adding severe atrophy), the AUROC was 0.73 (95% CI 0.69-0.76). These results were confirmed when lobar and nonlobar ICH were considered separately. CONCLUSIONS: The ICH score has acceptable discrimination for predicting 6-month functional outcome after ICH. CT biomarkers of SVD are associated with functional outcome, but adding them does not significantly improve ICH score discrimination. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02513316.

Cerebral thrombi of cardioembolic etiology have an increased content of neutrophil extracellular traps.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation is emerging as an essential trigger for thrombosis. In the interplay between innate immunity and coagulation cascade, neutrophils and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) can promote thrombus formation and stabilization. In ischemic stroke, it is uncertain whether the involvement of the inflammatory component may differ in thrombi of diverse etiology. We here aimed to evaluate the presence of neutrophils and NETs in cerebral thrombi of diverse etiology retrieved by endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). METHODS: We performed a systematic histological analysis on 80 human cerebral thrombi retrieved through EVT in acute ischemic stroke patients. Thrombus composition was investigated in terms of neutrophils (MPO+ cells) and NET content (citH3+ area), employing specific immunostainings. NET plasma content was determined and compared to NET density in the thrombus. RESULTS: Neutrophils and NETs were heterogeneously represented within all cerebral thrombi. Thrombi of diverse etiology did not display a statistically significant difference in the number of neutrophils (p = 0.51). However, NET content was significantly increased in cardioembolic compared to large artery atherosclerosis thrombi (p = 0.04), and the association between NET content and stroke etiology remained significant after adjusted analysis (beta coefficient = -6.19, 95%CI = -11.69 to -1.34, p = 0.01). Moreover, NET content in the thrombus was found to correlate with NET content in the plasma (p ≤ 0.001, r = 0.62). CONCLUSION: Our study highlights how the analysis of the immune component within the cerebral thrombus, and specifically the NET burden, might provide additional insight for differentiating stroke from diverse etiologies.

Association between critical care admission and 6-month functional outcome after spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty about the clinical benefit of admission to critical care after spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). PURPOSE: We investigated factors associated with critical care admission after spontaneous ICH and evaluated associations between critical care and 6-month functional outcome. METHODS: We included 825 patients with acute spontaneous non-traumatic ICH, recruited to a prospective multicenter observational study. We evaluated the characteristics associated with critical care admission and poor 6-month functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale, mRS > 3) using univariable (chi-square test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test, as appropriate) and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: 286 patients (38.2%) had poor 6-month functional outcome. Seventy-seven (9.3%) patients were admitted to critical care. Patients admitted to critical care were younger (p < 0.001), had lower GCS score (p < 0.001), larger ICH volume (p < 0.001), more often had intraventricular extension (p = 0.008) and underwent neurosurgery (p < 0.001). Critical care admission was associated with poor functional outcome at 6 months (39/77 [50.7%] vs 286/748 [38.2%]; p = 0.034); adjusted OR 2.43 [95%CI 1.36-4.35], p = 0.003), but not with death (OR 1.29 [95%CI 0.71-2.35; p = 0.4). In ordinal logistic regression, patients admitted to critical care showed an OR 1.47 (95% CI 0.98-2.20; p = 0.07) for a shift in the 6-month modified Rankin Scale. CONCLUSIONS: Admission to critical care is associated with poor 6-month functional outcome after spontaneous ICH but not with death. Patients admitted to critical care were a priori more severely affected. Although adjusted for main known predictors of poor outcome, our findings could still be confounded by unmeasured factors. Establishing the true effectiveness of critical care after ICH requires a randomised trial with clinical outcomes and quality of life assessments.